Buy The Dip!

🚨 JUST IN: this image was mined into block 938576 without OP_RETURN, showing Knots filtering does not prevent it. The transaction was included via MARA Slipstream. It was created by bitcoin developer Martin Habovstiak, who published a detailed research paper explaining exactly what he did and how anyone can verify it. RESEARCH TLDR 👇 His goal was to test if stricter filtering rules can actually stop arbitrary data from being embedded on-chain. Full research: KnotsLies(dot)com 🔗below WHAT THIS TRANSACTION SHOWS: • The image is stored contiguously inside a single transaction • No OP_RETURN was used • No Taproot was used • Consensus rules were followed • The transaction can be independently verified by anyone running a node His core argument: • Limiting OP_RETURN does not stop arbitrary data storage • Policy filters shift the data rather than remove the capability • If one encoding path is restricted, another can be engineered • Workarounds are practical, not theoretical SPAM OR WHACK-A-MOLE? I’m not a technical expert. But the more I read about all this, the more it feels like a whack-a-mole game. You close one door, someone finds another. I don’t like spam. I don’t like images embedded on-chain. But it doesn’t seem like there’s an effective way to fully stop it. What are your thoughts? - Full research: KnotsLies(dot)com 🔗below