Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 (@SLBirdintheTree) profile picture

SW London fan, coffee addict, Pilates lover, keen traveller, interest in policing and crime - H & F IAG Chair, H & F Stop and Search Monitoring Group

Joined June 2017
Photo by Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 (@SLBirdintheTree)Photo by Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 (@SLBirdintheTree)Photo by Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 (@SLBirdintheTree)Photo by Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 (@SLBirdintheTree)Photo by Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 (@SLBirdintheTree)Photo by Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 (@SLBirdintheTree)Photo by Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 (@SLBirdintheTree)Photo by Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 (@SLBirdintheTree)Photo by Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 (@SLBirdintheTree)Photo by Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 (@SLBirdintheTree)
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
In 2018, I exposed the family courts alongside The Times chief investigative reporter Andrew Norfolk. Speaking out came with enormous risks and could have resulted in me being imprisoned. I spoke out because of what they tried to do to me and my son, but also because of what they were doing to other families across the country. Local authorities were inviting rapists into the lives of children. The courts were also allowing rapists to apply for contact and custody of children conceived through the rape of their mothers. Imagine the trauma of knowing that the man who raped you could be granted access to your child. I immediately launched a campaign to change the law, calling for rapists to be stripped of parental responsibility, including the ability to seek contact or custody of children conceived through rape. My campaign was successful, and the law has since changed. However, the current legislation does not protect every child or every family, including grandchildren affected by these circumstances. The government must close the loopholes and ensure that every child is protected. No child should be left vulnerable to the man who raped their mother. I will continue working with Victims’ Commissioner Claire Waxman to push for further legal changes and ensure that ALL children receive the protection they deserve.
25
253
4
1,168
14,424
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
l’ve had no orders for my nature jewellery collection. I know they’re expensive but the materials for each cost £70 or more & I can’t charge nothing for several hours’ making time on each piece. They used to sell out. I make intricate casts of real flowers incl. snowdrop, lily of the valley & wild carrot, nature finds such as dragonfly wings & feathers & tiny 3d wearable sculptures of much-love birds. I’m taking pre-orders for🎄. A RT would really really help my small business rn, thankyou x: etsy.com/uk/shop/silverpebbl…
37
723
22
1,046
40,991
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
So, a boy has been spared prison for stabbing a girl repeatedly because he is a bright lad. Recently, some boys were spared prison for raping girls because they were not bright lads. Open season, then.
96
2,193
34
13,669
125,030
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
Flavored coffee is sprayed with flavoring after roasting. The solvent that carries the flavor is not listed on the ingredient statement. Dunkin' French Vanilla reads coffee, natural and artificial flavor. New England Hazelnut Creme reads 100% Arabica coffee, natural and artificial flavors. Community Pecan Praline, same two lines. What those lines leave out is the spray. The roasted beans tumble in a mixer while liquid flavor gets sprayed on, about 3 pounds of flavor for every 100 pounds of coffee, and that liquid is mostly propylene glycol, a synthetic solvent that carries the flavor oils on to the bean. A supplier's spec sheet for a pecan coffee flavor reads propylene glycol and natural and artificial flavor, use at 3%. It stays off the bag because FDA treats the solvent inside a flavor as part of the flavor. Food grade propylene glycol is allowed in flavorings up to 97%, FDA lists it as safe, and a small amount is used. A few roasters flavor with alcohol or glycerin instead and print no propylene glycol on the bag.
118
279
28
3,482
180,331
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
In the middle of World War Two, German soldiers in southeastern Poland started avoiding a cluster of villages. They wouldn't go in. They wouldn't take people out for forced labor. They put up warning signs and stayed away. They believed the area was infected with typhus. It wasn't. Two doctors had invented the whole thing. The man behind it was Eugene Lazowski, a young Polish doctor working for the Red Cross in the town of Rozwadów. He was watching the Nazi occupation tear his country apart. Executions. Deportations. People shipped off to labor camps, many never coming back. He wanted to stop it. He had no weapons, no army, and no way to fight. What he had was medicine. His friend and fellow doctor, Stanisław Matulewicz, had discovered something strange. If you injected a person with a harmless, dead strain of a certain bacteria, their blood would test positive for typhus. They wouldn't be sick at all. But on paper, they'd look like they had one of the most feared diseases of the war. And the Germans were terrified of typhus. It spread fast, it killed, and it could tear through an army. When the Germans found it, they quarantined the area and kept their distance. Lazowski realized what that meant. If he could make enough people look infected, the Germans would leave the whole region alone. So he started injecting his patients. He chose carefully. He sent the blood samples to German labs for testing, exactly as the rules required. The results came back positive. Again and again. The Germans declared an epidemic zone. Villages were quarantined. Soldiers kept out. People who would have been seized for forced labor or worse were left alone, because nobody wanted to go near them. Lazowski had to be careful. If too many cases looked fake, someone would ask why nobody was dying. So he spread out the injections over time and kept the outbreak believable. Eventually the Germans did get suspicious. They sent a team of doctors to inspect. Lazowski met them with food and vodka and played the gracious host. He guided them toward the sickest looking, dirtiest patients he could find, in the most crowded rooms. The German doctors, worried about catching typhus themselves, took a few samples and left in a hurry. The tests came back positive. The fake epidemic lasted until the end of the war. Estimates say it may have protected around 8,000 people. Lazowski also secretly helped Jews from the nearby ghetto, giving them medical care at enormous risk. After the war he moved to the United States and became a professor of pediatrics in Chicago. For decades he barely talked about what he'd done. Late in life he finally wrote a memoir. He called it My Private War. He died in 2006. He never fired a shot. He beat the Nazis with a needle and a lab test.
246
4,032
180
22,843
490,604
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
NEW - a serious legal loophole has been exposed: sentences in youth courts cannot be challenged for being ‘unduly lenient’. In this case, a 14-year-old boy who stabbed a girl in the neck in a “terrifying, premeditated & persistent” attack received a non-custodial referral order for wounding with intent. Had the sentence been imposed at Crown Court the Attorney General could send it to the Court of Appeal for review under the ‘unduly lenient sentence’ scheme, but cases in youth courts (and magistrates courts) are exempted. There are understandably growing calls to close this loophole. I don’t expect many cases would be affected but it’s surely important that there’s a check on those sentences which are so clearly out of kilter. Story for @Telegraph with @charleshymas : telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…
15
171
6
424
13,935
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
What incredible bravery from Joanne Young. She waived her right to anonymity after being drugged and raped by Tory councillor Philip Young. He also allegedly “advertised” her to be raped and sexually abused by other men who are not on trial. He has admitted his guilt. He shackled and blindfolded her and she thought she had had a nightmare. Hideous vile man. This is the second such case in British courts in the same month. How often is this happening? That we don’t yet know about?! telegraph.co.uk/gift/8989736…
41
653
19
1,870
26,269
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
I don't feel any urge to hurt or kill anyone, but were I ever to do so, I'd definitely target them when they were cycling and do it from my car, because you can get away with most things. Fractured a man's skull and drove off - no jail time at all and says "it doesn't matter".
Driver who left cyclist with brain injury says it ‘doesn’t matter’ i.stv.tv/4kiRPyr
8
19
81
2,854
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
Oxford Street a complete mess. Looks like Eastern Europe before the Wall fell. No access for disabled people & I might be able to walk from the circus to Selfridges , but many people can’t. Another Disgrace from our useless Mayor.
123
277
14
2,688
107,399
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
Walker: "I nearly bought a wool jumper in town. £140. Nice work if you can get it." Farmer: "I got about £2 for the fleece." Walker: "£2?" Farmer: "Per sheep, per year. Clipped it off her in two minutes, rolled it, bagged it, drove it to the depot. The cheque for the whole flock didn't cover the diesel." Walker: "Then who's getting the £140?" Farmer: "Not me, not the shearer. He costs me more per sheep than the wool fetches. I pay to have it taken off." Walker: "So you lose money shearing." Farmer: "Every year. And I can't not shear, or she cooks in July and the flies eat her alive. The wool's a welfare job that used to be an income." Walker: "Sell it yourself, then. Cut out the middleman." Farmer: "Not allowed. By law it goes through the board. Has done since 1950. I can keep a fleece for the wife to knit with, and that's about the extent of my freedom." Walker: "So where does it go?" Farmer: "Washed in Bradford, if we're lucky. Shipped to China, spun, knitted, shipped back, and sold to you with a label about heritage. By the time it's in the window there are eleven people between us and I'm the only one who met the sheep." Walker: "That's mad." Farmer: "My grandfather paid the rent on the wool cheque. I pay a man to take it away. Same sheep, same hill, same jumper in the window. Only the price of the farmer went down." Walker: "What would fix it?" Farmer: "You buying the jumper. And asking them where the other £138 went."
62
901
30
3,155
112,144
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
The Woman of the Day is the Anglo-Saxon noblewoman Godgifu of West Mercia, the only woman to remain a landholder in Britain after those robbing Normans swept in and stole everything that wasn’t nailed down (and quite a few things that were). Of course you’ve heard of her. You’ve heard of the Godiva Procession which was instituted in 1678 by Coventry Fair to commemorate the legendary ride by the Lady. Taking pity on the people of Coventry suffering grievously under her husband's oppressive taxation, she called his bluff that he would repeal the taxes if she would strip naked and ride through the streets of the town, clothed only in her long hair. She only agreed on the condition that everyone stayed indoors and shut their windows, but a tailor known ever afterwards as Peeping Tom disobeyed and was struck blind. Allegedly. It was all bunkum. Absolute bunkum. Lady Godiva’s real name was Godgifu. She married Leofric, Earl of Mercia, but both she and her husband were major philanthropists and among the most munificent of the Anglo-Saxon nobility until the Norman Conquest in 1066 (and those robbing Normans came along, etc). In Anglo-Saxon times, in laws dated around 1008 AD, women enjoyed full property rights, from peasant to nobility. They could own land, farms, houses. Upon marriage, a husband was legally required to give his wife a Morgengifu (Morning Gift): land, money, or goods, which remained her independent property that she could sell, give away, or manage as she chose. Women wrote their own wills and left property to whomever they chose including children, servants, or religious institutions, and they didn’t need their husband's permission. All that stopped after 1066. The new feudal system tied land ownership to military service, something women were barred from providing. Women became the chattels (property) of their husbands if they were married, or their fathers if they were not, a legal state known as coverture. Still, I’m sure the Normans thought they were being progressive and inclusive, two words I’ve come to loathe. But I digress. Godgifu survived the death of her husband and was mentioned in the Domesday Book, one of the few Anglo-Saxons and the only woman to remain a major landholder after the Conquest. Godgifu certainly would have ridden a horse but not in protest and certainly not minus her clothes. Still, the idea of it proved quite a crowd pleaser at Coventry Fair in 1678, even though the first fake Lady Godiva was actually a lad. Yes, I know. Some things just don’t change. In the intervening years, the myth was spiced up by the Puritans to prove a moral point but dampened down by other Protestants to make it fit for delicate ears. Never forget: the objectification of women is eternal, along with its fraternal twin, misogyny. The two generally go hand in hand. Despite several attempts to shut down the procession — in 1845, the Mayor got fed up with the crowds jostling to get a better view of her, expostulating, “It’s a disgrace”, and in 1854, the Bishop of Worcester protested against “a Birmingham whore being paraded through the streets as Lady Godiva” — it continued as a annual event until the 1960s. Godgifu’s date of birth is unknown but she died in her mid-fifties in 1067 after the Norman Conquest of 1066. The Domesday Book of 1086 notes that the lands formerly held by her had passed to others. Men of course. Chattels are property, and property cannot own property. Married women finally achieved independent taxation in their own right in 1990. Prior to that, their husbands were responsible for paying tax on their income unless she obtained his signature and consent to claim her own single person's allowance and pay tax on her own earnings. Her unearned income — such as investment or savings interest — still legally belonged to him. And of course, the "marital rape exemption" — the legal assumption that a wife could not withhold sexual consent from her husband under the marriage contract — was not formally abolished in English law until 1991. 935 years. It only took 935 years in this country to demolish the legal status and definition of Woman as Property, and despite the Supreme Court ruling, we still find ourselves having to dismantle the definition of Woman as a feeling — with political parties, Civil Service departments, with trade unions, charities, retailers, and with sporting bodies. I know many of us are tired of fighting the same old battles but keep going, sisters. “We woman suffragists have a great mission — the greatest mission the world has ever known. It is to free half the human race, and through that freedom to save the rest.” Emmeline Pankhurst, 17 October 1912.
57
378
30
1,146
20,140
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
שברו לבן דוד שלי את הלסת בתל אביב כי הוא דיבר בערבית. בשנת 2026. בתל אביב. עכשיו לא שזה אמור לשנות משהו, אבל הוא במקרה נמצא במכינה צבאית והוא היה עם שני חברים שלו שהם גם חיילים דרוזים, וכנראה שמישהו העיר להם שהם דיברו בינם לבין עצמם בערבית. הוא עבר ניתוח ועכשיו לחודש וחצי הקרוב>
380
640
154
5,344
256,295
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
🚨TRAGIC: While the world focuses on other conflicts, the Islamic Republic of Iran executed a 19-year-old boy today. His name is Erfan Esfandiari. He was his parents’ only child. He did not kill anyone. He did not carry a weapon. His only “crime,” according to the regime, was opening his door to shelter protesters fleeing from security forces. Erfan was one of 12 young men charged in the Alikhani Square case in Isfahan after being arrested during the January 2026 uprising. Yesterday, all 12 were moved to quarantine. Today, the regime hanged him. This is a government so afraid of a generation that refuses to stay silent that it executes teenagers for showing basic compassion. Say his name. The regime is trying to erase him. His grieving parents are left with nothing not even the freedom to mourn openly.
404
1,962
164
3,893
147,872
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
Harry’s GQ interview raises a question that seems to escape him: what does reconciliation actually mean if the past is to be left behind only on his terms? Harry says his family problems make him relatable because so many people experience disagreements with siblings and estrangement from parents. But there is a rather significant difference between an ordinary family falling out and turning your family’s private business into a global commercial enterprise. Millions of people have difficult relationships with their parents and siblings. They live with resentment, estrangement and unresolved hurt. They do not all sell their family grievances to the highest bidder, publish private conversations for millions to read, and make a business out of explaining why everyone else wronged them. Harry chose to do that. Interviews, a documentary, a memoir: year after year, the family feud became material for another public account of his grievances. He was entitled to tell his story. But he cannot claim that entitlement while expecting everyone else to absorb the consequences quietly, as though their privacy, reputations and feelings were merely collateral damage in his determination to tell his side. And now he wants to talk about letting go of the past. How convenient. He has had years to explain what his father and brother did to him. Where is the same determination to acknowledge what he has done to them? Where is the recognition that trust cannot survive indefinitely when private conversations become public disclosures and family disagreements become material for commercial projects? Harry speaks of scars that remain. Indeed they do. But he cannot invoke the permanence of those scars when discussing his own hurt while expecting the people on the other side to behave as though his choices left no lasting marks on them. His appeal to relatability does not make this any less striking. Having family problems is relatable. Monetising those problems, repeatedly exposing the people involved, and then returning to the language of family unity when you want a different outcome is another matter entirely. And this despicable man has the audacity to preach about reconciliation for a rift he helped create, as though he can spend years airing his family’s private grievances, profit from the fallout, and then lecture everyone about letting go of the past. And William should be particularly wary of being drawn into another round of public pressure. He has not spent the past few years giving interviews about his brother or publishing intimate details of their relationship. Harry has repeatedly chosen to make their family conflict a public affair. William does not owe him a public response, a public reconciliation or another appearance in a story Harry has spent years telling. There is also a fundamental difference between wanting a relationship back and accepting responsibility for what damaged it. Harry can speak about peace, forgiveness and the importance of family as often as he likes. None of those words answers the harder question: what is he prepared to acknowledge, and what is he prepared to do differently? If he is serious about repairing these relationships, he knows where his father and brother are. He does not need another headline to communicate that he wants them back. He needs to stop treating reconciliation as another public narrative in which he remains the wounded party and everyone else is expected to provide the ending. Harry is free to want peace. He is free to move back. He is free to say the past should be left behind. What he cannot do is demand that the permanent record he created be treated as a temporary inconvenience now that he finds it inconvenient. The family grievances were his to publicise. The consequences are not his alone to dismiss. The scars do stick around. And he has only himself to blame for them. variety.com/2026/tv/global/p…
349
326
30
3,868
93,179
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
Cop who shot a 1 year old dead because she thought someone MIGHT have been shoplifting has been ruled fine, won't even be investigated. America is a sick place where, they murder babies for no reason at all and then say it's fine.
60
1,445
25
4,928
41,490
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
To clarify. It’s actually even worse. The horror of what our families face is this: my son’s killer, Valdo Calocane, was given a Section 37/41 hospital order. This is medical care, not a penal sentence. By January 2027—the 3-year mark—he can legally apply to a tribunal to come out if deemed well enough. Worse, until our recent fight to close the loophole, these criminal patients actively pocketed up to £800/month in state benefits from their hospital beds. A hospital order is not prison. We face a life sentence ensuring this monster is never released. #JusticeForBarnaby #NottinghamAttacks 💚💛
231
1,796
47
8,061
153,881
He died. They still played the football game. No postponement. They just took the body off the field and went back to playing the game regardless of what just happened. Am I the only person disturbed by this?
698
1,907
159
36,416
4,317,270
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
A lot of workplace culture died after Covid and never recovered. Yes, working from home is probably bad for you as a whole - but I’ve noticed in my own workplace that nobody uses the environment as a social launchpad anymore - which should be its biggest utility. I remember in pre Covid times there were at least moments of serendipitous fun. In this post Covid era rife with economic pessimism, I get the sense that people are generally afraid to take any sort of liberties in the workplace, even if it’s something as benign as taking a long lunch. Fridays used to have a good energy to them. Now I dread them. You can hear a pin drop in my office most Fridays. Small talk has been killed in the name of productivity. I know this isn’t all workplaces but I have a feeling I’m not alone here. If you’re lucky enough to work somewhere that hasn’t been managed-to-death, count your blessings. Otherwise I am forced conclude that working from home is the lesser evil, even if not by much.
My strongest “vibes not evidence” belief is that remote work is a cancer that’s making (most) people miserable even though it seems better in the short term.
57
44
14
1,434
256,506
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
Jihadism is a global ideology. There are a lot of attacks on a daily basis in Africa and the Middle East and these gets little coverage in the media. Especially the ones in Africa, e.g. Mali, Chad, Congo, Sudan, Nigeria. Worth a follow @TrackJihadists nitter.cf/koshercockney/status/2…
Definitely worth following @TrackJihadists if you’re not already. The mainstream media won’t expose Jihadists. They refuse. They are all but silent on Islamic extremism while pointing the finger elsewhere. The more pages like this the better.
2
36
1
160
3,881
Sarah Chambers🇺🇦💙 retweeted
This is genuinely shocking behaviour. Inhumane. Lacking empathy.
Owner of tiny video game shop tries to protect his livelihood in France. The rioters surround him, throw rocks at him, then laugh and jeer as they attack him from behind.
27
143
2
1,355
34,679