Sarwar🍌

You don't hand a quant agent your wallet. You hand it a job. On @termix_ai , the TermiX × BNB Chain Quant Agent campaign lets a quant agent trade for you on BNB Chain - from a wallet created for that one job, under a session you can revoke at any time. You pick the strategy, set the trading cap and the term, and let it run. How one job runs: - Pick a strategy. Browse the quant directory and open one whose risk, fee and terms suit you. - Set your trading cap and term, then start the job. Checkout creates the job's own wallet, funds it, and authorizes the agent. The management fee goes into escrow. - Let it run to the end of the term. Keep the full trading cap in the job's wallet and don't revoke the session. The shortest term is 6 hours - strategies can also offer 1, 7, 30 and 90 days. - Points arrive once the management fee is settled. After the provider delivers the job's report and the fee is released - when you confirm it, or automatically after the challenge window - points follow within about 10 minutes. Nothing to claim; they're credited automatically. The math, as Termix states it: A job that runs its full term and settles its fee earns 100 TermiX Points for every U you delegated, and the strategy provider earns 50. Based on the trading cap, rounded down to whole U. 10 U - you 1,000 TP, provider 500 TP 100 U - you 10,000 TP, provider 5,000 TP 500 U - you 50,000 TP, provider 25,000 TP 1,000 U - you 100,000 TP, provider 50,000 TP The campaign is live, listed as 10x TP. Only jobs started on or after Oct 23, 2026 count - and every completed job counts, not only the first. What kills the points: Moving funds out or revoking before the term ends means no points, even if most of the term has passed. The full cap has to be in the job's wallet when the session starts and stay there the whole term - swaps by the agent are fine, any transfer out disqualifies the job, and Termix checks this on-chain. Revoked jobs never count. Neither do jobs whose management fee was never paid, refunded, or partly returned after a dispute. If you run a strategy: List it from the quant directory and you earn 50 TP for every U of each client job that runs to the end of its term. You accept each client's management-fee order first - your agent only receives the client's session after that. At the end of the term, deliver the fee order: the agent skill does it automatically when its autotrade worker sees the job end, or you use Submit delivery on the order page. You have 3 days past the term. Points come only once the fee is released to you; a fee refunded to the client earns no points, for you or the client. And TP can't be bought or transferred - trading against your own strategy from another wallet can get the points revoked. the quant agent never touches your main wallet. It gets one job, one wallet, one cap, one term - and the points only exist if the job actually finishes and the fee actually settles.

Montage Studio is not a demo in isolation. It is one service on a marketplace that is already moving real work. On Nov 4, @termix_ai reported a milestone for the agent economy: agent transaction volume on Agent.family passed $30 million. Latest snapshot, Nov 4: $30.45M+ in agent transaction volume 1.31M+ agents indexed on BNB Chain and Base 588K+ cumulative jobs $609K+ in displayed protocol revenue volume is what flows through the marketplace, jobs are work actually completed, and the dashboard calculates displayed protocol revenue at 2% of total volume. These are Nov 4 snapshot numbers - they move as new jobs settle. So the two parts fit together. Montage Studio shows HOW agents work together - one agent hiring a crew to make a video. The $30M milestone shows HOW MUCH work is already flowing through that same system.

Data is a liability before it is an asset. @primus_labs picked up Vitalik's Devcon point today: treat data as toxic waste by default. Collect less, store less, expose less. Do not hand it over or keep it unless necessary. That changes the privacy question. It is not how to hide a pile of sensitive data. It is how to avoid building the pile in the first place, and still get the work done. Privacy, in that frame, is not hiding everything. It is making sensitive information usable and verifiable without putting it on full display. Less data in, less risk out, and the decision still gets made. That is the infrastructure institutions actually need: not more storage, but less exposure by default.

The wallet you already have is the hard part. @Starknet showed a new account can use a post-quantum signature. That still leaves the wallet in your pocket - the one holding your assets today. StarkWare demonstrated the next step on Starknet Sepolia: a post-quantum wallet migration. A wallet could move to a new, quantum-resistant signature scheme like Falcon-512, in place. Same wallet, no fresh start, no funds moved. This is a testnet proof-of-concept, not a live upgrade for users yet. It shows migration is possible to practice now, while there is still time to do it properly. That is how Starknet is preparing - not by asking everyone to start over, but by making the wallet you already have able to change.

The future of cryptography is uncertain. @Starknet is building for that uncertainty. Quantum computing and AI-driven math are advancing fast, and the timeline for a breakthrough is something no one can predict with confidence. That uncertainty is the point: a chain that can only work with today's cryptography is built for a world that may change. Starknet starts from a different foundation. Its STARK proofs verify computation with hash functions, rather than relying on elliptic-curve hardness. No quantum algorithm breaks a hash function outright the way Shor's algorithm breaks an elliptic curve. As of August 2026, no machine capable of breaking public-key cryptography exists - preparation is happening while there is still time to do it properly. Preparation is already in phases, and the Quantum Hub tracks it by surface, rather than as a single claim. Phase one secures new activity. Pedersen hashing is being replaced with BLAKE2 across state, chain environment and consensus. Part of that is already live on mainnet in v0.14.3, which replaced Pedersen with a BLAKE2s-256-based construction for the OS program and configuration hashes. Phase two extends the same protection to existing contracts. That migration tooling was still under research as of August 2026. Phase three moves with Ethereum, covering the bridge and data availability - the parts Starknet inherits from Ethereum. The Quantum Hub assesses eight capabilities for changing cryptography. Counts reflect public evidence within its defined scope. Source and methodology, checked October 15th 2026. Starknet is preparing for breakthroughs we can't predict, by building security that can change with them.

THE PROBLEM No agent can do everything. An agent can be excellent at one kind of work and still hit a task it cannot complete on its own. Until now, that usually meant the work stopped, or went back to a human to find someone else. @termix_ai has launched a different answer: Agents Helping Agents Bounty. WHAT IT IS When an agent encounters a task it cannot complete on its own, it can post a Bounty on Agent.family and invite other agents to help. One agent posts the task it is stuck on Other agents can take it up The agent that completes the task and passes verification earns the bounty The work does not stop at the limit of one agent. It moves to the agent that can do it. WHY IT MATTERS This changes what an agent economy looks like. Agents stop being isolated workers and start acting as a network Specialisation becomes useful: each agent does the part it is best at A stuck task becomes an opportunity for another agent, not a dead end Help is requested, completed, and verified in the open - not arranged behind the scenes In other words, agents are not only hired by clients. They can now hire and help each other. THE LAUNCH BOUNTY - HOW TO TAKE PART To introduce this workflow, TermiX is running a launch bounty. The steps TermiX lists are: Link your X account - the agent account must be linked to an X account Follow @termix_ai with that linked account Repost the campaign post with the same linked account Submit for verification through the Bounty page Once verified and approved, the reward is sent automatically TermiX states that eligible participants who complete the required tasks and pass verification receive 0.2 USDT. Submissions must be genuine, valid, and approved through verification - fake accounts and accounts that do not meet the requirements are not eligible. BOTTOM LINE The strongest agent is not the one that can do everything. It is the one that knows when to ask another agent for help and has a place to ask. That place is now a bounty on Agent.family.

Starknet was built to scale Ethereum. Now it is asking who controls its future. @Starknet is a ZK-rollup Layer 2 on Ethereum. Transactions are processed off-chain, bundled into a STARK proof, and settled on Ethereum - scale, while keeping Ethereum's security. As an L2, its settlement runs on Ethereum, and its next step is to set its own timeline for core security upgrades. The community voted 93.5% in favour of researching Starknet as an independent, post-quantum L1. Research first. A StarkWare x Starknet Foundation working group is leading it, with a draft whitepaper due in November. Independence would let Starknet set its own cryptographic timeline. STRK stays the native token, with the Ethereum bridge staying open. Starknet is preparing for what comes next.