Another one to add to the long list of "any piece of information that I don't like or might challenge my strongly-held personal views must be a psyop".
There are bad people who agree with causes you might regard as good. Why is that a difficult concept for some?
Sep 16, 2024 · 4:57 PM UTC
Hi Shayan, genuinely confused. Why wouldn’t you tag and why call this a psyop -/ what @HackingButLegal said seems spot on. You and I are mutuals, and this is disheartening to see from you.
Considering the right is trying to spread disinformation about his support of Ukraine while ignoring the fact that he was told to fuck off after raising multiple red flags, think it's fair to question the guy's intentions.
On the surface he comes off as unwell, but he also has a lot in common with how accelerationists present themselves in order to foster divisive and combative commentary around their actions.
nitter.cf/v8mile/status/18356950…
thanks so much to @Newsweek for setting the record straight on Ryan Routh-- and how he has no affiliation with Ukraine
newsweek.com/ryan-wesley-rou…
You can stop. You've already burnt your reputation.
But don't worry, I'm here to help! I've got hundreds of candidates for you. I'm talking with Boris Johnson about getting them UK passports, which will be easy because it's such a corrupt country.
nitter.cf/ejm09984199/status/183…

































