We speak for the 2700 trees to be clearcut by Obama Pres Ctr/Tiger Woods PGA Course, Jackson Park, Chicago. MPH:CSU. Army:BTS. #ChicagoLakefrontNationalPark

Chicago, Illinois
Joined June 2022
The Obama Presidential Center has cut down 303 mature trees in Jackson Park; 612 trees left to destroy. One in 8 kids in Chicago have asthma. South and SE Chicago residents have the greatest incidence of asthma. We need these trees. #TreesMakeAir #SaveJacksonPark
37
54
12
133
𝗧𝗿𝗲𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗯𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗶𝗼𝘅𝗶𝗱𝗲. 𝗜𝗻 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗴𝗼, 𝘄𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻: ~300 large trees for Bears stadium expansion, ~800 legacy trees for Redefine the Drive. A mature 30 inch diameter tree absorbs roughly 40 to 50 𝗽𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝘀 of CO2 per year... a 30 inch tree stores vastly more total carbon: about 200 𝗽𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝘀 per year. We need a #ChicagoLakefrontNationalPark. Tree oxygen production varies by tree size. Based on data from Minneapolis, Minnesota (Nowak et al. 2006b), trees 1–3″ dbh produced ≈2.9 kg O2/year (6.4 lb O2/year); trees 9–12″ dbh: 22.6 kg O2/year (49.9 lb O2/year); 18–21″ dbh: 45.6 kg O2/year (100.5 lb O2/year); 27–30″ dbh: 91.1 kg O2/year (200.8 lb O2/year); and greater than 30″ dbh: 110.3 kg O2/year (243.2 lb O2/year). joa.isa-arbor.com/article_de… treeplantation.com/tree-carb… McPherson, Gregory E., David J. Nowak, Rowan A. Rowntree. (1994). Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. USDA Forest Service Northeastern Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NE-186, 63-81.
Stop calling it a climate problem. Call it what it is: organized greed. The planet isn’t dying. It’s being killed for profit. The killers have names. And boardrooms. #ClimateJustice #StopEcocide
1
1
171
See? Other people fight for trees, too. I wonder what would have happened if we had done this in the Women's Garden, Jackson Park. Ah well...
Treesit Blocks US-Mexico Border Wall Construction for Six Weeks in Arizona unicornriot.ninja/2026/trees…
1
1
5
117
Save Jackson Park retweeted
A data center company wants to build on land inside a national park. So they handed the park's top official a map of how to divide it up, and NPS's official boundary lines changed to match it. Here's the plan. Highland Digital wants to build four 100 foot data centers and a substation in Triangle, Virginia, right next to Quantico Creek, a waterway that feeds directly into the Potomac River. Their genius move? Swap 73 acres of wetlands they can't build on anyway, for 36 acres of forest they actually can, forest that's currently protected federal parkland. Call it an even trade if you want. It isn't. Nobody's said how much water four data centers this size would need, where it would come from, or where the wastewater would go. That's not a detail. That's an open question nobody in charge has bothered to answer yet. Why this land specifically? Existing high voltage transmission lines already run through the area. For a data center, that's the expensive part solved for free, so they're trading wetlands they can't build on anyway for forest they can clear. Can you believe this isn't even their first attempt? Highland Digital already tried this exact same data center, on this exact same site, at the county level. Severe public backlash forced them to withdraw their special use permit in May. So instead of taking no for an answer, they went straight to the federal government instead. Here's what it looks like from where I sit: when the public got a say, they said no. So now it's happening somewhere the public doesn't get a say. Nobody's going to come out and admit that's the strategy. But that's exactly what's happened so far. To make that happen, they hired Jeff Small, a former senior Interior Department official from Trump's first term, as their lobbyist. Meetings between Highland Digital and the park's top official started back in May 2025. By the time the story broke, Rep. Vindman (D-VA) had already been asking the Park Service whether it even has the legal authority to make this exchange without congressional approval at all. An independent analyst who reviewed the deal said: even though the Park Service technically gains more acreage, "the developer comes out ahead." That's not just about acreage. It's about what's actually on that acreage. This park is a designated Important Birding Area, home to 129 species of birds. Doesn't matter anymore. Not to this administration. A mother bird could come back to find her nest gone, her chicks gone, the whole tree gone, and legally, under the rule they just finalized, that's not "harm." Not anymore. Long before any of this, this park was called Chopawamsic, an Algonquian word meaning "divided streams." The Doeg people lived along these waters, and archaeologists have found their camps and tools along Quantico Creek, buried in the soil for over 10,000 years. They never got a say in what happened to this land either. This isn't happening in isolation. In July 2025, Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to put data centers on federal land, and to skip full environmental review, the same review that would normally catch exactly these kinds of water and habitat concerns. One year later, this same administration finalized a rule removing "harm" from the ESA. And they plan on using both of those tools right here, at Prince William Forest Park. This is how it works. Quiet meetings, informal agreements, deals shaped long before the public ever gets a say. We've seen this exact playbook before, water rights secured, meters tampered with, all before anyone outside the room even knew to ask a question. It's the same playbook in Texas right now, where Musk's SpaceX is angling for 775 acres of a wildlife refuge that's home to endangered ocelots. Prince William Forest Park may be next in line. We have to guard our public lands, because this administration is attacking them, one quiet meeting at a time. #DemsUnited
60
969
75
1,156
19,312
Please explain to me why Mayor Johnson is still committed to a lakefront Bears Stadium lakefront expansion that destroys 350 large trees which EACH sequesters, on average, 150 pounds of C02 per year. We need a #ChicagoLakefrontNationalPark
We face global warming of 3°C and rising in a handful of decades. That kills billions (starvation) according to a number of these distinguished scientists. Mass media? Totally silent.
8
170
Urban tree canopy not only helps filter the air of CO2, SO2, PM2.5, tree canopy helps cool our air while making 02 for us to breathe. We need a #ChicagoLakefortNationalPark to save our lakefront trees from being clearcut by Redefine the Drive.
The planet doesn't negotiate. 2024 wasn't a warning shot; it was the bullet. Every 0.1°C we prevent saves millions. We are the last generation with the power to rewrite this ending. The time for "later" is over. #ClimateEmergency #ActNow
5
9
171
Let the climate change hunger games begin. Chicagoans: Advocate for saving your lakefront parklands. Stop Redefine the Drive. We'll need all our big trees to sequester CO2, etc. Also, invest in planting a 3" diameter tree and water it a lot. If you have Ash Trees in your neighborhood, it's up to you to save them since City of Chicago won't: saveyourashchicago.org/ Don't worry. It's easy. A 30-inch American Elm tree sequesters ~90 to 110 pounds of CO2 yearly & stores 20,400 pounds of CO2 inside its wood. It sure is hard to envision 1 lb of CO2 much less 20,000 pounds. Save your Ash trees. And we need a #ChicagoLakefrontNationalPark. joa.isa-arbor.com/article_de…
1
75
Just because we deserve to see trees. It's been some hard times for trees because of the winds we've been experiencing in Chicagoland. Do prune/remove broken branches. Consider fertilizing your tree. I fertilize my trees; they grow stronger and bigger faster. I recommend SavATree. It's an expense... but trees are part of our family, too.
Every ray of sunlight that reaches the forest floor passes through a living cathedral of trees. Protecting rainforests means protecting life, hope, and our planet’s future. 🌿 RainforestProtectorsTrust.or… #HopeForNature #Conservation #ClimateAction #Biodiversity #MakeADifference
3
8
128
Trump's suggesting using coal to power new AI centers in US (AP News). If we power 20% of new AI centers using coal, by year 10 airborne emissions of these AI centers will be roughly equal to the weight of 3,500 𝘌𝘮𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘉𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 made entirely of CO2. In Year 10 of continuous building, these coal-powered AI centers would dump a grand total of 1.30 billion 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤 𝘵𝘰𝘯𝘴 of CO2 into the atmosphere, with the yearly emission rate climbing to 4.84% of present-day U.S. carbon output. When you build new data centers every year, the numbers don't just add up—they stack. The centers built in Year 1 keep running and emitting gas during Year 2, Year 3, and beyond, creating a compounding snowball effect. 5-Year and 10-Year Projections Here is how the numbers stack up if the U.S. continues this building pace for one decade: Timeline New Centers Added Yearly Emission Rate (METRIC TONS) / Year) Share of Present U.S. Total Total Accumulated CO2 in Atmosphere by Metric Tons (MT = Metric Ton) Year 1 ~20 centers 23.71 Million MT 0.48% / 23.71 Million MT/ Year 5 ~100 centers 118.55 Million MT 2.42% / 355.65 Million MT/Year 10 ~200 centers 237.10 Million MT 4.84% / 1.30 Billion MT The Cumulative Impact Broken Down The Yearly Emission Pace: By Year 5, the data centers built up to that point are pumping out 118.55 million metric tons of CO2 annually. By Year 10, that annual pace doubles to 237.10 million metric tons every year. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘵𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤 𝘋𝘶𝘮𝘱: 𝘐𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘶𝘮 𝘶𝘱 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘮𝘰𝘬𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘦 10-𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘸𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘨𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘥𝘥𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘢𝘪𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘴 1,304,032,950 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤 𝘵𝘰𝘯𝘴. Real-World Scale: That 10-year total is roughly equal to the weight of 3,500 Empire State Buildings made entirely of compressed greenhouse gas. Thanks to Gemini for doing the math... and thinking, this is a very bad idea. apnews.com/article/maha-trum…
2
2
66
Another reason to stop cutting down large trees: "Annual CO2 sequestration by a 30-in tree is around 204 lbs per year, the carbon emissions of a passenger vehicle driven approximately 900 miles." From study: "I actually think that what we are seeing is because our bodies are not adapting [to rising CO2 levels]," Dr Bierwirth, a retired environmental geoscientist affiliated with the ANU Emeritus Faculty, said. "It appears we are adapted to a range of CO2 in the air that may now have been surpassed. The normal range maintains a delicate balance between how much CO2 is in the air, our blood pH, our breathing rate and bicarbonate levels in the blood. As CO2 in the air is now higher than humans have ever experienced, it appears to be building up in our bodies. 𝗠𝗮𝘆𝗯𝗲 𝘄𝗲 [𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗲𝘀] 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗱𝗮𝗽𝘁 𝘀𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘃𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝘁𝗺𝗼𝘀𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰 𝗹𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗢𝟮." "Cutting CO2 emissions remains essential for limiting global warming. The findings also raise the possibility that lowering emissions could have an additional role in protecting long-term human health. When levels rise enough to trigger a condition called metabolic alkalosis, symptoms begin to affect your muscles, nerves, and heart. The symptoms can range from mild to severe: Mild to Moderate Symptoms Muscle cramping and twitching Numbness or tingling in your face, hands, or feet Hand tremors or prolonged muscle spasms Nausea or vomiting Dizziness or lightheadedness Feeling very weak or lethargic References: McPherson, Gregory E., David J. Nowak, Rowan A. Rowntree. (1994). Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. USDA Forest Service Northeastern Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NE-186, 63-81. my.clevelandclinic.org/healt…
Human body unable to adapt as Scientists detect a big shift in human blood as atmospheric CO2 rises Blood bicarbonate levels have climbed about 7% since 1999, while calcium and phosphorus have declined—changes that closely track increasing atmospheric CO2 sciencedaily.com/releases/20…
2
5
100
Save Jackson Park retweeted
Humans have impacted climate change. You don’t have to agree with Net Zero, you don’t have to like EVs, wind turbines, solar farms or heat pumps. You don’t even have to agree with the policies governments are introducing. But none of those things change the science. The IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report looked specifically at human influence on the climate system. “It is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land.” And when you actually read the report, the detail is pretty compelling. TEMPERATURE Global surface temperature in 2011–2020 was around 1.09°C warmer than 1850–1900. The IPCC estimates human-caused warming between 1850–1900 and 2010–2019 at 0.8°C–1.3°C, with a best estimate of 1.07°C. Natural factors such as changes in solar activity and volcanic eruptions… Their estimated contribution was between −0.1°C and +0.1°C. In other words, the estimated human contribution is roughly the same magnitude as the warming we’ve actually observed. GREENHOUSE GASES The IPCC states that the increases in major greenhouse-gas concentrations since around 1750 are unequivocally caused by human activities. By 2019 atmospheric concentrations had reached approximately: CO2: 410 ppm Methane: 1,866 ppb Nitrous oxide: 332 ppb Interestingly, greenhouse gases alone would likely have produced even MORE warming, estimated at 1°C-2°C. Other human effects, particularly aerosols, have actually offset some of that warming. THE OCEANS The upper ocean has warmed since the 1970s, and the IPCC says it is extremely likely that human influence is the main driver. Around 91% of the additional heat accumulating in the climate system has gone into the oceans. The IPCC also concludes that human CO2 emissions are the main driver of the current acidification of the surface open ocean. ICE Human influence is assessed as very likely the main driver of global glacier retreat since the 1990s. Arctic sea ice declined by around 40% in September between 1979–1988 and 2010–2019. Human influence is also assessed as very likely to have contributed to declining Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover. SEA LEVELS Global mean sea level rose by approximately 20cm between 1901 and 2018. More importantly, the rate accelerated: 1901–1971: 1.3mm/year 1971–2006: 1.9mm/year 2006–2018: 3.7mm/year The IPCC concludes that human influence was very likely the main driver since at least 1971. EXTREME WEATHER The report doesn’t say every individual heatwave, flood, drought or storm was “caused by climate change.” What it does say is that human-induced climate change is already affecting weather and climate extremes across every region of the globe. Hot extremes have become more frequent and intense across most land regions since the 1950s, with the IPCC concluding with high confidence that human-induced climate change is the main driver. Heavy precipitation events have also increased across most land areas where sufficient observations exist, with human-induced climate change assessed as likely the main driver. And marine heatwaves have approximately doubled in frequency since the 1980s. So no, this doesn’t mean Earth’s climate never changed naturally before industrialisation. Of course it did. The IPCC explicitly includes solar activity, volcanic activity and natural climate variability in its analysis. The important point is that those natural factors cannot explain the scale of the warming we’ve observed in the modern era. Human activity can. You can absolutely debate what we should do about climate change. That’s a political, economic and societal discussion worth having. But whether humans have affected the climate in the first place is a scientific question. And the evidence for that is now overwhelming. You don’t have to like climate policy to accept climate science. They’re two completely different conversations. Source: IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis.
21
17
3
44
1,806
What's more worrisome than proposing the National Park Service in the time of Trump oversee the care of our lakefront? Allowing the City of Chicago/Chicago Park District to do so. Their special project, Redefine the Drive, cuts down 450 more mature, large diameter trees, destroys acres of adjacent parklands and all of North Avenue beach to pave 3 more car & bus lanes for DLSD aka Redefine the Drive. Our National Parks Service is fighting back against Trump policies whereas Chicago's blissful ignorance of public health harms from cutting down vast amounts of large trees and turning public parklands into pavement is truly astounding. Maybe they should get in touch with the University of Chicago and ask for the newest stats on asthma incidence in children & older adults since clearcutting 600 mature trees for the OPC. We need a #ChicagoLakefrontNationalPark Want a car sticker? Help me gather signatures for an advisory referendum and its yours, plus a cap, too. DM me.
3
4
6
206
Chicago has 13% tree canopy. New York has 23%; WA DC 21%. Brutally hot days are here. Don't let CDOT/Chicago Park District cut down any more of our lakefront trees for a Redefine The Drive. We need all our trees to cool urban infrastructure and to create oxygen for us to breathe. #ChicagoLakefrontNationalPark
1/2. The most important sentence of our time "People don’t realise that we can’t make it get better again." It never goes back into balance - that option is not longer available. news.sky.com/story/brutal-ha… You either have a revolution to stop it getting worse, or it gets worse and worse and worse. Sometimes you have limited options in life. There is no reverse option. We are not Gods. The elites fucked up and you thought it would all go away if you just tried to forget about it and keep watching Netflix. Bad idea. theguardian.com/environment/…
5
9
269
This is our earth rejecting us to save itself. It's a race against time: The very rich destroying earth to make more $$$ versus us, hoping to breathe & live on earth. Whose side are you on? What are you going to do? Let's start by saving many more mature CO2 sequestering trees & parkland in Chicago. #ChicagoLakefrontNationalPark #TreesMakeAir
unavailable
1
6
120
Could you share your strategy & commitment with Chicago? Our tree canopy is 13% (and the OPC and plans for a TGR Design golf course, cutting down another 2,106 trees, are not helping that much). Maybe Canadian wildfires aren't the only reason why Chicago has some of the worst air quality in the world. Time for #ChicagoLakefrontNationalPark .
🚨 NEW: Mayor Zohran Mamdani has unveiled a plan to expand New York City’s tree canopy to 30% by 2040. The plan treats trees as critical infrastructure, cooling heat-vulnerable neighborhoods, cleaning the air, absorbing stormwater and making every borough more livable.
1
100
This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but with a fire. (Thanks, T.S.Eliot.) currentwildfires.com/en/
3
4
138