Donald Trunks retweeted
Oh no! If the Bush-Romney faction takes back power, they might start a war with Iran, increase government spending, hand a construction company to Indians, appoint Marco Rubio to any important position, continue the war in Ukraine and pass antisemitism laws!!
Donald Trunks retweeted
Arena
Daggerfall
Morrowind
Oblivion
Skyrim
Sentinel
A D M O S S
MOSSAD
Wake the fuck up
Donald Trunks retweeted
Yay!!!! My choices are:
R-Hates White people, openly worships Israel, secretly gay, replacing me legally with the third world.
D-Hates White people, secretly worships Israel, openly gay, replacing me illegally with the third world.
Yeah, I'm sitting this out. Fuck em both.
Donald Trunks retweeted
The pro-life movement is not winning over hearts and minds. There are more abortions than ever. Red state voters, when given a secret ballot, support a right to abortion. Anyone trying to use this issue as black mail in federal elections is subversive.
Donald Trunks retweeted
This is basically the relationship between Whites and nons throughout all of history
Donald Trunks retweeted
Young men are willing to die for fictional characters more so than any living man, and I find this meta shattering. Maybe we’ve fallen so far, we simply don’t have anymore hero’s. Maybe, like Alexander, Napoleon, Caesar, we need them to be separate from us. Distant. Imaginations.
Donald Trunks retweeted
The final goal of AI companies is to end personal computing which in simple terms means to remove all access to digital devices from genral public. You can already see how prices of laptops, phones and PCs are being artificially inflated so no one can afford them anymore.
This is the largest endeavour to move digital assets from people to the technocrats. They recognise the monetary value which internet affords to common people and want to take it away. After they've taken away all your phones & PCs they will sell you a rectangle box which would run on a cloud and would require a constant subscription, this is their long game.
Donald Trunks retweeted
>knew Palpatine was a Sith
>recognized the Republic’s deep corruption
>used humane robot army to minimize human sufferage
>left the Jedi on moral grounds
>sought genuine political reform
>led Separatist systems by choice, not force
>avoided needless cruelty
>slowly twisted by the war and the dark side
>tried to warn others and pull them away from disaster
>remembered as a villain despite his good intentions
>signature look of superiority
Most tragic character in the prequels
Donald Trunks retweeted
I still remember when neo cons insisted that this war would be over and done with in a matter of days. And I remember when we told them it wouldn’t play out like that, and it would prove to be a massive blunder, and they yelled at us and called us “panicans” and traitors.
Exclusive: The top U.S. commander in the Middle East briefed President Trump Thursday on military options for Iran as the U.S. weighs resuming major combat operations. on.wsj.com/4e7yBbl
Donald Trunks retweeted
From the Zoomer perspective the Jedi are evil
Anakin was born of a Virgin, conceived by the Force, the Jedi Council knew he was the Chosen One..
Yet still, they rejected him…
Why?
Because he was more powerful than them
Imagine they had loved him, trusted him, and recognized his Divine Destiny
Instead they:
-forbid him to reproduce
-allowed his mother to be sold into slavery and viscously murdered by “sand people”
-watched the Democratic Process of the Republic evolve into a powerless stalemate
-traded Ancient Prophecy in favor of a modern interpretation thereby mocking the very Tradition they claimed to protect
They got what they deserved.
Long live the Empire. Hail Lord Vader
Donald Trunks retweeted
“Anakin, my allegiance is to the political order that left your mother in slavery and then said you weren’t allowed to have any attachment to her or Padme!”
Donald Trunks retweeted
Normal people: “I want my country to remain majority White.”
James Lindsay: “I want to see you kiIIed or jailed.”
If it wasn't obvious that this sword-dancing zio-dork was anti-White five years ago when he fought to stop everyone from using the phrase “anti-White,” perhaps his open eagerness to see death befall White people who prefer White countries will better illuminate James Lindsay's true anti-White nature for you.
Donald Trunks retweeted
Replying to @Cernovich
Better yet why don’t American Christians who believe everyone is the same move to Ghana? I am told Americans are immoral and racist. Wouldn’t it be better to leave such a wicked place and move to Christian Ghana?
Donald Trunks retweeted
Ghana is a majority Christian country. What is wrong with living there? Getting a lot of mixed signals. We are told all peoples are the same once you find Christ. Ok then. Why not go move to Ghana? Do they really believe this?
Donald Trunks retweeted
this is how cucked white people are now they let their daughter date a thug and are SHOCKED when he murders her not only that they DID NOTHING while she was being killed in her room they just LISTENED (cowards)
all because they lack basic pattern recognition
Donald Trunks retweeted
I don’t think the founders intended fat black people from Ghana to sneak in via immigration fraud from Canada and have a bunch of anchor babies when they wrote that immigration should be limited to “White people of good character”
Donald Trunks retweeted
Humans are a pack animal.
This may be hard to understand if you are evangelical and think the book of genesis is literal rather than allegorical, but humans are a pack animal.
What this means is that the human desire for the acceptance and support of a tribe is as fundamental as the desire for food, for air, for water, for sex, for sunlight, for love.
If you tell young men that they cannot have a tribe, they're not going to accept that.
Ever.
Especially if you tell that only to the young men of one tribe in particular. They're going to wonder why everybody gets to have a tribe and they don't.
And they're eventually going to decide that you are the enemy.
Because you are. Anyone who stands between young men and what they need for a healthy, fulfilled life is their enemy.
That includes you.
And if you manage to convince them that god doesn't want them to have a tribe, it will also include god.
The more you push back against their healthy and natural desire for a tribe, a homeland, and a birthright, the more they will hate you, and the more exclusive their definition of that tribe will become.
There is no way you can stop this. The only thing you can control is how far they have to go, how radical they have to become, in order to get it.
Because this can go all the way from enforcing immigration law, and shutting down corrupt visa programs right now, to gangs of young White men in balaclavas with Ar15s going door to door ten years from now.
We have to do something about the 14th amendment. I don't care if that makes you uncomfortable or unhappy. It's not a choice. The constitution exists to serve Americans, not the other way around. If that sentence confuses you, read the first paragraph of the constitution.
If we do not, young men of the future, the same little boys who are being radicalized right now by your malicious indifference, will treat a piece of paper that says they cannot have a homeland the way they would treat a piece of paper that says that can't eat food, or a piece of paper that says they can't own a home, or have a wife and children.
You may think that you offer them a tribe in the form of the universal kingdom of god, the community of all believers, but that's just a word game and you know it, which is why you are so defensive about the whole thing.
Where was the universal community of believers when these young men needed help? When they needed not just the surface appearance of a tribe, but someone to do the things that tribes actually do for younger generations they care about?
The pack serves a concrete set of functions in the life cycle of the human species, and you cannot perform those functions with a cardboard cutout.
Young men are sick of religion that offers them responsibilities with no rights, lectures with no help, demands with no love or empathy.
It's odd, in a way ironic, that, I, the man of zero faith, should have to be the one standing here telling self-styled religious leaders how they failed both their people and their god.
But having no faith does give me one advantage. It frees me from the delusion that Jesus is a puppet that I can pull out of my pocket, slip over my right hand, move his mouth and make him say what I want.
I used to wonder, as a child, what the phrase "taking the name of the lord in vain" actually meant.
But I no longer wonder, because when I became a man, I looked around me and saw all these people who talk to god and somehow get told exactly what they want to hear.
Then I understood that the key phrase here wasn't "in vain". It was "taking". Taking the name of god and using it as a tool for one's own goals.
Joel, here, is sad that his friend is getting sent home. This personally inconveniences both him and his friend, which effects Joel in a way that young men being denied their birthright does not.
So he finds an interpretation of scripture that says that god wants him, Joel Berry, to get his way, and that god wants all the young men who want a homeland and a birthright to go get fucked.
I'm not terribly impressed.
Replying to @JoelWBerry
And after you’ve donated once, donate once again to stick it in the eyes of the demonic neo-Nazi cringelords posing as “Christian Nationalists” who are gloating over Samuel’s situation.










































