Tracy Hemstock retweeted
The United States is never going to invade or attack Canada
Climate Change is a hoax
Canadians are still lining up at Food Banks
Canada has exactly zero Trade Deals
Liberals are dumb.
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
Social media users are furious, with some even calling for her to be charged, after a young woman posted a video admitting that, as a middle school student, she falsely accused a male teacher of sexual misconduct simply because he wouldn’t let her sit next to her friend.
Viewers pointed out that she never once took responsibility for potentially ruining the man’s life. She smiled throughout the story and ended by saying her actions “weren’t that bad” and weren’t really her fault.
This is exactly the kind of behavior that makes people skeptical of sexual assault allegations and can make it harder for genuine victims to be believed. Falsely accusing someone of something this serious is vile.
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
🚨 RFK Jr ha appena INCENERITO il World Economic Forum — e ha assolutamente ragione.
Chiedendogli Glenn Beck dove si collochi rispetto al WEF, RFK non si è trattenuto:
“È un club dei miliardari che sposta la ricchezza verso l’alto e impone controlli totalitari.”
“Volano a Davos su jet privati e dicono ai leader mondiali come governare il resto di noi.”
“Durante il COVID, 4 TRILIONI DI DOLLARI sono stati spostati verso l’alto mentre chiudevano i piccoli imprenditori.”
Questa è la parte che i media seppelliranno:
RFK Jr sta dichiarando apertamente che Big Tech, il Grande Governo e il WEF hanno cospirato —
per censurare il dissenso, schiacciare le piccole imprese ed eliminare i diritti costituzionali mentre arricchivano l’élite globale.
E non ha torto.
Il modello del WEF è semplice:
• Obbedire alla governance globale
• Cancellare la sovranità nazionale
• Criminalizzare il dissenso
• Centralizzare il potere
• Arricchire la classe élite
• Digitalizzare la popolazione
Nel frattempo, la gente comune è stata messa in lockdown, rovinata finanziariamente, messa a tacere e sorvegliata.
RFK Jr sta dicendo ad alta voce la parte silenziosa:
Il WEF non è un “think tank”.
È un cartello non eletto di miliardari che cerca di gestire il mondo.
E le persone si stanno finalmente svegliando.
@glennbeck
Via @JimFergusonUK
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
🚨 THEY STALKED HER. THEY SHOT HER IN THE HEAD. THEY CRUSHED A BABY IN A STROLLER. THEY STRANGLED HER. THEY STABBED HER AND DOUSED HER IN GASOLINE.
And ABC, CBS, and NBC gave these stories ZERO. SECONDS. on their flagship morning and evening newscasts. newsbusters.org
Griff Jenkins just laid it out on FOX & Friends. Five recent cases. Multiple murder charges. A 9-month-old dead in a New Jersey parking lot. Federal authorities identified the suspects as illegal immigrants. The Media Research Center found the Big Three networks looked away. 📺❌
Here’s what they buried:
💥 Sacramento, CA — Rohit Rohit, 22, from India. Illegally crossed in Arizona in 2023. Released. He AirTagged Shalini Thakur’s car. Deflated her tire so he could “help.” Copied her apartment key and walked into her home while she slept. She got a restraining order. He still hunted her. Then he chased her outside a Panera Bread, shot her, and finished her on the ground. He later killed himself on Highway 50. Her mother said she begged police for help and no one stopped him. 💔🔫
💥 Jackson, NJ — Maria Cobon-Guzmán, 20, from Guatemala. Never had a license. Released after an illegal crossing. An immigration judge had already ordered her removed. She slammed a car into a mother, a 5-year-old, and 9-month-old Yitzchok Rosenberg in a grocery store lot. The baby died. The woman teaching her to drive, Ariadna Lazaro-Flores, had been removed five times and came back anyway. ICE now wants them both. 👶⚰️
💥 Massachusetts — Flavio Alcantara Dias, 43, from Brazil. Prior DUI and assault. Released. He called 911 and said he “went crazy and suffocated her.” Brianna Connolly was found with a cord around her neck. Murder charge. 🥀
💥 Virginia — Alexis Antonio Cedillos-Campos, 19, from El Salvador. Crossed near El Paso in 2024. Released. Prosecutors say he grabbed a kitchen knife and gloves after his co-worker exposed their affair. Carmen Lizet Puch, a mother of a 3-year-old, was found stabbed repeatedly and soaked in gasoline. He confessed. They called it premeditated. 🔪🔥
These are not rumors. DHS identified the immigration status. Local prosecutors filed the charges. Families are burying their dead. And the networks that spend endless airtime on other stories gave these victims nothing.
Sanctuary rules. Catch-and-release. Restraining orders that don’t restrain. A 9-month-old who never got a chance.
Ask yourself why these names never made the national morning shows.
Watch the segment. Share it. Don’t let them vanish. 🇺🇸🚨
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
Imagine how massive the propaganda must have been to convince young people that the one on the left “isn’t a child” and the one on the right “is a woman.”
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
Because Jesus didn't sexually abuse an 8 year old.
Because Jesus wasn't a warlord.
Because Jesus didn't kill anyone.
Because Jesus didn't have slaves.
Because Jesus doesn't hate those who aren't Christian.
Because Jesus didn't murder sinners.
Should I go on?
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
Carney bans guns, then expects Canadians to defend against an American invasion.
Well I got news for Carney, if I see American soldiers walking down my street, I will be serving them beer and baby back ribs.
With a fucking smile.
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
Can President Trump PLEASE give the Presidential Medal of Freedom to the Amish for their amazing work rebuilding Western North Carolina?
They have literally rebuilt HUNDREDS of bridges, homes, businesses, and roads... and are STILL HERE HELPING!!!!!
No group deserves it more.
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
Think we're freaking out over nothing? Every traditional vaccine is eventually going to be replaced by mRNA. Here's where things stand just with Moderna. By keeping mRNA on the market, FDA has proven it does not care about safety. I am therefore telling my patients not to get ANY vaccines - FDA has lost all credibility.
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
Land acknowledgements are compelled speech.
You cannot change my mind.
It's time to boycott these absurd incantations.
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
He grabbed a little girl riding her bike, raped her, tortured her, killed her and dumped her body in a lake.
Now he’s granted permission to take cooking classes without a guard, outside of prison.
We have failed as a society if we can’t get the basics right. 🇨🇦🆘
Convicted B.C. child killer granted 60-day unescorted leave to take cooking classes
globalnews.ca/news/12073895/…
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
Sadly, Harry and Meghan have done something that has genuinely changed how a large part of the public sees the Royal Family.
They turned the monarchy into a reality show.
Everything becomes personal. Who spoke to whom. Who was invited. Who wasn’t. Who got the bigger room. Who stood where. Who was “favoured.” Who supposedly said what behind closed doors.
And once you look at the Royal Family through that lens, you stop seeing the monarchy as an institution and start judging it like a dysfunctional celebrity household.
That is a category error.
The Royal Family is a family. The monarchy is an institution. But there is another distinction people seem to have lost along the way: being a working royal is a life of service, not a personal promotion exercise.
The purpose is not to build an individual celebrity brand, control the narrative around yourself or turn every public appearance into an opportunity for personal recognition. The individual is serving something bigger than themselves.
That doesn’t mean royals don’t have personalities, interests or personal causes. Of course they do. But the role comes with an expectation that public duty takes precedence over personal promotion.
And this is where Harry and Meghan blurred the lines for many people.
They presented royal life increasingly through the language of personal identity, personal grievance, personal freedom and personal narrative. Suddenly, questions about the institution became questions about whether an individual was getting enough recognition, access, attention or support.
But that isn’t really how the institution is designed to work.
The monarchy has constitutional responsibilities, official duties, state occasions, diplomatic representation, military links, patronages and an enormous amount of public service that never becomes a storyline.
The people within it obviously have personal relationships, disagreements, grievances and complicated family history. Of course they do. They are human.
But their private relationships are not the purpose of the Crown, and their individual profiles are not the purpose of royal service.
This is where so much of the criticism becomes confused.
Palace silence is interpreted as guilt. Protocol is interpreted as personal spite. Different roles are interpreted as favouritism. Someone who leaves royal duty is then treated as though the institution still owes them the same access, platform and public defence.
But none of that necessarily follows.
The monarchy cannot function like a reality show where every family disagreement is explained to the public and every accusation gets a response.
It also cannot function like a celebrity agency, where every working member is expected to build their own brand and negotiate their own level of visibility.
It is a life of service.
Harry and Meghan chose to make their version of the family story part of their public narrative. That was their choice.
But the rest of the institution is under no obligation to participate in that narrative or turn every family dispute into public entertainment.
People can dislike the Palace’s reserve. They can criticise individual royals. They can question the monarchy itself.
But judging the institution through the lens of celebrity culture and family drama means fundamentally misunderstanding what it is.
The Royal Family is a family.
The monarchy is an institution.
And royal service is about serving the Crown and the public, not promoting yourself.
Confusing those things is where a lot of the nonsense starts.
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
🚨IT'S OFFICIAL!!!
PFIZER HAS JUST PUBLISHED THE LIST OF POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS,
OF ITS « COVID VACCINE » !!!
IT'S CRIMINAL!
1) Blood clot,
2) Acute kidney injury,
3) Acute flaccid myelitis,
4) Positive anti-sperm antibodies,
5) Brainstem embolism,
6) Brainstem thrombosis,
7) Cardiac arrest (hundreds of cases),
Heart failure,
* 9) Cardiac ventricular thrombosis...
10) Cardiogenic shock,
11) Central nervous system vasculitis,
12) Neonatal death,
13) Deep vein thrombosis,
14) Brainstem encephalitis,
15) Hemorrhagic encephalitis,
16) Frontal lobe epilepsy,
17) Epileptic psychosis,
18) Facial paralysis,
19) Fetal distress syndrome,
20) Gastrointestinal amyloidosis,
21) Generalized tonic-clonic seizure,
22) Hashimoto's encephalopathy,
23) Hepatic vascular thrombosis,
24) Shingles reactivation,
25) * Cancer reactivation...
26) Turbo cancers,
27) Immune-mediated hepatitis,
28) Interstitial lung disease,
29) Jugular vein embolism,
30) Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy,
31) Liver damage,
32) Low birth weight,
34) Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children,
35) Myocarditis,
36) Neonatal seizure,
37) Pancreatitis,
38) Pneumonia,
39) Stillbirth,
40) Tachycardia,
41) Temporal lobe epilepsy,
43) Testicular autoimmunity,
44) Thrombotic stroke,
45) Type 1 diabetes mellitus,
46) Neonatal vein thrombosis,
47) Vertebral artery thrombosis,
48) Pericarditis,
49) Sudden infant death syndrome.
SEVERE CONSEQUENCES of a so-called vaccine that protects neither against the disease, nor its transmission, nor severe forms!
" I was insulted, called a dangerous conspiracy theorist, I lost friends for saying that, for any medication, there are side effects, for loudly proclaiming that a so-called vaccine, which kills more than the disease, has no reason to be used, nor made mandatory.
I lost my job as a surgeon because of it! "
Share this before it disappears.
FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
Prime Minister Carney’s address to the European Parliament in Strasbourg rested on several foundational errors.
The claim that freedom was won “thanks to the heroism of the European resistance” is historically false. Western Europe was liberated by the armed forces of the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada. The subsequent emancipation of the Soviet empire was the product of the American strategy of containment. Canada’s role was particularly notable: a volunteer force from a country that had never been attacked or threatened by the Axis powers.
The European institutions have succeeded in reducing internal economic barriers and managing inter-state cooperation. As an economic administration, however, they have not been a success at all. In 2008 the GDP of Europe and the United States were roughly equal; the United States now stands at 140 percent of the EU’s. Much of this relative decline is attributable to the prolonged suppression of fossil fuels—an agenda Carney himself promoted for years.
Carney also omitted the decisive commercial reality: Canada sends roughly 70 percent of its exports to the United States (98% of which is unaffected by the recent tariffs) and only 6 percent to Europe. The United States accounts for half of the Canadian economy; Canada accounts for three percent of theirs. These proportions are not altered by elaborate metaphors about the transplantation of trees between Vimy and Milliken.
Until Canada recovers the relative prosperity it enjoyed with the United States a decade ago, there is little strategic sense in the prime minister travelling to the Rhine to deliver a wistful reflection on the failure of Canada and Europe to produce a superior political ethos while remaining economically competitive.
Conrad Black: Mark Carney's EU blunder
nationalpost.com/opinion/con…
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
It is with great concern for some of my fellow countrymen, inching precariously toward the edge of utter lunacy, that I write this post.
Prime Minister Mark Carney this week, in an interview with the New York Times, went on record saying it would be “irresponsible” not to plan for the possible contingency of a military invasion of Canada by the United States. Unfortunately, Mr. Carney didn’t misspeak or fall victim to a cherry-picked quote taken out of context. His concern was later reiterated by Defence Minister David McGuinty and Artificial Intelligence Minister Evan Soloman.
We all know that Donald Trump has a colourful history of spouting off some truly outrageous whoppers from time to time, but even he has never disseminated something as fatuous, dangerous or dishonest as this. And while he seldom backs down from his outrageous claims, whenever he pushes the envelope too far, at least his entourage goes on damage control to walk back some of his excesses – Carney’s guys are doubling down.
Despite these idiotic statements, these are intelligent men. The odds that all three of them would simultaneously become afflicted by the same psychotic delusion is infinitesimally small. The only rational conclusion, therefore, is that they believe, or rather their polling data shows, that enough Canadians are so possessed by Trump Derangement that engaging in such asinine demagoguery is politically expedient.
Sadly, they may be right. The vast coalition of useful idiots and true believers after effectively having their intelligences insulted by their dear leader, are coming out of the woodwork to express gratitude online for the Prime Minister’s caution in preparing for all, including the most remote, contingencies. Others are retreating slightly to hold the line at the fall-back position articulated by Minister McGuinty that, this kind of paranoid delusion is perfectly normal and, “all militaries in the world spend time analyzing risk scenarios.”
I assure you, this is not normal.
Back on planet Earth, the situation is tense and acrimonious (and there is plenty of blame to go around for that), but this is not the more than two centuries of peace along the 49th parallel that followed the signing of the Treaty of Ghent in 1815 drawing to an end. Trump has imposed tariffs on $20 billion (or 2% of the $400 billion per year) of Canadian exports to the US. In other words, amid this unnecessary, escalatory, and foolish trade dispute, the United States will still purchase 200% more Canadian goods and services this year than the rest of the world combined. This situation is like a restaurant’s picky regular customer complaining about an overcooked steak to a prideful chef who, fortified in his own mind by the knowledge he cooked the steak perfectly, refuses to comp the entree. This is not the start of World War III. We are so far removed from a military incursion at our southern border that we may as well be strategizing the response to the equally plausible threat of Santa Claus leading an invasion of elves from the north.
If we woke up tomorrow in some parallel reality where the United States actually was contemplating a full-scale military campaign against Canada, with all due respect to our brave men and women in uniform, the only preparations to be made would be negotiating the terms of our unconditional surrender. Some brave and patriotic Canadians may refuse to submit and instead choose to conduct, as a matter of principle, a brutal and bloody guerilla warfare campaign against the strongest conventional and nuclear military force in the history of the world. Unfortunately, they would be in the precarious position of having to rely on our miserly European allies, or countries like Russia or China, whose recent actions have been significantly more hostile and provocative challenges to our sovereignty than the US tariffs, to supply us with weapons, and they would not remotely be adequate. It’s all so desperately preposterous.
But for the sake of argument, let’s suppose that Donald Trump was indeed the terrifying bogeyman haunting the dreams of the most extreme and hopeless sufferers of Trump Derangement Syndrome and its frightful sister affliction, Andrew Coyneism, a rare and especially acute form of tweet-induced psychotic maladjustment. Even in this scenario, why would Trump use the military to annex Canada? All he would have to do is offer Alberta statehood, liberation from transfer payments, excessive regulation and carbon taxes, carte blanche to exploit its natural resources, a generous welcome bonus in the form of a $100,000 tax credit to every adult Albertan and replace their Canadian dollars with equal amounts of US currency. They would effectively be acquiring Alberta for the knock-down bargain price of roughly 1x annual GDP.
Simultaneously, the US (including the newly acquired Alberta) would immediately cut off all trade with the rest of Canada. The net impact to Canada of this manoeuvre would be a cataclysmic economic collapse, while the newly composed United States would take a net GDP hit (loss of all trade with Canada, mostly offset by the acquisition of Alberta) of 0.8%. Next would come a full package of sanctions, a naval blockade, and when the rest of Canada became desperate enough, a Chinese belt-and-road style offtake of all of Canada’s resources at bargain prices, which by then, the Canadians would be desperate for. In the meantime, the US would revamp its immigration policy to recreate the brain-drain of the 1990s on steroids, welcoming the top 20% most productive Canadians to flee what had overnight become the third world. Harvard Alumnus Mark Carney might well be among those at the front of the line seeking this emigration opportunity, rejoining 91 percent of his own investments already located there.
There would, no doubt, be a fearsome contingent of Canadians refusing to bend or break in the face of American tyranny, and elbows would be flying up to vertiginous heights with such vigour that the Canadian healthcare system would be overwhelmed by millions of spontaneous emergency room visits of patriotic patients with dislocated shoulders.
I suspect many of you reading this are thinking to yourself that this is so completely far-fetched and absurd that, if serious, I must have lost my mind. Allow me to reassure you that while this is all bunk, it remains at least ten times more likely than the United States military executing a boots-on-the-ground invasion of Canada. Anyone who spends more than one second worrying about such an outcome should immediately proceed to the nearest sink to splash some cold water in their face and pull themselves together.
🤖 Made with AI
Truer words have never been spoken. Another reason Fauci should be behind bars as we speak.
Tracy Hemstock retweeted
Ian Lee is not doing a rant. He is doing arithmetic.
Canada ships about $400 billion a year to the United States. That sounds like a weapon until you put it against their economy. It is about 1.5 percent of U.S. GDP. One and a half fingers. They are a $32 trillion machine. China is a distant second. We are just over two.
A small country does not win a trade war with a large one. We do not have the cash or the cushion. Retaliation lands here first. Plants. Distilleries. The till. Not a podium in Washington.
The part Ottawa will not say is the part that should enrage you.
Trump did not invent the dependency. He did not ban pipelines for a decade. He did not write the $200 billion in interprovincial barriers. He did not decide we would sell almost everything south and then lecture the only customer. We did that. He found the cracks and pushed.
Carney ran as the adult who could close a deal. Seventeen months later the file is a slogan and a walk-away. Elbows up polls. Arithmetic does not.
Lee’s fix is not another speech in Europe. Kill the barriers between provinces. Move resources at volume. Stop pretending 1.5 percent of their GDP is a chokehold.
You cannot bring the largest economy on earth to its knees with a rounding error. You can only bring your own plants to a stop and call it principle.
#cdnpoli