🔬Marchese Psychoanalysis🔬 Chad's Existence Feels Like Rape To Women Women's caricature of a rapist in their little foidnugget brains are very instructive. There are two different caricatures, but the important focus is on their vision of a chad rapist. They typically imagine a good looking guy, or in every one of these cases go really hard on a good looking guy, or a not necessarily a good looking guy, but rather one that generally appears to be cocky or has status, like fraternity membership. They start to get this idea of their ✨vibes✨ telling them they're rapists, which is really just their little foidnugget brains appraising high testosterone. "High testosterone implies aggressive and high sex drive therefore uh like that's what a rapist looks like" But even more important than that is the psychological underpinnings. Women who never aligned with their Superego, & perpetually indulged their Id feel forever powerless and helplessly enslaved. They're enslaved by their feelings and neurotransmitters. Typically, they can cope with this (instead of just disciplining themselves and superego aligning because lizard brain no likey metabolizing calories) by outsourcing a sense of power to control of the supply and demand of sex. They get to decide who they have sex with, and *how much* sex to give in terms of linearity. E.g., telling a man he's hot or sending nudes or something gives a linear fraction of sexuality, and she does so pursuant to extracting something from him. Often calculating an optimization in this, giving less for more. It's fake power and agency because it's not intrapsychic, meaning it doesn't tame the Id, making for her to still feel like a slave. The only resolve entails repeatedly exercising fake sexual agency to get a "close enough" feeling to power to suppress the guilt and shame of Id Slavery. The grand problem, is Chad. Chad is not only attractive, but a rarity, making for sappy and demand urgency. Both in his looks and his energy, he thwarts this setup because she can't help herself but to want to fuck him. He robs her of this fake agency, she feels she has no choice but to say yes. She wants to fuck him essentially no matter what. This provokes existential crisis. Her foidnugget brain goes into DEFCON 1, because now she's faced with the slippery slop down to the deepest darkest depths of her low self esteem. This break in that carefully constructed fake agency potentially leaves her empty-handed, leaving her to feel all that aggregate shame and guilt for being an Id Slave. For betraying herself, for reducing herself to neurotransmitters, for being lazy, for being too weak to conquer mere instincts. She scrambles the cope jets, hoping to visit the good idea fairy. The good idea fairy emerges, and gives a little zap to the right neurons that start to look for a fake felt hunter gatherer associative reasoning. Chad's existence violating her fake autonomy gives the same feeling as rape does, because rape violates her ACTUAL autonomy, especially sexually. Chad's existence makes her feel guilt and shame, but so does actual rape. Both reduce her to mere flesh, an animal, and both feel similar enough that she thinks: > THEY'RE THE SAME She runs in her little foidnugget head to the Court of the Superego, in her lab coat, submitting this as evidence. It's fake convincing enough that it manages to suppress the Superego from the guilty verdict of being an Id Slave. The conclusion: > Chad's existence making me feel like a weak helpless animal is not because I don't have sexual autonomy and thereby am in the category of autonomous, but rather it's because his existence is raping me! QED. Complete, done, over, safe from intrapsychic guilt. This existence part then expands into linearizing rape, and essentially makes for any instance at any moment of doing something they later regret to be rape. Any version under this cope of wanting to have sex is thus rape, and this is how this retard in the Cornell 7 and women across TikTok are so fervent and unironically convinced they have a real and rational argument.