RT @KatiePavlich: Headlines this are totally misleading. Like every government program, SNAP
is rampant with fraud and people
who aren’t el…
This quoted post is unavailable.
Mr. Thin Blue Line retweeted
Nah man. I’m not gonna let this go unchecked. As a GWOT veteran I can’t.
I listened to Massie drone through his articles of impeachment against Pete Hegseth and I recognized the sickness immediately.
We fought under this ridiculous worldview during GWOT, and it cost us dearly.
Massie is merely an acolyte of the bloodless bureaucratic religion that puts the lawyer in the center of the kill chain, treats every American use of force like a moral emergency, and somehow always finds more sympathy for the enemy being hunted than for the American sent to hunt him.
His whole speech I began wondering who he actually was speaking for, and that’s not good.
GWOT vets know EXACTLY where that road leads. Another approval. Another review. Another JAG opinion. Another commander afraid to make a decision because one bad headline will destroy his career faster than losing the fight ever could.
We were lectured for years about “courageous restraint.” We were told that killing one enemy might create ten more. We were taught to fear our own lethality while the enemy studied our hesitation.
And then we spent twenty years bleeding into the fucking sand.
So spare me the sermon about how dangerous it is to remove lawyers who think their job is to become a veto point over command. Spare me the sudden reverence for process from people who watched Afghanistan collapse, watched thirteen Americans die at Abbey Gate, watched the Taliban retake Kabul, and somehow found no constitutional apocalypse worthy of impeachment then.
Now the outrage is that the machine is actually being used. That commanders are expected to command. And that enemies are being treated like…. actual enemies for once.
That civilian leadership is telling the bureaucracy to get the hell out of the way of lawful military action.
From where I sit, the betrayal isn’t that Washington finally found some aggression for a chang. The realest betrayal is that men like Massie still think the lesson of the GWOT was that we needed more hesitation.
No. WE NEEDED MORE VICTORY.
And I’m done pretending those are the same thing. We’re all done with it. Massie is dead wrong here, he knows it, you know it, and I know it.
Sincerely,
-A seriously disgruntled GWOT vet who knows Hegseth is the cure to what ails our military here.
Breaking News: Congressman Thomas Massie is reading Articles of Impeachment against @SecWar Pete Hegseth on the House floor now.
Watch here: youtube.com/live/3EmwC0QQ8f8…
Mr. Thin Blue Line retweeted
If you believe the price of gasoline went down 60 cents. The price of diesel went down 80 cents in the last 3 days since the midterms on Tuesday because of the price of oil falling or other natural economic indicators; you’re gullible and do not understand how deep the Deep State is and its ability to manipulate certain sectors of the economy for political purposes. Look at oil companies' quarterly profits last quarter, and when this quarter's reports come out, you will realize President Trump was right again.
Mr. Thin Blue Line retweeted
Shocker. Everyone who voted because of higher gas prices, congratulations, the elite played you like a string instrument.
Breaking: The national average price of gasoline has fallen below $4 per gallon for the first time in 3 months Per @GasBuddyGuy
Mr. Thin Blue Line retweeted
I would like to thank all the oil companies that wanted Republicans out of office.
You did a great job manipulating the price of gas before the election and it worked spectacularly.
It was $4.50 on Tuesday and now it's $3.01 on Saturday.
I'm no economist, but this is a massive reduction in price in 4 days.
President Trump did say it was going to drop like a rock after the election and it sure looks like he was right about that.
Gas prices at the pump are “magically” falling after the midterms. Will there ever be an investigation into the collusion & manipulation of fuel costs that continues to happen?
3
22
Mr. Thin Blue Line retweeted
Tom is absolutely correct. He didn’t even monetize his page. He told me himself.
There is some sort of label being placed on his account where he can’t promote his music.
@elonmusk can we look into this?
Help my friend out. Make sure Elon sees this.
Please. 🙏🏼
Mr. Thin Blue Line retweeted
“It takes intellectuals to come up with some of the dumbest ideas.” Orwell.
Mr. Thin Blue Line retweeted
The argument that America is only in the Middle East because of Israel is not just wrong. It is historically illiterate and anyone parroting it just wants to revise history.
America’s strategic interest in the Middle East predates the modern state of Israel. Franklin Roosevelt met with Saudi Arabia in 1945, three years before Israel existed, to establish America’s relationship with Gulf oil.
The Truman Doctrine, the Eisenhower Doctrine, the Carter Doctrine, all of them were built around one thing: keeping Soviet hands off Middle Eastern oil and keeping the global energy supply out of hostile control.
This was always about oil and geography.
The Middle East sits at the intersection of three continents and controls the energy supply of the entire industrialized world. America would have a vital strategic interest in that region if Israel had never existed at all.
The 1953 Iran coup was about British oil interests and Soviet encroachment. Not Israel.
The 1958 Lebanon intervention was about Arab nationalism and Soviet influence. Not Israel.
The tanker wars of the 1980s were about keeping oil flowing through the Strait of Hormuz during the Iran-Iraq war. Not Israel.
The 1991 Gulf War was about Saddam Hussein invading Kuwait and threatening Saudi Arabia. Not Israel.
In fact Israel stayed out of it entirely at American request even after Saddam fired Scud missiles at Tel Aviv.
America fought that war to protect Arab oil states, not Israel.
The 2001 Afghanistan invasion was a direct response to September 11th, which was planned in Afghanistan by a Saudi national running an organization funded by Gulf money with ideology rooted in Egyptian and Saudi Wahhabism. Not Israel.
The 2003 Iraq invasion, whatever you think of it, was about weapons of mass destruction claims, regional dominance, and finishing what 1991 started. Not Israel.
And now Iran.
America’s conflict with Iran began in 1979 when the Islamic Revolution took 52 American diplomats hostage for 444 days. Before Israel had anything to do with it. Iran has killed over 500 American soldiers through proxies in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Iran plotted to assassinate a Saudi ambassador on American soil.
Iran directed attacks on American embassies and bases across the region for decades.
Iran was months from a nuclear weapon that its leadership had explicitly said it would use to threaten America’s allies and eventually America itself.
Every single one of those is an American interest and an American reason to act that has nothing to do with Israel.
The argument that Israel is why America is in the Middle East is based on nothing.
America was in the Middle East before Israel existed, stayed in the Middle East for reasons entirely independent of Israel, and has fought its bloodiest Middle Eastern conflicts against enemies who were America’s enemies first and Israel’s enemies second.
Israel is not why America is in the Middle East. Oil, geography, Soviet containment, terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and 47 years of Iranian aggression directed specifically at the United States are why America is in the Middle East.
Now I have heard a lot of people criticize this war, a lot of lazy people who refuse to actually engage with the history and what’s going on in that region. So let me ask them this; what was Donald Trump supposed to do? Was he supposed to let them enrich, or are you going to be a child and pretend like they were not enriching uranium to get to a nuclear weapon because some podcaster told you so?
What is the specific path forward when it comes to a relationship with Israel? What specifically would people like to see happen? How is that going to secure our national interest in that region? And how are we going to deal with Iran and their seven terrorist proxies that attack American bases?
I want actual answers to those questions, not a bunch of lunatics running around screaming Neocon.
Mr. Thin Blue Line retweeted
As it turns out, the case for war with Iran had, in fact, been made, and it was clear and necessary. You were lied to about it, repeatedly, by smart people who knew they were lying, on Iran's behalf, against Trump, dear American conservatives.
Mr. Thin Blue Line retweeted
Changing your mind because the evidence changed is intellectual honesty. Changing it because the room got uncomfortable is something else.
Mr. Thin Blue Line retweeted
Jobless Claims Fall To 57-Year Low of 189,000
breitbart.com/economy/2026/1…
Mr. Thin Blue Line retweeted
🚨 THIS: President Trump just shared Joel Pollak's take on last night, and it is the only one worth reading.
"Securing the border is ugly. Fighting Iran is costly. Taking on special interests upsets donors. Backing AI scares people."
"Tonight, Republicans paid the costs. The benefits will be with us for many generations."
Weak Republicans campaign on what is easy. Trump governs on what is NECESSARY.
One bad night does not undo a secure border.
Mr. Thin Blue Line retweeted
When will Thomas Massie read the Epstein List on the House floor like he promised to four months ago?
Mr. Thin Blue Line retweeted
There’s a few people I’d like to thank for the election results last night:
First, I’d like to thank the RINOs on Capitol Hill who are more worried about posturing than production.
Second, I’d like to thank Republicans that stayed home because they are frustrated with the party.
Lastly, I’d like to thank people like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens who have been working tirelessly every day to destroy the Republican Party from the inside out.
Congratulations!



























