Tom Weidig (@TomWeidig) header
Tom Weidig (@TomWeidig) profile picture

Member of Parliament & city councillor for ADR (part of ECR). Board Member at New Direction. PhD physics. Worked in finance, insurance & VC. Author.

Luxembourg
Joined June 2009
Photo by Tom Weidig (@TomWeidig)Photo by Tom Weidig (@TomWeidig)Photo by Tom Weidig (@TomWeidig)Photo by Tom Weidig (@TomWeidig)Photo by Tom Weidig (@TomWeidig)Photo by Tom Weidig (@TomWeidig)Photo by Tom Weidig (@TomWeidig)Photo by Tom Weidig (@TomWeidig)Photo by Tom Weidig (@TomWeidig)Photo by Tom Weidig (@TomWeidig)
My speech to European parlamentarians on dropping the ban for fossil fuel cars and subsidies to electric cars. If the e-car is the better technology, it will win any way. If e-cars need a ban of its main competitor and heavy susidies, it is not viable yet for the mass market!
9
18
65
4,522
Named after one of the great champions of liberty of the 20th century, the Margaret Thatcher Awards recognise that the secret of freedom is courage. But courage alone is not enough, it needs to be told and acknowledged, so that it can inspire others to follow. This year the Night of Conservatism comes to Brussels, for a second edition that will once again bring together the conservative community. Follow us to learn more soon! #MargaretThatcherAwards #Conservatism
11
30
1
195
3,689
Congratulation to the Student List for their victory! Yesterday was also a victory for Serbian democracy and for Serbian civil society. My respect also goes to Vučić and his party to concede their defeat and go into opposition! Under Vučić's leadership over the last 15 years, Serbia has changed for the better with dramatically improved infrastructure, especially in Belgrade. I have seen it with my own eyes. It is now up to the candidates of the Student List, many of whom with great achievements in fields other than politics, to show that they can manage the country better than Vucic's party. I wish them all the best!
1
1
104
Hey, @elonmusk, big man, are you playing politics with your products again? As your European customers, we are watching you.
4,796
12,545
736
69,247
2,477,641
Leftists defeated as ECR debate proposal is adopted✌️ Tonight we debate: Escalating student riots in France: arson attacks on schools, assaults against firefighters, police officers and teachers, including in La Ciotat, and the role of far-left parties in inciting violence
7
65
4
464
9,812
Starke Performance 🎼🎶 Strandkorb & Karrieresprung feat. Philipp A.
37
115
20
589
32,551
Martenstein schreibt über Eier und hat welche, aus Messing. Wollenwir hoffen, dass der Remmo-Clan nicht vorhat, über kritische Journalisten herzufallen.
29
317
13
1,746
29,229
« Les promesses de campagne, c’est bien. Mais la réalité de votre bilan migratoire, Monsieur @GabrielAttal, est apocalyptique : 1,9 million de titres de séjour supplémentaires en six ans et des records d’entrées au titre de l’asile. Soit vous mentez aux Français, soit vous tenez un double discours. »
119
1,056
15
3,817
42,785
Tom Weidig retweeted
Das Interessanteste an den Einlassungen von Clara von Nathusius sind für mich die asymmetrischen Sprecherpositionen: Eine CDU-Influencerin aus der Jungen Union ohne politisches Mandat hat inzwischen das Selbstbewusstsein und Momentum, im »Bericht aus Berlin« eine zentrale (und gleichermaßen gescheiterte) CDU-Leitlinie und den eigenen Kanzler Merz infrage zu stellen. Damit dürfte sie etwas zum Ausdruck bringen, was hinter vorgehaltener Hand viele in der Union schon länger sagen und was die Partei gleichzeitig sprengen könnte. Dass von Nathusius diesen Pflock überhaupt einrammen kann, zeigt aber, wie angeschlagen der Kanzler ist – und dass die Position der Stärke heute das offene Infragestellen von Merz bedeutet. Es geht zu Ende.
88
200
11
2,248
116,382
Congratulation, @AdamBielan! All the best! You have my support.
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
86
I was in Sachsen-Anhalt to observe the election campaign. The people are friendly, helpful and patient. They know what real democracy is as they lived through the totalitarian socialist regime. Respect their votes. They voted AfD bc the others refused to act on illegal migration, irrational energy policies (exit from nuclear & combustion engines), wokeness & LGBQ, biased state media and more.
1
102
Cruising Sachsen-Anhalt to see how they do election campaigns, spoke to the CDU prime minister Sven Schulze by chance, had a drink with the Green veteran ex MEP Reinhard Bütikhofer where we debate the German Energiewende and saw the SPD final rally in Wernigerode.
🤖 Made with AI
1
127
Tom Weidig retweeted
James Watson and Francis Crick published their one-page paper “Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid” in Nature on 25 April 1953. That report elucidating the structure of DNA changed the entire world. This is Nature's legacy and today it is publishing this toxic drivel in support of fraudulent academic Jason Arday. I'm sorry to say but ... things are very bad and it does not bode well for the West. This comes on the heels of The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) which published a piece by oncologist Kemi Doll that opens with the sentence: “They are trying to kill us.” She is not speaking metaphorically. That is literally her thesis. The “us” is Black academics. The “they” is some vague, ever-present wind of white supremacy and anti-blackness. The actual, documented record of Jason Arday’s career is treated as an inconvenient detail, or worse, as further proof of the conspiracy. The NEJM is the medical journal that published Henry Jacob Bigelow’s 1846 account of ether anesthesia, the first public demonstration that surgery need not be agony. That article helped spread a technique that ended unimaginable suffering. These premier scientific journals were once the opposite of propaganda. They played a sacred role in society as the mechanism by which claims were entered into the record so they could be tested, replicated, or discarded. Now they publish emotional manifestos that treat documented academic fraud as a hate crime and skepticism as violence. Doll’s piece does not wrestle with the plagiarism, the fabricated quotes, the shoddy scholarship, the phantom visiting professorships, or the collapsing personal mythology. It simply declares the scrutiny itself as lethal radicalized violence. That these writers believe these things is one thing but why are the journals debasing themselves by publishing them? In James Baldwin’s ‘Beyond this House’ unfinished essay, he wrote that "the Negro does not want to be ‘understood’ or ‘liked’ by the White Man. He merely wants them to get out of his way." So the editorial team of Nature and NEJM simply got out of the way, thereby continuing the public self-immolation of yet another institution we used to hold dear.
Editorial: The death of Jason Arday must prompt deep reflection go.nature.com/4xu6cnq
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Arday was an academic fraud whose life story was fake. Editorial falsely treats former as unproven allegation, omits mention of latter, defames those who covered the scandal as racist. Calls him "autistic Black scholar" despite no proven autism diagnosis. substack.com/@nathancofnas/… theguardian.com/education/ng-i… thetimes.com/uk/education/a… news.educ.cam.ac.uk/230223-jason-a… bbc.com/news/articles/… bbc.com/news/uk-englan… youtube.com/shorts/4kLRJvR… youtube.com/watch?v=g28uXe… youtube.com/watch?v=FA78tV… x.com/benryanwriter/… x.com/benryanwriter/…
19
88
8
605
47,463
Tom Weidig retweeted
I studied in the academic department at Cambridge that later employed Jason Arday. Here's just some of the crap I learnt: For one module, I wrote a lengthy essay about how cultural products like kids’ cartoons and jazz songs serve as instruments of capitalist oppression. I got a top mark on that paper (despite knowing at the time that I was essentially regurgitating complete crap). While studying for another paper I had a debate with the professor, an eminent anthropologist, because she insisted that native tribes could fly through the trees - not metaphorically, but that they could literally fly because they believed they could fly. After all, who are we to question ‘indigenous ways of knowing’... For a different course, I read long ‘research papers’ which argued that the fact that black kids are excluded from schools more than white kids proves systemic racism exists in education. Crucially, they ignored the fact that white kids are excluded more than, e.g., Japanese kids, a statistic which, applying the exact same logic, would suggest that the education system is systemically biased in favour of, erm, Japanese kids (which obviously it isn’t). Something that was held up as proof of the existence of this largely imaginary racism was that teachers tell kids not to use booming voices in the classroom, and not to put up their hoods or wear their trousers down below their pants. On another occasion, my supervisor casually praised some students agitators who were trying to shut down a talk by someone they disagreed with. I said that I didn’t think this was something to celebrate, because I believed in freedom of speech. He got visibly angry, and proceeded to tell me that free speech was not worth protecting in a capitalist system (or something along those lines). In my all-important final year, a lecturer let me know that I shouldn’t worry too much about my exam results, because as someone who was not from an upper class background I should be more focussed on using my grasp of leftist revolutionary theory to further the interests of the proletariat. Writing this down, it strikes me that it’s so hilariously mental that some of you will presumably assume I’m lying. But there’s no way I’m leaving it out, because it happened. Unlike the academics who make a living from this stuff, I couldn’t bring myself to build a career pumping out whiney, divisive, intellectually incoherent rubbish. But others, as we’ve seen exposed in recent days, do so with gusto. And are lauded for it. Please read the full piece this is taken from, and give it a share. I've linked it in the tweet below.
403
4,037
348
15,256
606,489
I was just suspended by Ghent University. They will almost certainly fire me. The decision was made by rector Petra De Sutter, a former leader of the Green Party.
7,292
9,974
3,066
70,030
11,085,738
I am bewildered, and not very impressed, by the visceral, naked, irrational hatred spat out by some defenders of Jason Arday. If a Cambridge professor is accused of being an unqualified charlatan, the accusation might be racially motivated. On the other hand it might not, depending on the evidence. The correct question to ask is not, ”What is the colour of his skin” but “Is it in fact true that he is an unqualified charlatan?” Please examine the evidence before leaping to the assumption of racism. As for the idea that journalists “piled in on him” and “hounded him to his death”, most attacks were against Cambridge University. Jason himself was widely regarded as an unfortunate victim of foolish promotion way beyond his ability to cope. In appointing him to a professorship for which he was manifestly unqualified – in ludicrously describing him as “the best in the world” – certain senior members of the university showed a level of patronising condescension towards black people that could fairly be described as racism, while at the same time making him tragically vulnerable to such attacks as came his way.
1,944
9,669
803
71,149
3,707,922
Tucker Carlson's favourite "political scientist", John Mearsheimer, and his ATROCIOUS predictions on the war in Ukraine: Feb. 2022: "I don't think Russia is going to invade." Sep. 2023: "The Ukrainians are doomed to lose." Jan. 2024: "It's ridiculous to think Ukraine can hold the line in 2024." Apr. 2025: "It's unimaginable Ukraine will hang on beyond 2025." Jul. 2026: "The Russians are slowly moving forward." The Jim Cramer of foreign policy predictions.
634
3,369
563
19,105
1,985,687
.@AliCologne schrieb vorgestern @welt: „Als Schwuler habe ich auf der Straße keine Angst vor Rechten oder gar AfD-Wählern. Die pöbeln mich im Alltag nicht an. Wir haben Angst vor ganz anderen Gruppen: vor arabischen und afghanischen Muslimen.“ welt.de/debatte/plus6a573b86…
297
2,456
60
12,362
154,347
The Economist's editor-in-chief Zanny Minton Beddoes went to a private all-girls boarding school in Shropshire where fees run up to £45,000 per year (about $60,000). She was born and raised in Shropshire, one of England's most affluent rural counties. She attacks @elonmusk saying he's wrong and the UK is thriving. Elon hits back that she lives a cloistered existence. He's absolutely right. She's Oxford and Harvard educated. She doesn't live in the towns where migrant grooming gangs operate. She can't see the destruction from her ivory tower. So many elites in this country and Europe are removed from the decay their leftist policies have brought. Good on @elonmusk for calling her out.
1,031
5,401
217
35,566
1,081,152