All out Politics & Football
Manchester
Joined March 2011
- Tweets31.5K
- Following815
- Followers852
- Likes8.4K
Michael retweeted
To all the women caping for the right of men like this to enter women’s single-sex spaces, please explain why you care more about keeping him happy than you do about the women he’s threatening to punch. Extra points for explaining how your position is ‘real feminism.’
Michael retweeted
Greta and all the rest said the planet was doomed. They said billions would die. Yet now they’ve breezily moved on to bashing Israel. They’re such moral frauds, says Brendan O’Neill
buff.ly/4u2mtHg
Michael retweeted
Can you believe this ?
This Sikh restaurant owner does not serve hallal meat, which is produced by a process of torturing live animals
These 'protesters' are so intent of making him serve meat produced by torturing live animals, that they gather to threaten his wife and his livelihood
But he's not there because the police have just arrested him. For making a joke...
I am being quite serious.
But now, having arrested the joker, the police can't be bothered to send anyone to protect the restaurant from a growing and threatening crowd
Luckily, a private citizen has paid for security, which helps to deter the protesters from doing actual damage. They have to be satisfied with merely
frightening people
Eventually the police do manage to turn up in small numbers. They stand next to the security team for safety
Because, by then, the security team has quietened things down
In other words, they've done the police's job
This is Britain in 2026, under a Labour government
Michael retweeted
Secretary of State Marco Rubio just delivered the most brutal indictment of Third World Mass Immigration and Open Borders I've ever heard.
“They tell us that we are compelled by a sacred legal obligation to give up our power, to surrender our sovereignty, to submit to the whims of our enemies, to allow our cities to descend into violent anarchy, to welcome in any foreigner from anywhere in the world who arrives at our doorstep without permission, to transform our towns into refugee camps for the entire planet.”
“And beyond our borders, too, they would have us believe that we must allow our rivals to act against us with impunity, that those who flood our country with drugs and crime and death should be met with little more than the occasional and polite complaint.”
“There is nothing, there is nothing in our history or the history of any other great nation that requires us to recognize the authority or legitimacy of any of these ridiculous ideas.”
So good 🔥
Michael retweeted
The curious case of Mohammed Alfatih Naim is worrying evidence that Britain really has lost the plot.
His father was a senior Hamas politician.
He’d been a bodyguard for Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh.
He’s been detained in Egypt on suspicion of helping Hamas smuggling.
He entered Britain illegally in 2014.
Yet a year later we granted him asylum.
Then British citizenship.
Facing trial for an altercation with a bailiff at his Brum home, some numpty of a magistrate ruled he couldn’t be named for 100 years.
Thankfully The Sunday Times challenged that, which is why he can now be named.
He is now facing extradition to Germany, where prosecutors accuse him of orchestrating a planned massacre of Jews in Berlin and Vienna last year.
This is how he thanks us for asylum and citizenship.
Which he was given under a Tory government.
But has this Labour one, as it welcomes ‘refugees’ from Gaza, learned any lessons.
Not if we’ve lost the plot.
This 👇
MATT RIDLEY: If Britain reaches its Net Zero target, the world will be 0.00376C less warm by 2100. Is that REALLY worth £695bn? trib.al/OLz21G6
1
41
Michael retweeted
The truth is Andy Burnham doesn’t have a 10 year plan. He’s barely got a 10 week plan > Daily Mail > dailymail.com/debate/article…
Michael retweeted
Elon Musk: "Even if I'm criticized by the whole world, I won't let go of X." The reason makes you think.
Reporter: "Why are you so attached to X?"
Elon: "What do you mean by that?"
Reporter: "Since the acquisition, it's been nothing but criticism, right?"
Elon: "That's true."
Reporter: "Politicians criticize you too."
Elon: "Yes."
Reporter: "There are conflicts with regulatory authorities."
Elon: "That's true."
Reporter: "Honestly, wouldn't it be easier to sell it?"
Elon: "Why?"
Reporter: "You have Tesla and SpaceX, don't you?"
Elon: "I do."
Reporter: "There's no need to stay in the center of controversies, right?"
Elon: "But what would that solve?"
Reporter: "...... Huh?"
Elon: "I think it's important to have a place where opinions can be exchanged freely."
Reporter: "But there are unpleasant opinions too, aren't there?"
Elon: "Of course."
Reporter: "There are wrong opinions too."
Elon: "That's true."
Reporter: "So, shouldn't there be restrictions?"
Elon: "How far to restrict?"
Reporter: "That's..."
Elon: "Who decides which opinions are correct?"
Reporter: "..."
Elon: "It's easy to protect only the opinions we agree with."
Reporter: "Yes."
Elon: "But what about when contrary opinions arise?"
Reporter: "..."
Elon: "That's where the real test of free speech happens, don't you think?"
Michael retweeted
The media is obsessed with slimeball celebrity predators- latest allegations are against David Walliams - while Maggie Oliver has to sue the government to get action for tens of thousands of victims of Pakistani rape gangs.
I know which story I think is more important.
@MaggieOliverUK
Michael retweeted
So all the dimwitted Lefties cheered when the Chancellor increased the tax on banks. The effect? Banks, especially Lloyds and Barclays, have at F1 speeds added the .25% to your mortgage but your interest on savings hasn’t moved at all.
The reason is the banks are deliberately slowing the rate rise on YOUR savings to claw back the £2billion tax from YOU.
The real culprit is Burnham and Co who are in effect increasing the tax on your hard-earned savings so that it can be spent on benefits for the nation’s SKIDS- Skint Idle Dim Socialists.
Michael retweeted
BEAUTIFUL! Tens of thousands of Polish patriots are flooding the streets for Independence Day, flying their flags—and even American flags!
The fake news calls them "far-right" simply for loving their country, opposing socialism, and defending their borders.
GOD BLESS POLAND! 🇺🇸🇵🇱
Michael retweeted
They were announced in January. They’re being reannounced today because Big Green (RWE) and Big Capitalism (KKR), who will benefit from the massive state subsidies already being poured into these projects, have demanded more (to cover rising costs of developing offshore wind). So Labour has obliged with another £1 billion from the so-called National Wealth [Destruction] Fund. Life is truly grand for the crony capitalists.
Michael retweeted
WATCH: Andy Burnham gets schooled by @KemiBadenoch at PMQs👇
Michael retweeted
This is government gaslighting to a high degree.
1. It’s not a new announcement. The Norfolk East and West offshore wind projects were announced earlier this year as part of the AR7 round of contracts.
2. No way does it bring down prices. Those behind it, energy giant RWE + global investors KKR, were guaranteed an above-market strike price of £91.20/MWh based on 2024 prices — indexed linked for 20 years. That guarantee is already worth £97/MWh in 2026. This is v expensive energy.
3. What is new is that the costs of developing offshore wind have soared. So the government has now had to chip in £1 billion of the £12 billion investment needed from the National Wealth [Destruction] Fund. So more state subsidy on top of the massive subsidies for two foreign companies implicit in the price guarantees embedded in AR7.
4. Far from cheaper electricity this embeds high-cost electricity in the system for 20 years.
5. So much for the Chancellor’s Budget pledge to ‘only build new projects when they lower prices’. This does the opposite — and at enormous expense to the taxpayer and electricity user.
Gaslighting indeed.
Michael retweeted
BREAKING: The Texas midterm numbers are raising eyebrows all across America because they simply do not add up. Now, Will Caiin of Fox News is sounding the alarm like nobody else ever has.
When you break down the very specific numbers, it's easy to see that something is afoot.
"Republicans get 4.5 million votes, again, same as they did for the last 3 midterms or so," Cain said on his latest podcast episode.
"Democrats jump from where they'd been consistently at 3.5 to 5.2. 1.7 million new votes for Democrats."
That's a jump of nearly 50 percent. In one cycle.
So where did 1.7 million new Democratic votes come from? The analyst ran through the explanations, and none of them work.
Population growth?
"Only 1.4 million people have moved to Texas over the last 4 years. That's bigger than that," Cain continued.
"If you say Rs voted Ds, well, then why did the Rs stay in stasis and the Ds jumped?"
"This needs to be understood. Even if all in the end your understanding is, how did Democrats mobilize... How did they do that? That's wild," Cain concluded.
So the question everyone should be asking...where did 1.7 million votes come from?