ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
βΌοΈ Binance reveals how hackers pulled off a $6.43 BILLION crypto theft.
Fake job interviews, a trojanized Homebrew installer, and abuse of an internal AI tool were part of the attack that compromised engineers and reached Binance's wallet signing service.
Full details β thehackernews.com/2026/11/biβ¦
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
Early-stage failure is easier to cut. Later-stage failure carries more history, emotion, and reputational pressure. The article explores why timing changes the decision: bit.ly/Kill-Your-Project
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
The later a project gets, the harder it becomes to stop. More money is committed. More reputations are attached. That does not make continuation more rational. It only makes the decision harder.
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
Sometimes the most useful thing a PM can do is stop another meeting and ask, βWhat decision are we actually waiting for?β That question has rescued more schedules than another status deck.
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
A packed schedule can feel efficient while leaving no room for actual work.
Interruptions, dependencies, defects, meetings. Plan for them. Keep this close: bit.ly/PMSurvivalGuide
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
Without agreed kill criteria, stopping becomes personal. Reputation, pride, and politics rush into the gap where governance should have been. See why exit criteria matter: bit.ly/Kill-Your-Project
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
A project manager is not responsible for keeping every project alive. The responsibility is to manage it honestly, including surfacing when the cost of continuing no longer makes sense.
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
The new framework promised flow. What slowed us down was still approvals, unclear ownership, and people afraid to say no. The board changed. The system did not.
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
Curiosity belongs in risk management. Asking what would change your mind is often more useful than defending the original forecast. Explore why: bit.ly/PM-References
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
Killing a project is not the same as failing to manage it. Sometimes it is the clearest sign that someone is finally managing the economics. Explore the argument: bit.ly/Kill-Your-Project
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
Pride can keep a failing project alive after the business case has weakened. The higher the sponsor sits, the harder it may be to separate perseverance from protecting a past decision.
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
A delayed decision is still a decision. It quietly chooses rework, waiting, or compressed testing while everyone pretends the schedule remains untouched.
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
Optimism bias rarely announces itself. It sounds like confidence.
Question the estimate before reality does it for you. Build better delivery judgment here: bit.ly/PMSurvivalGuide
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
The sunk-cost trap rarely announces itself. It often sounds like commitment, perseverance, or βone more push.β Learn how to recognize the difference: bit.ly/Kill-Your-Project
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
βWeβve already spent too much to stop nowβ is not a reason to continue. Past spend is gone. The next decision should depend on what the project can still realistically return.
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
Teams rarely resist retrospectives because reflection is pointless. They resist when yesterday's honesty became today's performance problem.
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
Scope gets dangerous when small changes stop looking like changes.
Make the impact visible before βjust one more thingβ becomes the new baseline. Protect your next project: bit.ly/PMSurvivalGuide
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
Some projects should not be rescued. When future cost outweighs expected benefit, stopping can be the responsible decision. Why that call is so hard: bit.ly/Kill-Your-Project
ZeroOneKeys π retweeted
A project can be failing long before anyone is willing to say it. The danger is not only the loss. It is continuing because admitting the loss feels worse.



