Walter Zoom

U.S. Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) decision starts with this: It has long been established that mail-in ballots are prone to fraud. See, e.g., Veasey v. Perry, 71 F. Supp. 3d 627, 676 (S.D. Tex. 2014) (“Mail-in ballots are not secure.”), aff’d in relevant part, 830 F.3d 216, 256 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc). That is why voting by mail jeopardizes election integrity and democracy itself. Full decision link is in next comment.

🚨🚨🚨 ACTION ALERT! 🚨🚨🚨 Please call Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson’s office at (512) 463-6116 and politely request that the Hart Vanguard voting system be DISAPPROVED, since the machine examined was not the EAC-certified one. See link in reply below for details. ⬇️

Texas Voting System Examiner’s Report Is Still Missing Updated February 10, 2026 Here’s the story: Hart InterCivic applied to the State of Texas for certification of their new Verity Vanguard 1.0 voting system, which if approved would add that model to the official list of equipment Texas counties can choose to use in elections. As part of the process to decide on approval in Texas, expert examiners are chosen by the Secretary of State (@TXsecofstate @SecJaneNelson) and by the Attorney General (@TXAG @KenPaxtonTX). The chosen experts examined this voting system September 16-18, 2025, and also the following week. The examiners then have 30 days to write their reports, which are required by Texas Administrative Code Title 1 §81.60(9)(B) to be posted on the Secretary of State's website before the public hearing held in accordance with paragraph §81.60(10). However, one examiner’s report is still missing. As shown by the following email, obtained by a public records request, two of the examiners were Andrew Appel and Clay Parikh:📷 Although expert examiner Andrew Appel’s report was posted at sos.state.tx.us/elections/la…, expert examiner Clay Parikh’s report was not. Not only was Clay Parikh’s report not posted before the public hearing December 19, 2025, as required, but as of February 10, 2026, it has still not been posted. To underscore the importance of Clay Parikh’s report, here is what the FBI said about his expertise in their January 28, 2026, affidavit posted at justthenews.com/sites/defaul…: 43. Since at least 2003, Clay Parikh has worked in the cyber security field in both private sector and for government agencies. Since 2008, he has done security and performance testing of voting machines. Due to his background in voting machine security and performance, Parikh is often asked to review data related to technical questions related to voting machines. Parikh is currently a Special Government Employee, a temporary officer or employee in the U.S. Executive Branch appointed to work for up to 130 days. This makes expert examiner Clay Parikh’s report on Hart Vanguard all the more valuable for the public to see. Multiple inquiries have been made to the Attorney General’s office, but they have so far refused to release Clay Parikh’s report. What’s in the still-missing report? When will the public be allowed to see it? Everyone please call the AG’s office at (512) 475-4213 and politely request that Clay Parikh’s report on the Hart Vanguard voting machine be released to the public. Texans need to know what’s in it! @GregAbbott_TX @rasmussen_poll @realJoeHoft @EmeraldRobinson @DebbieCanWeTalk @theprofsrecord @elonmusk @ColonelReynolds @VoterGa @weible_rick @Wernick4Dallas @LauraScharr @EricMetaxas @EFFE4USA @pjcolbeck @RachIC @WethePeopleAZA1 @BlehmLawAZ @mad_liberals @ShawnSmith1776 @JackPosobiec @CauseAmerica @aaron_reitz @laralogan @SidneyPowell1 @owengregorian @amuse @j3669 @JoeTalkShow @realDonaldTrump @DC_Draino @seanhannity @realkahall @joerogan @JasonFrazierUSA @BuckSexton @JamesOkeefeIII @TalkMullins @WorldViewTube @CarolSnowinNC @RSBNetwork @AKinghornTX @LauraLoomer @GuySmith1713057 @PatriotMarkCook @ParikhClay

TIME’S UP! 23 DAYS PAST THE DEADLINE… …to DISAPPROVE the Hart InterCivic Verity Vanguard 1.0 voting machine which fails to meet federal, state, and Texas Secretary of State requirements, as shown at nitter.cf/ZoomWalter/status/2002…. The deadline to DISAPPROVE it was January 18th, the 30th day after the public hearing on December 19, 2025. Today is February 10, 2026, which 23 days late to DISAPPROVE it. @GregAbbott_TX @KenPaxtonTX @SecJaneNelson @catturd2 @rasmussen_poll @honestpollster @realJoeHoft @HermesLux @Bannons_WarRoom @EmeraldRobinson @DebbieCanWeTalk @theprofsrecord @elonmusk @ColonelReynolds @VoterGa @weible_rick @Wernick4Dallas @LauraScharr @EricMetaxas @EFFE4USA @pjcolbeck @RachIC @WethePeopleAZA1 @BlehmLawAZ @mad_liberals @ShawnSmith1776 @JackPosobiec @CauseAmerica @aaron_reitz @laralogan @SidneyPowell1 @owengregorian @amuse @j3669 @JoeTalkShow @realDonaldTrump @DC_Draino @seanhannity @realkahall @joerogan @joshua__b @JasonFrazierUSA @BuckSexton @JamesOkeefeIII @TalkMullins @WorldViewTube @CarolSnowinNC @RSBNetwork @AKinghornTX @LauraLoomer