
attorney | @nytopinion editorial board | writing a book on the american dream and economy for harper collins: WHITE PICKET FENCES
Philadelphia, PA
Joined September 2011
- Tweets11.4K
- Following4.6K
- Followers12.8K
- Likes78.3K
Pinned Tweet
Some personal news: I’m writing a book! White Picket Fences is a deeply personal portrait of my immigrant family and two families across Pennsylvania, exploring what happened to the American Dream—and why hard work no longer guarantees the stability and ownership it once promised.
Rotimi Adeoye retweeted
The future of the Democratic party is probably not this endless factional war—which turned out to be entirely irrelevant to yesterday's results, by the way
Vance will have to run for president in 2028 knowing he stood by Trump through all of this and did nothing to stop it. Much like how Harris had to defend Biden’s record while running to succeed him, the post below will be revisited many times in summer 2028.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
It’s because political pundits and journalists want to keep political debate focused on factional fights, in part because so much of that fighting is personal to them. Much of the pundit clashing on here has less do with worldview/policy and more with personality clash.
Pundits and journalists have become so invested in these factional fights that they mistake their own disagreements for the disagreements voters actually have. And we end up debating the politics of political insiders rather than the politics of the country.
The Democrat factional fighting is a relic of 2016. This election points toward a new liberal fusionism, candidates who combine leftist economic populism with centrist pragmatism. Talarico and Ossoff offer a model on this. The factional stuff is old news, beltway chatter.
Annie Andrews also offered another example in South Carolina. She ran on healthcare populism, taking on insurance companies, Big Pharma and hospital monopolies while supporting border security. It’s an approach that doesn’t fit neatly into either faction.
Our media environment is so fragmented and algorithm-driven that voters experienced entirely different versions of the Democratic Party. Everyone saw the Democrats who appealed to them, not necessarily the ones who appealed to someone else. That’s a good strategy!
The “end of the Trump era” takes are not crazy because I don't think alot of Republicans that win tonight barely or the ones that aren't up, will want to experience *this night* in 2028 and they may get more selfish and want their power back.
There was a lot of discourse about whether Nixon running in Florida would hurt Democrats in other states. She lost, but ran a competitive race. If anything the idea that one candidate in a state actually affects Democrats running elsewhere is truly a half baked idea.
Decision Desk HQ projects Ashley Moody wins the FL US Senate Special Election General
#DecisionMade: 8:00 PM EST
Follow live results here: votes.decisiondeskhq.com/rac…
The whole argument that Zohran, AOC and the DSA left are going to send Democrats electoral future to the shadow realm probably deserves a lot more skepticism than it gets. Some real wacky people ran this cycle and Dems seems to be performing well. The idea that their presence dooms Dems elsewhere just isn’t that convincing.











