Jonathan retweeted
Beckham compartió este video de 2005 para homenajear a Harry Kane tras ganar el Balón de Oro.
En las imágenes aparecen el propio Beckham, un pequeño Harry y Kate Goodland, la nena que años después se convertiría en la esposa del astro inglés. 🙏
Jonathan retweeted
🗣Souness: "Its cruel on #ManCity. This is because of FFP, set up by the big clubs to protect big clubs. They've said, 'We are the big guys, we generate the most, let's set up a rule that prevents City buying the best players and we're not the big boys anymore.' Its jealousy" 👏
Jonathan retweeted
If Maresca’s plan is to keep taking Cherki off at half-time while the whole team is underperforming, just to justify Enzo’s price tag and make room for him at No. 10, then he should know that City fans are watching. 👀
How does one of our best players get subbed off at half-time three times in few games played this season? Make it make sense!
Cherki shouldn’t have to pay the price for someone else’s transfer fee. You pick players based on performance, not price tags or personal favourites. If this is favouritism, Maresca needs to cut it out early. City fans won’t tolerate it.
Jonathan retweeted
Muchos mensajes, análisis y comentarios como este, asegurando que las pandillas de Haití no son como las de El Salvador; que son sanguinarias, que están fuertemente armadas, que nadie ha podido vencerlas, que todas las misiones han fracasado, que estamos cayendo en una trampa, que no sabemos a lo que nos enfrentamos, que será nuestra ruina, que vamos camino a nuestro Waterloo.
Pero cuando Dios nos conceda la victoria, los mismos que hoy dicen todo eso cambiarán su discurso. Dirán que siempre fue fácil, que cualquiera podía hacerlo, que las pandillas de Haití no eran tan peligrosas como se pensaba.
En fin, nunca los hemos escuchado y no vamos a empezar ahora.
Todos los que se han enlistado son creyentes y hemos encomendado esta misión a Dios, mientras que las pandillas de Haití son satánicas y es de conocimiento público que hacen sacrificios humanos.
Dios nos concederá la victoria. El Creador del Universo está con nosotros.
Deuteronomio 28:7
“Jehová derrotará a tus enemigos que se levantaren contra ti; por un camino saldrán contra ti, y por siete caminos huirán de delante de ti”.
¿BUKELE Y SU WATERLOO?
Con el anuncio del envío hacia Haiti, desde El Salvador, de un contingente de 3000 militares, cuya misión es encontrar a los 4 miembros de las fuerzas armadas de ese país, secuestrados el pasado domingo, cuando penetraron en territorio dominado por las pandillas y fueron atacados por una pandilla de irregulares armados, se avizoran en las próximas horas fuertes enfrentamientos armados.
A estas horas, y sabiendo cómo se resuelven las cosas en Haití, las probabilidades de que estos militares continúen vivos son mínimas, así que si no hay posibilidad de negociar nada, y por lo tanto lo que se plantea es un enfrentamiento armado entre tropas de El Salvador y las pandillas que son dueñas del territorio donde fueron atacados y secuestrados los militares centroamericanos.
Según lo publicado en la prensa internacional, los responsables son dos organizaciones criminales que dominan el área de “Croix des Bouquets”, una de ellas dirigida por Claude Celestin, quien es cabeza de la pandilla Chen Mechan (perros rabiosos), y Wilson Joseph (“Lammo San Jou) líder de la banda 400 Mawozo.
En el día de ayer, este último desafió públicamente al presidente Nayib Bukele en un vídeo publicado en las redes sociales, donde advirtió que no se irá de Haití, y mostró miles de municiones y pertrechos con arma de diversos calibres, que según el están esperando a los salvadoreños.
Tenemos entonces la bandeja servida para un enfrentamiento armado a solo 45 kms de la frontera de la República Dominicana y Haití, de un ejército de pandilleros armados sin nada que perder, frente a tropas regulares de El Salvador, que pelearán una guerra urbana en las calles de un país que no es el suyo y es absolutamente desconocido.
Ya en el pasado reciente, los Estados Unidos en 1994 mando 20,000 soldados e intentó organizar a Haití para que se volviera a la senda de lo que ellos llaman democracia, y luego en el 2004 invadieron de nuevo junto a Canada, lo que terminó en la creación de una fuerza multinacional, la Minustah, que terminó en el más absoluto fracaso, es decir, estamos metidos en un tema que no tiene solución.
Si hay alguien que tiene experiencia en combatir pandillas lo es Nayib Bukele, el presidente de el Salvador, su historia de combate a las “Maras” está a la vista de todos, solo que Haití no es el terreno amigo donde peleó esa guerra, un país de habla y cultura hispana donde jugaba de local, el país caribeño es un transplante de África en América, con una historia de violencia típica de las sociedades primitivas.
Cuando Napoleón envió a sus tropas a sofocar la revolución haitiana en 1802, pensó que miles de solados podrían devolver la colonia a sus dueños, pero solo un año después, Dessalines y la fiebre amarilla los obligó a rendirse, ¿será Haití el Waterloo de Bukele?.
El futuro dirá.
Jonathan retweeted
In case you do not understand the origin and nature of the so-called “115 charges” against Manchester City, allow me to clarify it for you. The English Premier League was formed in 1992. The purpose of the association was to create, centralize and distribute revenues for the member clubs. For the first 19 years of the Premier League's existence, the so-called “Red Cartel,” (Arsenal, Liverpool, and Manchester United) dominated the Premier League and collected the vast majority of revenues. The Red Cartel clubs won 15 of the first 19 Premier League championships.
Then something happened. In 2012, Manchester City, the so-called “noisy neighbors” of Manchester United, won the Premier League title. The following year, Manchester United was able to scrape back a narrow victory in the Premier League but have never come close since. In 2014, Manchester City again won the Premier League.
Manchester City, owned by a rich Arab Prince named Sheikh Mansour, had put together a world caliber team using his own money. He did not spend more money than the Red Cartel clubs. He just spent it better, on better players, and started to win trophies. Around 2014, the Red Cartel clubs, Arsenal, Liverpool and Manchester United, then complained to the Premier League and pushed for new financing rules which were referred to as “financial fair play.” These rules were specifically designed to prevent a club owner from spending their own money to improve their football club.
Yes. You read that correctly.
In reality, these rules were nothing more than a straightforward “get Manchester City” scheme. They were designed to specifically target Manchester City’s revenue streams, effectively banning City from competing at the highest levels of the sport.
It did not work. Over the course of the next 10 years, Manchester City won 6 more Premier League titles, the Champions league, and the so-called “treble;” The Premier League, the Champions league, and the FA Cup in the same year, becoming only the second club to ever do so.
Manchester City had set up an arrangement which was legal under the Financial Fair Play rules. This involved the government of Abu Dhabi investing in advertisers, who then subsequently advertised with Manchester City, giving them revenue that they could then spend on new players. This was 100% legal under the Financial Fair Play rules.
However, in a case brought in 2018, the Premier League created an “independent commission,” which ruled that Manchester City had violated the byzantine Financial Fair Play rules. The so-called “independent commission” actually consisted of various officials who had either financial or cultural ties to the Red Cartel clubs (Arsenal, Liverpool and Manchester United.)
Since 2012, the only non “Red Cartel” teams to win the Premier League title are Manchester City, Leicester City, and Chelsea Football Club.
Only two other Premier League winners besides Manchester City have ever been accused of violating the financial fair play regulations. Those other two clubs are Chelsea Football Club and Leicester City FC.
I hope this explains it.
@ManCity
@ManCityUS
@RealTalkMCFC
@ManUtd
@City_Xtra
@cityreport_
@LCFC
@ChelseaFC
@premierleague
@Arsenal
@liamgallagher
@LFC
@piersmorgan
@Erling
Jonathan retweeted
24 witnesses. Bank statements. Company records. Letters from key sponsorship figures — yet City’s evidence was dismissed, while leaked emails allegedly lacking crucial context were relied upon.
And we’re supposed to believe there were no grounds to question the commission’s impartiality? 😂
@premierleague
Ah, pero el City hizo trampa al inyectar capital para cubrir gastos.
🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: ENGLISH FOOTBALL IS FACING A MAJOR FINANCIAL CRISIS! 📉
An ALARMING report from England's Independent Football Regulator (IFR) reveals:
• 94% of clubs across England's top five divisions are LOSING MONEY: 109 out of 116 clubs!
• Total debt is projected to reach €6 BILLION next season!
• 73 clubs could NOT survive more than 90 DAYS without financial support from their owners!
• Almost TWO-THIRDS of lower-league clubs and 20% of Premier League clubs are technically INSOLVENT!
— @lequipe
Exacto, aunque para el minuto 60, creí que lo empatabamos. Luego empezó a caerse esa idea.
Lo que nunca cambió en mi pensamiento es que este City si peleará por todo si juega siempre así. Ojalá aprendan, desde #Maresca hasta todo el equipo.
Ellos mismos saben que erramos muchas chances ayer.
Por suerte pasó ahora, es el momento para tener un partido así y aprender. Si jugamos siempre como el segundo tiempo de ayer ganamos el triplete.
El partido de ayer fuera de joda me dejó más ilusionado que antes, jugamos contra el campeón de Europa y lo pasamos por arriba el segundo tiempo.
City Till I Die 🩵
Jonathan retweeted
Luis Enrique: "We could've lost this match if #ManCity scored the chances they created! It was a very nice match, the way they play is amazing, the way Enzo Maresca's @ManCity play is really nice, and we like to play these kind of matches!" [via @footballontnt]
Jonathan retweeted
The scoreline doesn't tell you the whole story, cause I've never seen a team dominate PSG in a second half the way we did tonight, and I'm so proud of the boys for standing up with balls and attacking them relentlessly. Big chances missed, touches in their box, chances created, xG. All we did was 1) press them aggressively 2) bring Bouaddi on to keep the ball 3) bring Ndiaye on to destabilise them 4) win our duels 5) cover ground quicker in transitions. I'm taking lessons, particularly on the technical level of this game, where PSG were better in the first half. We're not that far off. We'll be there soon. Proud of the boys. @ManCity. 👏🩵
Lo que es, escribir idioteces! 🤣😂🤣
Jonathan retweeted
The central pillar of the Premier League's case against City is that Sheikh Mansour secretly funded substantial portions of the Club's sponsorship agreements with Abu Dhabi-owned companies, artificially inflating City's commercial revenue.
City denies this, maintaining that the financial support came from the Abu Dhabi government—the sponsoring companies' shareholder—not from City's owner. That distinction matters.
Mansour privately owns City through ADUG. The Abu Dhabi government owns the sponsoring companies. They're not legally the same entity, even though Mansour is well-connected with the government.
And it bears repeating that state-owned sponsorships are hardly unusual. For example, Arsenal's principal sponsor, Emirates Airline, is wholly owned by Dubai's government. Arsenal also received millions from Visit Rwanda. Manchester United's sponsors include state-owned Malaysia Airlines and Visit Malta.
There's nothing inherently improper about a government providing financial support to companies it owns. So if, as City insists, the sponsorship money at issue came from the Abu Dhabi government, not ADUG, the foundation of the Premier League's disguised owner-funding allegation collapses.
So did the anonymous commission get this right? What's so frustrating is that the media and punditry seem almost entirely uninterested in this question.
Instead, we get relentless calls for severe punishment before City's appeal has even been heard, based on blind faith in an anonymous Premier League panel citing undisclosed and unexplained evidence.
That's why City supporters need to keep asking the questions everyone else seems determined to ignore.
#mancity #mcfc #premierleague
😭😭😭😭
Manchester City has lost it's relevancy after that verdict,nobody cares about them ,whenever they play now everyone feels like they don't belong to the premier league .
You just know that nobody cares about them anymore when trolls like Trey and Janty didn't laugh at Liverpool for losing that game yesterday and the streets are back to norm again today.
Just imagine if it was Manchester United or Arsenal who beat Liverpool 3-0 at Anfield!
Truth be told even if Manchester city cheats and avoids relegation or points deduction that club will never go back to norm since history will always remember them as cheats and a Sham institution built by Arab oil money!
Jonathan retweeted
Manchester City never fixed any match.
Manchester City players never doped.
They just bought the same weapons as four other clubs and then used them better,For over a decade they simply outplayed everyone on the same pitch.
Cry harder.
Jonathan retweeted
🚨 Araujo compares facing Manchester City to playing against Real Madrid:
🗣️ “It reminds me of playing against Real Madrid when I was at Barcelona. The pressure, the intensity, the atmosphere, and the fans - you feel everything.
Now, playing for Liverpool against Manchester City, I’m experiencing something similar. Every duel matters, every mistake is punished, and the atmosphere makes the game even bigger.
Honestly, maybe this is the Premier League’s version of El Clásico. These are the matches you want to play in!
Esto es una crítica con sentido.
Cuando el City se quedó con 10 en Old Trafford, jamás pensé que se Podía ganar, pero siempre creí que no se iba a perder. La razón? La aptitud de los jugadores y su forma de adaptarse.
El Liverpool debió jugar distinto después de la expulsión.
Replying to @rincon_anfield
Muchos se centran solo en la doble amarilla debatible a Graven, pero no miran que el equipo con uno menos pareciera que se sintieron derrotados, el 0-3 pudo haber sido peor porque nunca tuvieron la actitud para afrontar esa adversidad y eso es todo de los jugadores
































