Five years ago today, Sir David Amess was killed while serving the people of Southend West.
I knew David as a kind, tireless colleague who dedicated his life to public service. His death was a terrible reminder of the risks faced by those in public life, and of our responsibility to ensure that everyone can serve their communities without fear.
Today, we remember David’s extraordinary commitment to the people he represented, and the lasting loss felt by his family, friends and all who knew him.
Oct 15, 2026 · 8:45 AM UTC
5 years since David Amess was butchered to death by an Islamic extremist POS.
He was being watched by prevent, they met him for a coffee and decided he wasn't a threat, the Islamist murderer laughed in court at how easy it was to tell prevent he wasn't an Islamist....
Five years on, still no inquiry into Sir Davids death.
Two years since Southport, the killer had been caught in a public place with a knife on multiple occasions previously, stated he wanted to stab people, he was referred to prevent 3 times and wasn't arrested.
4 months since Ann Widdecombe was bludgeoned to death by an allegedly far left killer.
This week, MI5 told you to Worry about the "Far Right......"
People who, pop dinghys, attach flags to lamp posts and throw plastic bottles around...
Sir David wasn't
"killed while serving the people of Southend West"
You disingenuous prick.
Sir David Amess was brutally murdered, stabbed 21 times by Ali Harbi Ali, an Islamic State sympathiser. How dare you minimise this atrocity? @KatieAmess & her family deserve better from you.
The rise of political violence and violent rhetoric in Britain is deeply disturbing.
Here we have Reform UK councillor Dean Miller, caught on camera calling for King Charles to be beheaded because he believes the monarch is a Muslim.
He's since resigned from Reform UK, but remains an elected councillor.
Meanwhile, more than 3,600 people were arrested in Britain for non-violent protests.
Consider the extraordinary contrast.
People peacefully protesting face arrest under terrorism legislation, while an elected politician can openly advocate the decapitation of the Head of State and, at least so far, remain in public office.
You don't have to support the monarchy to recognise how dangerous such rhetoric is, particularly in a country where elected representatives have already been murdered.
Freedom of expression matters. So does the right to peaceful protest. But advocating political violence cannot simply be dismissed as another controversial opinion.
Where is the consistency, the accountability, and the commitment to protecting our democracy?
nitter.cf/implausibleblog/status…
Reform Councillor Dean Miller on ITV News's expose,
"King Charles is a f*cking Muslim"
Says that's "traitorous"
And then says, "cut the c*nts head off, sorry"
My view: The sheer extremism of this statement is staggering, words spoken so casually.
A democratically elected councillor suggesting that the British monarch should be beheaded because he supposedly follows Islam is not simply offensive language. It is a chilling expression of religious hatred and violent extremism.
And consider the underlying prejudice: even if King Charles were Muslim, why on earth would that make him a traitor? Since when has someone's religion determined their loyalty to Britain?
Dean Miller has since resigned from Reform UK, but how is he still in public office in Bromley Council, or anywhere for that matter?
How can a democratic system claim to uphold equality, tolerance and the rule of law when its institutions lack the powers to remove elected representatives for even the most serious misconduct?
The issue goes far beyond Dean Miller or Reform UK. It raises fundamental questions about accountability across our entire political system.
There should be an immediate police assessment of remarks advocating violence, alongside an independent investigation and a legally robust process for removing councillors found responsible for serious misconduct.
👇🏻
Sir David Amess was murdered by an Islamist terrorist, another in a long line of religious fanatics who have committed atrocities in the United Kingdom, slaughtering innocent people in the name of a medieval, militant interpretation of their faith.
We know that MI5 is constantly working to thwart further Islamist attacks, thankfully with considerable success. And yet our politicians seem far more comfortable talking about Islamophobia than confronting the ideological threat that has already claimed so many British lives.
I’m sick and tired of the increasingly binary debate about what it means to be British or English. Because, to my mind, the answer is remarkably simple.
It’s about values.
It doesn’t matter what colour your skin is, where your parents were born or what your ethnicity happens to be. What matters is what you believe in.
Democracy. Free speech. The rule of law. Tolerance of other religions and beliefs. Equality before the law. A belief in individual liberty. And, yes, some affection for this country and its traditions, rather than an instinctive contempt for everything it represents.
Those are the values that, for my money, define Britishness, and Englishness too.
But if you subscribe to the worldview of religious fanatics who believe that their interpretation of scripture entitles them to impose their beliefs on others, subordinate women, persecute minorities, suppress dissent or murder those they regard as infidels, then you represent a threat not only to Britain but to Western civilisation itself.
And our politicians need to find the courage to say so.
The British public can see what is happening. And I suspect growing numbers are thoroughly sick of being patronised and gaslit by politicians who respond to every new ideologically motivated atrocity with the same exhausted platitudes about diversity, tolerance and how the terrorists “will never divide us”.
We’ve heard it after 7/7. After Westminster Bridge. After London Bridge. After the Manchester Arena bombing. And after the murder of Sir David Amess.
But who, exactly, is trying to divide us?
It isn’t the ordinary British citizen who wants secure borders, freedom of speech, the rule of law and a society in which people can live peacefully regardless of their background.
It’s the fanatics who reject those values, despise the society that protects their freedoms and, in the most extreme cases, are prepared to murder their fellow citizens in pursuit of their ideology.
And until our political class is prepared to speak plainly about that ideology, rather than retreating into euphemism and platitude, we will never confront the threat with the seriousness it deserves.
You cannot defeat an enemy you are too cowardly even to name.
Still protecting the Islamist who killed him, you just can't bring yourself to say those words.
Islamic extremists freely roam our streets, they arrive illegally treated like kings, housed fed watered every service is free. A high profile murder should of set alarm bells ringing but no Islamic attacks continue protected by you Burnham.
@grok What was the ethnicity of the man who killed him? Address Burnham directly.
Why was he murdered?
What was the motive?
We all know the answer but you and that vile @ShabanaMahmood won’t say it.
He was killed by Islam, for opposing that very cult.
Absolute coward! You're not a leader. You're a disgrace!
A leader would call out the problem!
Islam.
You are so quick to jump the gun when you believe there's a so called "far-right" attack, which is not even a threat. You have never once condemned the actual threat, "radical" Muslims.
You have shown us you have zero political will to make a change. You are an unelected PM. We didn't want you and you're showing exactly why!
Starmer mentioned the ideology that killed Jo Cox, and called a murder a murder?
Why can't you do the same for the murder of Sir David Amess?
It has been ten years since our friend and colleague Jo Cox was murdered by a far-right terrorist.
She was a dedicated mother, a fierce campaigner and a deeply committed Member of Parliament. Her conviction that we have more in common than that which divides us lives on beyond her death.
We all wish Jo was still here with us today, and we will continue to honour her legacy by standing by her message of hope and unity in the face of hatred and division.










































