Chad Bockius (@bockius) header
Chad Bockius (@bockius) profile picture

3X CEO. $850M+ value created. Now I score GTM messaging so you stop losing deals to inaction. Yours might be next. https://nitter.cf/t.co/N8hGnlIsVm

Austin, TX
Joined December 2008
Photo by Chad Bockius (@bockius)Photo by Chad Bockius (@bockius)Photo by Chad Bockius (@bockius)Photo by Chad Bockius (@bockius)Photo by Chad Bockius (@bockius)Photo by Chad Bockius (@bockius)Photo by Chad Bockius (@bockius)Photo by Chad Bockius (@bockius)Photo by Chad Bockius (@bockius)Photo by Chad Bockius (@bockius)
Chad Bockius retweeted
That was the most insane product demo I’ve ever seen. Well done Tesla!
461
1,532
498
15,873
1,949,795
Chad Bockius retweeted
JUST IN: Investigation reveals former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon reportedly worked with a “doomer PR firm” while launching his viral campaign warning of AI’s existential risks.
346
983
338
9,297
933,010
Chad Bockius retweeted
Check out our story behind Matic Cues! Just tell us which room to clean or point at a mess, and we'll handle it!
It took us 9 years, 11 prototypes, and our life savings to learn that every great product has the same design process. Matic is now decisively the best home robot for families (I'm biased) A 500-word thread and video on the Universal Design Process behind every great product:
5
9
73
25,866
Chad Bockius retweeted
I'm signing up for Grok Bot today to try it out If you want to save money: you can just do the Cursor $200/mo plan, I don't think there are added benefits to the SuperGrok Heavy at $300/mo in regards to Grok Bot
37
3
1
140
24,600
Chad Bockius retweeted
Stanford tested two ways of giving feedback to students. Group one got standard comments. Group two got the same comments with one added sentence: "I'm giving you these comments because I have very high expectations and I know you can reach them." Group two improved at four times the rate as group one, despite having the same correction. Give your children the gift of high expectations.
28
298
28
5,518
769,090
Chad Bockius retweeted
WARNING: Longer post (but worth reading or bookmarking for later). Your life has seasons. Each one is unique. Characterized by its own distinct desires, struggles, opportunities, and identity. But one reflection I've had recently is just how easy it is to completely disassociate with the present season. To give all your time and energy toward a longing for some nostalgic memory of a prior season or an anticipation for some beautiful state of a future season. You look back at the past and all you see is sunshine. Because it all worked out. You forget (or glaze over) the struggle you endured. You're here today. You made it. You're alive. You're doing fine. You look forward at the future and dream on what could be. You'll have so much more. More freedom. More purpose. More health. More deep connection. More everything. The past is beautiful and the future feels limitless. So, logically, you slowly start to treat everything about the present as the bridge. A dash connecting your past and your future. A gap to be crossed as quickly as possible. Everything you do today is in anticipation of some eventual end state. I'm doing this now, so that I can have that later. Unfortunately, the danger of that dissociation with the present is significant. You may spend your entire life living for a future that has a decidedly mirage-like property. You inch closer, but when it's right in front of you, it disappears and reappears on the horizon. You may spend your entire life skipping through the present, deferring your presence, your joy, and your very humanity to a future that never comes. In a classic French fable, a young boy is gifted with a magic ball of golden thread. He's told that if he simply pulls on the thread, time will leap forward. The catch, of course, is that once it's pulled, it can never be put back. The young boy takes advantage of the newfound powers. Each time he's faced with a boring day at school, a frustrating set of chores, or a scolding from his parents, he pulls the thread, skipping through to the good parts. As an adult, he continues, leaping through mundane struggles in his marriage, the friction of having a newborn, and the boredom at work. He finds himself pulling on the thread more and more, avoiding even the most minor inconveniences of his life. But when he wakes up one day and sees an old man looking back at him in the mirror, he's filled with regret. He realizes in that moment that as he chose to skip through the boredom, struggles, and friction, so too did he miss the real texture of being alive. How often do we all do the same? How easily do we default into this disassociation? Disconnecting from the present in anticipation of some future. A mentor recently asked me this: "Where are you going and why are you in such a rush?" It hit me hard. And to be honest, I haven't stopped replaying those words since he said them. Why are you in such a rush? The world wants you to rush into everything. Rushed decisions. Rushed conversations. Rushed relationships. Rushed timelines. In doing so, you slowly relinquish your agency. You give up your claim on your own life. Surrender authorship to a pen that was never even yours. In a world that wants you to rush, the ultimate act of rebellion is presence. Be in the season you're in. Don't romanticize the past, don't fantasize the future. Be here. Be now. Be in this. All of its texture, depth, and struggle. All of its joy, tension, and pain. Sit with the uncertainty. Become friends with it. Fall in love with it. Because every single thing you do today is something your younger self dreamed of and something your older self will wish they could go back and do. The good old days are happening, right now. And the next time you find yourself skipping through the present, remember these words: Where are you going and why are you in such a rush?
343
1,086
173
6,938
1,926,858
Chad Bockius retweeted
I read this every week for 3 years and had it pasted on my dorm room's wall. Best writing is not literary or PhD-esque. It is persuasive. It is simple. It's humorous. It has short sentences. That is more valuable, than any other type of writing.
15
176
11
1,884
54,566
UI/UX Designers, here are my go-to best design resource sites on the internet you should bookmark: Design Library → curations.supply Landing Pages → landing.love Saas Websites → saaspo.com AI Mobile App Builder → sleek.design/?ref=abrahambw Fonts → uncut.wtf Animation → 60fps.design Mobile Apps → mobbin.com/?via=abraham Brands → rebrand.gallery Icons → hugeicons.com/?via=Abraham Design Systems → component.gallery
48
473
11
3,622
769,286
Chad Bockius retweeted
A new father became so terrified of never learning anything again that he accidentally dismantled the biggest lie in education. His name is Josh Kaufman, and he wasn't a neuroscientist or a professor. He was an author working from home, running a business with his wife, with a newborn daughter who had just obliterated any concept of free time he thought he had. Around week 8 of sleep deprivation, he had the thought every parent has. I am never going to learn anything new ever again. And because he was the kind of person who responds to panic with research, he went to the library and started reading everything he could find about how humans acquire skills. He read book after book, study after study. Every single one said the same thing. 10,000 hours. He had a full-body reaction to that number. 10,000 hours is a full-time job for five years. He didn't have five years. He didn't have five hours. He had a newborn and a business and a wife who was also building a business in the same house. So he kept digging. And here is where it gets interesting. The 10,000 hour rule came from a researcher named K. Anders Ericsson at Florida State University. What Ericsson actually studied was professional athletes, world-class musicians, chess grandmasters people at the absolute tip of ultra-competitive, ultra-high-performing fields. His finding was that the people at the very top of those narrow fields had put in around 10,000 hours of deliberate practice. That is all the finding said. Then Malcolm Gladwell wrote Outliers in 2007, and the message went through a game of telephone that destroyed its meaning entirely. It takes 10,000 hours to reach the top of an ultra-competitive field became it takes 10,000 hours to become an expert, which became it takes 10,000 hours to become good at something, which became it takes 10,000 hours to learn something. That last statement is completely false. And the actual research had been showing something different the entire time. When cognitive psychologists study skill acquisition, they measure a graph that looks identical across every domain they have ever tested. At the start, performance is terrible. With a small amount of practice, it improves rapidly. Then it plateaus, and subsequent gains become much harder and slower to achieve. The steep part of that curve the jump from knowing nothing to being reasonably good happens much faster than anyone tells you. Not 10,000 hours. Not 1,000 hours. 20 hours. Kaufman tested this himself. He had always wanted to learn ukulele. He picked one up, put 20 hours of focused deliberate practice into it, and stood on a TEDx stage playing a medley of recognizable pop songs in front of a live audience. The crowd went wild. He then told them that performance was his 20th hour. But 20 hours is not just a number. There is a method inside it. The first step is to deconstruct the skill. Most things we think of as single skills are actually bundles of dozens of smaller skills. You do not need all of them. You need the ones that get you to your specific goal the fastest. In music, this means most songs use four or five chords. Learn those first. Ignore the rest until they matter. The second step is to learn just enough to self-correct. Get three to five resources books, courses, videos but do not use them as a reason to delay practice. The point of learning is not to master theory first. It is to get good enough at noticing your own mistakes that you can adjust as you go. The third step is to remove barriers to practice. Not through willpower. Through structure. If the instrument is in the case in the closet, you will not play it. If your phone is in the room, you will not focus. Kaufman was brutal about this. The environment does the work that discipline cannot sustain. The fourth step is the one that actually makes the system work. Pre-commit to 20 hours before you start. Here is why this matters. Every skill has what he called a frustration barrier. The early part of learning anything is genuinely terrible. You are incompetent and you know it. That feeling is so uncomfortable that most people quit before they ever cross to the other side of the curve. By pre-committing to 20 hours, you are making a contract with yourself to push through the frustration long enough to arrive at the part where things start clicking. The barrier to learning something new is never intellectual. It is emotional. We are afraid of feeling stupid. That fear costs most people everything they could have learned. Kaufman figured this out while holding a baby and running out of time, which is the most human possible condition for having a breakthrough. Most people are waiting for the perfect season to start. He just started. 20 hours is 45 minutes a day for a month. That is it. That is the price of going from knowing nothing to being genuinely capable at almost anything you can name. The 10,000 hour rule was never about learning. It was about becoming the best in the world. You probably do not need to be the best in the world. You just need to start.
15
263
23
984
45,103
Chad Bockius retweeted
Marc Andreessen just said something that would end most public figures on contact. He practices zero introspection. And he believes the entire framework was invented and sold to you. Andreessen: “Zero. As little as possible. Move forward. Go.” Not a calibrated amount. Not a healthy minimum. Zero. The man who has deployed more capital into transformative technology than almost any living person does not look backward. Does not dwell. Does not self-examine. He builds. So why does everyone else think they should? Andreessen: “All of the modern conceptions around introspection and therapy are kind of manufactured in the 1910s, 1920s.” Everything you were taught about psychological self-awareness is not ancient wisdom. It is not a universal law of the human mind. It is a framework. Built in Vienna. About a hundred years ago. By one man and the movement he started. Before Freud, no one building anything real thought this way. Andreessen: “Great men of history didn’t sit around doing this stuff.” They did not journal their feelings before making decisions. They did not run ambition through a filter of guilt before acting. They saw the thing. Built the thing. Moved. David Senra has read over 410 biographies of the world’s greatest builders. Every single one runs the same way. Senra: “Sam Walton didn’t wake up thinking about his internal self. He just woke up and kept doing it over and over again.” No emotional audits. No existential loops. No self-examination before execution. Just the work. Every morning. For decades. Then Andreessen named the mechanism. Andreessen: “The individual needs to self-criticize. The individual needs to feel guilt. It never resonated with me.” He called it a guilt-based psychological update installed across Western civilization. One that convinced ambitious people their first instinct should be self-doubt. Then the line that lands hardest. Andreessen: “I find people who dwell on the past get stuck in the past.” That is not philosophy. That is pattern recognition from a man who has watched thousands of founders win and fail up close. The ones who dwell do not ship. The ones who loop on self-criticism do not scale. The ones who relitigate every past decision cannot move fast enough to matter. Look at who is actually building right now. Not pausing to assess implications. Not waiting for public consensus. Not scheduling emotional audits before the next product cycle. Running the same operating system as every builder Senra has ever studied. See the thing. Build the thing. Wake up and do it again. A hundred years of therapy culture told ambitious people their biggest obstacle was inside them. The builders didn’t listen. And you’ve spent your whole life learning their names.
60
59
19
474
68,154
Chad Bockius retweeted
In 2019, MIT professor Patrick Winston gave a legendary 1-hour lecture called “How to Speak.” It has 18M+ views for a reason. His frameworks: • Your ideas are like your children • The 5-minute rule for job talks • Why jokes fail at the start 15 lessons on communication:
229
8,399
228
39,874
5,818,500
Chad Bockius retweeted
Naval Ravikant: "The only true test of intelligence is if you get what you want out of life" "There are two parts to that. One is getting what you want, so you know how to get it. The second is wanting the right things, knowing what to want in the first place. I could want to be a 6'8" basketball player and I'm not going to get that. That's wanting something you can't get. But there's also wanting something that's a booby prize, prizes that are just not worth having, or that create their own problems." Naval explains how people end up in places they never meant to be: "If you're not careful, you can end up in a place in life not only that you don't want to be, but one you didn't even mean to get to. Usually people end up there because they're going on autopilot with societal expectations. Or out of guilt. Or out of mimetic desire, our desires are picked up from other people. Go to law school, go to med school, go to business school. Or it might be what your parents expect. Guilt is just society's voice speaking in your head so you'll be a good little monkey." He shares a problem most people have: "We run on these four-year cycles. You join a startup, you vest over four years. College is four years. High school is four years. You go to law school, that's a 5-year cycle. You become a lawyer, that's a 40-year cycle. These are very long cycles. But the amount of time we spend deciding what to do and who to do it with? Very short. We spend one month deciding on a job where we're going to be for 10 years." Naval's rule: "If you're making a four-year decision, spend a year thinking it through. Really thinking it through. 25% of the time." He explains the Secretary Theorem: "It turns out the optimal time to search is about a third. By a third of the way through, you've seen enough to know what the bar is. Then anybody who meets or exceeds that bar is good enough. But here's the key: it's not time-based. It's iteration-based. You need to take opportunities quickly and bail out quickly. If you look at failed relationships, the biggest regret is usually staying after you knew it was over." Naval reframes the 10,000 hour rule: "Malcolm Gladwell popularized 10,000 hours to mastery. I'd say it's actually 10,000 iterations to mastery. Iteration is not repetition. Repetition is doing the same thing over and over. Iteration is modifying it with learning and doing another version. That's error correction. If you get 10,000 error corrections in anything, you will be an expert." On pessimism vs. optimism: "You want to be skeptical about specific things, every specific opportunity is probably a fail. But you want to be optimistic in the general. Something in here is going to work out. If something fails, it was a learning experience. It was an iteration. As long as you learned something, it's a win. You don't want to jump into the first thing. But once you find the match, you have to be willing to go all in. Move your chips to the center of the table." He concludes: "Most people are stuck in this gray bit. 'I'm half in, but I don't really know.' That doesn't work. It's a barbell strategy, black or white. Explore quickly, cut losses fast. Then when you find the right thing, compound into it."
15
195
5
783
74,678
🚨 I just learned about a concept, I can't stop thinking about. The Four Burner Theory. It destroyed Elon Musk's first marriage. It explains why Bezos is jacked but divorced. And why Zuckerberg has no real friends. Once you understand it, your life will never be same:🧵
635
3,998
378
22,536
5,868,877
Chad Bockius retweeted
Just tried this - use claude chrome plugin, ask it to extract all saved memories and create a MD file for them. Watch the magic. It worked perfectly.
I would kill to be able to export all my memory, chats and projects from ChatGPT and import them into Claude
22
9
6
334
63,631
Vanderbilt has as many wins against ranked opponents as Indiana and Oregon COMBINED. The committee CAN’T leave a 10 win SEC team out of the College Football Playoff!
397
339
44
3,250
400,869
Use this 3 Questions To Diffuse Any Conflict Instantly‼️‼️
26
2,126
43
10,592
273,425
1⃣3⃣
10
102
4
965
23,914
192
1,497
70
13,844
311,680
DUB.
39
267
38
1,765
84,679
🔟
30
297
71
1,834
259,158