I'm the co-founder of @phaze_in and previous co-founder of @parsecteam
Joined June 2009
- Tweets4.1K
- Following525
- Followers1.2K
- Likes2K
Pinned Tweet
Remote desktop software hasn't been a good experience. Today, we take the first step to changing that. We released a Beta this morning. Sign up for access here - phaze.app/beta.
We're just getting started, and we're excited for everyone to join us on our journey to building a better user experience for remote desktop. The needs for remote access are proliferating - companies are racking workstations, agents need access to remote machines, and hardware costs are making shared resources a better option for every company.
I think computers will be optional. Muse is showing us the future, but it's not going to work for companies. Businesses will need to own their own infrastructure, provide access to it, and deliver it just-in-time for tasks to be completed.
Every time I start building with claude code it feels like I'm playing civilization. It's a really fun turn-based game until it's round 215 and I'm trying to figure out if I made the wrong tech tree choice in turn 108.
Are we winning again?
It took a little longer than expected (8 months vs. a few days) but the US has finally erected a system for moving oil out of Hormuz in the face of the Iranian blockade.
Moving average for regional flows is now (conservatively) 15-16m bpd, and still rising. wsj.com/world/middle-east/mi…
I (all claude, so we?) made a github repo to show what you can do with the Phaze MCP and API. It's experimental, so I'm looking for feedback. The repo shows how you can headlessly control other Windows PCs to answer end user IT support cases submitted via Slack. github.com/boxerbk/phaze-mcp…
the commentary on anthropic's IPO based on 2025 financials is so dumb. What are people even thinking? Maybe it's overpriced...maybe not. But you certainly can't tell based on 2025.
OMG. This was science fiction. One rocket carrying that payload capacity built by a private company in the US.
From concept to reality.
@SpaceX has successfully deployed Starlink V3 satellites into Earth’s orbit and made contact with them for the first time.
At scale, one Starship carries 60 V3 satellites, the same network capacity as about 20 Falcon 9 launches.
Companies will need to move data between machines to support people using multiple computers at once with their agents. Their personal files need to be instantly accessible.
Computers will be optional when we can accomplish the tasks computers were for with an agent who uses a computer for us.
I’ve seen a couple of posts about this so wanted to demystify. Today, every Muse user gets a free computer in the cloud. It's a real computer, and we’ve designed the security architecture of the Muse Secure VM carefully so you and your Muse can do almost anything you could with a computer sitting under your desk while keeping you and the system safe from threats like prompt injection. We wrote about this at length in our security blog post – security.muse.ai. Activity in the “runtime cell”, which you share with your Muse is unfettered, but sensitive actions are all overseen by the Sentinel, which runs outside of that cell. Similarly, all sensitive secrets - like the passwords you enter into Muse’s secure credential storage - are also stored outside the runtime cell.
The runtime cell gets its own root filesystem (including a full Ubuntu linux image) separate from the host filesystem where your other more sensitive data lives. Because it is isolated from the sensitive stuff that runs on the same box, this means that we can, and do, offer users full visibility and control over the files in the runtime cell. Just as you can when you install Linux on your home computer, you can poke around and see all the files that make the system work - both debian system files and the binaries and data files that implement the parts of Muse which run in the runtime cell.
This was a very deliberate choice - your Muse Secure VM truly is your own computer in the cloud. You can install software in it, write and compile code, use the browser to surf the web: it is your own Linux box that you can operate as you choose with your Muse. Poking around in this computer doesn't give you any privileged access to Meta infrastructure, or to other people's data
If I may geek out a little here for a second… As a kid I loved to take things apart to see how they worked. As a teenager I got into computers and soon found myself drawn to C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM and the system registry, later Slackware’s /dev/, /proc/ etc – I could see how the system was laid out and as I explored what DLL files and .so files actually did, I gradually became able to meld the computer to my own will.
We’re really proud to be able to put a real computer in millions of people’s hands with a similar level of transparency. We built a file explorer right into the Library tab of the UI. We want you to be able to see the markdown files Muse writes while it thinks about how to serve you better, and explore the internals of the system if you’d like to.
So, when you ask your Muse to show you its entire filesystem, and receive gigabytes of files you’re seeing the full contents of the runtime cell. It’s yours to explore and enjoy!
If you’re not a geek like me, or simply want to download the data that you personally have created directly with your Muse, we added a feature for that too in Settings > Data controls > Download your agent data.
The queen of productive capital cycles making stock markets nervous 🤣. Don’t worry…it’s not 2000. It’s actually 2008 or 1929
Many people worried about the possible #AI bubble crash compare it with the Nasdaq collapse of 2000. But the relevant cases are 2008 and 1929. I only just discovered @B_Eichengreen 's 2015 book Hall of Mirrors, comparing those two. Super important!
Feels good man. We can do hard things like our forefathers did.
a.co/d/03RBTgWy
Pretty cool that General Motors was able to retool a car factory to make the outer shells of the Patriot missiles. They've managed to make the delivery to Lockheed just 22 days after signing the contract.
(22 days!!!!! We still got it...🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸)
Lockheed says this work normally takes months or years for the previous supplier (General Dynamics) to fulfill.
There's a strain of neoliberal thinking that says if domestic carmakers can’t compete, they should just be allowed to fail. No bailouts. Just let Japan or China make cars because of comparative advantage or whatever.
Imagine if we had believed that automobile manufacturing was something to offshore.
It's now clear that the argument for preserving that industrial base is not simply nostalgia for a previous bygone era. It simply is the case that you cannot improvise precision manufacturing overnight once it has disappeared.
I wonder if the collusion among big law firms that have all somehow decided that hourly rates should be the exact same (and outrageous) across the industry will finally end. openai.com/index/astra-for-l…
First, they took free abundant energy away from us (nuclear). Now they want to take free abundant intelligence away from us. In exchange, we get “safety” and millions of extra deaths from carbon emissions and conflicts in the Middle East. What will we earn this time instead of all of the breakthroughs?
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
- Benjamin Franklin
Benjy Boxer retweeted
What Is To Be Done?
I propose a simple plan:
Big AI companies should be allowed to build AI as fast and aggressively as they can – but not allowed to achieve regulatory capture, not allowed to establish a government-protect cartel that is insulated from market competition due to incorrect claims of AI risk. This will maximize the technological and societal payoff from the amazing capabilities of these companies, which are jewels of modern capitalism.
Startup AI companies should be allowed to build AI as fast and aggressively as they can. They should neither confront government-granted protection of big companies, nor should they receive government assistance. They should simply be allowed to compete. If and as startups don’t succeed, their presence in the market will also continuously motivate big companies to be their best – our economies and societies win either way.
Open source AI should be allowed to freely proliferate and compete with both big AI companies and startups. There should be no regulatory barriers to open source whatsoever. Even when open source does not beat companies, its widespread availability is a boon to students all over the world who want to learn how to build and use AI to become part of the technological future, and will ensure that AI is available to everyone who can benefit from it no matter who they are or how much money they have.
To offset the risk of bad people doing bad things with AI, governments working in partnership with the private sector should vigorously engage in each area of potential risk to use AI to maximize society’s defensive capabilities. This shouldn’t be limited to AI-enabled risks but also more general problems such as malnutrition, disease, and climate. AI can be an incredibly powerful tool for solving problems, and we should embrace it as such.
To prevent the risk of China achieving global AI dominance, we should use the full power of our private sector, our scientific establishment, and our governments in concert to drive American and Western AI to absolute global dominance, including ultimately inside China itself. We win, they lose.
And that is how we use AI to save the world.
It’s time to build.
Well written post and helps clarify the hubris and insanity of the last few days.
The contagion of fear
bcantrill.dtrace.org/2026/09…