Del Bigtree

Vaccines only work as a product if everyone takes them. That’s the scam built into the whole model. COVID’s real death rate was 0.35 percent, based on numbers from Brownstone, Jay Bhattacharya, and other respected epidemiologists. A bad flu season, nothing more. A product built to protect the genuinely vulnerable population only needs to reach that 0.35 percent. Call it a vaccine instead, and the argument flips. Now the only way to protect that small group is for everyone else to take it too. A product meant for a third of one percent of the population becomes one sold to 99.97 percent of the population. That’s the genius of it. And it only works as long as we all stay confident enough to keep buying in.

In England, vaccine uptake landed around 70 percent, meaning 30 percent never took a single dose. Denmark came in the same. So did Finland. Africa was even lower. America lands in that same range, roughly 30 percent who never vaccinated. That number is worth sitting with. Under the largest coordinated propaganda campaign I’ve ever seen, every government on earth, the WHO, the WEF, the UN, all working in lockstep with a twenty four hour news cycle, 30 percent of humanity still said no. Different countries, different media systems, and the number held steady everywhere. We didn’t even know there were this many of us. People were too afraid to talk about it at work. When employers mandated vaccination to return, I told people to start talking to their coworkers. If the numbers held true in their own workplace, 30 percent of the room could have walked out together. Thirty percent changes governments. This is an international movement, and we have to keep speaking up loudly, or we lose both free speech and the most powerful chance for change we’ve had in a generation.

A patient tells their doctor, my arm started losing feeling two days after the vaccine, and now I’m losing feeling in my chest and I’m having trouble breathing. The doctor’s answer is that it couldn’t be the vaccine. That’s the argument happening in exam rooms right now instead of the one that should be happening. Nobody is asking which vaccine, or when, or what we should be doing to help this person’s body recover. No doctor anywhere is working on how to stop a vaccine injury once it starts, how to keep something like transverse myelitis from spreading through the whole body and paralyzing someone. There should be an entire field of science dedicated to treating adverse reactions as they unfold. Instead our doctors and scientists have spent decades looking away, and an entire group of people has been injured and had their lives destroyed in the dark. That’s not fair. It’s not right. It is not humane.

Some children are going to die from vaccines this year. Others will be maimed and permanently injured. How rare is it? And does that rare group matter? That’s the entire question behind medical freedom advocacy. We’re not talking about the kids having a great experience with vaccines. We’re talking about the ones nobody studies, the ones whose parents say they were fine and then regressed, fine and then paralyzed, screamed for days in a way that matches encephalopathy, the brain swelling listed on the warning label itself. Science should study them. Find out if there’s a genetic predisposition. Find out if a blood test could identify which kids can’t handle three vaccines at once, or ten in a day, whether it should be one at a time, whether some vaccines should never be given to certain children at all. We have artificial intelligence. We have machine learning. We have more capability than any generation before us, and none of it is pointed at this question, because anyone who tries gets called a bad person for asking.

Vaccines didn't eradicate disease. The only thing they eradicated was herd immunity. The entire goal of the vaccine program was to wipe a disease off the planet, to leave no dry grass anywhere for it to catch fire on. That goal failed. Anti-vaxxers didn't start getting loud until about ten years ago, and this program has been failing since long before that, through the 70's, the 80's, the 90's, the 2k's. It never actually worked. Here's what actually used to happen. In America, you'd see something like one case in five hundred thousand, because most people carried lifelong immunity after having the disease once. A community needed enough new children born into it before the disease could circulate again, and when it did, that same community wouldn't see another case for years. That's natural herd immunity, and you cannot replicate it with vaccines, because of primary and secondary vaccine failure. Herd immunity requires lifelong protection, and this product was never capable of providing that. So when these outbreaks hit, the first question has to be who's actually carrying this disease right now, symptomatic or not. Test everyone in the affected areas and find out. If the adults who were vaccinated as children have lost their immunity, that tells you exactly where these outbreaks are coming from. @alixm

CVS launches its new “Truth in Advertising” campaign ….

When someone tells me a vaccine’s risk is one in a million, I go read the actual package insert, and I count a hundred serious side effects listed on it. So which is it. One in a million, or a hundred in a million. And if a child is getting ten vaccines in a single visit, each one carrying its own one in a million odds on every side effect it lists, what does that number actually become by the time they leave the office? @alixm asked me why people treat vaccines like soap, as if getting one sanitizes you and makes you clean. I think it comes from the orthodoxy we were raised in, the idea that this is the most important process in modern medicine, the place where we improved on God’s design and made it so disease simply couldn’t touch us anymore. Meanwhile, there’s an ocean of injury behind these products, and we’re not exposing anyone to that risk once. The package insert contradicts the one-in-a-million claim before you’ve even finished reading it. That number is wishful thinking, the kind you wish on a star, and the pharmaceutical industry has been selling that wish for a very long time. The health of our children tells a different story.

A vaccine only gets liability protection under the 1986 Act once ACIP votes to recommend it and the CDC puts it on the schedule. That’s the exact moment the shield activates. Move a vaccine off the recommended schedule and into shared decision-making instead, and it starts losing that protection. There are more steps after that before it’s fully gone, and whether Bobby completes all of them is still an open question. But watching him take that first step is watching him line up a path to undo the 1986 Act.

Sitting next to Dr. Sears, I kept thinking about how astounding it is that he took all that heat alone, before any of the science we have now existed, before there was any movement behind him. In California, families were desperate with nowhere to go, and he stood in that gap at the worst possible time. We’ve watched this pattern repeat since, during COVID, with doctors who stood their ground and lost their licenses. I’ve been lucky enough to do this work surrounded by people, starting with Andy Wakefield and growing to thousands. Dr. Sears did it alone. He's a hero.

They’ll tell you we don’t need placebo trials anymore because these vaccines have been in use for fifty years and have proven themselves safe. Really? You want to point at the health of our children as the evidence of this product’s quality? Let’s look at that evidence then. We have the highest rate of chronic disease in the industrialized world. The CDC itself now says seventy-five percent of adults in America have a chronic disease, up from twelve percent. And when I bring that up, the same people will tell you that you can’t blame vaccines for that. You can’t have it both ways. You used these children as proof your product works. The moment I point out they’re not actually healthy, suddenly that’s not the vaccine’s fault anymore. If the outcome doesn’t count against you, you don’t get to claim it as your evidence either.