scaled (@ecomdiddy) header
scaled (@ecomdiddy) profile picture

8 figures in ecom at 20 | Dm me “Mentor” for 1-1

Joined October 2025
Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)
you're not launching enough creatives and it's the reason you're stuck you found a winner and you're riding it til it dies: we've all done it. one ad carrying the whole account and you're praying every morning it still works. it won't last. and when it dies you're scrambling with nothing behind it you're launching 1-2 ads a week and calling it testing: that's not testing that's hoping. most ads don't work. you need volume to find the 1 in 10 that hits. the people scaling are launching 100-200+ a week. it's a numbers game your "new" ads are the same angle with a different hook: that's not new. go wider. different angle. different mechanism. different format. stop reskinning the same idea your winner dies after a week and you panic: that's not a problem that's how meta works. every ad fatigues. the difference is the people scaling already have the next batch ready before it happens you don't have a system you just open your laptop and figure it out: spy on what's winning. break it down. rebuild it for your product. launch. read the data. repeat. every week. that's the system the brands printing money aren't more talented than you. they just never stop launching build the system. the system scales. you don't
1
12
381
$1.7m in 8 days on the main brand Record month loading i’m 20 and this is just getting started
7
3
124
3,107
These guys are selling a mouse repellent and they're scaling hard perfect score of 100 on gethookd. 6 brands have already ripped the same creative. when that many people copy you it's not a coincidence the image is two college kids. no product anywhere. no logo. looks like a news thumbnail. your brain doesn't register it as an ad so you don't scroll past it the hook is about shark tank. the product has nothing to do with shark tank. that's the whole point. the hook's job isn't to describe the product. the hook's job is to get you reading then it's 2000+ words of copy that reads like someone wrote a blog post. you're 800 words deep before you even realise you're being sold to this is what a native ad is. no video. no ugc. no fancy creative. just an image that blends into the feed and copy that tells a story and the reason they scale so well is simple. someone sits on your ad for 3-4 minutes reading the copy. facebook sees that as high engagement. your relevance score goes up. your cpms come down. you're literally getting rewarded for writing a good story compare that to a 15 second ugc clip someone swipes past in 2 seconds the brands printing are running ads that look like articles and converting cold traffic at scale with long form copy everyone knows about natives now. but knowing and doing are different things. writing copy that holds someone for 3 minutes is a skill and most people don't want to put the reps in app.gethookd.ai/share/ad/210… scroll gethookd daily. study what's actually working. that's how you get better
10
10
235
15,361
My student was ready to give up on his brand 2 months ago. Stuck at $3k days. CPAs through the roof. Creatives dying every few days. Nothing scaling. We didn't change the product. We changed everything around it: → Went from launching a handful of creatives a week to 50+ a day. Mostly natives mixed with AI generated videos. Net new concepts not iterations. Different mechanisms different angles different formats so the account always had fresh winners before the old ones burned out → Deep dived into every winning and losing creative to understand exactly why something worked and why it didn't. Once you know that you stop guessing and start building creatives with intent → Built automated workflows for the entire creative pipeline. Scripting, editing, publishing. What used to take him all day now runs in the background → Made the right hires. Editors and recently a creative strategist. Let him work ON the brand instead of drowning in it → Rebuilt his funnel top to bottom. Ad message matching the landing page. Stronger offer. Upsells that actually converted Yesterday he hit $23k in a single day. Same product. Same niche. Completely different system. You're closer than you think. Most people quit right before everything clicks. Don't switch products if it is showing demand. Fix what's around it.
4
1
74
3,369
Your ad account is telling you exactly whats wrong You just dont know how to read it High CTR but no purchases: The ad is doing its job. People are clicking. Your landing page is killing the sale. Fix the page not the ad Low CTR: Your hook is dead. First 3 seconds of video or the headline on a static. Thats all that matters here. Swap the hook keep the rest High CPM: Stop blaming Meta. Your ad looks like an ad. The algorithm charges you more when people skip past it. Make it look native and CPMs drop Good CPA but no profit: Your unit economics are broken. COGS + shipping + ad cost per unit. If that number is higher than your selling price it doesnt matter how cheap your CPA is. Youre buying revenue not profit CPA creeping after 5-7 days: Creative fatigue. Launch net new concepts. Different mechanism different format. Then increase your creative volume so you always have fresh concepts going in before the old ones die Add to carts but no checkouts: Friction at checkout. Shipping cost surprise. Too many steps. No trust signals. Or your offer isnt strong enough to close Stop guessing whats wrong The data already told you Learn to read it
11
8
1
116
5,827
$700k in 4 days on my main brand Was editing other peoples ads 2 years ago One decision changed everything Bet on yourself or stay stuck
11
2
147
3,538
Your ad says "fixes bloating" So does every other supplement ad on the internet. Thats a claim not an ad What actually converts is the mechanism. The HOW "Silymarin in milk thistle regenerates liver cells so your body breaks down food properly instead of storing it as bloat" Now the customer understands WHY it works. They dont need to trust you they just need to follow the logic Angle = the problem you lead with Mechanism = the specific process that solves it Most brands test different angles. Smart brands test different mechanisms within the same angle One angle. Multiple reasons WHY it works. Find the mechanism people believe and you have an ad that scales for months
2
22
1,200
Supp brand update: Month 1 was $200k MRR Haven’t even hit month 2 yet and were at $357k $1M MRR speedrun
$200k MRR in 1 month on a brand new supp brand. not because of the product. because of the system behind it. most brands spend a month hunting for one winning angle. we assumed we didn’t know which would win and went wide instead ran native and AI videos across a stack of angles, not just hook variations on one offer for each angle, we went into the mechanisms, built out the different reasons why the product actually works and tested those separately too built a PDP for every mechanism, matched word for word to the ad so there’s no funnel congruency gap between click and landing page built a workflow using AI to automate the video creative and PDPs, so testing a new mechanism took hours instead of weeks set hard kill criteria on CTR and CPA, dead concepts got cut within 48 hours, no emotional attachment to a losing ad budget went straight into the angles and mechanisms actually printing while most competitors were still waiting on their first custom lander high testing volume beats a “gut feel” every time. the data picks the winner, not you $1M MRR real soon
10
4
108
4,312
your product isn't losing to better products it's losing to better offers and most people don't even realise it here's what I mean you can have the best ads in the world but if someone lands on your page and your offer is just "buy one for $39.99 + free shipping" you've already lost free shipping isn't an offer. everybody does that. that's just expected now the brands that are actually printing are making saying no feel stupid a 90 day supply bundled with a free bonus product. subscribe and save that genuinely saves them money. a guarantee so strong it removes every reason not to buy. now that's an offer but here's where most people really fumble they send all their traffic to one product page and hope for the best wrong if your ad is about back pain, that click needs to land on a page that ONLY talks about back pain. not your homepage. not your full collection. a page that feels like the exact same conversation your ad started the click and the landing page need to feel like one experience. the moment there's a disconnect you lose them and then there's the part nobody wants to hear if your aov is under $50 you are fighting a losing battle. cpms are going up every year. the brands winning right now aren't getting cheaper traffic they're making every single visitor worth more bundles. subscribe and save. post purchase upsells. this isn't optional anymore this is survival stop trying to compete on product. compete on everything around the product that's where the real margin lives
4
35
1,919
What you guys think of the fit? Trick or treating but instead of candy I'm collecting MRR 🎃
5
2
116
4,964
Your ad is eating budget but not printing sales? that's not a dead ad. that's an ad with one thing wrong if Meta keeps spending on it something already hit. your job is finding the leak first place I look: who's actually clicking? if your hook is too vague you attract window shoppers. people who love the content but were never pulling out their card tighten up who you're talking to in the first 3 seconds. name the person, name the problem. keep the energy that made it work but filter out the tourists I've had ads doing insane CTR that sold nothing because the creative was entertaining the wrong crowd. soon as we narrowed the hook, same ad, completely different results second place I look: does the page finish the job? the ad got the click. that parts done. if they're bouncing after that your page is the problem not the ad biggest mistake I see is the ad selling one angle and the page saying something completely different your ad is about saving time? your page better not open with "premium organic ingredients" every winning angle deserves its own page. not just one PDP for everything. the brands doing real numbers all figured this out early congruent landing pages aren't a nice to have. they're the difference between an ad that spends and an ad that scales before you kill that ad, check what's around it. the winner might already be there you just haven't connected the pieces yet
3
3
30
1,815
The biggest problem with running subscriptions isn't getting customers. it's keeping them Most people don't cancel. they just dispute the charge in their bank and you wake up to a chargeback you didn't even see coming this intercepts that before it happens. if you're doing MRR you need this
Your subscribers can now skip a delivery from their banking app. That gives you a chance to keep them before a renewal dispute becomes a chargeback. When a customer goes to their banking app to dispute a charge, Disputely Resolve intercepts it. Instead of a chargeback, they get a 1-tap option to just skip their next @LoopEngine delivery. The customer keeps their routine, and you keep the revenue
2
2
20
2,063
The reason most ecom stores fail isn't the product It's the feedback loop You launch. You wait a week. You change nothing. You panic. You switch products Winners launch. Read the data in 48 hours. Cut what's not working. Double down on what is. Repeat Speed of iteration is the only real advantage in this game
7
44
2,405
$215k in a day My first ever day in ecom I did $85 That was 2 years ago This game will change your life if you don’t quit
24
5
1
335
14,147
Every ad I run gets broken down. winner or loser. I don't care about ROAS until I understand WHY where did they drop off. was it the hook. was it the proof. did the ad do its job but the PDP killed the sale. would it print on a different sub-avatar most brands skip this. they kill ads that had all the right signals just because the surface numbers looked bad that feedback loop is the difference between guessing and scaling and AI has blown the whole thing wide open AI songs, pixar style ads, formats that didn't even exist 6 months ago. stuff that stops the scroll before your hook even needs to work take one winning angle, run it through 20 different formats and personas in a day. by tomorrow you know exactly what prints and why the brands still waiting a week for one piece of content are already behind They just don't know it yet
13
45
2,370
An 18 year old with no experience just did $16k in a single day selling supplements no funding. no connections. no team. just a phone and a willingness to shut up and listen 3 months ago he was burning money running ads with no structure, no offer strategy, no backend I took him on as a 1-1 student and we rebuilt everything from zero today he’s printing $16k days and BFCM hasn’t even started yet the craziest part? he almost quit before we started working together said he “wasn’t sure supplements was the right move” now he’s sitting on a subscription machine that’s only getting stronger every month guys with way more money and way more experience can’t figure this out he figured it out at 18 the difference was never talent. it was never money it was having someone who’s already done it strip away all the noise and show him exactly what to do stop overthinking it. the game is simple when you have the right person next to you
3
4
92
4,084
Most people testing creative only test hooks and wonder why nothing moves after the first few wins. Hook, angle, and mechanism are three different things. Almost nobody separates them. Hook is how you stop the scroll. The first 3 seconds. Angle is the emotional reason someone cares. Fear of aging, social proof, convenience, status. Mechanism is the actual "why it works." The science, the process, the specific reason this product solves it. You can run 20 hooks on the same angle and same mechanism and just be testing editing style, not actually learning anything new about your customer. Here's the breakdown that matters: New hook, same angle, same mechanism = you're testing creative execution Same hook, new angle, same mechanism = you're testing what your customer actually cares about Same hook, same angle, new mechanism = you're testing whether they believe the product works Most accounts plateau because they're stuck doing the first one on repeat. New face, new b-roll, same angle, same mechanism, same ceiling. The accounts that keep scaling are testing all three independently so they know exactly which lever moved the number, instead of guessing why an ad died. Few.
7
1
25
1,426
$200k MRR in 1 month on a brand new supp brand. not because of the product. because of the system behind it. most brands spend a month hunting for one winning angle. we assumed we didn’t know which would win and went wide instead ran native and AI videos across a stack of angles, not just hook variations on one offer for each angle, we went into the mechanisms, built out the different reasons why the product actually works and tested those separately too built a PDP for every mechanism, matched word for word to the ad so there’s no funnel congruency gap between click and landing page built a workflow using AI to automate the video creative and PDPs, so testing a new mechanism took hours instead of weeks set hard kill criteria on CTR and CPA, dead concepts got cut within 48 hours, no emotional attachment to a losing ad budget went straight into the angles and mechanisms actually printing while most competitors were still waiting on their first custom lander high testing volume beats a “gut feel” every time. the data picks the winner, not you $1M MRR real soon
13
6
1
148
10,933
Hired too late for years and it capped everything kept doing tasks that didn't need me anymore because "nobody does it like me" that mentality is the single biggest ceiling in ecom right now, not ad spend, not creative, not the algorithm here’s the test i run on every op now if the task only needs time and attention, it's not mine anymore if it needs judgment on offer, positioning, or where the brand goes next, that stays with me everyone obsessed with doing more. the operators actually scaling are obsessed with doing less, better most people will read this and agree almost none of them will actually hand off the task they're avoiding today
1
1
18
1,310