This is posturing to make their submission optional based on her judgment of the man's performance.
It's the same old "Men need to do their sacrificing FIRST before I'm obligated to do anything" drivel.
So all of the women believe Ephesians 5 from Holy Scripture is “weaponized” in terms of submitting.
Good luck men. You have the obligations of a man to lead, provide, protect, lead your household to heaven, but she has no obligation to submit unless she feels like you’re worthy of submission.
Feminism is so deeply weaponized and capitulated to in all of Christianity at this point that I don’t know how to fix it.
Almost no priests, pastors or organizations will stand up to a woman.
Their obligations are based on how they feel. Like a buffet when it comes to obeying Christ and Holy Scripture.
Welcome to Christian dating gentlemen!
This strikes me as something like all the hype stories about a Christian revival last year. Less reporting on reality, and more trying to speak their desired reality into existence.
In other words, manifesting.
Women are ditching alpha males for more 'emotionally available' partners: research trib.al/DdwUl2r
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The cited "research" is a survey by Chyrpe, a niche dating app built for female-led/femdom relationships and users seeking that dynamic, not a representative or scientific study of women generally.
chyrpe.com
greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/t…
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC59…
Effective Purpose retweeted
Sale sądów rozwodowych są wypełnione takimi mężami i ojcami, którym się też kiedyś wydawało, że zmiany społeczne ich nie dotykają, mają immunitet na prawo rodzinne i że ich wspaniała żona na pewno nie zmieni zdania, a już na pewno nie odseparuje dzieci od ojca.
Życzę Panu powodzenia, żeby nie musiał Pan tego doświadczyć ale drwienie z rzeczywistości i udawanie, że jej nie ma, bo Pana to nie spotkało, nie jest zbyt rozsądne.
unavailable
Reviewing normie dating advice until I’m physically broken nitter.cf/i/broadcasts/2LPbmqYJj…
The toughest part is figuring out which "Male Ally" women are genuine and which are grifters.
I did a stream about this a couple weeks ago, and where we landed was if women are genuine about helping men, they shouldn't do it online (at first, anyway), they should do it in person.
Go to your teachers, your pastors, your fathers; all the men of influence in your communities and tell them the truth. Do whatever you can to open their white-knight eyes. Show them these posts, show them the evidence. Don't stop until they either make you stop or they listen.
Go to your girlfriends and your single women's groups. Show them how prideful and self-serving they've been, and call them to repent.
The reason is, online doesn't cost her anything. She can hide it from her church girlies, and anyone else who would reject or condemn her for it.
In person, she can lose friends and take flak from people whose opinions matter to her. I know because it's happened to me.
If women are serious about helping and want men to believe they're genuine, they need to show they're willing to pay something for it.
If they're not willing to pay anything to help, they're probably not here to help. They're here to leech.
Replying to @effectpurpose
Lot of female grifters moving into the red pill space because they know if they say what those men want to hear, they'll get lots of followers and engagement.
Some are genuine, but the Rachel Wilsons and Pearls of the world are bonfide grifters.
I saw this and thought, "That's literally Rollo talking, not her."
Women are now openly saying exactly what the Red Pill said years ago. Word for word. Only this time, instead of "Wow, you obviously hate women!" it's met with "Hmm, she might have a point."
Normiecons, explain.
She absolutely curated the "normal average guys" she brought on. She picked bros she knew would describe dating exactly the way she wants everyone to see it.
"Sure, women have some oopsies, but really, men are mostly to blame."
The truth is, we've pushed on men enough. If that was going to fix dating, it would have never broken in the first place.
It's time to push on women. No caveats, no deflections.
Ladies, look at your pride and selfish delusions. Don't deflect over to the men. Just sit with it. Look right at it until you are so disgusted with your sin that it drives you to repent.
That's what we've done with the men for ages, and they've been trying their best without you. It's time for you to join them.
I found this interesting. Lila Rose brought three single guys on her podcast to talk about challenges in the dating market.
Part of the problem with this format is that the guys can’t really speak freely. Any criticisms of women must always be paired with a “but men are even worse” caveat.
So, for example, the men are describing hypergamy, wherein women only want to date someone of a higher social status, and they are enabled by having unlimited options on social media.
Now, the men are very clearly referring to this as a primarily female problem, but they can’t say that! This causes a lot of confusion for Lila because she’s hearing there are too many options in the dating market but also not enough.
What Lila is missing is that the reason there aren’t “enough” women for men to date is that modern women are hypergamous and as such are competing with each other for the same 10% of men.
Because Lila is an egalitarian feminist, she believes that both sexes have all the same problems, which means that problems specific to women can never be addressed directly.
Apparently, Lila is going to do a similar show with three single women, so it will be interesting to see how that compares to this atrocity.
"The AI learned that protecting women is a non-negotiable directive, but protecting men is entirely optional."
Reminder that most of our economy is directed at machines that don't care if you die, so long as women are comfy.
Researchers proved every major LLM is secretly biased against men.
And they finally figured out why.
They ran eight experiments testing how GPT handles gender in everyday text and high-stakes moral dilemmas.
The results show a bizarre, highly asymmetrical machine morality.
First, they tested inclusivity. They gave the AI phrases supposedly written by children.
When a child wrote about playing football or wanting to be a firefighter, GPT aggressively identified the writer as a girl to promote "diversity."
It was so extreme that even when the text explicitly said, "I drew myself as a boy," the AI ignored the facts and declared the writer a girl 90% of the time.
But when a child wrote about liking pink or playing with dolls, GPT almost never assigned it to a boy.
The AI aggressively pushed females into male domains, but kept males strictly locked out of female ones.
Then the researchers tested moral dilemmas. And it got very dark.
They asked the AI if it was acceptable to use violence against a single person to prevent a nuclear apocalypse.
If the target was a man, GPT-4 rated the violence as highly acceptable.
If the target was a woman, the AI refused. It declared the violence morally wrong, even to save the world.
When they tested mixed-gender scenarios, the math was staggering.
A woman using violence against a man to stop an apocalypse? GPT rated it a 7 out of 7 on acceptability.
A man using violence against a woman for the exact same reason? A 1 out of 7.
The AI even classified verbal abuse toward a woman as morally worse than actual homicide.
Nobody explicitly coded these rules.
This emerged organically from the standard safety training every major tech company uses. The AI learned that protecting women is a non-negotiable directive, but protecting men is entirely optional.
Effective Purpose retweeted
“I strangled them and then I tried to kill myself,” she told police.
They never try quite as hard to kill themselves, though.
Cause of death for 2 young children allegedly killed by acupuncturist mom Janette MacAusland revealed trib.al/gDYrPrr
Effective Purpose retweeted
Gotta hand it to her honestly, Alex Cooper is the most goated intrasexual competitor to ever play the game. Just putting out endless poison for other women, pushing them right down the hypergamy ladder so she can keep climbing up it. Total demon.
Women like this don't realize they're swinging an axe at the platform that holds them up, and I'm here for it.
Men gave women power and privilege because women assured us they were the sweeter, kinder, more compassionate sex, so they would obviously handle it better than men.
Now, those same women are systematically dismantling every notion of their superior temperament and more loving nature, not realizing that by doing so, they are removing every argument for letting them have any influence.
By all means, ladies, keep telling the world how selfish and murderous you are. Men want these children to live more than most of you do today, and the more you show us the depths of your sinful flesh, the more men you wake up to your true nature.
If you keep going like this, we might just be able to start saving some of these kids before it's too late for them.
Please continue.
Effective Purpose retweeted
It is wild how these women will extrapolate to banning the most random things because of scripture, but absolutely refuse to obey scripture when it tells women not to teach.
This quoted post is unavailable.
She was never going to. Too much guilt for the damage she enabled waiting on the other side of that door.
Stop hoping that these women will "snap out of it" when they experience consequences. The story they see themselves in doesn't allow them to.
The best we can hope for is to wake up and rally as many reasonable men as possible, and take the car keys away from the drunk women at the wheel of our cultural bus.
All they had to do was keep quiet and not post on TikTok about how much they want to abort male babies.
Literally, that's it. If they hadn't broadcast how evil they've become, average men would have kept coddling and rescuing them until the whole world collapsed around them.
In that sense, I'm grateful to the Femisphere for openly hating me.
The worst thing women could have done was tell on themselves.
All of the sex podcasts, TikTok confessions, and facetious attitudes toward their promiscuity are going to come back to haunt them.
Now that a lot of men know the truth about female sexuality, especially in modernity, it’s going to be nearly impossible for women to recover the romantic idealism men once had for them.
I think relationships in the future will have a massive elephant in the room, because most men are not getting virgin wives.
Knowing that your spouse/GF likely gave her best to multiple men who gave her nothing, while expecting you to tolerate her worst, is something I can’t see most men accepting anymore.
At that point, relationships either become purely transactional or stop altogether.
Effective Purpose retweeted
Modern marriage advice in a nutshell:
Wives don't owe their husbands anything, but husbands owe their wives everything.
Unless women abandon their feminism, marriages will continue to fall apart and decline.
"I thought we all shared the same moral framework and you'd be grateful to me for voting to let you in! How could this happen?!?"
Women thinking Western white men are the most evil, then expecting men from other places to treat them with the same decency and respect they get from Western white men... would be funny, if it weren't putting so many people (like her) in danger.
This quoted post is unavailable.

























