Fraser McMillan 🌐 (@frasmcm) header
Fraser McMillan 🌐 (@frasmcm) profile picture

Lecturer in Scottish Electoral Politics @EdinburghPIR πŸ—³οΈπŸ΄σ §σ ’σ ³σ £σ ΄σ Ώ | Dandies πŸ”΄βšͺ | Abundance bro πŸ—οΈ

Edinburgh
Joined March 2019
Photo by Fraser McMillan 🌐 (@frasmcm)Photo by Fraser McMillan 🌐 (@frasmcm)Photo by Fraser McMillan 🌐 (@frasmcm)Photo by Fraser McMillan 🌐 (@frasmcm)Photo by Fraser McMillan 🌐 (@frasmcm)Photo by Fraser McMillan 🌐 (@frasmcm)Photo by Fraser McMillan 🌐 (@frasmcm)Photo by Fraser McMillan 🌐 (@frasmcm)Photo by Fraser McMillan 🌐 (@frasmcm)Photo by Fraser McMillan 🌐 (@frasmcm)
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
People who have been in research fields develop a felt sense that most "research" (in almost any field that isn't exactingly technical) is research theater, and many superstar careers enjoy star status not because of a unique connection to the truth but because of a unique connection with an audience. No one really has the time or stature to, from a position of objectivity and trust, bring popular researchers to heel. But it will get increasingly hard to hide from serious critique. The machines can do critique now, at the level of depth and rigor previously only possible for the academically deranged. We're going to have to revise a lot of what we "know" about the world that isn't really knowledge but is actually just received popular consensus - like floating voltages without grounding wires. The grounding wires are coming.
Tyler Cowen: 'I am not even sure what to say at this point. We need a radical revaluation of this work, and of the associated policy arguments. More generally, this is only a single step in the story of how AI is going to revise economic science, and indeed past research more generally. As I stress in many of my recent talks, there will be significant gains and losses in status, with the losses often outweighing the gains. I see this as one of those cases.'
44
197
51
1,486
149,165
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
A very apt description of what being terminally online feels like
5
131
5
1,186
29,602
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
The cyberpocalypse is going to hit British politics like an asteroid. So many people have heads buried so far in the sand (just look at what Parliament spends its time discussing...)
35
51
11
600
70,516
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
first set of photos to really make me internalize 2013 is about to be closer to the 90s than to today soon – at New York, NY
Midnight release of GTA V (2013)
28
882
18
17,585
287,499
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
So true, Mr. Fukuyama.
8
106
8
793
17,196
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
NEW WORKING PAPER We meta-reanalyzed a decade of candidate-choice conjoint experiments. 144 papers. 243 studies. 434K respondents. 2.18M candidate matchups. 52 countries. tl;dr: It turns out people vote based on policy... Here's what we learned:
2
40
4
128
8,500
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
Stuff like this is what downgrades my expectations re: speed of AI diffusion + impact on the economy. One of the easiest, cheapest, high value things editors could do right now is just run stuff they publish through pangram and I would bet less than 5% are doing it every single time.
newspaper editors, you know that i love you how are you not running *everything* through pangram??
10
15
3
265
33,376
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
Data project (AI-able) and exam (paper, no aids) score distribution on the undergraduate Development Economics course I have been teaching at Stockholm University, 2022-2026.
14
80
6
508
47,209
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
Today we're sharing some initial data on how Americans use Claude for politics, based on aggregated conversation data analyzed with differentially private methods. A couple interesting takeaways: *Almost no one asks AI how they should vote* About ~5.75% of conversations in the US touch on some kind of political or social issue in a recent one-week period, and less than 0.01% of conversations involve asking how to vote. *Political conversations have many goals* These conversations have wide-ranging goals, everything from research and writing assistance to learning, fact-checking, and arguing. We are continuing to make progress on improving how Claude talks about these topics---steadily increasing our performance on our even-handedness evals and partnering with a range of outside organizations to develop new measures of political bias---and I hope that sharing information about the shape of these conversations will help people outside the company evaluate AI's political bias, accuracy, and other criteria in ecologically valid ways. I'd love to discuss this with people who are interested, as it was a huge priority for me before joining. This was a big joint effort as part of our work preparing for the midterm elections @AnthropicAI. Full post is here: anthropic.com/news/2026-us-m…
21
55
10
298
34,206
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
Under our new Westminster model this works out as: πŸŽ—οΈ SNP β€” 46 seats πŸ”Ά LD β€” 5 🌳 Con β€” 3 🌹 Lab β€” 3 The SNP are swamping Labour as they did in 2015, 2017 and 2019
NEW: Scottish Westminster Voting Intention on behalf of @theSNP SNP: 34% (+4) Labour: 20% (-15) Reform UK: 18% (+11) Conservative: 12% (-1) Lib Dem: 8% (-2) Green: 6% (+2) Others: 3% (+2) Changes since the 2024 General Election F/w 18th September - 12th October 2026
23
64
8
170
38,205
the "Feb 2020" feeling is correct but tech adoption is not like a virus Altman said it, there will be a huge lag in uptake in the real economy, plus likely massive negative polarisation/backlash will be THE issue at 28/29 US/UK elections if we aren't all paperclips by then
why is it that no one outside of tech or twitter has internalized the consequences of what is being described more and more of, every day, as time goes on?
1
193
Regulatory Superpower? πŸ‘€
Anthropic's Lord Booth-Smith (no relation lol) tells UK lawmakers that US and UK gov are in talks to make the UK AISI one of the third-party evaluators with employee-like access. At oral evidence hearing in UK parliament.
172
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
πŸ“’New paper in @The_JOP on the reciprocal nature of citizens’ support for democratic transgressions. We show that citizens reciprocate undemocratic behavior: When confronted with violations by political opponents, citizens’ support for transgressions by their own side doubles
2
20
1
62
3,247
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
On the eve of The AGI Chronicles (which comes out tomorrow!) I'm publishing an excerpt from "Big Blob of Compute," a 2017 internal research document by Dario Amodei, back when he was a researcher at OpenAI. It's never been published before, but BBOC is, in my mind, the essay that started the AI race. It described Amodei's hypothesis that scaling up AI models was the best way, by far, to make them smarter. GPT-2 was an experiment to test the hypothesis, and when it worked, OpenAI went all-in on scaling, which led to the race we have today. It's a fascinating historical artifact that deserves to see the light of day. And it's taken on mythical proportions inside the AI industry, which is now spending trillions of dollars building the "big blobs" that Amodei thought would be necessary to get to AGI. Enjoy! And please pre-order the book if you do! kevinroose.substack.com/p/th…
27
57
23
539
106,351
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
The world is being reshaped daily by AI. Yet after a month of party conferences, I was taken aback at just how little interest our political leaders seem to have in what's going on My @thetimes column thetimes.com/uk/politics/art…
7
29
17
139
47,058
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
Axios is reporting that the top labs are wargaming scenarios for the aftermath of a catastrophic event in the next 6 - 12 months, that some executives now see as being inevitable.
199
475
234
4,820
654,023
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
Peru politics be like: Mayor Hitler Mussolini, moderate social democrat.
🚨#BREAKING: Hitler Mussolini Simeón Flores is set to become mayor of the Peruvian town of Queropalca after defeating his opponent by just 25 votes.
13
205
12
2,774
51,130
Fraser McMillan 🌐 retweeted
New paper: Selfish Equality In a global experiment, I show that high-redistribution countries are not particularly altruistic. Instead, they believe inequality is pragmatically harmful. This creates selfish equality -- the defining feature of redistributive countries.
4
80
7
423
42,169
America: $40 borger Russia: literal plague France: on fire Samoa subplot:
17
378
4
6,581
107,464