Stacy

Read books. Lots of them. As many as you possibly can.

The entire cholesterol theory began in 1913 by feeding a carnivore's dinner to a vegetarian, and it has never worked on anything else. Feed cholesterol to a rabbit and its arteries fill with plaque inside weeks. Feed cholesterol to a dog and nothing happens. The dog eats it for life. Feed cholesterol to a rat and nothing happens. Feed cholesterol to a cat and nothing happens. A cat eats nothing else. Feed cholesterol to a lion, a wolf, a fox, an eagle, a seal, and nothing has ever happened, in the whole history of veterinary medicine. Feed cholesterol to a human and the liver makes less of its own, and the blood number barely moves. The rabbit is a herbivore. It has no system for handling a molecule it was never built to eat, so the stuff piles up where it lands. Every carnivore has the system, because every carnivore has eaten cholesterol at every meal since there were carnivores. A Russian pathologist proved the rabbit result in 1913. He tried it on dogs and rats and it failed, so the dogs and rats were left out of the story. A hundred years of heart advice rests on the one animal that reacts the way the theory needs, and that animal eats grass. They built a diet for a rabbit and prescribed it to an animal with canine teeth.

The Conversation nitter.cf/i/spaces/1qKVmyqnLEZxB

Turns out the future does have flying cars

Y ya que estamos con los consejos de salud, aquí van otras cosas que todos pueden hacer, empezando hoy, y que no cuestan ni un centavo: 1. Recibir sol, al menos 15 minutos al día. 2. Caminar descalzos unos minutos sobre la grama, tierra o arena (no en la vía pública, jajaja). 3. Dormir. 4. Pasar tiempo con la familia/amigos. 5. Leer un libro (aunque sea unas páginas al día). 6. Detenerse un minuto al día para respirar profundamente. 7. Cerrar los ojos y meditar (pensar) 5 minutos al día. 8. Sonreír (aunque estén solos). 9. Decir gracias, por favor y buenos días. Háganlo y si no se sienten 10 veces mejor de lo que se sienten ahora, voten por la oposición en las próximas elecciones 😂

Everybody with common sense should vote Republican in November! If you don't believe me, just listen to this.. No Socialist/Communist!!

CHAUSER already told US the answer 700 YEARS AGO In 1387, A knight is about to be killed. Queen Guinevere says: “I will spare you if you answer one question in a year and a day “What do women most desire?” He asks 100 women. He gets 100 different answers. On the last day, an old hag gives him the answer for a price. He goes back to court and says: "Women desire to have sovereignty over their husbands as well as their lovers, and to be in mastery above him." All the women in the court agreed. It was correct. His life was spared. 700 years later, nothing has changed. If you want proof, look at every mother-in-law vs daughter-in-law fight in history. Look at baby mamas vs wives fights in history. What are they fighting over? To control the MAN. It's never about the dishes. It's about WHO CONTROLS HIM. Who has sovereignty over him. The mother had him, now the wife wants mastery over him. The battle never ends because the desire never ends. Women want to control men. This is why they hate Andrew Tate. This is why they hate the word Patriarchy. This is why they hate red-pill men. It's not because Tate is "corrupting" young men. It's because Tate is teaching young men how NOT to be controlled. They need men to be weak, soft, apologetic, and feminine because a weak man is easy to control. A masculine man who knows his worth, who leads, who doesn't tolerate disrespect? He cannot be controlled. And a man they cannot control, they must demonize. Patriarchy is not oppression. Patriarchy is the one system where men could not be controlled by women. That's why they hate it. Now you are being called “A REAL MAN” do you see women call a woman doing the same thing you do “ A REAL WOMAN”? They want sovereignty. They want mastery. And any man who refuses to give it to them will be called toxic..

The competitive spirit is about how you can just do things by outdoing others at the things they are doing.

Another Cow Falls Ill in Denmark in 2026 Due to Bovaer A Danish farmer writes: We’ve been participating in a trial where veterinarians and others were involved for 14 days prior to the start of the Bovaer treatment and for the first 14 days of the trial. But they’re stopping the trial as early as tomorrow because they can see that it’s having a major negative effect on the cows and because we’ve asked them to stop. The trial is being conducted in collaboration with Seges and the manufacturer of Bovaer, DSM-Firmenich. Fourteen days before the start, blood samples, urine samples, milk samples, etc., were taken. Feed samples were taken every day, and we kept track of how much the cows ate. The veterinarians examined all cows showing signs of illness. After the trial began, things went well for the first four days, but then things started to go wrong. On the sixth day—that is, today—the veterinarian has already examined six sick cows. The one in this video cannot stand up; the other five have diarrhea and are generally unwell. Last year, when we used Bovaer, all our time was spent caring for sick cows. Is this really what politicians and consumers want? How far do you want us to go, and where does animal welfare fit into all of this? NOPA-Nofff.com (find us on Facebook) Boycott Arla🇩🇰🐄💚 Kent Nielsen 10/6 26

At first, Jean-Pierre did not understand. He watched the evening news, paid his taxes, voted responsibly and believed what respectable people told him. 1. France needed immigration because the economy needed workers. 2. Diversity was an opportunity. 3. Public services were under pressure because they lacked funding. 4. Disorder at school was caused by inequality. 5. Crime statistics required context. 6. Anyone who connected these things too quickly was probably an extremist. Then his children started coming home from school saying they could barely hear the teacher. Half the lesson was spent restoring order. Teachers changed constantly. Some simply disappeared for weeks. Jean-Pierre complained once, politely. The administration explained that the situation was “challenging” and that the school was developing an “inclusive pedagogical response.” Jean-Pierre went home reassured. There were professionals dealing with it. His neighbourhood changed too. Shops closed. Others appeared. Groups of men occupied the same corners every evening. His wife stopped taking one street after dark. Jean-Pierre noticed all of this, but he had also learned that noticing patterns was dangerous. So every event remained an isolated event. One closed shop meant nothing. One assault meant nothing. Ten incidents meant ten unrelated incidents. Only a racist would connect dots. Then his daughter was sexually assaulted by a man who had recently arrived in France. Jean-Pierre was devastated. But almost immediately he began policing his own thoughts. The attacker was an individual. Of course. One must never generalise. The television explained that exploiting such crimes politically was irresponsible. A minister warned against “stigmatisation.” Jean-Pierre found himself nodding through tears. What had happened to his daughter was monstrous, but the truly frightening possibility, apparently, was that somebody somewhere might vote for the wrong party because of it. Nothing changed. His son’s school became worse. His daughter stopped going out alone. His wife wanted to move. The police were exhausted. The teachers were exhausted. The hospitals were exhausted. Jean-Pierre was exhausted. Yet every explanation he had been given required him to believe that each deterioration was temporary, accidental, exaggerated or caused by something entirely unrelated to the deterioration immediately beside it. And whenever somebody proposed that perhaps the country had made serious mistakes — about migration, authority, education, policing, integration, punishment or borders — Jean-Pierre knew the correct answer. “Careful. That sounds like the far right.” So he remained reasonable. He remained moderate. He remained informed. He remained completely incapable of drawing a conclusion from his own life. So at first, Jean-Pierre did not understand. And he still does not understand.

Elon Musk makes predictions for Europe. After what we’ve seen in France in the last few days and terrorist plots in the UK, the stabbings, the rapes. All covered up/downplayed by Politicians and MSM. Will he be right? "I think we're going to see widespread slaughter in Europe." "You're clearly seeing a massive increase in the number of attacks." "And the legacy media downplays these attacks. But the attacks, the terrorism, the killing of innocent people is rising. Every week, there's more." .. nitter.cf/WikiLeaksQ/status/2105…

Instagram is for girls

Each video coming out of France is more insane than the last. Heres some little scumbag attacking an old lady with a makeshift flamethrower. How can Le Pen lose after scenes like this?

Let’s recap: - agrees to threesome and is excited (her own statement to the police) by the idea after a few drinks - one of the guys is so drunk he passes out and loses his erection, the only person who was stated to have “passed out” btw - she asks to stop so the passed out guy can recover, agrees to do ketamine with the guy still standing - does ketamine directly off the erect cock of the guy who didn’t pass out - can’t remember how she ended up having sex with more guys but doesn’t ever claim she passed out, and remember up until this point she’s been drinking and doing K and engaging in group sex voluntarily, so there’s no reason to assume she was opposed to more men, she just can’t remember all the details because of the drugs she did voluntarily - the second she’s too tired and wants it to stop she asks them to stop and it all stops and it’s over Women are not actually getting these details and when they do they’re ignoring them so they can call you a rapist If they actually knew this girl in their social circles they would all call her a whore behind her back Women are terrible people, awful hypocrites, and there is no point in explaining any of this to them because they don’t care about the truth, they want to look virtuous for standing up for the girl, feel morally superior for secretly looking down on her for being a whore, and then brow beat all the men who care about the pesky facts by saying they’re sexist and probably also rapists This is the situation summed up Ignore the women, share the facts