Jason retweeted
This is an unusual tweet. My reading of this is the Vice President is blaming the policy of the President. And the son of the President is tweeting agreement.
Am I missing something? Is there a really clever play at work here or is someone dense?
Jason retweeted
Completely meaningless words
UK government to outlaw new North Sea drilling bbc.in/4eg9IKL
Jason retweeted
Bad policy, bad character make bad politics: erratic tariffs, impulsive Iran war, blanket pardons, apparent corruption, weaponized justice, ICE brutality, mountainous deficits, hiding Epstein, abandoning allies and coddling enemies. Hoping for a course correction, for the country and for my party.
I still believe that saying “hurt people, hurt people” about a Hezbollah affiliated terrorist attempt to murder Jewish toddlers a Michigan synagogue preschool should have been disqualifying for him.
Michigan's Democratic candidate for Senate Abdul El-Sayed confronted @jamesmatthewsky, telling him he wouldn't answer his questions as he wants "zero" votes in the UK.
Watch the heated exchange between the two.
Watch our live coverage of the US midterms➡️ trib.al/BikRSb2
Jason retweeted
Having won an election because people hated inflation, I simply would not have imposed tariffs, badgered the Fed for rate cuts, run enormous budget deficits and thrown in a Middle Eastern war. But I appreciate there are different schools of thought.
Jason retweeted
PA: A famous man has lost his bid for a High Court injunction against two media organisations to prevent the publication of allegations against him but cannot yet be named subject to any appeal, a judge has ruled.
There should be a public inquiry into the fact this existed
Alton Towers closes World of David Walliams bbc.in/4sXvGIF
Jason retweeted
What a depressing Labour u-turn on the extension of ILR for Boriswave care workers. It’s not just the huge cost heading our way, it’s the way that care workers are singled out for the sentimental treatment we usually reserve for NHS nurses. For our own benefit as a country we need the average carer to be better paid, better trained, and higher status (I recently wrote a book partly about this The Care Dilemma). But we don’t have to pretend they are all angels: there are some who are v good, most who are average and too many who are useless, as in any walk of life. The immigrant carers are coming here for a better life from poorer often failing societies not because they love looking after British people. In my own last hospital stay most the care assistants were Boriswave women, mostly from Africa - some decent some indifferent - but ALL spoke quite poor and v heavily accented English that was sometimes hard to understand and unless I spoke slowly and deliberately they struggled to understand me. This is obviously a sensitive issue that many people experience but don’t feel able to talk about (though it must be reflected in those low satisfaction surveys), partly because a carer has helped you when you are vulnerable and there is a kind of reflex gratitude even if the care has actually been a bit sloppy or incompetent (and you also feel you’re getting it free so shouldn’t moan, even if you’re paying more and more in tax). Yet it’s crazy that we are spending billions subsidising this when we could be using the money to incentivise British ppl, who speak the language fluently and understand the culture, to do these jobs.
Jason retweeted
Tenants used to be able to challenge rent rises. If they succeeded, the landlords could evict them. This obviously meant that the rulings weren’t binding and couldn’t set rents below the market rate.
Now you can’t evict the tenant, no matter how low the tribunal sets the rent. And tribunals can reduce the rents agreed to at the start of the tenancy, not just rent increases at the end of a fixed term.
This is *obviously* rent control by anyone’s definition of the term. This is what they wanted to happen!
I see the nonsense “rent controls are back” takes keep coming.
There is no rent control in England.
The legal right to challenge rent increases at tribunal was introduced by the Thatcher Government in its 1988 Housing Act.
It was rarely used in practice only because it inevitably resulted in a landlord serving a Section 21 notice.
Labour’s Renters’ Rights Act abolished Section 21 ‘no fault’ evictions and renters are now rightly empowered to challenge unfair or above-market rent increases.
In both the recent cases that have been the cause of so much debate, the tribunal has been operating exactly as it should – determining that the landlords in question were charging rents that simply did not reflect local market values for comparable properties.
Jason retweeted
My new blog, on 8 ways Burnham is increasing immigration:
1 New community sponsor route
2 HE sponsor route
3 Business sponsor route
4 UK Resettlement Scheme
5 Lowering of salary requirements
6 EU youth scheme
7 Taxpayer funds for EU students
8 Caving in on ILR
Link below!
Jason retweeted
I had intended to limit my public response to Lucy Kon’s story, allowing her to speak for herself. Her account had already attracted considerable attention within the Jewish community and the wider journalistic community.
But after reading today’s report in @thetimes, I believe remaining silent would be a dereliction of duty.
The Jewish community is one of the UK’s smallest minorities. What happens to individual Jews resonates far beyond those directly affected. Others read these accounts and recognise their own experiences, or fear they could be next. The chilling effect is profound.
Lucy Kon’s story cannot simply be dismissed as an isolated incident. It raises serious questions about a wider climate in which Jews face exclusion and public pressure, while too many people find it easier to acquiesce than to challenge it.
Little by little, British Jews are being made to feel that their identity puts them on the defensive. Each account of someone being silenced, marginalised or shown the door sends a message to many others: speaking openly about who you are may come at a cost.
The strength of a democratic society is measured by how it treats its minorities. British Jews deserve the same freedom, dignity and protection as everyone else.
Especially from the state.
Today’s @thetimes column is an interview with @imluciekon, an award-winning producer who was dealing with antisemitic bullying and had to fight for her BBC job while in hospital for anorexia
If you’re Jewish you’ll be an unperson at the BBC
thetimes.com/article/ad6378d…
Jason retweeted
Yet another one for the 'shocked but not surprised' list. A BBC diversity officer [political officer/identity politics commissar] told a Jewish staff member that Jews didn't need a support group because they run the media.
How did I miss this jaw-dropping anecdote from Lucie Kon @imluciekon last week.
Apparently a BBC diversity officer told a Jewish staff member, who’d been trying to set up a Jewish BBC support group a few years ago, that it wasn’t needed “because Jews run the media”.
A ‘Diversity, Equity and Inclusion’ officer.
This is just dystopian now.
(@DailyTPodcast int here: youtu.be/sqB2GDunRZU?is=t8cV…)
Jason retweeted
Thanks for the accurate summary of my positions, though you forgot helping get Hasan Piker banned from UK.
Who paid for your visits to Iran?
Why do you think you weren't imprisoned like Lindsay & Craig Foreman?
Do you get paid for your appearances on Press TV? If so, how much?
Hi David @DavidTaylor85
You really should be careful about using your position to come after me, because once you do that, people are entitled to look at your own record.
You've gone after the BBC over my appearance and questioned why I was given a platform.
Let's look at your record.
•You backed the proscription of Palestine Action.
•You went after Francesca Albanese and opposed the renewal of her UN mandate.
•You've defended Labour Friends of Israel and pushed back against scrutiny of pro-Israel influence in Parliament.
•You've attacked the Green Party and Zack Polanski over their position on Palestine and Zionism.
•You even opposed parliamentary wording referring to "accusations of genocide" in relation to Israel.
And you've described Israel as a "lone beacon of democracy, freedom of speech and rule of law" in the region, while it disregards international law, refuses to work with Palestinian Arabs and kills journalists.
So forgive me if I'm not going to take lectures from you about who should or shouldn't be given a platform.
You have a very clear political position on Israel and Palestine. That's your right.
But when you then use your position as an MP to put pressure on the BBC because I was given a platform, people are entitled to ask whether this is really about "standards" or whether it's about the fact that you don't like what people like me say.
And if you want to abuse your political power to scrutinise me, I'm going to scrutinise you right back.
Hemel Hempstead should know who you REALLY are. Is the kind of MP they want representing them.
Jason retweeted
Former MAC chair explaining why the care worker visa was always a very stupid idea.
For the average migrant arriving on the care worker visa, typically in their late 30s, you are effectively selling 100 years of residency in Britain in exchange for five years of care work.
Replying to @maxtempers
This is from a blog post by the former chair of the Migration Advisory Committee, explaining why the care worker visa was a total disaster. blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandp…
Jason retweeted
EXCL: Senior Greens will warn that the party has been taken over by pro-Palestinian activists who have replaced its environmental values with anti-Israeli politics
Adrian Ramsay, the former leader and MP for Waveney Valley, is expected to give an interview to the BBC on Sunday criticising what has happened to the party under the leadership of Zack Polanski
He leads a group of Green figures including former members of the European parliament as they call for a “conversation about the party’s direction”, after a series of scandals and internal party rifts about antisemitism
New figures show some 18,000 members have left the party since its peak in May this year, falling to about 212,000 after the conference from a height of 230,000
The Times understands some party figures have estimated that up to eight council coalitions could collapse, after Labour said it would pull out of power-sharing agreements if local groups did not denounce a motion to declare Zionism to be racist. The exact number is still unclear
Full read in @thetimes
thetimes.com/article/fe67f93…

































