Matt Oliver (@mattotele) header
Matt Oliver (@mattotele) profile picture

Industry Editor @Telegraph. Formerly @DailyMailUK and @theoxfordmail. Tips and stories to [email protected]

London, England
Joined February 2015
Photo by Matt Oliver (@mattotele)Photo by Matt Oliver (@mattotele)Photo by Matt Oliver (@mattotele)Photo by Matt Oliver (@mattotele)Photo by Matt Oliver (@mattotele)Photo by Matt Oliver (@mattotele)Photo by Matt Oliver (@mattotele)Photo by Matt Oliver (@mattotele)Photo by Matt Oliver (@mattotele)Photo by Matt Oliver (@mattotele)
Exclusive: General Lord Sanders has intervened on John Healey’s maiden budget, telling @telegraph it’s “incredible” that the Chancellor - who resigned as Defence Secretary over a lack of money for defence - would not use next week’s Budget to explain how the UK will get to 3% by 2030. Lord Sanders told me that you can’t expect industry to prepare the nation for war when it has no idea how the gov intends to get to its NATO target of 3.5% by 2035 when it can’t even set out the initial steps of getting there. Lord Sanders was speaking at the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on rearmament, which is running an inquiry into the state of the military and whether it needs to rearm (short answer: Yes.) He stressed the Army has some of the best people in the world serving, but they don’t have the money or capabilities to back this moral component up. So while the UK could fight day 1 of a war, without adequate stockpiles etc being able to hold the fight on day 30/day 90 is not a sure thing. Mike Martin, @ThreshedThought who chairs the APPG told telegraph: “We heard today in our inquiry that the UK is effectively unable to deter our enemies on land and we are taking grave risks as a nation. “For the Government not to set out a credible path to 3 per cent of GDP next week in the budget beggars belief.” V interesting conversation where Lord Sanders also told those gathered in Houses of Parliament that he was deeply concerned about lawfare, the Troubles Bill in its current shape and how soldiers HAVE to feel that the country “has their back”. How can they be expected to fight for king and country if they fear they will be hung out to dry by the very institution they dedicate their lives to? telegraph.co.uk/politics/202…
9
33
8
128
14,999
Featuring yours truly after spending months gazing at the north-east Atlantic and the Russian trawlers sailing along the edges of NATO nations' EEZs. Many thanks to all who helped - especially those I can't name. telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…
21
43
1,894
Matt Oliver retweeted
This was the scene in the third part of the hearing. Around half of MPs present
Today I went to a select committee hearing on AI. A few interesting things came out of it, but what really stuck with me was the behaviour of the MPs They weren’t paying attention At one point I counted 6 of the 13 MPs on the committee looking at their phones. And not in that way you do when you’re quickly checking something - two stared at their phones for over half an hour. Several others left before the end Many people think AI is the most important thing in the world. The MPs were warned there was a 50/50 chance it might destroy humanity! You’d think that’d be enough to make you take your chance to listen to experts and key players on the topic - apparently not
2
6
1
16
5,054
Matt Oliver retweeted
No no David you don't understand, if we don't bribe them with no strings attached they might get closer to China even though they are also the staunchest ally the West can have and it's safe to give them Diego Garcia and the Chagos and lease the base back from them.
Why is it “essential to keep Mauritius onside”? Lest their Carrier Battle Groups smite us?
11
33
1
421
12,270
Matt Oliver retweeted
It does seem like the only way to save the SAS is for everybody to start swearing in Marks & Spencer. I’m sorry, I don’t make the rules.
99
139
32
1,361
73,089
What is left to say about the Pensions Triple Lock? Well this it seems. @szupingc brings out the best/worst in me when she calls for a policy chat.
8
4
1
38
5,120
Matt Oliver retweeted
clocking in for another day at the apocalypse factory. we can’t stop working or someone else might do the apocalypse
Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.
27
673
15
6,621
200,010
Matt Oliver retweeted
whoever’s in charge of comms at anthropic
Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.
75
507
18
12,355
748,255
Matt Oliver retweeted
This is a great piece from Sarah. The backlash against the reporting about Arday is a reminder that the attachment to free speech (even reporting quite clearly in the public interest) is worryingly thin in the UK, including among people who think of themselves as liberals.
58
118
20
934
128,829
Matt Oliver retweeted
Having read a great deal about Arday, I think this may be the very best piece. By @sarahditum sarahditum.substack.com/p/th…
72
273
35
1,299
189,447
Matt Oliver retweeted
It's very confusing to see people on the Left calling for more regulation of the press. All hard and soft law regulating the press has been used - and is used - by the wealthy and powerful to silence their critics.
251
187
68
1,999
408,441
✍️ A big essay by me for The @Telegraph on the astonishing scale of Britain’s mission to build a working nuclear fusion power plant in Nottinghamshire. Most people don’t realise the scale of this, which is really our Manhattan Project - a giant national re-industrialisation effort through engineering.
24
68
13
385
23,999
Matt Oliver retweeted
Slightly off the beaten track for me, but this video by my colleague @_Harry_Brennan_ who went out to test this "air-conditioned" clothing on the roasting streets of London. It's truly magnificent: telegraph.co.uk/gift/e43f99b…
1
4
650
For an EG on how anti nightlife westminster council is, popular cocktail bar Three Sheets has had to make its location into a restaurant so you can’t go for just a cocktail. They had to fight to allow ten people to sit at the bar for a drink only til 9pm committees.westminster.gov.u…
5
29
5
124
9,582
Matt Oliver retweeted
Actually, it does seem that the proposals from Westminster City Council are designed to do exactly that, per @horton_official's story.
*Westminster City Council is NOT planning to stop you from standing up in the pub* This morning, The Guardian published a story that they know to be untrue. The basic theme is that @CityWestminster plans to ban people from standing up in a pub. This is untrue. They had asked us for a comment and we sent them a direct answer. They made a decision to use a tiny portion of it. Critically, they didn't use the part where I clearly stated their main point was untrue so I am sharing the complete text we sent to them. Sadly, even before publication, it was clear that this was part of a politically-motivated campaign and the line they were taken was deliberately and knowingly mis-leading. We suggested that ahead of publication and it turned out to be the case. This is a clear example of a major UK newspaper being more interested in promoting the interests of one political party over the truth and doing so when the facts had been clearly explained to them, and that was ignored. The added irony is that the photo they chose to use was of a close friend of mine taken about five minutes before I arrived to begin a couple of hours of standing up while drinking. They came pretty close to having me illustrate the story, which is an irony that should not be lost in anyone. We are investigating our options for a formal complaint with The Guardian. Here is The Guardian's false story: theguardian.com/business/202… Below is what we sent them, in full, from which they pulled the tiny quote from me at the end of their piece, which is not reflective of the core message of my comments: Cllr Tim Barnes, Westminster City Council deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Growth and Planning, said: "It is utterly ludicrous to suggest the Council is planning to "ban" people standing up in pubs. Suggesting otherwise is a wilful misreading of the policy proposals with clauses taken out of context. "We want people to go out in the West End and have a good time. Our guidance is simply about encouraging venues to manage their customers so people don't pack onto pavements or excessive drinking doesn't disturb others passing by. "The Cumulative Impact Zone is recognised as an area that has a high concentration of activity and particular policies exist for that in Westminster and the Mayor’s London-wider planning. There is a legal obligation to look at every application on its merits and we do just that, meaning we see new venues opening all the time. Again, there is little change here from the policy of previous administrations and we have seen new pubs and fast-food outlets open recently including a license extension for the McDonald's on Leicester Square, which will now be open 24 hours despite objections from the Mayor’s police representatives. "We are the country's largest planning authority with some 4,000 licensed venues. We reject less than 1.5% of license applications and there is a strong desire to see thriving, profitable, venues across Westminster. "As we have made clear we are happy to work with the Mayor of London on licensing and have just launched our own campaign to promote nights out in Soho."
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Westminster City Council can impose capacity and seating conditions on venues. Its draft 2026 policy says measures "to remove opportunities for vertical drinking" could count in applicants' favour (D171). res.cloudinary.com/commonplace-di…
14
28
6
195
40,101
Matt Oliver retweeted
Quite a few rail workers have publicly replied to this suggesting there's nothing to see here. If you know more about this practice of making up diagrams to secure wrongful free travel, DM me on here or email me: [email protected]
I was leaked a remarkable document recently. It showed how Government-owned Nuclear Transport Solutions' rail subsidiary has been cheating the taxpayer out of millions "since 1996" - in its own managers' words. 🧵
2
3
19
5,742
Matt Oliver retweeted
I was leaked a remarkable document recently. It showed how Government-owned Nuclear Transport Solutions' rail subsidiary has been cheating the taxpayer out of millions "since 1996" - in its own managers' words. 🧵
12
10
6
59
28,488
Matt Oliver retweeted
"Royal Navy must embrace robot warships, says former Sea Lord" writes @mattotele in @Telegraph today. Being open to new ways of delivering hard power winning effect is what our @RoyalNavy and our allies' navies need now. @wesstreeting My interview👇 telegraph.co.uk/business/202…
3
3
1
13
7,904