naheeda (@nportocarero) profile picture

Grok says: "sharp-eyed critic of government overreach, exposes shady policies and corporate collusion"...wild!

Hay on Wye
Joined May 2012
Photo by naheeda (@nportocarero)Photo by naheeda (@nportocarero)Photo by naheeda (@nportocarero)Photo by naheeda (@nportocarero)Photo by naheeda (@nportocarero)Photo by naheeda (@nportocarero)Photo by naheeda (@nportocarero)Photo by naheeda (@nportocarero)Photo by naheeda (@nportocarero)Photo by naheeda (@nportocarero)
None of the information posted or repeated on this account is known by its author to be false, nor intended to stir racial or any hatred of, nor cause psychological or physical harm to, any person or group of people (howsoever identified).
4
3
31
5,740
Following today’s announcement of new legal refugee routes, I’ve never been more convinced that a large number of people ‘working’ in the Home Office need to go to prison.
460
2,776
78
19,150
145,102
Never forget: They’re not building a surveillance state because WE are the criminals. They’re building it because THEY are the criminals. And they'll weaponize it against ANYONE who dare challenge their power, privilege, and impunity.
33
853
37
2,537
18,090
naheeda retweeted
COLLECTED $13 BILLION FOR HAITI… BUILT 6 HOUSES
500
2,939
119
9,933
63,615
A study by leading researchers in South Korea found that emotions, personalities, fears, anxiety levels, mental well-being, and overall outlook changed after individuals received the "vaccine." The study, which included over 2 million participants, was published in the prestigious Nature Journal. Led by Professor Hong Jin Kim from Inje University, the researchers confirmed that Covid injections are linked to significant global reports of personality and behavioral changes over the past four years. They explained that the vaccines induce "psychiatric manifestations" in the vaccinated, leading to spikes in mental health disorders such as a 68.3% increase in depression and a 93.4% rise in sleep disorders. nature.com/articles/s41380-0…
6
59
6
128
3,600
I am reasonably sure that if a competent mental health professional assessed this womans behaviour, speech & facial movements, there would be areas of concern. I'm concerned. Primarily that she may have influence over young minds in #Australia That is massively irresponsible.
67
106
6
382
9,921
naheeda retweeted
In case anyone thinks the Lib Dems are on another planet, I just sat next to one on Question Time. She claimed the reason there’s a housing shortage in Britain is because of Airbnb. Incredible.
244
742
21
5,766
72,344
I have had a look at St Hilda’s policy on harassment: “creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for another person. The recipient does not need to have explicitly stated that the behaviour was unwanted” How does this not fit the brief?
22
57
2
346
3,525
naheeda retweeted
Ardern has left blood all over the country in NZ dead & dieing from her decisions . Destroyed untold lives . She was hounded out of the country. Yet here she is in Australia under Albanese being treated like royalty. Rich beyond dreams. Money coming from blackrock & pfzier.
20
84
3
443
4,155
During the COVID Crime some Irish politicians & some people in the MSM actively pursued a despicable, coercive & discriminatory narrative which maliciously attacked unvaccinated people. These vile abusers turned the public/family/friends against those who chose not to get the jab
20
41
2
107
1,931
Burnham listened to the people, and decided to do the opposite
From today, charities can apply to sponsor refugees through new, capped Named Community Sponsorship and Refugee study safe and legal routes. Sponsors will provide accommodation, integration support and help finding work. First arrivals are expected in autumn 2027.
44
398
4
3,886
41,214
Sad to report Andy Burnham is shitting himself over the insolvency of Poundland, as its distribution centre is his constituency. Rumour he has ordered business minister Jonathan Reynolds to do what needs doing to save the firm and stop a local rebellion of labour supporters. How exciting
35
214
6
1,048
29,540
naheeda retweeted
Zia never ever misses and he’s got got some bollocks on him. Clinical Like a hitman. Fuck you @campbellclaret
10
27
1
255
4,856
If 100,000 Muslims try to take over a city, the government wouldn’t do anything. If 100,000 white people try to take over a city, the army would be deployed. Welcome to Britain, where the natives are targets.
28
272
2
2,736
12,345
A morning in Westminster - gossip is that backbenchers are quite unhappy with the Budget. Complaints that "Andy's been captured by the machine". Cross-party people who had his ear on social justice issues before he became PM now say they can't get near him. Dissent brewing.
76
156
47
588
54,599
🚨 BREAKING NEWS Andy burnham has said £30 billion will be used to regenerate asylum seeker accommodation. GET HIM OUT NOW!!!!
811
2,586
166
9,653
158,610
naheeda retweeted
While more undocumented men cross the channel today, more Afghan men face criminal trials for the rape of British girls and the country falls deeper into debt. This is what the King of England is doing.
148
244
23
596
10,449
Angela Rayner is to appoint an “Islamophobia” adviser. They'll enforce her “Islamophobia” definition, which Labour allowed extremists to influence. Ministers claimed the evidence was deleted, but I proved this was a lie. It's still kept secret. Rayner must end the cover up.
258
1,652
58
4,628
57,895
naheeda retweeted
There really are some idiots in our "government" who think being at war with Russia is a really neat idea, because it would enable them to cancel elections until the war was over. They are prepared to risk nuclear Armageddon so that THEY can hold onto political power.
21
27
157
1,195
Ofcom should be abolished and all of its staff sacked. It's difficult to understand how anyone could, in good conscience, work for such a vile censorship organisation. Perhaps some of them are quasi-Bolsheviks who think the state should tightly restrict freedom of speech.
34
205
6
1,244
12,153
naheeda retweeted
The year is 1873. Your wife tires easily and reads too much. The doctor prescribes the rest cure: six weeks flat in bed, no books, no visitors, fed on milk, forbidden to sit up without his permission. The man who devised it is the most famous nerve specialist in America, and the women come out of it quieter, which is taken as the cure. The year is 1915. The hospital has a new way of delivering your child. Morphine, then scopolamine, and the mother wakes two days later with a baby she cannot remember having. They call it twilight sleep. The women are strapped into padded cots so they do not hurt themselves while they scream, and the straps are the modern part. The babies arrive blue and slow to breathe. The year is 1945. The truck comes down your street fogging DDT, and the children run behind it in the white cloud because the man on the back says it is harmless. At the beach it is sprayed over the bathers on their towels. It goes on the cattle, over the barn, and across the kitchen table. The year is 1948. Your son has trouble with his ears. The doctor slides a rod tipped with radium up each nostril and holds it there for the best part of ten minutes, and you bring him back three more times. Hundreds of thousands of American children get the same treatment. The cancers arrive in their fifties. The year is 1962. The health visitor tells you breastfeeding is old-fashioned and the formula is scientific. By 1972 fewer than one American baby in four is breastfed at all. The formula is skimmed milk and sugar, with the milk fat taken out and vegetable oil put in. The year is 1971. The family planning clinic fits a small plastic crab called the Dalkon Shield. Its tail is a bundle of fibres that wicks bacteria up into the womb. 2.8 million are fitted in America before it is withdrawn, and the company goes bankrupt under the claims. It had been sold as safe and superior. The year is 1983. The doctor says your arteries are the butter's fault. The dripping tin goes in the bin, the yolks go to the dog, the margarine goes in the fridge, and you have the heart attack anyway, on skimmed milk, having done everything right. The year is 2001. Your 15-year-old is low, and the doctor prescribes Paxil, because the trial in the journal says it is effective and well tolerated in adolescents. The raw data, reanalysed 14 years later, shows more suicidal thinking on the drug than on the sugar pill. The company pays $3 billion to settle. Nobody rings the house. The year is 2009. The government has spent around £500 million stockpiling Tamiflu for the pandemic, on the strength of the manufacturer's trials. When the trials are finally prised loose five years later, the drug shortens flu by about half a day and nothing shows it keeps anyone out of hospital. The stockpile goes out of date in a warehouse. The year is 2026. The doctor has ten minutes and a screen. The number is high, so the tablet is for life. The weight is high, so the injection is for life. The meat is bad for the planet and the oil is good for the heart, and the person in the chair is as certain as everyone who ever sat in it. Every one of those was settled, by a committee, in a journal, with a doubter somewhere being laughed at. The rest cure, the straps, the fog, the rod, the formula, the crab, the margarine, the trial, the stockpile. All of it certain, all of it printed, all of it done to somebody who had asked for help. You were never the one who was wrong. You were the one it was done to, and the only person in the story who did as they were told every single time. The apology comes a generation late, in a footnote, addressed to nobody. The next one is being drafted now.
433
3,850
212
14,868
497,100