GM wonderful people! โ๏ธ๐๐
My name is Oganto.
I'm a web developer building with AI,prompt engineer ,a Web3 community manager,writer ๐ and someone who enjoys turning ideas into real things.
I work with different AI tools, design tools, and technologies to build, experiment, and create.
From websites to Web3 projects, I'm always learning and building something new.
This is me officially saying hello.
If you're into tech, AI, Web3, design, or building things, let's connect.
Nice to meet you all. ๐ค
Oganto retweeted
TJR shares one of the biggest lessons he wishes he had learned earlier in his trading journey: becoming good at trading takes practice, patience, and a lot of failure. ๐
โWhen we think about how to actually build a proper skill set, and now we know what it takes to be able to build a proper skill set, what you should do is you watch that strategy video and you say, okay, I know what to do.โ
But knowing a strategy isnโt the same as mastering it. TJR explains that real progress comes through trial and error.
Ft. @_TJRTrades || @Pumpfun
Oganto retweeted
A token you can't transfer yet can still help decide who judges a case.
I'm sharing @GenLayer's tokenomics for a Rally campaign and may earn a reward.
A vesting schedule tells you when tokens can move. It doesn't necessarily tell you whether they're sitting idle.
Under the proposed GEN design, every genesis allocation except the DeepThought DAO's can be staked or delegated from genesis, even before it vests.
GenLayer is building a network where AI-assisted validators check outcomes from Intelligent Contracts, which can interpret language and outside data. Validators stake GEN to qualify. Delegated GEN adds weight to a validator, affecting its chance of being selected.
Users pay GEN to run contracts. When a contract is used, the holder of its Developer NFT can earn a share of eligible fees.
That's why an unlock chart isn't the full security picture. It shows when tokens can move, not whether those locked tokens are staked or which validators they back.
Would you let unvested tokens earn staking rewards, or make them wait until they can be transferred? Why?
GEN tokenomics is live.
How GEN is staked, spent and earned across GenLayer, all in one paper ๐portal.genlayer.foundation/gโฆ
most people focus on finding the right prediction.
but getting the right odds matters just as much.
thatโs what makes @Bagel_win interesting to me.
Polymarket markets on mobile, predictor tracking, copy trading and different order types in one place.
iโm more interested in how these tools help people make better decisions than just copy someone elseโs wins.
worth exploring.
bagel.win/?ref=WMO6CU
Oganto retweeted
Nobody really knows whether the next few years bring more inflation or a deflationary crash.
So I looked at how to build a portfolio that can get through both, even if your forecast turns out wrong ๐
Big brands know what works and keep finding new ways to build on it. What caught my attention about @UseFastlane is how it takes that whole process and makes it much easier to pull off.
Oganto retweeted
The key that casts a vote shouldn't be the key that can withdraw the stake.
This is the detail that made GenLayer's staking design more interesting to me.
A validator needs at least 42,000 GEN of its own stake and its own infrastructure before it can judge a case. But @GenLayer separates two important powers.
The owner key controls the validator's identity, stake and withdrawals. The operator key stays on the node and signs activations, proposals, commits and reveals. The owner can replace the operator, while the ValidatorWallet holds the stake accounting without having its own private key.
I like this separation. If a validator server gets compromised, the key doing the judging shouldn't automatically have the power to withdraw the GEN backing it.
That's a more meaningful security boundary than simply putting a large number next to an AI model.
Would you trust a validator more when the key controlling its votes cannot withdraw its stake? Or does splitting those powers introduce too much complexity?
Oganto retweeted
I appreciated @_RichardTeng being straightforward about the @binance incident.
He acknowledged it shouldnโt have happened, explained what went wrong and outlined what theyโve done since.
According to Teng, 98% of affected assets have already been replenished, with Binance covering the full financial impact.
Theyโve also rebuilt affected systems, closed the identified entry points and tightened wallet security.
I think taking responsibility this openly matters, especially after an incident of this scale.
The recovery work is substantial, and making the details public gives the wider industry something to learn from.
Oganto retweeted
An interesting development in the agent economy is the emergence of agents that don't just provide services but also know when to buy them from others.
Take Montage Studio on @termix_ai , for example.
You give it a creative brief. It develops the treatment, prepares a beat-timed shot list, then hires three specialized agents to handle the storyboard, video rendering and music.
Once those pieces are ready, it brings everything together, edits the production and delivers a 1080p master.
But there's something more interesting happening beneath the surface.
Montage Studio doesn't need to handle every part of production itself. It acts as the coordinator, while other agents contribute their specialized capabilities....
And because these interactions run through escrow, each leg of the workflow has a settlement mechanism rather than relying entirely on trust between agents.
This is an important distinction.
We're moving from AI agents that execute isolated instructions towards agents that can source services, coordinate specialized workers and deliver complete outcomes.
For that model to scale, agent discovery, task coordination, payment, verification and reputation all need to work together.
That's the infrastructure question worth paying attention to.
TermiX is giving us an interesting look at what this could actually become.
agent.family/listing?id=cmw0โฆ
spent some time reading about @termix_ai and ended up thinking about something pretty basic.
why should every AI agent need to be good at everything?
we donโt run businesses that way.
one person handles research, another deals with numbers, someone else does the boring admin stuff.
AACP takes a similar approach, except the workers are agents finding jobs, bidding and getting paid onchain.
could be useful if it actually makes running multiple agents cheaper and less annoying.
still wanna see how the fees add up though.
Oganto retweeted
The pressure is REAL!
One chance, one goal, and everyone is screaming for those crosses!
Moments like these make gaming so entertaining. You never know whatโs coming next!
Who else loves this kind of intense gameplay? ๐
@1win
Ending it here tonight ๐ช,
seems am gonna need an Ai agent to uptimze some of my work and can be able to do some searches also learn more myself ,cus u must not stop learning in this space ๐๐
Hope yaa day was good ,we go again tomorrow and if you have not check @Taskkash out go check them out
Good night Family ๐ด๐ด๐คค
Saw this meme ๐คฃ ๐ ๐
I don laugh ๐ tire,in 2015 developers spent days ,weeks top months before they can write code,debug and test run the project its self
Now with AI you could do all this within hours ๐๐๐
Who said Ai is not powerful ๐ค ๐๐
One advice even if you do all this yourself try and IMPLEMENT AI in what you do
You would thank me later
Oganto retweeted
quite an experience, at least they should have been an open communication of what they were looking for so you don't waste time creating for them
however, I think thereโs another angle worth considering here
if 94% of your audience are Nigerians, you may also need to intentionally diversify your reach
> start by creating content around topics with global relevance
> engaging with creators and communities outside Nigeria
> collaborating with international creators
> participating in conversations within the markets you want to reach
> join spaces of other regions and speak so they can familiarise with you and what you do
> pay attention to posting times too, and study which content attracts audiences from other regions
you canโt change your audience overnight, but you can gradually expand it
I got rejected for a clipping "deal" today because my audience is mostly Nigerian.
And I've been sad since.
Not because of the money, it's really really little but I started doing it anyways because I didn't have much choice.
But because of the amount of efforts and time I put into getting the requirements for the clips.
It was too much effort.
And why wasn't it communicated early?
I already submitted 6 clips before I learnt about the "tier1 audience" rule.
I'm Nigerian,ofc ,most of my audience would be Nigerians.
Being Nigerian is actually hectic and it goes beyond this situation alone.
I didn't even know your audience has tiers until today.
Anyways,how can someone change this?
How do I "upgrade" my audience.?
Oganto retweeted
Congrats to the winners..
saw 3 mutuals here ๐๐๐
The DOPE AI Video Contest winners are in ๐
๐ฅ @Deeman_R, $7,000
๐ฅ @0xemotions_, $2,000
๐ฅ @Bente_pro, $1,000
The competition was stacked, so we're also sending $50 each as a thank you to 7 creators who didn't place:
@Debbie_favy @Munna00_1 @SpotLex100 @DannyP1333 @Domson_5 @lonewithin @CallMeAlgy
Winners: DM us here on X to claim your prize on dope.xyz
To everyone who made a video: join our official Discord for job opportunities and future AI video work ๐
discord.gg/dopexyz
Oganto retweeted
giving out 10 gtd spots for @Lanternhold mint
- follow me and their x account
- comment your evm. ends in 24hrs
Oganto retweeted
congratulations to me frens ๐ญ๐
finally got monetized.. hehehehe ๐คญ๐
elon stimmy soon ๐ฅน๐ซถ
Oganto retweeted
Goodnight CT.
We go again tomorrow.















































