Orde F. Kittrie (@ordefk) header
Orde F. Kittrie (@ordefk) profile picture

Law professor & think tank senior fellow; former US State Dept attorney; author Lawfare: Law as a Weapon of War (Oxford Univ. Press) RT/like/follow≠endorse

Washington, DC
Joined November 2009
Photo by Orde F. Kittrie (@ordefk)Photo by Orde F. Kittrie (@ordefk)Photo by Orde F. Kittrie (@ordefk)Photo by Orde F. Kittrie (@ordefk)Photo by Orde F. Kittrie (@ordefk)Photo by Orde F. Kittrie (@ordefk)Photo by Orde F. Kittrie (@ordefk)Photo by Orde F. Kittrie (@ordefk)Photo by Orde F. Kittrie (@ordefk)Photo by Orde F. Kittrie (@ordefk)
Orde F. Kittrie retweeted
.@FDD sanctions expert @miadmaleki spent years choking Iran's economy through secondary sanctions. He tells Israel Hayom why that same toolkit, and blockchain especially, could never protect an export economy built on Nasdaq listings and Silicon Valley contracts. israelhayom.com/2026/10/25/m…
3
10
68
5,630
Orde F. Kittrie retweeted
Interview with @MiadMaleki, a former senior official at the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), who helped design the maximum-pressure sanctions campaign against Iran and is now a senior fellow @FDD. His central argument is that Israel would be far more vulnerable than Iran to serious financial sanctions because its economy is deeply integrated into Western financial markets. The article makes several important points: 1. Sanctions could extend far beyond the West Bank. Israeli banks finance construction and provide mortgages in the settlements. Foreign financial institutions could sever relationships with these banks rather than risk exposure to sanctions. 2. Banks may overcomply. Even narrowly targeted sanctions can have wider consequences because financial institutions avoid activities that might expose them to U.S. penalties. Maleki cites the rapid freezing of sanctioned settlers' bank accounts in 2024. 3. Israel cannot realistically circumvent Western sanctions. Unlike Iran, Israel depends heavily on Western investment, dollar transactions, technology exports, and international financial integration. Cryptocurrency would not provide a viable alternative. 4. Banking sanctions are the greatest danger. Maleki distinguishes between sanctions on individuals, trade restrictions, and financial sanctions. He argues that measures targeting banks would be the most consequential. 5. The political threat could grow. The article discusses potential congressional action after the November 2026 midterm elections and the possibility that a future Democratic president could reinstate and expand sanctions. 6. The consequences could be severe. Maleki warns that broad financial isolation could undermine Israel's standard of living and its access to international markets. The article's central warning Maleki says: “Israel will not become Iran, but it will not be able to remain Israel either.” He argues that Israel, with $165 billion in annual exports, 56% of them services sold to Western companies, cannot build an alternative economy insulated from Western financial pressure. He concludes that the distance from such a scenario depends on Israeli conduct in the West Bank and whether support for Israel in Washington remains bipartisan.
10
23
4
117
18,268
Orde F. Kittrie retweeted
Benjamin Netanyahu has done much for Israel over a long career and deserves to be remembered as one of its most consequential leaders. I particularly admire his leadership against Iran’s regime and his economic reforms that helped unleash Israel’s technology boom. But his failure to grasp the potentially devastating threat of U.S. financial and economic warfare against Israel—and his faith in a “resistance economy” as the answer—are deeply troubling. I say this as someone who helped design the Iran sanctions playbook over more than two decades and remains passionately committed to defending democracies like Israel, Taiwan. Ukraine and others. I know firsthand the power of these weapons. If the current coalition returns to power with the same policies, and Democrats take the White House in 2029, this financial warfare campaign against Israel is inevitable.
רה"מ נתניהו על סערת הקריפטו: "לוקח בחשבון את ההתנגדויות, לא בטוח שישתמשו בו - זו רק אחת האופציות" #מהדורת_מוצש @Litalsun
125
74
25
635
74,490
Orde F. Kittrie retweeted
The fundamental flaw in this response is its failure to confront the potentially devastating consequences of U.S. financial and economic sanctions against Israel. Latin America and cryptocurrency are no credible substitutes for access to the American financial system and economy. Israel’s prosperity and resilience are undeniable, but they offer no immunity from future economic shocks. Past success is not a predictor of future success.
רה"מ נתניהו על סערת הקריפטו: "לוקח בחשבון את ההתנגדויות, לא בטוח שישתמשו בו - זו רק אחת האופציות" #מהדורת_מוצש @Litalsun
19
7
2
87
6,942
Orde F. Kittrie retweeted
Former US State Department attorney Orde Kittrie warns: “If the ICJ lowers the genocide threshold in the Myanmar case, it will not only wrongly pave the way for a genocide finding in South Africa’s pending case against Israel, but it would unleash frivolous genocide claims against the U.S. and other NATO organization members and their officials in international courts and foreign courts.” nationalpost.com/opinion/mic… via @nationalpost
1
6
9
1,022
Orde F. Kittrie retweeted
Russia and China will "tie" up Western militaries with frivolous genocide claims if the ICJ "waters down" the genocide threshold in the pending Myanmar case, warns Alan Kessel, the Canadian foreign ministry's former top lawyer. National Post nationalpost.com/opinion/mic… via @nationalpost
1
13
24
3,805
Orde F. Kittrie retweeted
Some common sense. 📰🚨 Bank of Israel responds to Netanyahu’s remarks on Saturday: “Cryptocurrencies cannot serve as a way to circumvent sanctions. The right course of action for Israel’s economy is to preserve our economic relationships with our major trading partners and focus on preventing sanctions and their negative impact on the economy.”
33
50
6
333
29,791
נתניהו לפני עשור: אני אחזק את מעמד ישראל בעולם, תהיה לנו מדינה חזקה עם יחסי חוץ מעולים. נתניהו היום: נתבצר על הר קירח במדבר יהודה ונאגור מטבעות וירטואליים.
הראשון לזהות?: "צריך להתארגן בכלכלה עוקפת לסנקציות בנקאיות, הבלוקצ'יין הוא חלופה, ביקשתי להכין תכניות לזה". נתניהו בראיון לערוץ 10 על ההיערכות לחרם כלכלי בינלאומי וסנקציות כלכליות על ישראל
35
197
10
1,718
20,801
Orde F. Kittrie retweeted
There is no viable “bypass economy”whether through blockchain or other sanctions-evasion mechanisms that could shield Israel from a comprehensive U.S. financial and economic sanctions campaign. Israel has meaningful political and policy options to mitigate that risk. Believing you can circumvent American sanctions is not one of them.
ברייקינג: נתניהו אומר שהסיוע הבטחוני האמריקני לישראל "נגמר" ושצריך להיערך ל"סנקציות בנקאיות" עם "כלכלה עוקפת". *מדובר באמירות מטרידות מאוד שמשמען סוף הכלכלה הישראלית הגלובלית ע"ע רוסיה של פוטין, רק בלי נפט וגז.
31
59
10
366
27,284
Critics of Amb. Waltz's warning about the ICJ's impending Myanmar genocide decision are conflating two different issues. As explained in my below Wall Str. J. oped, the concern expressed by @USAmbUn is not that the ICJ will determine Myanmar committed genocide (which Myanmar has clearly committed under the current definition). The concern is that Pillay and her supporters are poised to hijack the Myanmar case to drastically reinterpret the genocide standard so as to retroactively justify her claim that Israel committed genocide, even though Israel's conduct doesn't meet the current definition. That isn't justice -- it's an abuse of the ICJ. wsj.com/opinion/the-icjs-per…
Yes. The definitions matter. The ICJ must not be allowed to lower the legal threshold for proving genocide so that weakened and false standard can later be weaponized against American and allied soldiers whenever they raise a finger against terrorists that hide behind civilians.
33
5
133
12,228
Orde F. Kittrie retweeted
This is not a political issue. It is about protecting the United States and our military from international courts and actors trying to weaponize those courts by redefining definitions, lowering standards to allow the pursuit beyond their jurisdiction or international law standards. @michaelgwaltz is not saying there was not a genocide in Burma, he said Pillay is trying to use the current Myanmar case to "lower the legal threshold for proving genocide" that will surely be weaponized against American soldiers. I fully support not allowing Pillay or the ICJ weaken the genocide definitions, especially lowering the legal threshold for proving genocidal intent.
Reminder for Mike Waltz: the United States government determined genocide occurred in Burma.
10
80
3
346
15,097
Orde F. Kittrie retweeted
Yes. The definitions matter. The ICJ must not be allowed to lower the legal threshold for proving genocide so that weakened and false standard can later be weaponized against American and allied soldiers whenever they raise a finger against terrorists that hide behind civilians.
Replying to @tomdannenbaum
This is not a good talking point, though it is making the rounds. @michaelgwaltz is not saying the ICJ should not conclude their was or was not a genocide in Burma - he is saying they shouldn't use the opportunity to smuggle in a downward definition of the crime.
53
62
12
304
93,872
Orde F. Kittrie retweeted
Replying to @USAmbUN
@USAmbUN is right to warn against the ICJ using its imminent Myanmar case decision to lower the legal threshold for proving genocide. Lowering the threshold is unnecessary to find Myanmar committed genocide. So why lower it? Pillay and others are trying to advance their political objective of vilifying Israel, which they have already accused of genocide even though its conduct doesn't meet the current definition. Changing the law to fit a political agenda isn't justice -- it's an abuse of the ICJ. wsj.com/opinion/the-icjs-per…
ICJ ad hoc "judge" Navi Pillay is tipping the scales on the ICJ’s current proceedings on Myanmar, intending to lower the legal threshold for proving genocide so that weakened and false standard can later be weaponized against American and allied soldiers whenever they raise a finger against terrorists that hide behind civilians. Pillay: We see your agenda and we'll be watching the ICJ’s handling of these proceedings very closely. As our actions against the ICC demonstrate, we will not allow globalist, faux-judges to weaponize the law against our troops, undermine our sovereignty, or put American lives at risk.   The Nobel Committee has disgraced itself by awarding the Peace Prize to Pillay. What a shameful choice to "honor" someone who represents an "international community" with a leftist, globalist, antisemitic agenda. President Trump is showing a better way, by actually ENDING WARS, bringing hostages HOME, and making PEACE.
2
18
2
61
8,756
Orde F. Kittrie retweeted
Allowances made for rhetorical excess, it is undeniable that Navi Pillay and the academic-legal milieu she represents have waged a long campaign to dilute the definition of "genocide", essentially towards criminalising war itself. And the US and its allies are the target.
ICJ ad hoc "judge" Navi Pillay is tipping the scales on the ICJ’s current proceedings on Myanmar, intending to lower the legal threshold for proving genocide so that weakened and false standard can later be weaponized against American and allied soldiers whenever they raise a finger against terrorists that hide behind civilians. Pillay: We see your agenda and we'll be watching the ICJ’s handling of these proceedings very closely. As our actions against the ICC demonstrate, we will not allow globalist, faux-judges to weaponize the law against our troops, undermine our sovereignty, or put American lives at risk.   The Nobel Committee has disgraced itself by awarding the Peace Prize to Pillay. What a shameful choice to "honor" someone who represents an "international community" with a leftist, globalist, antisemitic agenda. President Trump is showing a better way, by actually ENDING WARS, bringing hostages HOME, and making PEACE.
3
13
48
2,355
Moral clarity and responsible leadership at its finest.
ICJ ad hoc "judge" Navi Pillay is tipping the scales on the ICJ’s current proceedings on Myanmar, intending to lower the legal threshold for proving genocide so that weakened and false standard can later be weaponized against American and allied soldiers whenever they raise a finger against terrorists that hide behind civilians. Pillay: We see your agenda and we'll be watching the ICJ’s handling of these proceedings very closely. As our actions against the ICC demonstrate, we will not allow globalist, faux-judges to weaponize the law against our troops, undermine our sovereignty, or put American lives at risk.   The Nobel Committee has disgraced itself by awarding the Peace Prize to Pillay. What a shameful choice to "honor" someone who represents an "international community" with a leftist, globalist, antisemitic agenda. President Trump is showing a better way, by actually ENDING WARS, bringing hostages HOME, and making PEACE.
2
9
927
Spot on from my friend and colleague @USAmbUN
ICJ ad hoc "judge" Navi Pillay is tipping the scales on the ICJ’s current proceedings on Myanmar, intending to lower the legal threshold for proving genocide so that weakened and false standard can later be weaponized against American and allied soldiers whenever they raise a finger against terrorists that hide behind civilians. Pillay: We see your agenda and we'll be watching the ICJ’s handling of these proceedings very closely. As our actions against the ICC demonstrate, we will not allow globalist, faux-judges to weaponize the law against our troops, undermine our sovereignty, or put American lives at risk.   The Nobel Committee has disgraced itself by awarding the Peace Prize to Pillay. What a shameful choice to "honor" someone who represents an "international community" with a leftist, globalist, antisemitic agenda. President Trump is showing a better way, by actually ENDING WARS, bringing hostages HOME, and making PEACE.
3
7
16
1,916
Orde F. Kittrie retweeted
Replying to @tomdannenbaum
This is not a good talking point, though it is making the rounds. @michaelgwaltz is not saying the ICJ should not conclude their was or was not a genocide in Burma - he is saying they shouldn't use the opportunity to smuggle in a downward definition of the crime.
6
5
4
72
32,573