Imagine the following: You're a man who serves as Chairman of the Board of a large University who led the search for the recently hired president. Your wife runs a non-profit in the DEI space. She is the only full-time employee of the organization, serving as Founder, CEO, and CFO. You serve as Treasurer. The non-profit ostensibly sells two principal products in the DEI space: 1. "Evidence-based 'how-to-guides' and 2. "The most comprehensive intersectional analytics platform of its kind..." but the non-profit has no revenues. It relies entirely on contributions to fund its operations, which principally consist of your wife's salary and some other ancillary overhead. There have been only two contributors to the non-profit, the University whose board you chair, which has contributed: 2018 $100,000 2019 $300,000 2020 $150,000 2021 $600,000 2022 $789,000 and a donor advised fund (DAF) affiliated with you which has contributed: 2018 $0 2019 $0 2020 $0 2021 $10,000 2022 $20,000 Doesn't this seem very strange? What if the University was @MIT? What if the Chairman was Mark Gorenberg? What if the non-profit is parity.org? Why are there so many conflicts/scandals concerning DEI organizations? All of the above can be found in MIT's and Parity.Org's IRS Form 990s which are available and summarized here: instrumentl.com/990-report/p…