Pinned Tweet
Next Wednesday sees the launch of Double Down Newswatch, a new weekly magazine programme that will showcase the best of independent media.
Here I explain why it's needed.
youtube.com/watch?v=O8OBmdrB…
"Israel would say ..."
This is an extraordinary compilation - an exhibit for the genocide museum.
The most painful part is the faces of the people from the region who just have to sit silent through what is essentially genocide denialism. /1
Richard Sanders retweeted
EXC: The lead drafter of the IHRA definition has condemned the UK govt for imposing it on schools, saying it's being pushed “at a time when there’s a big disagreement in the Jewish community over whether being a Zionist is required to be inside the tent or not”.
For @zeteouk 👇
- @vicderbyshire herself looks embarrassed to be still doing this.
So why do it?
Richard Sanders retweeted
At this very moment, as I write this post, shells are falling on the eastern areas of Gaza City. The sounds are absolutely terrifying.
They have literally gone insane. Aircraft are flying at extremely low altitudes and the situation is incredibly difficult.
Talk about what is happening here. Share our voices. Make Gaza the world's headline again.
Richard Sanders retweeted
My hotel room was forced while I was in the Supreme Court and the jamb spilt apart. But nothing was taken, £180 cash left on the table.
Please note just in case. I am not suicidal, I have the most wonderful family and friends and many battles to fight.
Richard Sanders retweeted
🔵 “They try to call you hateful if you believe that Palestinian kids should get to grow up in the land of their forefathers without being murdered by our tax dollars.”
— Democrat Abdul El-Sayed
Richard Sanders retweeted
Replying to @declassifiedUK
@declassifiedUK is not going to be intimidated by anti-semitism smears put out by the pro-Israeli lobby.
Please join us.
👉 secure.declassifieduk.org/pa…
📹NEW VIDEO -- 'A Jew List': How pro-Israel media smeared our journalism
The right-wing press and pro-Israel lobby want to intimidate people who are demanding basic accountability for Britons who served in the IDF amid the Gaza genocide.
👉youtube.com/watch?v=vZER1hv7…
Richard Sanders retweeted
What an outrageous distortion. You have to be asleep or deeply dishonest to argue that Corbyn was merely 'claiming to be persecuted by the media' as a 'distraction tactic'. Numerous careful media studies have shown that Corbyn was indeed persecuted right across the supposed media 'spectrum'. The Guardian and BBC led the way:
'She [Kuenssberg] deconstructs the techniques Farage has developed to dodge questions he dislikes: expressing total conviction even when he doesn’t know the facts; turning questions back on his interviewer; and claiming to be persecuted by the media when cornered – an incendiary tactic Corbyn also adopted and which Zack Polanski is beginning to use, though Kuenssberg says at least Polanski has a “swagger and a bluntness” which means he’ll usually answer a straight question. When a politician lashes out at the mainstream media, she argues, pay extra attention to what they’re actually doing: often it’s a distraction tactic.'
theguardian.com/books/2026/n…
Richard Sanders retweeted
This is very important and please support if you can.
GLP are bringing a legal challenge against the adoption of the problematic Bell review about antisemitism in schools, and, in particular, Lucy Powell's announcement that she will write to all schools setting out her "expectation" that they adopt the flawed IHRA Working Definition of antisemitism that will aggressively chill speech on Israel in schools
We live in a bizarre world where a Labour government enacts laws that force universities to host far right racists – but stops young people from advancing legitimate criticisms of a country engaged in genocide.
We believe students and teachers must be free to debate, question and criticise the actions of the Israeli government, so we're preparing a legal case against this government's new antisemitism guidance.
Support the legal case 👇
goodlaw.social/yzyl
Richard Sanders retweeted
Today, the long hand of the Labour Together Project will make the UK a crueller, less fair and less equal place, while also undermining worker's rights.
This afternoon Shabana Mahmood, one of Labour Toether's most prominent "brave eight" MPs, will present her immigration proposals. They are the most likely going to be the most hardline immigration reforms in a generation.
The Labour Party's leadership will likely try and spin the minor concessions they may have extracted to signal a welcome shift under Burnham. But it really is just that - spin. The totality of the package will mean legal immigrants to this country will be cast into greater insecurity by forcing them to wait much - much longer - for settled status in conditions of worsening insecurity.
These proposals are nearly universally opposed by unions, and for good reason. The reforms will help create a labouring underclass living in conditions of unjust precarity. It binds immigrant workers to bad employees who can exploit them for longer, and pay them less.
They particularly target low-paid but socially necessary workers like carers, who get tied into long-term contracts under awful conditions, often based on broken promises. This precariariat then undermines ALL workers, who must compete in the same workforce as exploited, vulnerable, low-paid employees who can't fight for fair pay and acceptable working conditions.
Mahmood's reforms will be championed by the right-wing press as tough and fair, and she will be celebrated for taking hard decisions. But doing exactly what the right-wing press and bad employers want is actually the path of least resistance. Standing up for all workers, regardless are where they from, is the real hard work, and the essence of solidarity. This should be non-negotiable for a Party born from the trade union movement.
I expect the Green Party will oppose these reforms, but this is also the time for the Labour left to stand up. The Labour left has survived the Starmer/McSweeney years - now they must use that survival to push back against the regressive politics pushed by Mahmood, one of the key architects of the Labour Together project.
Richard Sanders retweeted
🔴 An Israeli soldier posted this photo of Palestinian journalist Marah Awad, blindfolded and with her hands bound, following her arrest during a pre-dawn Israeli military raid on her home in Beit Ummar, north of Hebron in the occupied West Bank, on October 26.
According to her brother Hamouda Awad, Israeli soldiers questioned her about her writings on Israel, accused her of “incitement,” and confiscated her phone and computer before taking her away. Soldiers also reportedly beat two of her brothers during the raid.
No formal charges have been publicly confirmed.
It's a mantra of the political/media class that X is a cesspit. In fact much of the most unpleasant stuff comes from them.
I've long suspected their real objection is that it exposes what a minority they are.
Ahead of what will clearly be a coordinated assault on Zack Polanski - some basic facts.
1 - Yes, Polanski's own net approval ratings have dipped sharply in recent months. This is primarily the result of more people becoming aware of him and forming an opinion. His actual approval ratings have been remarkably steady and, at 19%, he remains considerably more popular than his party.
2 - By comparison Adrian Ramsay's approval rating when he was co-leader in June 2025 was 5%. 81% had either never heard of them or had never bothered to form an opinion. His fellow co-leader Carla Denyer was only marginally better on 9%.
3 - Reportedly 18,000 members have left in recent months. But this is in the context of an unprecedented surge in membership which took the party from 70k to close to quarter of a million members after Polanski became leader.
4 - The party now has more than 1300 local councillors, compared to less than 900 when Polanski became leader.
5 - Yes, the Greens have dipped in the polls recently. But even now they are at the same level they were when he became leader. And they are primarily victims of their own success having obliged the Labour Party to ditch Starmer - a level of influence the Greens could previously only dream of.
6 - The Zionism is racism motion is held up as having done huge damage to the party. An Opinium poll showed 56% of Green Party members supported it - and just 13% opposed it. A clear majority among all voters under 34 who expressed an opinion supported it.
By any logical criteria, if your aim is for the Greens to become Britain's first genuinely radical, mass political party, capable of holding the balance of power in parliament, it makes no sense whatsoever to get rid of Polanski.
It makes sense only if that is precisely what you don't want to happen.
thetimes.com/uk/politics/art…
Not doing this sort of thing was a really cost free way of winning back voters on the left. Just bewildering.





















