@pvshort

🦖 retired, but not from life. politically homeless, cook, gardener, 3 cheers for biology…

Scotland
Joined July 2011
Boom! The filthy Epstein class are attacking your children. Wake up. Resist - or throw your children under the bus:
25
288
17
920
21,533
It really shouldn’t be necessary, but it appears that some on the left - and complacent, wet centrists - need a lesson in why the rape gang scandal is so important, and why it is not simply a shameful chapter from the past. For the rest of us, there are also lessons about what the modern left has become, and how progressive left-wing thinking and elitist snobbery helped enable the horrors that we have all read about. The rape of vulnerable children across the country by men from different cultures, who in some cases operated with racist attitudes towards their victims, is not just a heinous outrage. It also raises profoundly uncomfortable questions about immigration, integration and multiculturalism. These men targeted, exploited, groomed and raped children. Children who had already had extremely difficult lives. Children from care homes. Children from tough backgrounds. Children who were vulnerable and easy to exploit. And these crimes were enabled by a culture in which modern left-wing thinking had made it extremely difficult to point the finger at particular communities without the risk of being accused of racism, a serious charge that could have implications for careers and livelihoods. As far back as 2003, Labour MP Ann Cryer was raising the alarm about the sexual exploitation of young girls by groups of older men from the Pakistani community in her Keighley constituency. According to her son, former Labour MP John Cryer, who now sits in the House of Lords, she was then smeared and attacked as a racist, particularly by figures in her own party. She received threatening calls and notes, and police installed a panic alarm in her home. In 2017, Sarah Champion, the Labour MP for Rotherham, highlighted the issue, writing that Britain had a problem with British Pakistani men raping and exploiting white girls. She subsequently distanced herself from the wording and resigned from Labour’s front bench amid the backlash. Even as recently as May 2025, Lucy Powell, then Leader of the House of Commons and a member of the Labour government, reacted to the grooming-gangs scandal being raised on Radio 4’s 𝘈𝘯𝘺 𝘘𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴? by saying: “Oh, we want to blow that little trumpet now, do we? Yeah, OK, let’s get that dog whistle out.” Powell is now Secretary of State for Education and remains at the heart of government. And this is how parts of the left too often see this unspeakable pattern of crimes. Highlighting it undermines their agenda, undermines the narrative that multiculturalism is working beautifully and strengthening our nation when, in some instances, it is doing the very opposite. Some people within certain communities have produced the worst sort of criminals. But too often the instinct on the left has been to minimise, deflect or avoid discussing that fact because of where it leads politically. And as Rory Stewart showed in his dismal comments during a recent interview with 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳, a man who supposedly comes from the Conservative tradition can share much the same worldview. Stewart argued that the grooming-gangs debate was being conducted in “bad faith” and that culture-war arguments about it distract from Britain’s bigger problems. That sort of dismissal is exactly the problem. Among sections of the political and media class, racist crime and misogynistic sexual offences seem to matter a great deal less when the perpetrators are not white. Look at the absurd reaction to 𝘈𝘥𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 - a fictional Netflix drama received more attention from some politicians than real-life sexual crimes against vulnerable girls. There are no doubt vulnerable girls being raped today. There are still cases involving organised child sexual exploitation going through the courts, and there has not been justice for everyone affected. Rory Stewart doesn’t like people “banging on” about it. I would suggest we all bang on about it louder and louder until there is real accountability and real justice.
22
144
1
505
5,629
12 years with no discernible progress towards Independence for Scotland. Meanwhile the village of Paddington has taken two weeks to vote for independence! bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckz7…
1
13
As we wait for the trials of 12 suspects accused of raping a woman whose husband just pled guilty to drugging her for them to abuse, it is evident that there is an epidemic of similar crimes going on in the West. In addition to this case, and the death of a woman in Austria who was being abused in the same way, last week in London, Darren Conway pled guilty to encouraging other men in a chat room to abuse their unconscious partners and swap images of the sexual assaults. Another man is set to be sentenced this week in central England on 32 separate charges after he spent a decade sexually abusing his girlfriend while she was asleep or unconscious. He will not be named to protect the victim’s anonymity. Meanwhile, in January of this year, former Swindon Borough Councillor Philip Young pled guilty to 54 separate sex offenses, most related to the decade and a half which he spent drugging and raping his (now ex) wife Joanne. Young is another man who brought in others to participate the abuse of his unconscious partner: five other men were identified and charged. One, 46 year old Dean Hamilton, pled guilty to charges of rape, sexual assault, and assault by penetration that stemmed from a 2015 incident, while four others — Mohammed Hassan, Richard Wilkins, Connor Sanderson Doyle, and Norman Macksoni, have pled not guilty and are set to go to trial in October. Additionally, in December of 2025, a Spanish-born school janitor living in Germany was found guilty of aggravated rape, sexual coercion, grievous bodily harm, and 34 counts of violating personal privacy over the six year campaign of abuse he carried out against his wife. Between 2018 and 2024, Fernando P. regularly drugged his wife unconscious, then filmed himself sexually abusing her before uploading the footage to specialized chat groups and internet forums. Of course, the most well known example of this sort of abuse is the Giselle Pelicot case, in which her husband and 50 other men were charged with raping her after her husband had drugged her into unconsciousness. Then there is Brian Hayward, a Canadian man who pled guilty to drugging and raping 12 women, recording the assaults, and posting the videos online. He uploaded 22 videos, and they racked up 144,000 views. Hayward also advised other men in chat rooms as to how best to drug victims of their own. This epidemic of drug facilitated sexual abuse has led to the creation of Project Medusa, a task force involving 9 countries, including the UK, the US, Germany, and Brazil, that targets men who drug and assault their partners before sharing the abuse online. As of July, the task force has initiated 113 criminal investigations, and made 57 arrests. All of the perpetrators were sharing images and/or video of the abuse online. It is a terrible truth that many women can never completely trust even the man they love the most. Most of these victims were betrayed by long term partners, the men with whom they felt the safest.
47
402
25
1,283
17,235
#TUC Motion 17 commits 5.3 million union members to campaign for gender self-declaration, reversing a Supreme Court ruling on women's sex-based rights. Refuges. Changing rooms. Prisons. Women-only spaces. All at stake. Yet the motion never once uses the word "woman". Ask your union rep why. Read Motion 17 as many times as you like. Count every line, every clause, every one of its two hundred-odd words. You will not find the word “woman” anywhere in it. Not once. Not “women,” not “sex,” not “female,” not “girls.” A motion built entirely around reversing the practical effect of a Supreme Court judgment about the meaning of sex under British equality law manages, across five resolutions and four sub-clauses of condemnation, never to mention the people that judgment was about. That is not an oversight. It is the whole story. Read it here: 👇 heartlandstribune.com/tuc-mo… #womensrightsmatter #tucconfrence2026 #EHRC @RosieDuffield1 @jk_rowling
64
411
67
840
203,580
Replying to @genevieve_holl
@andyburnham way to go if you want to ensure this term is your last. I was a lifelong Labour voter. No more. And trust me, outside of your circles, I’m far from alone. #labourlosingwomen
12
19
374
5,642
Language matters.
A new petition in the UK which would “Require Government departments, NHS, education and publicly funded bodies to use the words women, girls, mothers and pregnant women as the primary and default wording in policies, guidance and public messages. These words must not be replaced, removed, diluted or overshadowed by alternative wording. “We believe clear, sex-specific language is essential to safeguarding and safe healthcare for women, men and children, ensuring that biological differences, risks and needs are properly recognised and understood.” petition.parliament.uk/petit…
3
12
335
They will thrive, as always. They are modern Scottish poets. Honest, thoughtful artists who speak unflinching truth to power, straight from their hearts - be it London music Svengalis, the British State or the SNP. And we love them for it. 🎶💚🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿✊️🎶
15
92
1
614
8,724
It is entirely empirically defensible to say: Puberty blocker interventions used to suppress normally timed puberty in minors have documented evidence of harms, while evidence of meaningful clinical benefit is weak or uncertain. So why are politicians, doctors, lawyers, teachers, and the press not saying this? And, if they are not -- what are they doing about this problem of accountability to evidence and failure of professional ethics in their organizations?
8
39
1
159
1,956
To all MPs whether for, against, unsure or abstaining on the assisted suicide vote on Friday in the Commons, please watch Better Off Dead? @BBCOne @OpenUniversity It’s my documentary explaining why no disability rights organisation supports this unsafe law bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m0…
19
684
20
1,272
15,799
I see that Stella Creasy is accusing me of leading a pitchfork mob against her, because I opined that she is less likeable and more hypocritical than the wild parakeet she mistook for an escaped pet. For those who don’t know, Creasy is an elected politician and self-proclaimed ‘old-fashioned feminist’ who is ‘still fighting the patriarchy’. She’s more than once publicly defined herself against me (and my reaction was not to accuse her of leading a mob, even though I was probably averaging a dozen death threats a day at the point when the article below appeared.) I thought it might be instructive for those of us who don’t share Creasy’s brand of ‘feminism’ to examine her campaigning record, so we can learn to do better. Creasy wants women admitted to the male-only, exclusive, London-based private members Garrick Club, a change that would benefit rather privileged women like Creasy. Creasy is a mother who wants better accommodations for working mothers, a change that would benefit Creasy. Creasy takes selfies at a men-only Muslim march because that reminds everyone how non-racist she is, which benefits Creasy. Creasy asserts that ‘trans women are women’, which keeps her in good odour with her party’s most aggressive activists, and benefits Creasy. However, keeping cross-dressing heterosexual men out of nurses’ changing rooms doesn’t benefit Creasy, because Creasy has never had to mop up other people’s piss, blood and vomit at work. Challenging the notion that a male basketball player becomes a girl if he says he is doesn’t benefit Creasy, who has no sporting ambitions. Speaking up against the patriarchy as practised by non-white men doesn’t benefit Creasy, who wants those selfie-opportunities. Criticising an ideological movement that persecutes, harasses and openly threatens women who don’t believe some women have penises wouldn't benefit Creasy, because she's already fully-signed up to self-id, where any man who says he's a woman must be taken at his word. As the late Gloria Steinem said: ‘“Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It's about making life more fair for women everywhere.’ Creasy the patriarchy-challenger is provably more than happy to cosy up to men and misogynist movements when it suits her public profile and career advancement, no matter the harms those men might be causing less privileged women. By Steinem’s definition, what Stella espouses is not feminism, but Creasyism, and I suggest the emblem for this brave new rights movement should be an indignant parakeet with severely ruffled feathers. telegraph.co.uk/women/life/s…
2,142
8,463
617
52,768
1,407,002
It's odd, isn't it? I don't believe that women should be forced to segregated from men in public, yet @stellacreasy is fine with it. I do believe they should have the right to be segregated when they're undressing, but Creasy doesn't.
68
670
15
4,437
46,372
Not sure there’s too much point in posting on here any more, as barely anyone seems to see my posts at all now thanks to @elonmusk’s changes to the site. 😔🤷🏼‍♀️ But here’s some #MondayMotivation for you just in case this post shows up on your timelines. #MagentaMonday
138
128
8
1,662
14,495
Peter V retweeted
As of today, @girlguiding is back to being a single sex association for girls (and women leaders). Almost 8 years to the day that Katie @wontsomeonethi2 and I were expelled for holding, as it turned out, beliefs that were entirely consistent with U.K. equality law 1/
121
829
60
6,043
164,401
It is impossible to project a globe onto a sheet of paper without compromise. Distances, areas, directions and angles cannot all be preserved at once. Something must be sacrificed when three dimensions are forced into two. Hence, there is nothing improper about preferring one map projection over another. But the quarrel over the Mercator projection soon becomes identity politics. And so it inherits every vice of that style of argument: it is anachronistic, reductionist, and charged with unspoken insinuations about colonial guilt and the inherited sin of white people. The Mercator projection of 1569 was a stroke of genius for the purpose it was meant to serve. Mercator’s map was a navigational instrument. Its decisive property was that it rendered directions and angles truly: a line of constant compass bearing appears as a straight line. To secure that property, a faithful representation of area had to be given up. But as already said: one cannot have everything when a sphere must be drawn as a plane. One has to choose. It is therefore almost intolerable to hear the insinuation that Mercator was some kind of racist, intent on striking Africans with an inflated Greenland. We should honour Gerardus Mercator for what he was: one of the great cartographers in the history of the craft. The author of a projection whose charts, for centuries, helped generations of seafarers across the open ocean - long before longitude could be determined with any reliability at sea.
160
463
44
2,930
123,165
TRAs have posted what they think are our addresses on multiple platforms. One site lists the wider family of women's rights activists, including children. They have driven the @EHRC from their offices & @KishwerFalkner had to stop using public transport. heraldscotland.com/news/2652…
25
506
24
1,344
50,794
Another example of ‘inclusivity’ in action…
Today was absolutely f-in mental Surrounded by an angry mob who stole and ripped up my sign and stole Annaïg’s banner And why? For saying lesbians don’t do 🍆 Unbelievable
1
30
Peter V retweeted
Don’t stop! “Save The Lammermuirs - Stop The Data Centre - Sign the Petition!” c.org/5tFsmdGFp7 via @UKChange
53
1
58
882
Well ladies, better get your hard hats on. Seems Pink Ladies Glasgow are about to be the subject of our first hit piece. The Sunday Post are running a story on us this weekend. Not about why we are protesting, or who will be speaking at the event or the actual aim of the event. Their story is why do we allow people they view to be Far Right to share our posts promoting our event. Seriously!! Oh and would we like to respon to a host of other organisations who are condemning our protest and planning on counter protesting us on the day. No balance to the reporting. It’s actually ridiculous. Maybe if they attended on the day in good faith as independent journalists and reported what they actually see and hear from the women of Glasgow, instead of gaslighting us, they would have a better understanding of the fears of these women. Regardless we keep calm and carry on ladies. If nothing else at least they are noticing our efforts.
40
151
6
552
11,475