Coach, retired SW.
Joined September 2013
- Tweets68.1K
- Following112
- Followers756
- Likes22.7K
Pinned Tweet
Congratulations son!
𝐖𝐞𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐫𝐞 𝐃𝐚𝐦𝐞, @DukeSwimJosh!
Josh joins the Irish after spending the previous four seasons at Duke!
📰 und.com/lindauer-tabs-josh-s…
#GoIrish x #ALLIN
Imagine believing this is a real video. Check out door on right.
An HOA telling homeowners they can’t fly the American flag on American soil is peak insanity.
People pay mortgages, taxes, and dues… then get told patriotism violates “community standards.”
And banning political flags too? Funny how “freedom of expression” suddenly disappears when it offends the wrong people. 🇺🇸
Stop believing what these types claim without verifying their links, or reading how the data came about. This one comes from a survey of 1K, and including multiple questions about Trump directly and indirectly.
Young voters (ages 18-34) say they would vote for Democrats in the 2026 midterms by a +33 margin.
👉🏻 generationlab.org/state-of-y…
Always remember, when reading these sites with their percentages, that it’s actually the percentages of those who returned the surveys sent out. Many are at 5% return rate. It isn’t what is being claimed.
Hard to be this stupid and walking upright. Mr TV anchor thinks seniors save MORE on the $6K deduction, by $1500. Furthermore, retweeting ignorance says a lot about readers. He hates seniors. He’s a moron. Both are true.
OP blocked me because I correctly noted that it was a lie of omission. She took offense and was snarky about it. I did say she didn’t need to be an 🫏🕳️, about it. It was wrong to not contextualize Ritter and Cher. She decided blocking was better option. 🤷🏼
Such a stupid way to describe this discussion. Even in unlikely event the numbers are actually true, the OP shifts between “young”, young adults and Young workers. The chart is U26, 26-64 snd 65U. There’s no youn worker category. Lies of omission and commission.
This quoted post is unavailable.
rick stanfield retweeted
I've written a lot about the loss of trust in public health during Covid in various articles and threads over the years, but I'll attempt to consolidate my thoughts here...
For me, my trust in public health was tested early on with the complete lack of consideration for the risks and benefits of lockdowns, masks, school closures, etc. Prior to March 2020, cost-benefit analysis was a major component of developing public health policy, and then suddenly... it wasn't. The one main exception to this, of course, was public health bending over backward to support George Floyd protests.
As a parent of a middle schooler, my main concern was for children. I started identifying significant errors in data from the CDC and other doctors and scientists, particularly around exaggerating the risks of Covid to kids. The strong age gradient of Covid harms was known early on, but it was consistently downplayed by public health. I spent a lot of time pointing out often blatant errors in Covid data, mostly being ignored by those responsible. And I argued extensively in support of school reopening. My own daughter was back in person in early August 2020, along with much of Georgia, so I knew it could be done.
Then came the vaccine, which was delayed by the left for political purposes. During the vaccine rollout, we witnessed the denial of natural immunity, a refusal to prioritize the elderly for vaccines, dishonesty about vaccine effectiveness, efforts to downplay and deny myocarditis risks, the rush for vaccine approval to enable mandates, vaccine mandates being pushed for the young and healthy (those least at risk), and more false claims from CDC and others about the risk of Covid to children (including faulty mortality statistics on the CDC's data tracker and the "top 5 killer of children" falsehood).
Overall, it was clear to many of us that studies and data were being published to push a predetermined narrative, rather than to test a hypothesis and then come to an objective conclusion. That's not how science is supposed to work, and yet we were being beaten over the head with the mantra "follow the science." Meanwhile, public health was feeding journalists all of this propaganda, and the media for the most part was all too happy to help by parroting the official public health position and attempting to discredit anyone who dared to offer another perspective.
This is the kind of post that passes for research. It’s likely, he doesn’t know how many entities charge homeowners for property taxes. W exception of Dems, and Florida, no one else is trying to end all property taxes. Not a serious thinker here.
Whenever people read the bloggers on housing, always remember they use the statistics to best suit their argument only. There is no discussion of regional variability or even close data review. It can be tough market. It isn’t that everywhere. They won’t tell you.They don’t care.
unavailable
rick stanfield retweeted
If you aren't following SR by now, please do.
Dude does nothing but consistently improve with every post. He's also incredibly nice
I made my answer I this guy. He doesn’t see that his condescending attitude and continued misstatements about the C19 virus, is why people stopped trusting drs. His bio says it all. FTR, he didn’t do squat. Many died due to incompetence in tx. “Expert”, my ass.
Stopped the pandemic that no one saw coming from a novel virus and of course we would make mistakes. But we studied it, stopped it, and yet you think that is the basis to not trust doctors. How sad for you. When the car accident comes and you are in the trauma room we will make sure to find a witch doctor for you
rick stanfield retweeted
Trust revoked.
All those supposedly prestigious medical associations closed ranks, parroted each other, suppressed dissent, and ultimately chose to line up on the side of mass child abuse.
They endorsed this nightmare into existence, leveraging their authority and influence to increase their own political capital.
And children and families paid the price.
Don't ever let them claim it was a "mistake."
I have a piece in The New York times about what it means to "trust the science" when it comes to the professional guidelines on youth gender medicine
nytimes.com/2026/02/24/opini…
Maybe Italians should keep their opinions in Italy. What our healthcare system is, has little to do with your obsession w President Trump. We have problems w insurance overcharges and such, but, isn’t new.
Desidero formulare i migliori auguri di pronta guarigione a #LindseyVonn che ora tornerà a casa sua negli Stati Uniti.
La Vonn ha potuto apprezzare lo straordinario sistema sanitario pubblico italiano che si è presa cura di lei con tre interventi chirurgici. In Italia, a differenza che nel suo paese, ci prendiamo cura di tutti: ricchi o poveri, vip o anonimi, Americani o italiani.
Se ne avrà occasione, spieghi a Trump e a Kennedy Jr cosa vuol dire prendersi cura di chi sta male.
Sorry you couldn’t comment, so I’ll choose same route too. There is verifiable data in Tx that you’re wrong. Feeling overwhelmed is legitimate. Showing the hospitals were even AT capacity, is data. They weren’t.
The “hospitals were never over capacity” line requires either selective memory or selective spreadsheets.
During multiple waves, especially winter 2020–2021 and again with Delta, large systems in Los Angeles, New York, Arizona, Texas, and elsewhere were operating at or beyond staffed ICU capacity. Not “total licensed beds.” Staffed beds. Those are very different numbers.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention hospital surveillance dashboards documented regions with ICU occupancy above 90–100% of staffed capacity. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services HHS Protect data showed sustained periods where adult ICU capacity was critically strained across multiple states.
Above capacity doesn’t mean every rural hospital in America was simultaneously overflowing. It means:
• Elective surgeries canceled
• PACUs converted to ICUs
• Staff pulled from other units
• Crisis staffing ratios
• Ambulance diversions
• Field hospitals activated
That happened. Repeatedly.
Yes, some facilities were quiet at times. Pandemics are regional and wave-based. But pointing to one hospital that wasn’t full while others were stacking ventilators is like saying a hurricane didn’t exist because one street stayed dry.
If your hospital was over capacity — and many were — that’s not anecdote. It aligns with national staffing and occupancy data. The distinction conspiracy accounts exploit is “licensed beds” vs. “staffed beds.” A hospital can have empty physical beds and still be over capacity because it lacks nurses, respiratory therapists, or physicians to staff them.
Pretending it didn’t happen requires ignoring:
• Excess mortality
• Surge staffing
• National Guard deployments
• Temporary morgues
• Inter-hospital transfers
Data exists. So do memories.
The only thing that wasn’t overflowing was the patience of people actually working inside those buildings.
One downside to Winter Olympics, is a new set of people whine about this. They never mention she fell earlier in her program, that the move had been illegal for 21 yrs before and 26 years after. Sadly, this guy didn’t bother researching anything. No surprise. Every 4 yrs
Clown piles on us old folks, but, hides from comments.
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
