Bryan Wade (@stale2000) header
Bryan Wade (@stale2000) profile picture

Former Twitch Staff of 4 years, on Clips. Creating content about tech, reddit, AI and live streaming DM me for collabs!

San Francisco
Joined October 2010
Photo by Bryan Wade (@stale2000)Photo by Bryan Wade (@stale2000)Photo by Bryan Wade (@stale2000)Photo by Bryan Wade (@stale2000)Photo by Bryan Wade (@stale2000)Photo by Bryan Wade (@stale2000)Photo by Bryan Wade (@stale2000)Photo by Bryan Wade (@stale2000)Photo by Bryan Wade (@stale2000)Photo by Bryan Wade (@stale2000)
Bryan Wade retweeted
The Kleinpocalypse just keeps getting better. Reddit grass-avoider Bryan "Syndrome" Wade encourages Ethan to double-down, and stage a weeks-long protest in front of Reddit HQ.
I Stand By Ethan Klein A message to Ethan
5
6
58
1,083
“Effective Altruism’s overwhelming maleness, its professional incestuousness, its subculture of polyamory and its overlap with tech-bro dominated ‘rationalist’ groups have combined to create an environment in which sexual misconduct is tolerated, excused, or rationalized away. Several described EA as having a ‘cult-like’ dynamic.” time.com/6252617/effective-a…
23
42
11
300
38,836
Bryan Wade retweeted
it's midterms in a fascist presidency during an ongoing genocide and all theyre talking about is a youtube podcaster
4
8
120
2,482
Bryan Wade retweeted
I will cover 100% of your legal costs to fight this, will dm you. Its so funny how this side always acts like they are above lawfare but will do it for anything that makes them look bad. @qtcinderella withdraw the DMCA's- I am kinda busy atm!
QTCinderella has been sending out mass false DMCA takedowns to channels, including mine. I have received 10 of these takedowns from clips in 2025. Clipping small segments is absolutely fair use @qtcinderella is one of the few creators who will try to continually silence others with lawfare, having done this before. If this was a mistake or misidentification, hopefully she can retract it
106
202
9
5,772
349,845
The Agentic AI space is heating up! Just got to hear @marissamayer, former CEO of @Yahoo pitch her startup @itsdazzleai! P.S. if this gets a lot of impressions @DavidPawlan will give me $3000. Please help, thanks.
5
7
1
18
1,675
"Leftist" complaining about "stolen intellectual property"
“They used local servers” THE MODELS ARE STILL TRAINED ON STOLEN ARTWORK
58
449
33
6,487
97,872
Bryan Wade retweeted
The Majority Are Red
346
2,421
306
24,056
1,221,758
Bryan Wade retweeted
If you’re willing to push doomer narratives about AI you can make hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars. And keep in mind this is just what *one* EA org is doling out. It’s an endless money fountain and there’s no equivalent to it on the other side
Doomer journalism gets another big boost from the EA crowd. Creating a fear factory to fuel dystopianism and advance the war on computation.
4
27
14
164
34,081
Bryan Wade retweeted
Female Draco/Malfoid is so genius that it’s possibly the biggest missed opportunity in the whole series. And what makes it crazy is that you barely have to change the story. Most of the major scenes could happen almost exactly as written. You’d just add an entirely different layer underneath them. Harry and Malfoy still hate each other. They’re still rivals. She’s still an arrogant, spoiled pure-blood supremacist from a family that represents almost everything Harry despises. But somewhere underneath all of that, there’s an attraction neither one of them particularly wants. Go all the way back to Madam Malkin’s. Their first meeting suddenly matters more. They meet before either knows who the other is, and there could be just the slightest flicker of interest before Harry realizes what kind of person she is. Then they get to Hogwarts, identities fall into place, and whatever possibility existed immediately turns into hostility. From there, you almost don’t need to manufacture anything. The existing story keeps putting these two people in each other’s orbit. The Quidditch rivalry becomes charged. The constant insults become a little too personal. Malfoy seems unusually interested in whatever Potter is doing. Harry insists he can’t stand her while nevertheless noticing her every time she walks into a room. And then you get to Goblet of Fire, where some of the fanfiction versions of this idea have stumbled onto something that actually works remarkably well: Harry somehow gets stuck taking Malfoy to the Yule Ball. The reason can be almost comically contrived. A magical obligation, a lost bet, McGonagall forcing some inter-house arrangement, whatever. That's hardly outside the operating logic of Harry Potter. The series routinely uses magical rules, school traditions and bizarre circumstances to force characters into situations they would never voluntarily choose. The important part isn't how you get them there. It's what happens once they're there. Because now Harry has to spend an entire evening with Malfoy when neither of them can retreat into their normal roles. For the first time, Harry sees her dressed for a formal occasion instead of wearing Slytherin robes and a sneer. There's that horrible teenage moment of realizing, Oh no. Malfoy is actually beautiful. And she gets the corresponding realization about him. They're still antagonistic. They probably spend half the night insulting each other. But eventually they actually talk. Maybe they even have fun for ten minutes before remembering they're supposed to hate each other. Then Malfoy goes home for Christmas. And Lucius finds out that his daughter went to the Yule Ball with Harry Potter. That's where this version could suddenly become much more serious. Lucius beats her for it. You wouldn't need to make it melodramatic or turn Draca into a helpless victim. In fact, it works better if Harry doesn't even know immediately. She comes back to Hogwarts acting exactly like Malfoy always acts; arrogant, hostile, determined that nobody see anything underneath. But Harry notices something is wrong. Eventually he discovers what happened. And that would fundamentally alter the way he sees her. Because Harry understands this. Maybe better than almost anyone at Hogwarts. Harry knows what it's like to be a child living in a house where an adult can hurt you and everyone outside that house has no idea. He knows what it's like to dread going home. He knows what it's like to cover up what's happening and then show up at school pretending everything is normal. And suddenly Harry has to reconcile two apparently contradictory facts: Malfoy is awful to him. And Malfoy's father is awful to her. One doesn't erase the other. That's much more interesting than simply revealing that she was secretly nice all along. She can still be prejudiced. She can still call Hermione a Mudblood. She can still bully people. Harry can still genuinely dislike enormous parts of who she is. But now he can't flatten her into Malfoy = bad anymore. And crucially, she knows that he knows. Imagine how humiliating that would be for her. Of all people, Potter knows. So maybe she becomes even nastier toward him afterward. And Harry can't understand why. Hermione probably can. That gives you an emotional thread that can sit quietly underneath the next several books without taking over the story. Then Half-Blood Prince is where the idea becomes almost absurdly perfect, because the story Rowling already wrote starts behaving like a dark romance without actually being one. Harry becomes obsessed with Malfoy. Where is she? What is she doing? Why is she disappearing? What is she hiding? Everyone else thinks Harry is being ridiculous. Ron could basically spend half the movie going, “Mate, you realize you talk about Malfoy constantly?” And Harry's answer is completely sincere: “Because she's a Death Eater!” Which, of course, she actually is. That's what makes it work. You don't have to turn her into a misunderstood sweetheart. In fact, doing that would ruin it. She's genuinely involved with something horrifying. Harry's attraction doesn't make his suspicions wrong; it makes the situation worse. And now the earlier Lucius storyline pays off. Harry knows what her father is capable of. So when he realizes Voldemort has given Malfoy an impossible assignment, Harry can understand something the others might miss: this isn't necessarily an honor. It may be another form of punishment directed at the Malfoy family. Then you get the bathroom scene. Instead of simply being a brutal confrontation between two enemies, Harry finds the girl he's spent years fighting (and whom he now suspects of being a Death Eater) crying alone in a bathroom. For once, there's nobody else around. No Crabbe and Goyle. No Ron and Hermione. No audience. Just Harry and Malfoy. And everything explodes. Harry nearly kills her. Now imagine him standing there afterward, looking down at her bleeding on the floor. Because he's seen Malfoy hurt before. Her father did it. And now Harry has too. That realization would absolutely devastate him. Then the Astronomy Tower takes it further. Harry watches her stand over Dumbledore and realizes she can't do it. Not because she's secretly been good all along. Because she's sixteen, terrified, trapped by her family and Voldemort, and discovering that becoming the person she was raised to be is much easier in theory than in reality. And then you arrive at Malfoy Manor. That scene barely needs to change at all. She's asked whether the disfigured prisoner is Harry Potter. She knows. Harry knows she knows. And she says she isn't sure. That's the moment. No kiss. No confession. No sudden declaration that she's joining the good guys. Years earlier, Harry learned what happened to her when Lucius discovered she'd gone to a school dance with Harry Potter. Now she's standing in Lucius Malfoy's house, surrounded by Death Eaters, with Voldemort potentially one summons away. All she has to do is say: “That's Harry Potter.” And she can't do it. Harry realizes that Malfoy may have just saved his life. That also gives Harry saving her during the Battle of Hogwarts much more weight. Neither of them has formally switched sides for the other. They just keep reaching moments where the other person's life is actually in their hands and they can't let them die. The crucial thing is that I wouldn't actually have them become a couple during the main story. That would make it too neat. Let the war finish first. Let Malfoy remain complicated: proud, damaged, occasionally awful, deeply attached to her family, and forced to reckon with what that family taught her. Then, after Voldemort is gone, you finally allow all those years of hatred, fascination, attraction, guilt and reluctant respect to become something else. And suddenly Harry's romantic story isn't something that appears relatively late in the series. It's been quietly developing since the first book. It even reinforces one of the central ideas of Harry Potter: the family you're born into doesn't have to determine the person you become. Harry isn't defined by the Dursleys. Sirius isn't defined by the Blacks. And Malfoy doesn't necessarily have to become what Lucius intended his daughter to become. That's why I think the idea is so compelling. It's not just “Draco would be hotter as a girl” or an enemies-to-lovers gimmick. Changing one variable creates a seven-book romantic arc almost entirely out of material that's already there. And then, after everything Harry Potter has been through, you get the most ridiculous possible final punchline: Harry Potter marries a Malfoy. Which means Lucius Malfoy has to spend the rest of his natural life knowing that the daughter he once beat for going to a school dance with Harry Potter eventually married Harry Potter. And Harry Potter is now the father of his grandchildren. Christmas at Malfoy Manor would be spectacular.
Minimax-H3 Malfoy test #malfoy #comfyui
183
511
120
6,321
406,825
Bryan Wade retweeted
Replying to @lumpenspace
We are living in a plague inc simulation
1
3
99
happy slutcon! my latest, and hopefully last on the TESCREAL (h/t @timnitGebru) or Rationalist / Effective Altruist communities and sexual misconduct tl;dr do not expect adult decisions to be made by children, and keep yourself safe (link in reply) ⏬
6
10
1
96
10,028
i was personally harmed by the normalization of weird sex stuff that was normalized inside of the rat community they're particularly insensitive to the full range of harms, and great at rationalizing those concerns as irrational, not consequentialist, evolutionary tech debt
Tbh I think a lot of the ‘weird’ sex stuff coming out of the rat and EA community is just a function of nerds who struggled with it finding each other and doing what other people do in their own way. It’s not that deep. Non-nerds do this stuff too. That we are so obsessed with calling out that element of it is kind of revealing of our own insecurities around the taboo. If it’s over 18 they can do what they want, enjoy! That is the society we have agreed to live in already so it’s not exactly an own.
9
9
1
398
12,828
"The cow is in a superposition of states? that's ridiculous", Dumbledore scoffed, and proceeded with the most long-winded defense of the MWI.
43
57
22
762
107,398
Bryan Wade retweeted
Asmongold reveals how he would deal with Reddit "If I was Trump, I would just sign an executive order that takes away Reddit's Section 230. And it wouldn't hold in court and it would obviously get appealed, but it would tank their stock price and destroy their company" "As soon as a judge appealed it..I'd just write another one, slightly different..and then you also remove the judge..the process is the punishment..unless they decided to adhere to a free speech doctrine. And if they didn't do that, I would just write infinite more legislation and executive orders and then go after and investigate them..I will put an end to this in like 5 seconds"
142
203
22
4,856
277,843
Bryan Wade retweeted
Shoutout to @stale2000 for making this absolute banger fan song for @jstlk_!
2
2
10
629
Replying to @futuristbench
2
15
413
6,542
Effective Altruism in practice:
Let me defend effective altruists’ concern for shrimp welfare. We don’t know whether shrimp are conscious. But if they are conscious and can feel pain, we should be willing to spend resources to reduce the suffering we inflict on them. We don’t need certainty to justify spending resources to reduce the risk that we’re torturing conscious beings. Yes, reducing this to math can yield absurd conclusions about, say, how many babies we should sacrifice to spare how many shrimp from suffering. But any well-defined moral system can lead to troubling conclusions, and that doesn’t excuse cruelty to beings that may be conscious nor justify not thinking carefully about moral choices.
51
1,128
15
12,152
291,499
Bryan Wade retweeted
We aren't fighting EA because they are weirdo narcissists but because they literally want to enact totalitarian world government (for your safety, ofc). You do not, under any circumstances, let these types of people have any power - that's how end up with the gulags.
A lot of the EA AI safety x risk people have avoided talking about the policies they support to address their concerns with AI, but a look at some of the laws that EA orgs do support should send a chill down your spine
8
40
6
362
15,948
Bryan Wade retweeted
>be me >discover effective altruism >apparently normal charity is inefficient >why donate to random sad thing when spreadsheet can tell you optimal sad thing >fair enough >buy mosquito nets >save lives >numbers look good >feel powerful >couple years later >someone asks an innocent question >why only count people alive today >huh >future people matter too >obviously >my grandchildren shouldn't matter less just because they haven't spawned yet >reasonable.jpg >keep following logic >what about their grandchildren >also yes >what about people in 500 years >sure >5000 years >why not >500 million years >starting to get weird but morality is morality >open calculator >humanity could survive for an astronomically long time >could colonize galaxy >could have trillions upon trillions of descendants >maybe digital people too >maybe simulated civilizations >maybe dyson spheres full of happy uploaded minds >calculator starts smoking >realize currently living humans are rounding error >8 billion people suddenly looking extremely beta >future contains potentially 10^something people >can't even fit beneficiaries in google sheets >new moral priority unlocked >protect the long-term future >stop thinking in units of "people helped" >start thinking in "fraction of cosmic endowment preserved" >malaria? >terrible >but only kills existing humans >AI extinction could delete the entire light cone >nuclear war could permanently derail civilization >bad institutions could lock in terrible values for ten million years >someone invents wrong constitution in 2140 >quadrillions suffer >better fund governance workshop now >friend says maybe we should improve hospitals >explain opportunity cost >friend says hospitals are full of actual sick people >explain scope sensitivity >friend stops inviting me to dinner >need to decide what to fund >easy >expected value >suppose project has one in a million chance of preventing extinction >sounds tiny >but extinction destroys 10^50 future lives >multiply >mother of god >$10 million project has expected value of several galaxies >charity evaluation complete >someone asks where the one-in-a-million number came from >expert judgement >which expert >us >how calibrated >extremely thoughtfully >reduce estimate to one in ten million to be conservative >still beats curing cancer by 38 orders of magnitude >epistemic robustness achieved >someone says maybe project doesn't work >assign 20% chance >still astronomical >maybe project makes problem worse >assign 5% chance >still astronomical >why 5 >because 30 felt pessimistic >publish 46-page report >contains seventeen sensitivity analyses >every sensitivity analysis begins after assuming intervention has positive sign >critic says you're multiplying enormous hypothetical stakes by extremely uncertain probabilities >yes >that's literally why it's important >critic says the uncertainty might be structural rather than numerical >make probability smaller >critic says no, I mean maybe your model is wrong >make probability smaller again >critic begins rubbing temples >discover AI safety >perfect longtermist cause >AI might kill everyone >or create utopia >or seize galaxy >or tile universe with paperclips >or create billions of conscious software minds >finally a problem with numbers big enough for me >start AI safety nonprofit >mission: prevent dangerous AI >hire smartest people available >smartest people immediately start building better AI to understand dangerous AI >interesting >we must understand capabilities to understand safety >we must scale models to study alignment >we must race ahead so less responsible actors don't get there first >we must deploy systems to learn how deployment can go wrong >we must build the thing quickly because building the thing quickly is dangerous >outsider asks why the people most worried about AI apocalypse all work at AI companies >complicated field >company releases stronger model >very concerned >company begins training even stronger model >extremely concerned >company raises $14 billion >concern reaches unprecedented levels >need to influence government >future is at stake >normal democratic process too slow >politicians don't understand exponential curves >public doesn't understand x-risk >experts must guide them >who counts as expert >people who understand x-risk >who understands x-risk >our friends >someone objects that this seems politically convenient >explain we're representing future generations >future generations unavailable for comment >develop concept of value lock-in >terrifying possibility that one ideology controls civilization forever >therefore extremely important that civilization adopts correct values before lock-in >whose values >let's circle back >begin with impartial morality >end with small group of people deciding what quadrillions of hypothetical beings would want >beautiful arc >meanwhile actual humans keep doing annoying things >voting wrong >having parochial attachments >loving family more than strangers >caring about local community >getting upset when told their suffering is cosmically negligible >evolutionary biases everywhere >explain that moral intuition cannot be trusted >except intuition that future digital people count >and intuition that extinction is uniquely bad >and intuition that our probability estimates are sane >and intuition that our institutional choices improve the future >those intuitions survived peer review >someone donates $5k to local homeless shelter >inefficient >could have funded 0.0000000000003% of an AI governance researcher >think of all the simulated people you just killed >okay maybe don't phrase it that way publicly >PR team says "future generations deserve a voice" >much better >journalist asks what longtermism means >say "future people matter" >everyone agrees >great >journalist asks what follows from that >well technically we should redirect enormous resources toward low-probability interventions affecting astronomical futures >journalist raises eyebrow >return to "future people matter" >motte has entered the chat >critic: of course future people matter >me: glad we agree >critic: I don't agree that your institute knows how to help them >me: why do you hate our grandchildren >eventually notice uncomfortable implication >if future value dominates everything >then helping people today mostly matters through effects on future >education matters because future institutions >health matters because future productivity >democracy matters because future trajectory >human beings slowly become instrumental variables in their own moral philosophy >see starving child >feel compassion >check spreadsheet >child's direct welfare contribution negligible >but perhaps childhood nutrition improves national institutional quality >compassion restored >tell myself this is impartial altruism >one day assistant asks obvious question >"how do you know your intervention actually improves the far future?" >silence >open spreadsheet >increase column width >add confidence interval >assistant asks again >"no, I mean how do you know the sign is positive?" >stare into cosmic light cone >10^50 people staring back >none of them exist >none of them can tell me >none of them can falsify my assumptions >realize I have invented the perfect constituency >infinitely important >completely silent >and always represented by me
760
2,390
944
20,412
2,891,999