This started when @MrsErikaKirk publicly “forgave” Tyler Robinson at what may have been the most televised funeral in recent memory. In doing so, she effectively pronounced a man guilty on a national stage with no evidence presented and a very real risk of poisoning a future jury pool. That was followed by @TPUSA ’s handling of texts from the night before Charlie was killed. Those messages said, in plain English, that he was done with the Israel cause. First they denied the texts existed. Then they insisted Charlie was fully aligned with Israel and that there was no rift. Both claims were false. It is precisely that pattern that led Candace Owens to start asking what actually happened. Charlie told her he believed he would be killed young. He asked her to be his “David.” That is not a nickname she invented after the fact. That was his request. The people closest to Charlie know he would have wanted a REAL investigation to be done. He said himself that he feared harm coming from those nearest to him. The government’s case is met with skepticism because the government has earned that skepticism, repeatedly.