Wuss (@wussweb3) header
Wuss (@wussweb3) profile picture

Crypto student

Joined February 2025
Photo by Wuss (@wussweb3)Photo by Wuss (@wussweb3)Photo by Wuss (@wussweb3)Photo by Wuss (@wussweb3)Photo by Wuss (@wussweb3)Photo by Wuss (@wussweb3)Photo by Wuss (@wussweb3)Photo by Wuss (@wussweb3)Photo by Wuss (@wussweb3)Photo by Wuss (@wussweb3)
$500 in SLX each everyday! 😊
The $10,000 SLX giveaway starts now. $2,000 in SLX goes out every day from today through Jul 9th. Four winners a day, $500 in SLX each. Comment under this post to enter today's round.
1
1
65
not gonna oversell this but the guy behind @thebeaksart has been painting walls like this for 20+ years same guy whose illustrations ran in Harper's, The New York Times, MIT Tech Review @DKashtalyan has been building this universe with millions of tiny dots paying attention
The Beaks by @dkashtalyan is coming. 20 years of practice entering web3. Are you early?
1
39
小马 ethereum:0x44b28991b167582f18ba0259e0173176ca125505 作为 hook 曾经的龙一,是不是该站起来了。
Her Majesty's horse bows as the mini donkey passes by
13
3
1
37
10,065
Wuss retweeted
Unipeg is now live on @OpenSea 🦄⛵️ opensea.io/collection/unipeg… permanent on-chain digital objects built on @Uniswap v4 hooks. every uPeg generated from live block data at the moment of the swap. no IPFS. no external storage. backed by a fully liquid ERC-20. how to list 👇🦄
145
75
16
288
52,360
Thoughts on ethereum:0x44b28991b167582f18ba0259e0173176ca125505
Fam, I’ve just bought some ethereum:0x44b28991b167582f18ba0259e0173176ca125505 Honestly, don’t know enough about it to say if this is a good idea or not. Seems to me (remember I’m an idiot) like an extension of ERC-404. There is some hype around NFTs on ethereum:native again right now and this seems to be the cutting edge of tech. I feel it’s currently just an experiment, but at $18m market cap I’m having a punt. Wanted to keep you in the loop. No affiliation, just having a punt on a token that’s all
9
4
1
37
9,609
Really love how this guy explain things 🦄
hadrian 5月4日 19:59 部署了 UnipegItemNFT 合约,地址 0x21dFb86dD4d9d22Cd43C5DC03A7bfBb043F26c00,已 verified。 这是之前 X 上承诺的 wrap 合约。 dupe 检测机制写得很直接,一张全局 mapping,从 seed 映射到 upegId。第一个用某 seed wrap 进来的 upegId 占住该 key,后续同一 个 stale seed 派生出来的克隆品,wrap 时检查 mapping 已被占用,直接 revert,每个 seed 全局只能被 wrap 一次。 unipeg 主合约 owner 已 renounce 改不了,但 wrap 合约是 hadrian 新部署的独立 ERC-721,owner 留着自己。这不是修旧漏洞,是在二级市场入口加新过滤器。设计上原 持有者可以反复 wrap 和 redeem 自己的独角兽,但 dupe 永远被卡在外面。 另外 NFT metadata 里写了 Era 字段,每 1000 个 upegId 算一代。upegId 1-1000 是 Era 1,1001-2000 是 Era 2,依此类推。这一字段会作为标准 trait 显示在 OpenSea,集合一打开就有代际分层,老 ID 一眼可识别,跟头像 NFT 看 #1234 这种序号文化是一回事,但稀有度叙事由出生顺序决定,而不是视觉特征的随机组合。 Era 的出现呼应了 post5 那句 the lower the ID, the older the object,这是 age 叙事的合约级落地。 当前状态,enabled = false,wrap 还没开,OpenSea 上 collection 已经创建 opensea.io/collection/unipeg…。 合约改不了,定义可以改,定义已经变成代码,等 hadrian setEnabled(true)。
1
54
Wuss retweeted
Thank you for your patience. Ensuring everything is integrated perfectly for anticipated longevity and value. Almost there. 🦄
43
28
3
208
14,575
Wuss retweeted
history is about to made. 🦄⛵️ uPeg objects will soon be tradable on @OpenSea the same object. the same history. now visible to the largest NFT marketplace in the world. 🧵🦄 _what_it_means_ 👇
40
73
14
344
62,107
Think about this deeply. $SHIB did a shib run because people didnt know it could happen $Pepe did a pepe run, because all other pepe were scams and why would this one even run? $Ohm or $Yfi went nuts as nobody really understood the defi mechanics. $SPX was a barely interesting meme coin, but insiders controlled supply and made it run selling very little tokens along the way There is ALWAYS something new or impossible, for the cycle runner. $Brett was bundled to hell, why would anybody buy ANOTHER Matt Furie beta coin... Yet it ran to BIllions too... $wif ran like crazy because meme sucks yet nobody has seen supply crime like this before. Something MUST make the smart money FADE it. And all of that HAPPENED with ethereum:0x44b28991b167582f18ba0259e0173176ca125505 New tech, NFT 2.0s, rarity is dynamic, minting is always on, the NFT is fungible and people can hold the tokens and ride the hype alongside, team is (allegedly, Uni / eth OGs), unicorn is a theme which never had a mega runner as a meme, yet many coins before, aka the demand was always there for a strong unicorn memecoin, OG NFTs are buying now, OG memecoiners buying now, Opensea listing in 2 weeks... Yet it was faded by all sub 1m mcap. and still faded sub 10m mcap. Most people can't hold past 100x. Because they don't know a cycle runner from a regular coin that would INDEED rarely hold 100x. The assignment is clear;. Identify the outliers. And hold them as long as you can. 100k doesnt change a life. 1mil does. "the unicorn in the coal mine of DEFI 3.0" And most people thought it was nonsense and impossible. This is what a cycle runner looks like my people. Post written at 16m mcap for upeg, for future reference...
9
12
68
11,475
关于 uPEG 那个所谓BUG闪电贷攻击事件,我顺着链上扒了一下。 事实跟传播出来的版本有一些偏差,顺手记一下。 攻击者是 EOA 0xcc76bafA5f14377D0A9606530De87d2c2516F2Df,自己部署了一个攻击合约 0x182779f2ebb6cD934Ed21BeCa943A46f0674444C。EOA 是合约的唯一调用者。 我拿了一笔代表性 tx,5-2 23:16 那笔。一笔 atomic tx 内: - mint 100 只独角兽 (OnUpegMinted × 100) - burn 99 只 (OnUpegBurned × 99) - transferUpeg 1 只稀有的给 EOA - gas used 10,674,996 (一个 block 上限的 1/3) 工作流是:攻击合约从 V4 池子单笔买入 100 整枚 uPEG → 触发 100 mint → 评估 seed 找最稀有那一只 → transferUpeg 转给 EOA → 99 只 swap 卖回 V4 → 套差价。 严格说这不是闪电贷。没用 Aave、Balancer 这些借贷协议。EOA 自己出 0.85 ETH 当垫资,atomic tx 内部 swap 进 swap 出回收本金,本质是 atomic batch rarity extraction 原子批量稀有度提取。 也不算低 gas。10.6M gas 一笔在主网很贵,但只要稀有度溢价大于 gas + price impact,就跑得通。 V4 PoolManager 持仓从攻击前 17%+ 跌到现在 6.47% (646 只)。攻击节奏 ~4 分钟一个完整循环,5-2 22-23 时段高频运行,当前原子批量稀有度提取操作已经暂停。 目前在做 peg2peg 挂单管理。 最后一点,这不是合约 bug。 这是 unipeg mint 阈值机制的结构性攻击面 ,单笔 swap 进 N 整枚就 mint N 只、用 transferUpeg 转走具体 ID 不受限、剩下的 swap 出去 burn ,三步合约都按设计运行,没有任何一步是漏洞。任何能读源码的人都能看出来。 目前官方加入了持有时间权重作为稀有度判别标准,看后续市场怎么解读。
26
23
6
148
26,810
Wuss retweeted
1 ETH 🔹 ≡ 1 uPeg 🦄 📺 watch live on t.me/unipeglive
31
34
4
218
14,568
Wuss retweeted
history unfolds // destiny unpegs 250 ETH trading volume on Peg2Peg marketplace 🦄 reminder: p2peg.app is now the primary marketplace URL. peg2peg.app now redirects to this domain. 🦄🛒
22
13
112
8,327
Wuss retweeted
I've been digging into the $upeg project, and they're building something bigger than most people think. You've probably seen the thesis: "Interesting project. Each swap generates unique 24×24 fully on-chain SVG unicorn pixel art (no IPFS). Fixed 10k supply. Blends token + generative NFT as 'on-chain object'. Trading creates art." But this is not the ACTUAL thesis. What @unipegv4 is actually building is way bigger. Traditional NFTs die from illiquidity. You mint, list, and wait. Floors collapse because no AMM is holding bids. The asset and the market for it are two separate things, and the market usually disappears. Unipeg fuses them. The trade itself becomes the generative event, and the pool IS the secondary market. One of the cleanest demonstrations of where v4 hooks are headed. And there's a clever wrinkle. Hold a whole $upeg, you get a unicorn. Sell below a whole token and the unicorn burns. Buy back up and a new one mints. Right now 3,218 of the 10k supply sits as fractional dust, meaning only 6,782 unicorns actually exist on-chain. The "dust dominance ratio" (0.47) tracks this in real time. The higher it goes, the fewer unicorns exist, the rarer each one becomes. This is bullish mechanically. As trading heats up, supply gets split across more wallets, dust dominance rises, and circulating unicorns drop below the 10k cap. Scarcity becomes a function of volume itself. What the broader v4 hook model could unlock: > Sports cards and collectibles. Pool-based cards are always priced, with art that can update with player stats. Topps NFTs flopped because there was no volume/liquidity, this fixes the structural side. > In-game items. Loot drops with built-in buyback. Every sword, skin, or rare item has an automatic exit price the moment you stop playing. > Generative art and PFPs. Mint through trading, not bot-dominated gas wars. Supply curve set by the market in real time. What this approach fixes about the old NFT model: > No IPFS rug. Everything lives on-chain as SVG, no link rot, no vanishing JPEGs. > No royalty enforcement wars. Fees baked into the swap, paid by protocol, not goodwill. > No dead collections. Even at zero hype, the pool still quotes a price. NFTs were supposed to be programmable assets. Most ended up as static images on a CDN. Unipeg is one of the cleanest demonstrations of treating the trade itself as the primitive. That's the actual thesis. (i'm still learning more about the model so pls correct me on stuff if I was wrong) With their marketplace going live soon, and the overall way the team is communicating and building, I can see this trade A LOT higher soon.
37
35
20
286
95,202
😉
Next, we start exploring rarity. 🦄
6
this "It’s high time people take ownership of their investments and stop blaming others."
I don’t understand the point of blaming influencers if a project rugs or shuts down its business. How can anyone know for sure whether a project will rug even after doing their due diligence? Fantasy Top, Friend Tech and Nifty Gateway are perfect case studies. All three of these dApps once dominated the timeline and were among the most used platforms at the time. People were bullish on the teams, used the platforms a lot, made money from them and also lost money at some point. Eventually, these businesses wound down because they were not sustainable or didn’t achieve product–market fit. So who should be blamed here in terms of ‘due diligence’? Now we have MegaETH, Abstract, Polymarket, Kalshi, Xeet, Ethos and many more projects that people are bullish on. If any of these businesses fail who should be blamed for that failure or lack of due diligence? Influencers, users or the team? In my personal opinion, anyone willing to put their money into projects should be responsible for doing their own due diligence. It’s high time people take ownership of their investments and stop blaming others. Just because someone is doing a paid partnership doesn’t necessarily mean you have to buy in. Do your own research first and only invest if you feel comfortable. If not, move on. In our industry, 8 out of 10 products eventually shut down because they fail to find product–market fit. That doesn’t necessarily mean the project ‘rugged’ it simply means the business model wasn’t sustainable. What Ben and Trove did was a rug. What others experienced was failure. Understand the difference, start with your own due diligence and the web3 space will become a much better place. Onwards and Upwards.
1
29
A creature unlike any other. A dreamer, a disruptor … a … DEGEN. 777 supply. Free mint. Q1 2026 Enter the dream → dream.degen.tips
99,711
43,562
1,828
54,278
1,476,661
🚀 Seeker Game Boost! Special rewards for @solanamobile users All Seeker & Saga Genesis wallets can claim: Points, Energy, Mattle Keys, up to 500 $MATTLE, and PENGU Hero. Drop your .skr wallet below and follow the steps 👇
3,295
2,048
209
2,731
84,825