david

what the f*ck is this Grok Bot. I'm genuinely shaking it texted me at 5:21am: "goal 40× done. keep going?" I said yes $70 → $5,492.85 by 6:47am. I touched my phone once it runs 4 bots, and nothing gets bought unless all 4 say yes, in order > Scanner pulls every fresh Solana pool and kills anything under $35k liquidity, dev wallet over 6% or bundles over 20% > Analyst scores whatever survives, 74+ or dead > Executor buys with 24% of the stack, filled in 0.3s > Risk puts a -8% stop under every buy and trails winners, out the moment one drops 9% from its top 11,400 pools overnight, 98% never got past the Scanner 20 trades 14 green, 6 red the 6 red ones cost $94.93 combined, worst one -$72.38 every red got cut at exactly -8%. no hoping, no "it'll come back". that's why i let it run best trade of the night went in with $174.93, Risk sold it at 5:19am for +$2,658.94 two minutes later it asked me "keep going?" $70 → $155 → $594 → $3,388 → $5,492.85 i left the screen recording on all night, battery 91% to 24% would you have said yes at 5:21am, or taken the $3,387.83 and gone back to sleep? send this to the friend who still sets alarms to check charts comment "GROK" and I'll send you the 4 bot rules illustrative build, numbers simulated

I FEEL LIKE I'M CHEATING 47X. MY GROK BOT COPIED 28 TRADES OUT OF 8,700 AND $100 BECAME $4,768 i connected my wallet, gave it a $100 spending cap and walked away. i didn't touch a thing Grok Bot runs a crew of 5 agents inside the GROKIUS terminal Scout · tracks 512 smart wallets Filter · kills anything that breaks a hard rule Analyst · runs the deep checks Sniper · copies whatever survives Guard · sets the stop before every entry and tightens it on pullbacks the funnel 8,700 signals → 8,398 killed → 150 killed → 28 copied what killed them 2,519 · dev wallet holding over 5% 1,931 · liquidity under $25k 1,763 · top 10 holders over 35% 1,259 · bundled buys 923 · already up 100% in the last hour 150 · smart wallet sold early the coins NUBI · killed, LP not locked HONKER · killed, smart wallet buying it but weak win rate SIB · stopped at −$313.70, worst of the session JEFF · +$1,080.80, best trade of the session 28 trades · 64% win rate · 10 stops hit · max drawdown −19.7% $100 → $297 → $946 → $1,755 → $3,919 → $4,768 it lost 10 times and still did 47x, because every loss was small and every bad coin died before it got a single dollar bookmark this before the market teaches you the expensive way

Today, in collaboration with Anthropic, we’re excited to share rapid initial progress towards an antibody treatment for food allergy, which affects over 200 million people worldwide, discovered with the help of Claude. At Divergence Labs, we believe that AI can unlock the next generation of antibody therapeutics with more effective mechanisms than before. Such mechanisms are urgently needed in food allergy, which involve overcoming one of the tightest affinity protein pairs in immunology, IgE and its receptor FcεRI, on mast cells. Treatment with Xolair—the only approved antibody for food allergy—sequesters circulating IgE, but mast cells remain sensitized for weeks to months due to the extraordinarily slow dissociation of IgE from FcεRI. We envision a treatment that actively pulls IgE off of FcεRI, without waiting for natural dissociation. Like picking a lock, this requires the right combination of geometry and force. Our research team, working with Claude, ideated on mechanisms to accomplish this disruption, and converged on an antibody format with two arms with different functions and epitopes. Within one month, we designed, synthesized, and experimentally confirmed the biophysical function of the two arms, which we are now assembling into full therapeutic formats.

society might genuinely collapse if tailscale gets hacked

SCOOP: Major U.S. banks are detecting unauthorized third-party AI agents inside customer accounts, including some attempting to take actions that appear to be independent of user instructions, sources told Axios. The findings have alarmed banking executives, who are racing to restrict access to their systems as AI moves at a velocity faster than financial institutions can respond, multiple industry and bank executives told Axios. Several banks are now preparing for worst-case and even “day after” scenarios, including how to rapidly secure or restore customer accounts if things go wrong, the people said. Several bank executives told Axios they're struggling to distinguish between human users and AI agents. One executive said banks also struggle to determine whether agents are authorized by customers or potentially operating without their permission, more akin to rogue agent behavior. Read my latest for Axios here: axios.com/2026/10/22/ai-agen…

We’re opening a research preview of Claude Duet, a new app where Claude works as a proactive agent. It comes to you with what needs your attention, completes tasks you ask of it, keeps working when you step away, and checks with you before it acts on your behalf.

f*cking insane. I hired an AI chief of staff for $0, gave it one rule: "find me $50,000 a month or you're fired", went to sleep, and Opus 5.5 had it on my desk by morning a SpaceXAI engineer said one line that hit 5 million views: "i have a Chief of Staff agent. he knows about all my other bots and manages everything" a human one costs $200,000 a year. mine runs on Opus 5.5 inside Viktor, on his own computer in the cloud, with my laptop shut i give the goal, he does the steps, i only make the calls the rule: "find me $50,000 a month of new business. public data only. contact nobody without my yes" the night: → 9pm broke the goal into 4 jobs and gave each a day and a time, i wrote none of them → 11pm pulled 240 dental clinics in Austin from Google Maps and cut every chain → 1am read every site that was left and kept 25, each with one thing he noticed and where he saw it → 2am wrote an opener for every one of them, sent zero → 3am built the offer on one page, no invented results, price left blank for me instead of guessing → 8am i typed $2,000 a month. 25 clinics × $2,000 = $50,000 a month on the table honestly the blank price is what i'd pay for, an AI that guesses your price loses you the deal and he does it again every Monday: 100 new clinics a month, and he never forgets to start 240 clinics → 25 worth it → 1 offer → $50,000 a month on the table → 0 sent without my yes second 12, he leaves the price blank and hands it to me someone's chief of staff is already pitching the clinics in your city i left the whole setup below ↓ free, steal it

It is becoming f*cking dangerous A 23-year-old dev from China just ran 300 Claude Code agents in parallel and hooked them to a verification layer so none of them could bullshit him He opens the live dashboard: - 300 agents writing and checking at the same time - Every output verified against the source in ~100 ms - Three passes over 100 company profiles → zero errors left - Everything dumped straight into an Obsidian vault The trick is the split: one model does the work, a cheaper one decides if the claim is actually true. The loop doesn’t stop until everything checks out An analyst team would bill weeks for this. He got it in one run Same kind of Second Brain + swarm setup that keeps circulating. Bookmark the full breakdown

My dear friends, I’d like to show you my latest toy project Introducing Handwired: turn your regular JavaScript code into a neural net! - no training - exact outputs vs the JS program - fully differentiable All runnable in a browser, without GPU