Bryce W. Eddy

Far-left terrorism poses a profound threat to the United States and the broader West. Today, the United States sanctioned several transnational far-left terrorist networks, including Autistici/Inventati – a major far-left tech collective whose services are used by the most active and violent Antifa cells in the United States and across the world. There will be no refuge for violent extremists who wage war on our civilization and plot to undermine law and order, destroy critical infrastructure, assault political opponents, or conspire to conceal their crimes from authorities. We will use all the tools and authorities at our disposal to fight terrorism and protect our way of life from terrorist coercion.

😂 I invited @RealCandaceO on for a discussion multiple times. She has not accepted. Guess why @molonlabe2024 In fact, I invited @IanCarrollShow - he has not accepted (even though he has been on my channel before). I invited @baroncoleman - he has not accepted. I invited @mchooyah - he has not accepted. I invited @LionelMedia - he has not accepted. Guess why? The people “just asking questions” don’t like just answering questions. But your next pivot will just be accusing me of being a “grifter” by asking them on for a discussion.

You seriously don’t hate this duplicitous crone enough. She’s always been a lefty. She started at Vogue and doxxed people that disagreed with her. But the left was a special kind of crazy and she realized that she could get more famous on the right. So, she acted like a conservative and rode both Charlie’s and Ben’s coattails to fame she never could have possible accomplished on her own, but she couldn’t hide who she really was from either of them. That’s why she was pushed out of TPUSA and then eventually fired from the Daily Wire. And there is no “fracture” between the right and the left. We are diametrically opposed. The left wants socialism and globalism, and ultimately to do away with the Constitution. They want DEI and open borders. They want America last. The right… the real right—not the Halal Right pushed by Dugin, Russia, and the CCP that consists of this witch, Islamist lovers, and Jew haters—wants a strong military, the welfare state to end, our sovereignty back, and American exceptionalism. She’s trying to soften her messaging because she’s facing multiple lawsuits and her legal team quit on her. She knows the walls are closing in. So ignore her or ridicule her, but just remember: This bitch deserves everything coming her way.

Candace Owens just did that thing again… Where she perfectly describes herself while criticizing others. “Her goal is to harm people psychologically by lying just by lying openly all the time” Sounds exactly like what Candace has been doing to Erika Kirk and TPUSA for the last 8 months. Candace gets caught in a new lie on an almost daily basis. Also you can love/hate Laura Loomer but she actually brought receipts for her claims which is something Candace very rarely does.

This is the background to the Candace Owens photo in the Trump post below (yes, the Time cover is satire, but the photo is real). Back in 2016, Candace stopped paying rent on her $3,500-a-month luxury apartment in Stamford, Connecticut. She then sued her landlord, claiming she withheld rent because the apartment had black mould. Candace alleged that the mould made her ill - saying she suffered from: • Rashes • Coughing • Asthma • Cognitive impairment ("inability to think clearly") • Emotional distress Candace allegedly submitted the photo below as proof of eczema and related skin irritation from the mould exposure. Despite these claims, she continued living in the apartment without paying rent for about six months until it was repossessed by housing court in early 2017. The landlord counter-sued, arguing that Candace herself was responsible for the mould and for unpaid rent. The court sided with the landlord, finding that Candace failed to identify a required expert witness to support her mould-related injury allegations. On April 1, 2021, the Superior Court of Connecticut ordered Candace to pay the following damages to her landlord: • $17,719.90 in unpaid rent and related charges • $2,657.99 in attorney’s fees (capped under Connecticut law) • $205.00 in court costs for the counterclaim filing • $440.00 for trial de novo filing Total judgment: approximately $21,000. Makes you wonder if the cognitive impairment was permanent - would explain a lot.

Project Hail Mary writer Andy Weir on social commentary in books: "I dislike social commentary. Like… I really hate it. When I’m reading a book, I just want to be entertained, not preached at by the author. Plus, it ruins the wonder of the story if I know the author has a political or social axe to grind. I no longer speculate about all possible outcomes of the story because I know for a fact that the universe of that book will conspire to ensure that the author’s political agenda is validated. I hate that." "I put no politics or social commentary into my stories at all. Anyone who thinks they see something like that is reading it in on their own. I have no point to make, and I’m not trying to affect the reader’s opinion on anything. My sole job is to entertain, and I stick to that." "To that end, I also don’t talk about my personal political opinions publicly. I don’t want readers to even know, honestly. I don’t want that in the back of their minds as they read my stuff." Is this why he has the #1 sci-fi movie in decades?

I feel compelled to share some insight on the shot/bullet that killed Charlie Kirk. I hate to wade into this conversation, but some sanity is necessary - seeing all the insane BS that’s out there. I’m a lifelong hunter and have shot at least 75+ deer with a 30-06, and countless more with other rounds, as well as bow and arrow. I guided hunting trips full-time for a decade. I have personally seen literally hundreds if not thousands of “kill shots” with high powered rifles. And in this line of work, I studied ballistics, bullet performance, etc. I guarantee I have more first-hand knowledge than pretty much every single “influencer” out there who is presenting themselves now as an expert in this. Two key points: - First, bullets do inexplicable things. Yes, they always obey the laws of physics (no “magic”) but there are just so many variables that an outcome in a dynamic situation is simply not predictable within the range of possibilities. - Second, yes it is quite possible that a 30-06 round (with a soft-point, lead-filled bullet, designed for expansion, as is the case here) would NOT make an exit wound. AND it is possible without a significant amount of external blood loss. I once shot a deer in the head at about 100 yards with a 30-06, and there was no exit. The skin on a deer’s head is thin compared to a human neck, and the cumulative bone-mass on the bullet’s trajectory much less than a human spine. I was baffled about this (must be magic!) until I figured it out. What happened is that (a slow-mo video would have revealed) the head instantly inflated like a balloon, and the insides turned to mush. That’s how it absorbed the bullet’s energy. It looked normal on the outside when I went to retrieve it, but on inspection it was obvious. And there was minimal blood loss (b’c the only hole was 3/10’s of an inch - ie, 30 caliber, as in 30-06 - and the skin closed around it as it sprang back after the shot). In the sickening video of Charlie’s assassination, there is a freeze-frame where his neck did the same thing — blew up (momentarily) like a balloon before springing back. That’s where the energy went. Not rocket science. Combined with a healthy spine (higher on the bone density scale, we are told), the thickness of skin and density of muscles in a human neck, the story we are being told is 100% plausible. I’m not saying I know what happened. Only that the folks saying this is not possible have no idea what they’re talking about, and by spewing this ignorant crap, they are only making things worse. If you are prone to be influenced by such ignorant conspiratorial information, please understand the context: fact is, “influencers” make their money by peddling their influence. Unethical ones do so to the highest bidder. Others have hidden agendas/biases that taint their content. Some are just batshit crazy. Some sow division on purpose, and fling out all kinds of crazy crap, just to stir the pot - to get clicks. Psyops from myriad powers shape our social media. Generating deepfake videos is easy as logging into Grok. It’s not rocket science to gin up a “following” and appear “credible” and “sincere.” The point is, you should not wholesale believe or even give a smidge of credibility to ANYONE you don’t personally know. And even then you have to be careful. The devil knows the more he tries to oppress revival from the outside, the more it breaks out. So the way to defeat it is to divide and conquer, through lies and deception that appear as truth. “The devil comes masquerading as an angel of light.” Be smarter.

ok now im totally convinced Candace is an op First why go after Nick Shirley at all more importantly, why discredit his work, implying he fakes his news coverage this is fucking wild

Listen you human pieces of garbage and anyone else here in the comments who wants to get this straight. First off, this isn't news. You're spreading salacious horseshit from propagandists, and we all know you're doing it on purpose and with malicious intent. That's nasty. Nasty, nasty. But now let's look at some things seriously, like you would if you had a responsible bone left in your sorry outfit. Charlie died in September of 2025. This conflict started in February 2026. Joe said this conversation happened in June 2025. Operation Midnight Hammer happened in June 2025. So we can establish that Charlie was talking to Joe in the context of Operation Midnight Hammer, but Charlie said those exact same things on camera to the world at the time. This isn't new information at all. It was always public straight from Charlie. Then Trump executed Operation Midnight Hammer, and a nervous Charlie Kirk said he supported President Trump 100%, though he didn't want a "regime-change war." He later said the operation was a success. Charlie Kirk backed President Trump 100%, even though he voiced his concerns before Trump made his decisions, both in public and in private. He supported Trump when he made these decisions and stood strongly with him, for him, and with and for the United States of America, even when he was nervous about it. Charlie's words in June of 2025 cannot be construed in any way to be applicable to the circumstances that led Trump to make these decisions in early 2026. It isn't hard to guess how Charlie would have felt about this situation, though, since he already demonstrated it for us in June last year. 1) He would be publicly and privately nervous about getting into such a war and would strongly caution against regime-change as a goal and boots on the ground as a strategy; 2) He would have voiced these concerns both on camera and in private and maintained a pro-Trump and pro-America, while "America First," messaging about the looming conflict; 3) Once things started in late February/early March, he would have backed President Trump 100% like he did on 100% of the other things he backed President Trump on 100%, 100% of the time; 4) He would have stood by the operation and President Trump's decision-making, even while voicing his anxieties, concerns, and beliefs about wanting the war/conflict to wrap up quickly and avoid boots on the ground and a deliberate strategy of regime change; 5) He would have reassured Americans that President Trump has the best intelligence, the best instincts, and the best capabilities to redefine conflict in the 21st century and to guide us through this war, consistently. To suggest anything else is to fail to have known Charlie Kirk or even to have paid attention to what he actually said in the relevant situation Kent is bringing up, standing on the silence of Charlie's coffin to do so. To tie this to Charlie's murder is nothing short of reckless and heinous, and it is likely so reckless that it will possibly interfere with bringing Charlie's murderer to justice, given the idiotic and opportunistic things he said. You are all vultures and skanks, and your judgment will be ruthless.