Replying to @MartinSLewis @itvMLshow
Martin you love giving away money to the most ineffective people. They have everything they could ask for and yet you still want to give them more. When are you going to stand up for people in the middle class? You shouldn’t be anywhere near the government economy.
Jack retweeted
Viajar en tren es seguro, muy seguro.
No hagáis caso a ultras, ignorantes o carroñeros.
Ya está bien de asustar a la gente
Replying to @prestoncouncil
Might as well tell us the weather in Palastine whilst you are at it
Replying to @engine_rich @scott_m_powell
Hmm you’re probably right. Maybe we will get second half of 2027 then xD
Replying to @engine_rich @scott_m_powell
I predict it will slip into Q2 for 45
Replying to @engine_rich @scott_m_powell
I would be surprised if they didn’t to be honest.
Replying to @engine_rich @scott_m_powell
Fair enough, it was re-confirmed in August but the same timeline from July
Replying to @engine_rich @scott_m_powell
It was over 3 months ago, so you aren’t some prophet assuming that it’s now incorrect. Hence, why I said wait till the next guidance.
Replying to @engine_rich @scott_m_powell
A fairer comparison would be to wait till the earnings and do a 5 months prediction then.
Replying to @engine_rich @scott_m_powell
The guidance they provided is out of date. They provide guidance every Q. When things happen that alter the guidance, they don’t update their guidance until the earnings. Got it?
Replying to @engine_rich @scott_m_powell
Well I will say you are right, once you release your 2027 end prediction. It’s not difficult to say their guidance for Q1 won’t hit.
Replying to @engine_rich @scott_m_powell
Because taking an out of date guidance and making a new assumption well past that and making a comparison is easy.
But I’m curious as to why you want to limit your prediction to only 1Q now whilst gloating how correct you were over 4Qs? Not confident now or?
Replying to @engine_rich @scott_m_powell
As I asked, I want your 2027 end prediction. Where you don’t get the guidance from ASTS. Your sole prediction, not your Q1 guidance as per your initial tweet.
And yet, I bet that your next prediction will include the launches under BO (but ofc this didn’t impact current guidance)
Replying to @engine_rich @scott_m_powell
It’s hilarious how you frame it as if the blow up of BO didn’t have any impact on their guidance. So, tell me, what do you predict.

