👑🖤💜🖤 Monarchist, philosopher, advocate of the struggle for a better world. Noblesse Oblige is a treasure that must be brought back from the dead.
cyprus
Joined August 2011
- Tweets5.7K
- Following301
- Followers102
- Likes36.2K
Pinned Tweet
Yeah. Mention this exact part in my video, it's a global problem that many nations are going to experience. We can learn a lot from the Russians and how it's affected them. youtu.be/xugN7UuIBkk?t=281
For a Cypriot like me, this is easy. Because before the sanctions, we used to import a lot of Russian goods, mostly for the Russian tourists, which were in the millions. For me personally, I would say Russian ice cream is hands down superior to most western ice cream,
I sometimes go to the north occupied side of Cyprus because Turkey did not impose a ban for russian diesel, so their diesel is 40% cheaper. And that's just consumer goods. I'm not going to go into Russian music or refined Uranium 40% of global supply.
2
31
1,395
Lord Revon retweeted
I guess I can say it now - so when applicants would apply to the studio, the producer would go through their LinkedIn to see what posts they liked, and if he disagreed with their political/social Like, he'd advocate not to hire them based on their Like.
Lord Revon retweeted
Polish identity was historically tied to the nobility, the szlachta, who were only 5-10% of the pop. They held all the rights and exclusive claim to be Polish, and if some commoner or serf claimed Polishness, he would be flogged. This only changed with the abolition of serfdom.
predictable outcome for "I am happy to pay 5X for the fuel if it means 🇷🇺 collapses. I don't care. Bravo, Ukraine, for fucking up these" bastards.nitter.cf/LordRevon/status/20361…
Amidst the growing wave of protests in Europe, street protests have also spread to Latin America: yesterday in Chile, and today in Colombia and Mexico.
2
88
Lord Revon retweeted
"desired effect" now russia can sell it to Korea,Iran,Yemen,China and others who want long range drones. Mind you russia and china are the only countries that could have made a starlink like breaking the monopoly for commercial and military use.
Like he stated many ways to determine a nation's wealth, like Russia having exports that usually exceed imports by 40% to 70% or having incredibly low debt GDP(20% of GDP.) compared to other nations like UK (debt over 100%) and this when russian is most sanctioned and at war.
This is absolutely priceless.
Tucker just states as fact that Russia has a much larger economy than the UK, is completely wrong and gets schooled.
1
65
Lord Revon retweeted
The ☢️ Missile Strike at the Pentagon on 9/11 /🧵
What really struck the WTC on 9/11? We've already eliminated airplanes as an option, which is a shock to anyone who lived through that day. We now have video evidence of not inserted planes in all footage of 9/11, but also the removal of another object. What the hell was that that "ball" like object?
Could it also be a composite? A deeper fake, so to speak? Is there any clue that could possible eliminate all other options? It's a ridiculous thought but, given what we experienced, we shouldn't make any assumptions and only work with what is real, provable and observable.
The real challenge of answering such a question is that the two world trade centres turned to dust, destroying the scene of the crime and most of the evidence with it. But we aren't out of luck, as another building was struck on 9/11:
The Pentagon.
Though there was obviously no wreckage of an aircraft on the scene, there is enough evidence in the Pentagon for us to determine not only what couldn't have struck it, but the only object in the world that could have struck it and left the damage that it did.
Unlike the strikes on the WTC, there was no televised composite film of a plane striking the pentagon, simply because the scenario required was physically impossible. The plane supposedly banked to achieve cruise speed at ground level and struck the Pentagon parallel to the ground. There is a very slow and low quality surveillance video that depicts this strike (which we will examine shortly). Yet, just from the satellite photos of the Pentagon, we can determine the actual damage.
So, let's examine three pieces of evidence based on things that are already established and known! With these pieces of evidence we will determine what struck the Pentagon and how it's related to whatever struck the WTCs and the larger plot around 9/11!
A. Penetration Depth
================
Let's do some math based on established observations. This is going to be necessary to other objects out, though it will be overkill for a plane.
The object that struck the Pentagon struck three of its five rings:
The E-Ring, the D-Ring and finally C-Ring when it stopped. The exterior wall of the pentagon consisted of ~13 centimetres of limestone and ~20 cm of bricks. Inside the Pentagon, each wall consisted of 25 cm of brick. The distance travelled to the end of ring C is 64 meters total. Given the 6 walls penetrated, at the perpendicular, that is a total of:
* 64 meters travelled after impact.
* 130mm of limestone
* 1580mm of bricks
* Six impact impulses
Even though the individual walls are not very thick or strong, that's a huge amount of material to eat through and that's at 90 degrees. And a very long distance from the first site of impact. If you measure the two visible impact zones, you will see that the object struck the Pentagon at an angle of 70 degrees to the plane. That means we have to divide the above by sin 70deg:
- 68 meters travelled
- 138mm of limestone
- 1680mm of bricks
The object was clearly on its way to the courtyard centre of the Pentagon and whoever planned this trajectory was attempting to penetrate the building as deeply as possible without targeting anything specific within it. Incidentally, the courtyard centre of the Pentagon was (and still is) called ground zero, a name it earnt during the Cold War under the assumption that the USSR would strike exactly that location during mutually assured destruction. There is even a hotdog stand in the middle of the Pentagon affectionately called cafe ground zero for this reason.
B. Pattern of Destruction
================
Despite being struck with this object, the Pentagon outer wall did not immediately collapse. In fact, close ups show very localised destructions, albeit very strong fires. 20 minutes later, the outer wall of the Pentagon collapsed.
Another important observation was impact shape it left: it was that of a single hole that destroyed a brick pattern around ~2 meters wide. This was evidence even in the C-ring. Keep this important observation in mind.
C. The Timeline
================
Let's place the attack on the Pentagon with all the events surrounding it:
8:46:30 AM - WTC North Tower is struck.
9:03:00 AM - WTC South Tower is struck.
9:37:46 AM - Pentagon is struck.
9:55:?? AM - First responders told to evacuate Pentagon perimeter.
9:57:?? AM - Pentagon outer wall "collapses".
9:58:59 AM - South Tower pulverised.
10:03:11 AM - Object destroyed over Pennsylvania.
10:28:22 AM - North Tower pulverised.
================
This is actually all the evidence we need from the Pentagon itself so let's dive deeper into the implications that every detail left behind.
/1
Finally, the only unadulterated shot of the WTC exploding on 9/11.
Not only was there no "plane" to speak of...
There was also another object in the sky.
This video was broadcast once and then never again. After this shot, all of the backdrops were lumakeyed. In some cases, some fake foregrounds and backgrounds like "walking" bridges were added.
Yet, they made a mistake. On that and subsequent days, they failed to notice an artifact, or shadow, of the object in the sky. It still persists in other videos, meaning all of them were edited.
I think most of you understood the first part, that the plane was inserted. This was obvious by the nose cone video. This one goes beyond that. This should disturb you deeply after you think about it.
Lord Revon retweeted
THE U.S. CAUSED THE Romanian government to collapse and can do the same to “any country we want”, a U.S. ambassador said, according to a Wall Street Journal report yesterday.
In a dinner discussion in Greece about the imminent implosion of Romania’s administration, Ambassador Kimberly Guilfoyle said: ‘We can do this to any country we want. We can do this here too.’”
No, you can’t, Greece’s Energy Minister Stavros Papastavrou responded angrily, saying that governments were elected by the people.
The Ambassador, a former Fox News presenter, released a lawyer’s letter disputing the story of the argument at the dinner—but the newspaper said the words spoken at the heated discussion were related by an eyewitness present at the dinner in Athens.
.
‘HEGEMON RUN AMOK’
The story broke at the same time that Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told the United Nations that “the dictatorship of a single hegemon has run amok”.
Academics, including those in the US, broadly agree that the US conducts major political interference operations around the world, particularly in places on the borders of Russia and China—including Romania.
.
FUEL MONOPOLY
What’s the long term goal of US interference in these nations? The US is pushing a pipeline called the Vertical Gas Corridor, or VGC, the Wall Street Journal said.
Instead of buying affordable fuel from Russia, people in Eastern European nations will instead be steered towards purchasing exported American gas for billions of dollars.
The US has already successfully created a huge market for its natural gas in western Europe, and has also made the Chinese island of Taiwan dependent on imported fuel from the US.
Washington’s foreign policy is designed to make more people around the world dependent on American gas, and has been largely successful. For this reason, the US and allies have been working to cut non-US fuel suppliers, such as Iran, Russia, and Venezuela, out of all trade routes.
.
.
