Aristocratic Ethno-Nationalist 🇸🇾🇱🇧🇬🇷 | Greco-Syrophoenician (M) Babylonian-Assyrian (P) | Mystical Platonist/Iamblichus-affirming | Theurgian
Joined July 2026
- Tweets3.2K
- Following747
- Followers396
- Likes1.9K
Pinned Tweet
𝗗𝗘𝗕𝗨𝗡𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗞𝗨𝗥𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗨𝗦𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗠 "𝗡𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗔𝗡" 𝗧𝗢 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗖𝗧 𝗔𝗦𝗦𝗬𝗥𝗜𝗔𝗡𝗦
Although you'll commonly see Kurds saying we being called "Nestorians" in some instances would disprove our Assyrian origin, they don't realize the sources that they themselves use rather identify the Nestorians as a religious instead of a racial group, and the Nestorians in most of these supposed sources are ethnically said to be of the same Ancient Assyrians.
Beyond relying on 1600s-1900s European travelogues and colonial writers whose biased claims constantly contradict authentic Ottoman, Arab, and Persian historical accounts of the Assyrian Christians. Kurds simply cannot find any other legitimate sources to support their claims regarding Assyrians being Nestorians with disconnected traces to Ancient Assyrians. Strip away this outdated 19th-century Orientalist race science, and they completely lack any indigenous historical continuity or evidence to prove their claims against Assyrians. They have absolutely nothing left to stand on.
Nestorius was Assyrian. Ancient and medieval records consistently identify him by his Mesopotamian origin and from Germanicia a city in the province of Syria Euphratensis of the same supposed Syriac Stock of Assyrians. gedsh.bethmardutho.org/Nesto… dev.gedsh.bethmardutho.org/e…
Literally the Sasanian Empire record explicitly calls him a theologian of Syrian/Assyrian origin, while other historical accounts describe the Nestorian faithful as the direct descendants of the old Chaldeans and Assyrians.
Assyrians are genetically proven to be the direct descendants of the Ancient Assyrians/Mesopotamians. With up to 85% direct frequency identicality between the two. nitter.cf/PlatosDisciple/status/… nitter.cf/MiroCyo/status/2024643…
Ancient DNA from Bakr Awa (Neo-Assyrian period, 7th–6th c. BC) confirms modern Assyrians are genetically closer to this imperial heartland sample than Kurds, proving long-term continuity. dnagenics.com/blog/ancient-m…
Ancient Assyrian Y-DNA is dominated by J2 (specifically descended from J-M304) and R1b-L23. Modern Assyrians retain these exact haplogroup lineages where J-M304 ranges 36-55%, and R1b (including/specifically R1b-L23) ranges 30-40%. en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1… such studies proving around 75-95% of Ancient Assyrian haplogroups are identical to modern Assyrian ones.
Kurds, by contrast, show distinct haplogroup frequencies, with R1b dropping to as low as 4-16%.
The 2017 Dogan study proved that Assyrians, Ezidis, and Shabaks possess a direct, unbroken genetic continuity with ancient Mesopotamian stock. Crucially, the researchers actively differentiated these specific indigenous populations from surrounding groups, effectively excluding Kurds entirely. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone…
The Nestorians and their Rituals (Volume 1, p. 179) notes that Assemani uses the term "Chaldeans or Assyrians" to describe the Nestorians, and that this proves the Chaldeans were of the same family with the Assyrians and descended from the Ancient Assyrians who were converted to Christianity by the Apostle Thomas, as "Nestorian" was a religious label not a ethnic one. en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page%…
This already destroys the modern sectarian label. "Nestorian" has always been a religious designation, never an ethnicity, as even British colonial records concede, they "constitute a religious rather than a racial minority". qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_… and in the same passage say they are of the Assyro-Chaldean race (which in the same book are descended from Ancient Assyrians)
Most crucially, the very sources Kurds cite for their arguments admit that the Nestorians, or the Assyrians as they are now generally called are one and the same people, confirming that the name Kurds weaponize as a slur is merely a theological tag attached to Assyrian blood. archive.org/stream/MN41565uc…
Joseph Simon Assemani who was the Maronite Orientalist and Vatican librarian used "Chaldeans," "Assyrians," and "Nestorians" interchangeably as names for the same people in Bibliotheca Orientalis Clementino-Vaticana (specifically Vol. IV, p. 1). archive.org/download/b248735…
Modern Assyrians are virtually indistinguishable from Ancient Assyrians, and there is overwhelming scientifical and historical evidence. Ancient DNA from Bakr Awa proves continuous Y-DNA haplogroups like J2 and R1b, confirming a direct, unbroken Mesopotamian genetic lineage.
𖤓 Philip Thomas Bartholomeus 𖢗 retweeted
“As a conservative, based Huwhite man, I just have to say, MY JEWISH GOD is REAL and YOUR INDIAN DEMON IDOL is FAKE. Take THAT you filthy race traitor. Owned. Kek, chat, aren’t I based 😏 I worship the God of the Israelites like a REAL European.”
- Coal Webbon (probably)
@25GrifuBro privated his posts after this, after I was cooking him.
Btw saar, you're literally spamming the same studies over and over again because you lack basic reading comprehension. Do you have the IQ of an alarm clock?
First of all, the 4th screenshot you just posted is already debunked, and I literally agreed with you that Punics weren't modern Tunisians. But what I disagreed with is your absolute retardation in dismissing Punics as non-Levantine. Look at the actual study you posted lmao it focuses on the settlements in the central and western Mediterranean between the 6th and 2nd centuries BCE meaning it's measuring the heavily mixed colonial populations, not the original Levantine founders who built Carthage. Sicilians and Aegeans were seen by Carthage as slaves. Even though the later Punics were half Phoenician, they still saw their Phoenician fathers as the rightful owners of the Sicilian slaves who composed their maternal ancestry. And Carthage explicitly prohibited mixing with Sicilian slaves, meaning this was a strict master-slave colonial dynamic, not some egalitarian melting pot you're trying to paint
And why did they mix? Because Phoenician settlers took local Sicilian and Aegean women as concubines. That's how colonization works, you absolute idiot. The Levantine Y-DNA lineage is still there, even if the autosomal DNA got diluted by local women over centuries.
Carthaginian and Punic generals literally justified enslaving conquered Sicilians by saying that persons who had not known how to defend themselves deserved to be slaves. Diodorus Siculus records that after the Battle of Himera (480 BCE), the Carthaginian general Gelon assigned Carthaginian prisoners as slaves to the Sicilian contingents. The broader Carthaginian practice of enslaving defeated populations is also attested, with Diodorus noting that the Syracusans declared war on Carthage to restore freedom to the Greek cities that they have enslaved. (Didorus Siculus, Library of History ia800607.us.archive.org/1/it…) That's the ultimate proof of their racial hierarchy, the Sicilians were viewed as natural inferiors meant to serve the Phoenicians.
And don't give me that "little to no Levantine ancestry" cope. I never claimed it made up the majority of their DNA. But 35% Canaanite DNA in West Sicily and 40-45% in Malta is not "low." Also, it claimed a "little contribution," but Punics being more Levantine than modern Malta which is already 40-45% Canaanite (higher than West Sicily) is already significant. That is a massive, undeniable genetic footprint. Punics weren't South Europeans; they were a colonial hybrid, a Mediterranean melting pot built by Levantine men.
So stop spamming modern Italian genetics to try and explain away ancient Carthaginian history, you absolute clown.
Furthermore, Greek and Roman historians explicitly describe Carthaginians/Punics as originating from Sidon and Tyre.
Strabo (Geography 17.3.15) states Carthage was founded by Dido from Tyre.
("Carthage was founded by Dido, who brought her people from Tyre. Both this colony and the settlements in Spain and beyond the Pillars proved so successful to the Phoenicians" perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/tex…)
Justin (Epitome of Trogus 18.3.5) says their origin traces to the Tyrians.
("Since I come to speak of the Carthaginians, a short account shall be given of their origin, tracing back, to some extent, the history of the Tyrians, whose misfortunes were much to be pitied." clas3303.wordpress.com/units…)
Virgil (Aeneid 1.12-14) calls it a Tyrian colony ruled by Phoenician Dido.
("The rising city, which from far you see, Is Carthage, and a Tyrian colony. Phoenician Dido rules the growing state, Who fled from Tyre, to shun her brother's hate" babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/ssd…)
Appian (Punic Wars 1.1) states the Phoenicians settled Carthage.
("The Phoenicians settled Carthage, in Africa, fifty years before the capture of Troy. Its founders were either Zorus and Carchedon, or, as the Romans and the Carthaginians themselves think, Dido, a Tyrian woman" perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/tex…)
Even if 2nd-century late slop doesn't represent the early founders, still they spoke Punic, a branch of Phoenician, they had Phoenician culture and worshipped Phoenician gods like Baal and Tanit. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punic_…. firstthings.com/joshua-and-c… archive.org/download/lartist…
The only reason late Carthage (the 2nd century slop you uploaded) was mixed is because Phoenician men turned Sicilian women into concubines.
What further proves this is that the Canaanite ancestry found in Sicilians and Maltese people is entirely paternal, not maternal.
@25Grifu
Address this or concede, and note that
you block me = I win.
𖤓 Philip Thomas Bartholomeus 𖢗 retweeted
Masoud Barzani, born in Mahabad, Iran, is the patriarch of a political dynasty that has consolidated enormous power and wealth in northern Iraq.
Under the KDP’s rule, the Kurdistan Region has increasingly resembled a family controlled political and economic system, with serious allegations of corruption, land appropriation and discrimination against indigenous Assyrian Christians.
Investigations have exposed the Barzani family’s extensive overseas property empire, financial links to Kurdish conglomerates and millions in unexplained personal spending.
Reuters has also documented an extensive oil-smuggling network benefiting officials connected to the Barzani and Talabani ruling parties.
Meanwhile, Assyrians and other indigenous communities continue to raise concerns about land seizures, political intimidation and unequal treatment in their ancestral homeland.
This is not simply a question of Kurdish autonomy. It is a question of accountability, indigenous rights and who actually benefits from Iraq’s resources.
Northern Iraq’s Assyrian homeland cannot remain the private estate of a foreign political dynasty.
Sources:
OCCRP – Investigation into the Barzani family’s overseas wealth and property empire:
occrp.org/en/investigation/m…
Reuters (11 July 2024) – Kurdish oil smuggling to Iran flourishes:
reuters.com/world/middle-eas…
OCCRP – US Justice Department moves to seize a mansion allegedly purchased with proceeds from a scheme defrauding the US military:
occrp.org/en/news/barzani-be…
USCIRF – Religious freedom and indigenous Christian land grievances in Iraqi Kurdistan, documented in the UK government’s September 2024 country report:
gov.uk/government/publicatio…
𖤓 Philip Thomas Bartholomeus 𖢗 retweeted
We Syriac Arameans, together with our Assyrian and Chaldean brothers
#aramean
𖤓 Philip Thomas Bartholomeus 𖢗 retweeted
“Folkish Paganism” is an insane ideology that attracts very distasteful minds.
Ethnic Platonism is the way, polytheist man.
Everyone, guess what? Take a look at this genetic distance chart to an Ancient Assyrian sample.
Notice how even Greeks from Pontus and Anatolia as a whole cluster closer to Ancient Assyrians than Kurds do? Pontic and Cappadocian Greeks literally sit closer to our ancient DNA than Kurds do.
Also, note that the "Syrio-Mesopotamian" Iraqi Arabs here refer specifically to Iraqi Arabs from Nineveh-Mosul, not all Iraqi Arabs. Those from Najaf and Baghdad cluster closer to Nabateans, Palmyrenes, and Amorites. But even then, those distant southern Arabs cluster closer to Ancient Assyrians than 90% of Kurds do.
Yet modern Assyrians are shown clustering extremely close to this exact same ancient sample, proving our unbroken, direct continuity. Meanwhile, Kurds sit at the absolute bottom of the list, desperately trying to larp as Mesopotamians.
Yet, guess his ethnicity?
Unsurprising as always.
These bastards are jealous of other people's civilizations, so they destroy them to reduce the said peoples to their level.
The Kurds who fought in ISIS were the ones who suggested and planned the destruction of Ancient Assyrian Artifacts in Nineveh.
🇪🇬 In the 12th century, Egyptian Sultan Al-Aziz Uthman tried to demolish the Egyptian pyramids. He thought the pyramids were evil and refused to believe that anything so majestic could have existed before Islam.
He spent a fortune trying to destroy the Pyramid of Menkaure. He failed but left a giant scar which we can still see to this day.
The Pyramid of Menkaure dates back to 2500 BC which means it is 3000 years older than Mohammed. As of now, the pyramids are still safe but their future remains highly uncertain.
𖤓 Philip Thomas Bartholomeus 𖢗 retweeted
"What is truth to me is not truth to another. The same arguments and evidences that convince one mind make no impression on another. This difference is in men at their birth. No man is entitled positively to assert that he is right, where other men, equally intelligent and equally well-informed, hold directly the opposite opinion. Each thinks it impossible for the other to be sincere, and each, as to that, is equally in error. “What is truth?” was a profound question, the most suggestive one ever put to man. Many beliefs of former and present times seem incomprehensible. They startle us with a new glimpse into the human soul, that mysterious thing, more mysterious the more we note its workings. Here is a man superior to myself in intellect and learning; and yet he sincerely believes what seems to me too absurd to merit confutation; and I cannot conceive, and sincerely do not believe, that he is both sane and honest. And yet he is both. His reason is as perfect as mine, and he is as honest as I.
The fancies of a lunatic are realities, to him. Our dreams are realities while they last, and, in the Past, no more unreal than what we have acted in our waking hours. No man can say that he hath as sure possession of the truth as of a chattel. When men entertain opinions diametrically opposed to each other, and each is honest, who shall decide which hath the Truth; and how can either say with certainty that he hath it? We know not what is the truth. That we ourselves believe and feel absolutely certain that our own belief is true, is in reality not the slightest proof of the fact, seem it never so certain and incapable of doubt to us. No man is responsible for the rightness of his faith; but only for the uprightness of it.
Therefore no man hath or ever had a right to persecute another for his belief; for there cannot be two antagonistic rights; and if one can persecute another, because he himself is satisfied that the belief of that other is erroneous, the other has, for the same reason, equally as certain a right to persecute him.
The truth comes to us tinged and colored with our prejudices and our preconceptions, which are as old as ourselves, and strong with a divine force. It comes to us as the image of a rod comes to us through the water, bent and distorted. An argument sinks into and convinces the mind of one man, while from that of another it rebounds like a ball of ivory dropped on marble. It is no merit in a man to have a particular faith, excellent and sound and philosophic as it may be, when he imbibed it with his mother’s milk. It is no more a merit than his prejudices and his passions.
The sincere Moslem has as much right to persecute us, as we to persecute him; and therefore Masonry wisely requires no more than a belief in One Great All-Powerful Deity, the Father and Preserver of the Universe. Therefore it is she teaches her votaries that toleration is one of the chief duties of every good Mason, a component part of that charity without which we are mere hollow images of true Masons, mere sounding brass and tinkling cymbals.
No evil hath so afflicted the world as intolerance of religious opinion. The human beings it has slain in various ways, if once and together brought to life, would make a nation of people; left to live and increase, would have doubled the population of the civilized portion of the globe; among which civilized portion it chiefly is that religious wars are waged. The treasure and the human labor thus lost would have made the earth a garden, in which, but for his evil passions, man might now be as happy as in Eden."
-Albert Pike, "Morals & Dogma, 10th degree lecture"
𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐍𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐃𝐎𝐂𝐓𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐄 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐓𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐈𝐓𝐘 (𝔓𝔥𝔦𝔩𝔦𝔭 𝔗𝔥𝔬𝔪𝔞𝔰)
P1: In classical logic and causality, begetting implies a clear ontological hierarchy. The begetter always inherently prior to, and thus superior in rank to, the begotten.
C1: If the Father eternally begets the Son, the Father holds a causal priority that makes absolute, co-equal status logically impossible.The source is always greater than the stream.
P2: Christian theology itself tries bypassing this by claiming "eternal generation" and asserting the Son is co-eternal and homoousios (of the exact same essence) as the Father.
C2: This is a blatant contradiction. You cannot have a derived entity be absolutely equal in essence and rank to its underived source. To even attempt to make this logically coherent, you'd have to view the Father and Son like the Neoplatonic distinction between the Thinker and the Thought (Intellect and its intelligible object), where they are eternally correlative. But mainstream Christianity rejects this. No Christians besides fringe mystical outliers like Nicholas of Cusa (and maybe Meister Eckhart) even attempt that framework. For everyone else, they are distinct "persons" in a way that completely defies the Thinker/Thought logic, collapsing the distinction into either modalism (they are the same person) or subordinationism (the Son is lesser).
P3: Platonism faces a similar structural reality with the Intelligible Triad: Being comes before Life, and Intelligible Life comes before Mind/Intellect. There is a clear sequence of procession.
C3: Yet, Platonists don't pretend they are absolutely "equal" in the way Christians do. We accept the hierarchy. Being, Life, and Intellect form a unified triad, but they are strictly ordered by causal dependence. Intellect is utterly dependent on Life, which is dependent on Being.
P4: Platonic metaphysics maintain that true unity is only at the absolute summit (the Good). Anything that proceeds into a triad or multiplicity (even an eternal, divine one) is inherently subordinate to its source.
C4: The Christian Trinity fails because it tries to force Neoplatonic emanation (the procession of the Son) into the strict, equalitarian box of Abrahamic monotheism. It wants the hierarchy of Platonism without accepting the subordination.
The Father is the Monad, the Son is the Dyad proceeding from it. You cannot have a Monad and a Dyad be the exact same thing without destroying the rationality entirely
𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐃𝐄𝐅𝐈𝐍𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐕𝐄 𝐐&𝐀: 𝐀𝐍 𝐀𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐂𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐂 𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐓'𝐒 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄 (𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔓𝔥𝔦𝔩𝔦𝔭 𝔗𝔥𝔬𝔪𝔞𝔰 𝔇𝔬𝔰𝔰𝔦𝔢𝔯)
1. What do you think of Homosexuality?
I disagree with Homosexuality as an action, I don't ideologically support the modern LGBTQIA+ movement, and I think the Western liberal obsession with it is degenerate. But I am a realist. I once met a girl who was 1/4 Assyrian, 1/4 Armenian, and 2/4 Greek. She nervously confessed to me that she was a lesbian, yet whilst simultaneously being Orthodox (that was really confusing ngl). I told her plainly: as long as she aligns with my nationalistic and racial values and puts her people first, I don't care what she does in her private life. Keep it out of the public sphere, but blood and loyalty matter more.
2. What do you think of Transgenderism?
Same baseline standard. I absolutely reject the Western liberal transgender movement; it's a cultural disease. However, I find much more common ground with nationalistic trans individuals from countries like Armenia or Greece. If someone is willing to actively fight foreign races threatening their nation, and would never marry outside their culture, they are vastly more reasonable to me than a straight person who race-mixes and sells out their country.
3. What is your stance on Islam?
It varies entirely on the sect. Salafis, Wahhabis, and Hanafis as a whole are absolute animals. Mutazalite Sunnis and Akbarian Sunni Sufis are perfectly okay due to their rationalist and esoteric metaphysics. Twelver Shias are generally far more tolerant of us than any Sunni majority. However, Khomeini ruined the Shia image by Wahhabizing their theology to build a militant state. Ismailis, non-Khomeinist Twelvers and Bektashis are chill.
4. What about Christians?
I was raised in a Christian background, so I find them okay, but with strict conditions. A Christian Assyrian must put an Assyrian pagan, Muslim Mlhallamiya Assyrian or even a secular Assyrian above some Kurdish convert to Christianity. I despise Protestant literalism; it's a brain-dead theology that ruined Europe. I respect the ancient Syriac church traditions, even if I've moved beyond them to Platonism.
5. What is your view on Freemasonry?
Pretty good. I actually believe it's a highly effective fraternal and institutional tool for building networks, discipline, and aristocratic values. If Freemasonry ever becomes legalized again in Syria, I am automatically establishing my grand lodge.
6. What is the truth about Assyrian identity?
We are the direct descendants of ancient Mesopotamia. Modern genetics prove we are virtually identical to the ancient Assyrians, and the names "Jacobite", and "Nestorian" is just religious label used by our enemies to divide us. Chaldeans, Mandaeans, Syriacs, and Assyrians are the exact same Mesopotamian stock.
7. What about Alawites?
They are beautiful and highly esoteric. They honor Greek philosophers like Plato and Aristotle as prophets, and their theology is far closer to Neoplatonism, theurgy and Hellenism as a whole (whether Platonic or pre-Socratic) than most Abrahamic religions. We Pagans should protect them.
8. Democracy vs. Monarchy/Empire?
Democracy is absolute incompetence; it exalts the Worthless Individual. I prefer an Empire and a strict meritocracy. Power should belong to those with aristocratic character. If my son turned out incompetent, I would much rather have a trusted, capable commander rule over him ruling.
9. Who is your favorite philosopher?
Iamblichus. He systematized theurgy for Platonists and understood that a finite intellect cannot grasp the divine, he has perfect mathematical and divine principles, and his system is a perfect synthesis of the teachings of Plato, Aristotle, and Pythagoras. I also deeply respect Proclus, Numenius, Porphyry, Simplicius and Damascius.
10. Do you believe in eternal suffering of the afterlife?
ABSOLUTELY not. A good source cannot condemn finite souls to infinite torment. Isaac of Nineveh and Origen were right that the God of the Bible's infinite ocean of love must eventually consume and heal all evil, including Satan. Eternal suffering imposes a dualistic limitation on omnipotence.
11. Are you a vegetarian?
Yes, but not radically. Iamblichus and the Pythagoreans taught that eating meat disturbs the soul's purity and binds you to the material body. Although following Porphyry's principles resources such as honey, eggs, milk, and wool only when the animals are unharmed, maintaining a diet that supports both ethical principles and the clarity required for theurgy. For theurgy, maintaining a clear, sober intellect is mandatory. I am trying to get rid of my wine addiction aswell.
12. What is your view on Nietzsche?
He was a brilliant philologist but a metaphysical nihilist. He correctly diagnosed the herd mentality of democracy, but his "Will to Power" is just a coping mechanism for a godless principleless irrational universe. Give me Plato over a guy with a hammer any day.
13. What about Hegel?
A dry, bureaucratic German idealist. He dismissed ancient paganism and viewed the Christian destruction of Paganism positively, he claimed true philosophy began with Eriugena, and exalted a Lutheran mystic above Plotinus and every known Pagan mystic.
14. What is the best music genre in your flavour?
Black metal. It captures the raw, primordial energy of the esoteric world. But I also do tend to appreciate classical music and traditional Middle Eastern instruments.
𖤓 Philip Thomas Bartholomeus 𖢗 retweeted
The elite have made Anakin the new symbol of the Right (Edomites/Christians), since they worship Messiah ben Joseph, and Anakin is Messiah ben Joseph, the infiltrator and destroyer of Rome. Anakins mother literally has a hebrew name and is a virgin. @fedelmayer #Kabbalah #Jesus
"You say, however, 'that the things which are offered in supplications are offered as to sensitive and psychical natures.' And, indeed, if the offerings consisted of corporeal and composite powers alone, or of such things as are merely subservient to corporeal organs, your assertion would be true. But as the offerings participate of incorporeal forms, of certain reasons, and more simple measures, the aptitude of them is to be surveyed according to this alone. And if a certain alliance, or similitude, is present, which is either proximate or remote, it is sufficient to effect the contact of which we are now speaking. For there is not any thing which in the smallest degree is adapted to the Gods, to which the Gods are not immediately present, and with which they are not conjoined. The connexion, therefore, of supplications with the Gods, is not as with sensitive or psychical natures, but as with divine forms, and with the Gods themselves [as Gods, i.e. as superessential hyparxes]. So that we have sufficiently spoken in opposition to this division."
—Iamblichus, De Mysteriis Aegyptiorum, Chaldaeorum, Assyriorum (On the Mysteries of the Egyptians, Chaldeans, and Assyrians), Book III, Chap. XVI
Iamblichus argues that the Gods (such as and especially the Assyrian Ashur or Egyptian Amun) are supra-essential hyparxes, absolute unities entirely transcending the Intelligible Realm, and Ousia (Being/Essence). They are not subordinate to the Divine Forms; rather, they transcend them. Because these Gods as Superessential Hyparxes exist prior to Being and Intellect, they serve as the ultimate causal foundation for the Forms themselves. Theurgy bypasses mere intellectual contemplation to connect the soul directly to these absolute, grounding realities. The Gods are simultaneously the transcendent source and the unifying ground of all intelligible reality.
"B-but saar vee vuzz soomirian sheiiit"-Desperate Kurdish nationalist.
Meanwhile the genetics show EVEN JORDANIANS clustering closer to the Sumerians than the Kurds do, even the Southern Iraqi Arabs despite overwhelming Amorite and Nabatean/Palmyrene-related ancestry cluster CLOSER to Sumerians than the Kurds do.
Yet guess who actually ends up clustering closest to Sumerians? Assyrians and Mandaeans.
