I have been asked why I whack genderist guffery and woo woo. 1. It is absurd. 2. It seeks to eradicate ("erase") women as a sex category. 3. It does harm to gays & lesbians. 4. It seeks to turn unwarranted privileges into "rights". 5. To embolden others also to whack it. Voila.

Oct 15, 2026 · 9:22 AM UTC

54
198
6
1,315
8,997
RelevantRecentLikes
Thank you. The fact you do so with eloquence & style is also a bonus.
1
12
177
Genderists try to drag things down low, bait and go nasty but there is no need for us to stoop to their level when our position derives from simple fact and reason. Simple fact and reason always wins out in the end.
1
21
170
Brilliantly concise. Thank you. BTW, I may(definitely will) steal this.
1
11
188
Please feel free to do so.
5
166
All guffery deserves to be whacked 👍 Why should gender guffery be any different?
1
4
70
Indeed. Select your preferred guffery and whack it.
1
3
75
And, if we don't challenge this stupidity our so called Govt will allow it to become the norm by default.
1
3
75
That is usually the way. Things are normalised & then one is faced with a fait accompli, as extravagant male "privileges" acquire the status of "rights". We had almost reached that point before the FWS Supreme Court judgment & that is why I will forever admire those brave women
1
6
83
Several comments about how you've always being a "whacker" [I think that's what they wrote] Nice work
1
2
185
They are free to write what they like as it circulates only within their own fetid circles and has no effect whatsoever on anyone beyond.
1
8
157
"No" does not register. It is like an online heckle, easily ignored but since you appear from your pose to be a real person and also thoughtful, I chose to respond.
1
24
No one who asks you "why" will be convinced by your cogent set of reasons.
1
15
186
A list which echoes my own, to which I would add: 1) It damages wider society and, most importantly 2) It is deeply, irreversibly damaging to many children, and in particular vulnerable and autistic ones.
1
1
23
141
Trans people, exist Colin. Sending greetings from Portsmouth.
7
1
20
521
As Pompous Steve has locked his replies: Yes, you exist, but you're not a woman, you never will be and aren't entitled to women's stuff. Grow up and deal with it.
1
14
100
When challenged, it relies almost entirely on lies and abuse to coerce people into either 'agreement' or silence.
1
12
117
All of this and: 6) I believe in material reality.
1
1
9
128
And we love you for it, Colin. Thanks.
7
101
It also turns a population into fools that will believe the opposite of reality. Fine for the gov... but not for the population.
5
95
Also - irreversible physical harm to children and young adults
4
79
You missed out harm to minors Mr W
3
104
Whack on, Mr W, whack on! x x x
3
112
You left out "sadism" and "disgust masquerading as rationality"
1
3
89
These days, I don't have the energy to 'whack' anyone. Could I just poke the malefactors with my walking stick?
3
43
And it tries to force others to take part in it, eg ‘preferred pronouns’.
1
22
It’s just another life style choice that is meeting resistance. The same as being gay or lesbian. Their life style choice is now accepted by most. That is why the trans ideology drive this so hard. Sexual fetishises being played out in public now. That’s is what drive this!
1
1
106
Thank you Colin, Clear and wise.
1
11
I think anything currently men’s/womens should be renamed XX or XY. Cuts through the rubbish. 😀 in sport the disparity is fundamentally about the genetics - xx or xy make-up - so forget about gender classifications just go on genetics.
1
55
For number 5... Thank you
1
68
You do spout some ignorant hateful stuff. The existence of trans people harms no one else. Trans people have and will always exist, no amount of hate from bigots like you will ever change that.
3
2
128