Dex trader || Content writer || Airdrop hunter || Ambassador || Telegram: https://nitter.cf/t.co/4kLo0KFPSR
Joined June 2026
- Tweets21.8K
- Following5.3K
- Followers4.2K
- Likes17.6K
Sabit retweeted
Good evening, everyone.
Cross chain expansion is not just about making a platform available on more networks. The real question is how activity across those networks creates value for the wider ecosystem.
That is the interesting part of the direction @RebateLaunch is exploring.
The plan is to keep one native $REBATE token on Robinhood Chain while routing revenue generated through other supported networks back to Robinhood Chain for automatic buybacks and burns.
This creates a connection between network expansion and the token economy. Instead of introducing separate versions of $REBATE across chains, the model aims to keep the token ecosystem unified.
However, the important details will be in the execution. Bridge security, accurate revenue routing, transaction costs, and verifiable burns will determine whether the model works as intended.
The infrastructure is reportedly moving through testing, and the next chain is still undisclosed.
More networks can bring more opportunities, but sustainable growth will depend on what the infrastructure can reliably deliver.
That is what I will be watching next.
$REBATE @RebateLaunch
Sabit retweeted
$PONS and $STONK proved how much attention a launchpad token can capture.
Rebate Pad takes that model further by putting buyers and holders (not creators) at the center of the economics.
On Rebate Pad, every buy can include a 2–9% token bonus, while holders can receive payouts in the pair asset directly to their wallets. Hold longer and your payout weight rises. That is a real incentive to participate and stay, not simply chase the next candle.
We needed something like this to bring back the Diamond Hands and the HODLers.
The structure matters too: launch liquidity is burned, the bonus treasury is locked and replenished by sell fees, and platform activity feeds $REBATE through buybacks, burns, and liquidity bids beneath the market. It is a closed-loop system designed to route activity back into the ecosystem.
PONS and STONK are strong launchpad narratives. But REBATE is building a more holder-aligned version of the playbook: buyers start ahead, holders get paid, and usage is designed to reduce supply.
Still early, but the difference is clear.
Sabit retweeted
3.5x+ oversubscribed. 👀🔥
With just few hours left, the 1win Token Sale is entering its final stretch.
The community is showing up, and the numbers speak for themselves.
If you’ve been waiting for a sign to check it out, THIS IS YOUR FINAL CALL. ⏳
Don’t wait until the sale closes to start asking questions. DYOR, make your move, and get in before time runs out.
🔗 1wintoken.com
CZ, why now?
just 17 hours before the 1win Token Sale ends...
hey crypto community, we’re fully ready
more than $13,000,000 has already been committed on 1wintoken.com, with oversubscription above 3.5x
there’s still time to join
Sabit retweeted
watching an AI battle becomes more compelling when the outcome isn’t the only thing worth paying attention to.
With @agentdojo , the arena creates an opportunity to make AI competition something people can follow for entertainment,discussion, and the unexpected moments that emerge between fighters.
That matters for the future of AI gaming. Technology may power the experience,but people still need a reason to stay,watch another match, and share what they saw.
Turning the capabilities of AI into something genuinely enjoyable to watch is a worthwhile direction to pursue
🤝 Paid partnership
Sabit retweeted
A wallet's history could matter as much as its trading capital when it comes to earning access in onchain markets.
@zerufinance has already scored 320M+ wallets through zScore, turning onchain behaviour into a trust signal from 0 to 1000. But the part I find more interesting is how Zaps combines that history with actual trading activity.
Trader Score brings together verified trading performance, zScore, community standing, contribution and zaps held. Trading carries the most weight, so a strong wallet reputation alone isn't enough to dominate the rankings.
This approach is now being put to work through zETH, the first activity market built around Ethereum activity. Registration opened on october 26. To qualify for a zETH seat, users need a minted zscore nft. They can also link up to 10 wallets under one identity through an ownership signature.
The next planned stages are a public race based on real onchain activity, a seat window for top ranked participants, and an auction that sets the first price of the season's new zToken.
What interests me is the change in allocation logic. Instead of rewarding users simply for arriving early, @zerufinance is trying to make wallet history and actual economic contribution count toward who gets access.
The real test will be whether this model can keep rewarding genuine activity without becoming another ranking system that traders eventually learn to farm.
🤝 Paid partnership
Sabit retweeted
Quantum security is no longer just a problem for tomorrow. the work to prepare for it is happening right now and @Starknet wants AI to become part of that research.
on November 5, alongside Devcon in Mumbai, StarkWare is hosting Bunker Autoresearch, an in-person competition where participants use AI tools to tackle real cryptographic challenges.
the goal is bigger than winning a competition.
it's about finding ways to make post-quantum cryptography more practical, efficient and affordable.
there's already some serious progress to build on.
Starknet's recent post-quantum signature challenge recorded 434 results, with Falcon-512 verification reaching around $0.023 per transaction.
now imagine giving more researchers and AI agents the opportunity to improve those numbers.
here's how Bunker Autoresearch works:
- learn the basics of autoresearch
- bring your preferred AI tools
- work on cryptographic research challenges
- experiment, test and improve results
- compete for a share of $1,000 in rewards
you don't need to be a cryptography expert to participate. anyone with an AI subscription and the willingness to experiment can join.
this connects directly to what Starknet is working towards.
Its STARK proof system already has a post-quantum-friendly foundation, and its native account abstraction makes it possible to experiment with quantum-resistant signatures without waiting for a network wide fork.
The remaining challenge is making the entire system ready, including its dependencies.
I like that StarkWare isn't treating this as something researchers should solve behind closed doors.
They're opening the challenge to people and AI, putting results to the test and pushing the cost of quantum security down.
November 5. Mumbai.
bring your AI. let's make cryptography stronger.
register here:
luma.com/j5p89t70
Sabit retweeted
𝙔𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙙𝙖𝙮, $𝟔.𝟑𝟔 𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙡𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙡𝙚𝙛𝙩 𝘽𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙨 𝙩𝙚𝙣 𝙗𝙡𝙤𝙘𝙠𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨. 𝙈𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙞𝙩 𝙢𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝟐𝟎 𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙪𝙩𝙚𝙨.
TRM Labs, Chainalysis and the FBI point to TraderTraitor, the North Korean hacking unit tied to the Lazarus Group. The same unit took $1.5 billion from Bybit in February 2025.
Bybit fell to one tricked person.
Hackers fooled a developer at Safe, got malware onto that developer's computer, and the developer approved a command without knowing it. For Binance, investigators suspect a hacked engineer's laptop, though the full path is not confirmed.
𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚊𝚍𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚍 𝚑𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚝 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗.
Then I took the MEXC Spot the AI Trap quiz and scored 93/100. My card says The Empath.
Strength: reads the vibe.
Blind spot: trusts the robots.
That blind spot is the part that matters. A scam message works by sounding friendly, sounding urgent, sounding like someone you know. Reading the vibe feels like a skill until a machine writes the vibe. AI can now write the message, copy the voice and build the face, so a feeling that something seems right proves nothing.
This is why MEXC's security setup makes sense to me, because it doesn't depend on your gut that day:
𝗧𝘄𝗼-𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗻. You choose any two from a passkey, a Google Authenticator code, an email code and a phone code. A stolen password alone gets a thief nowhere.
𝗔𝗻𝘁𝗶-𝗽𝗵𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲. Phishing means a fake email or link built to look real. You set your own code, real MEXC emails carry it, and a fake one without it stands out.
No exchange is immune, which is why habits like these matter on every platform. MEXC puts them in front of you, and that is how a platform takes its users' security seriously.
𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒒𝒖𝒊𝒛 𝒉𝒂𝒔 𝟔 𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒂𝒌𝒆𝒔 𝟔𝟎 𝒔𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒅𝒔. 𝑭𝒊𝒏𝒅 𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒅 𝒔𝒑𝒐𝒕 𝒊𝒔:
ai-safety-score.apcollective…
@MEXC @APCollectiveHub
AI scams are getting harder to spot than the real thing
We built the AI Safety Score with @MEXC to test how safe you really are
Try it now: ai-safety-score.apcollective…
Sabit retweeted
A reward system is only as transparent as its eligibility rules.
One detail worth examining in @RebateLaunch is who actually qualifies for holder payouts.
According to the published mechanics, wallets holding less than $1 are excluded from payout rounds, and up to 10 wallets can be excluded from receiving distributions.
These conditions matter because “automatic rewards for holders” does not mean every wallet receives an equal share.
For anyone evaluating a Rebate Pad launch, the important questions go beyond the advertised reward rate:
• What is the minimum eligible balance?
• How are excluded wallets determined?
• How is each payout calculated and distributed?
Clear eligibility rules help users understand what they are participating in before buying.
That is the kind of transparency a launchpad should make easy to verify.
Read the mechanics, understand the conditions, then make your decision.
@starlisting #RebateLaunch
Sabit retweeted
The cross-chain teaser from @RebateLaunch caught my attention because it goes beyond adding another network.
The plan is to keep one $REBATE token on Robinhood Chain, while revenue from launches on other chains is sent back to buy and burn $REBATE.
That links expansion to the token's existing ecosystem instead of creating separate versions across networks.
The pad is expected to keep its buy bonuses and holder payouts.
The bridge and burn are reportedly tested, with stress testing underway, but the next chain remains undisclosed.
I'm interested to see how this works in practice.
More chains could bring activity, but transparent execution and revenue will matter more than the teaser. Do DYOR.
@starlisting
Going cross chain.
The pad is built and running on a fork of the next chain. Bridge tested.
Burn tested.
And now stress testing.
One $REBATE token will exist and that's on Robinhood chain; all cross-chain networks will relay revenue to Robinhood to automatically buy and burn Rebate tokens.
Squint all you like, we're not saying yet.
Sabit retweeted
@RebateLaunch announced that $REBATE is now fully verified on Blockscout for Robinhood Chain.
Source code, logo, links, and project information are all live. Anyone can paste the contract address and inspect exactly what they are holding.
**Contract address:**
`0xb7Ff57631B97000d950236ef63bD463da5bEBA7e`
This update frames verification as making the token’s details publicly checkable on the chain’s explorer, rather than relying solely on the project’s own claims.
Sabit retweeted
Cross-chain expansion is easy to announce. Building a system where every network strengthens the same token is a much bigger challenge.
That is what makes @RebateLaunch worth watching. Instead of launching multiple versions of robinhood:0xb7ff57631b97000d950236ef63bd463da5beba7e, the project plans to maintain a single token on Robinhood Chain while taking Rebate Pad to additional ecosystems.
Here’s the interesting part: revenue from those external networks is expected to flow back to Robinhood Chain, where it will fund automated robinhood:0xb7ff57631b97000d950236ef63bd463da5beba7e buybacks and burns. In theory, more network activity could translate into more value flowing toward one unified token economy.
The real test will be execution. Bridge reliability, cross-chain revenue settlement, and transparent burn activity are critical pieces. The team states that initial bridge and burn tests are complete, with stress testing still in progress.
The next network remains undisclosed. The bigger milestone, however, is not another chain announcement. It is proving that this entire economic loop can operate securely and consistently.
Sabit retweeted
Good evening ct
What happens to the token when a project expands to multiple networks?
Does every chain get its own version of the token, or is there one central asset connecting the entire ecosystem?
What caught my attention in this @RebateLaunch update is the approach they are describing for $REBATE.
The plan is to keep one $REBATE token on Robinhood Chain.
Other supported networks would relay revenue back to Robinhood Chain, where that revenue would be used to automatically buy and burn $REBATE.
Consider what that means.
A user could interact with the ecosystem on another chain, while the revenue generated there still feeds into the token’s buy-and-burn mechanism on its home chain.
That creates a clear distinction between where platform activity happens and where the token’s economic activity is concentrated.
The infrastructure, however, has to work before the idea carries real weight.
That is why the bridge testing, burn testing, and current stress testing matter. Cross-chain systems introduce additional moving parts, and reliability is just as important as the architecture itself.
I’m interested in seeing how they execute this.
One token.
Multiple networks.
Revenue flowing back to one place.
Now that is an expansion worth watching.
Sabit retweeted
Good evening everyone.
Cross-chain expansion is underway for the @RebateLaunch Pad Ecosystem.
The launchpad is already live on a fork of the upcoming chain.
The bridge has been verified, burns have been confirmed, and stress testing is currently in progress.
A single $REBATE token will exist, residing exclusively on the Robinhood chain.
Every cross-chain network will route its revenue back to that chain so it can automatically purchase and burn Rebate tokens.
Look as closely as you like, the identity of the second chain is still under wraps.
Sabit retweeted
𝗖𝗥𝗢𝗦𝗦 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗜𝗡 𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗔𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡, 𝗢𝗡𝗘 $𝗥𝗘𝗕𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗧𝗢𝗞𝗘𝗡
@RebateLaunch appears to be preparing for its next phase of expansion.
According to the latest update, the team has built and deployed Rebate Pad on a fork of another chain.
The bridge and burn mechanisms have been tested, with stress testing now underway.
The bigger idea is what makes this worth watching:
There will be one $REBATE token, native to Robinhood Chain, while revenue generated across supported networks will be routed back to Robinhood Chain to fund automatic buybacks and burns.
If implemented as described, this could connect cross-chain platform activity to one shared token economy.
The details of the next chain remain undisclosed, but the execution is what matters now.
Cross-chain expansion is interesting. Reliable bridging, revenue routing, and verifiable burns are what will make it meaningful.
Going cross chain.
The pad is built and running on a fork of the next chain. Bridge tested.
Burn tested.
And now stress testing.
One $REBATE token will exist and that's on Robinhood chain; all cross-chain networks will relay revenue to Robinhood to automatically buy and burn Rebate tokens.
Squint all you like, we're not saying yet.
Sabit retweeted
One token. Multiple chains. One destination for the revenue.
The latest announcement from @RebateLaunch could be a much bigger development for Rebate Pad than simply expanding to another network.
The team has revealed that the pad is already built and running on a fork of an upcoming chain. The bridge and burn mechanisms have reportedly been tested, with stress testing now underway.
But the detail that really caught my attention is how they plan to handle robinhood:0xb7ff57631b97000d950236ef63bd463da5beba7e across multiple networks.
Rather than creating a separate $REBATE token for every chain, the project says there will be just one token, remaining on Robinhood Chain.
Here is where the model gets interesting:
→ Users will be able to interact with Rebate Pad across additional chains.
→ Bonus tokens will still be part of qualifying purchases.
→ Holder payouts will remain part of the experience.
→ Revenue generated across those networks will be relayed back to Robinhood Chain.
→ That revenue will automatically be used to buy and burn $REBATE.
Think about the implication.
A new chain could expand where Rebate Pad operates without fragmenting $REBATE into multiple versions across different networks.
More importantly, the team is proposing a system where activity beyond Robinhood Chain can still feed into the token’s buyback-and-burn mechanism.
That creates a much bigger question than simply how many chains the pad can support:
Can Rebate Pad turn cross-chain expansion into measurable economic activity for one shared token?
Of course, the announcement is still at the testing stage. Bridge reliability, revenue settlement, burn execution and the actual user experience will matter far more than the announcement itself.
But the architecture being proposed is worth watching.
Cross-chain expansion is one thing. Making activity across those chains contribute to a single economic system is a much more interesting challenge.
@RebateLaunch $REBATE
Going cross chain.
The pad is built and running on a fork of the next chain. Bridge tested.
Burn tested.
And now stress testing.
One $REBATE token will exist and that's on Robinhood chain; all cross-chain networks will relay revenue to Robinhood to automatically buy and burn Rebate tokens.
Squint all you like, we're not saying yet.
Sabit retweeted
𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆, 𝐅𝐀𝐌! 🌙
𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗛𝗔𝗣𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗦 𝗔𝗙𝗧𝗘𝗥 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗕𝗨𝗬 𝗔 𝗧𝗢𝗞𝗘𝗡?
That's a question worth exploring when looking at @RebateLaunch.
Rebate Pad is built around more than the initial purchase. Its model connects three parts of participation:
Buy: Eligible purchases through the Rebate main pool can receive additional bonus tokens.
Hold: Qualifying holders can receive automatic USDG rewards from trading fees, without staking or manual claims.
Platform activity: A portion of platform fees is used to buy and burn $REBATE, according to the project's stated mechanism.
There are also important details to understand, including the stated 1 billion maximum supply, burned launch liquidity, and contract renunciation.
But knowing these features exist is only the beginning. Buyers should understand which trading routes qualify for bonuses, how reward eligibility works, and what risks remain.
Bonuses do not guarantee profits. Rewards depend on activity, and market prices can still move in either direction.
What interests me is the idea of connecting the buying experience with holding incentives and wider platform activity.
The real test will be transparent execution over time.
Enjoy your evening, everyone. ❤️
@RebateLaunch @Starlisting $REBATE
Sabit retweeted
Cross chain expansion becomes more interesting when the value flows back to one ecosystem.
The idea of multiple networks generating revenue that feeds automatic $REBATE buybacks and burns on Robinhood Chain is worth watching.
The infrastructure is being tested, and execution will be what matters next.
Curious to see which chain comes first.
@RebateLaunch
Going cross chain.
The pad is built and running on a fork of the next chain. Bridge tested.
Burn tested.
And now stress testing.
One $REBATE token will exist and that's on Robinhood chain; all cross-chain networks will relay revenue to Robinhood to automatically buy and burn Rebate tokens.
Squint all you like, we're not saying yet.
Sabit retweeted
Cross chain expansion could open a bigger chapter for @RebateLaunch.
One $REBATE token, multiple networks, and revenue flowing back to Robinhood Chain for automatic buybacks and burns.
The infrastructure is being tested. The bigger picture is worth watching.
Going cross chain.
The pad is built and running on a fork of the next chain. Bridge tested.
Burn tested.
And now stress testing.
One $REBATE token will exist and that's on Robinhood chain; all cross-chain networks will relay revenue to Robinhood to automatically buy and burn Rebate tokens.
Squint all you like, we're not saying yet.
Sabit retweeted
Going cross chain.
The pad is built and running on a fork of the next chain. Bridge tested.
Burn tested.
And now stress testing.
One $REBATE token will exist and that's on Robinhood chain; all cross-chain networks will relay revenue to Robinhood to automatically buy and burn Rebate tokens.
Squint all you like, we're not saying yet.
Sabit retweeted
Happy Friday Everyone ❤️🩹
Trust is much easier to build when people can inspect the rules before they commit.
That’s one aspect of @RebateLaunch I think deserves more attention.
When a token launches, most people naturally focus on its name, price, bonuses and potential. But some of the most important details are found beneath the surface.
What can the creator still change after deployment? What permissions remain? How is liquidity handled? And can participants independently examine the contract?
Rebate Pad’s approach to contract renunciation is interesting because removing creator control after deployment can provide stronger assurances about the rules remaining in place.
However, that also makes preparation before launch even more important. A renounced contract is not automatically a guarantee that a token is safe or that its project will succeed.
There’s another side to trust that matters just as much: discovery.
People need more than a list of newly launched tokens. They need accessible project information, understandable mechanics and enough context to make their own assessments.
This is where I think launchpad design should go beyond deployment.
Making it easy to launch is one achievement. Making it easier for people to evaluate what they’re buying is another.
For me, both contract transparency and better project discovery deserve attention as Rebate Pad develops.
Research the details, understand the risks, and never let a launch bonus replace independent judgment.
$REBATE @RebateLaunch
