
[email protected] for business inquiries. support me here: https://nitter.cf/t.co/S6SAbXCDqe
Joined June 2019
- Tweets25.8K
- Following553
- Followers27.7K
- Likes70.7K
Pinned Tweet
Qualifying Simulation #MexicoGP 🇲🇽
Lap Stats:
laptime - 1:17.052
S1 - 26.676
S2 - 30.753
S3 - 19.623
top speed - 349 km/h
distance driven - 4257 m
power limited distance - 2064 m
grip limited distance - 2193 m
Energy Strategy:
start SOC - 2.996 MJ (start using 276 m before the line)
finish SOC - 0.055 MJ
energy recovered - 7.197 MJ / 8.5 MJ allowed
fuel spent - 1.043 kg (42.749 MJ)
Recovery Split:
overrun - 5.204 MJ
part Throttle - 1.992 MJ
superclipping - 0.000 MJ
Lap Time Sensitivity:
power +10 kW - 0.066 s
downforce +1% - 0.100 s
drag -1% - 0.024 s
brakeboosted retweeted
😮💨 It always bums me when this starts up each year. It shifts the focus away from the parties that actually make success happen.
It’s a shame that this performative PR game shifts so much credit and emphasis away from the real heroes of F1, the engineers. It’s wielded as a political tool for influence and aimed at shifting public perception in the media by sporting personalities that want to attach success to themselves, while distancing themselves from any shortcomings.
It’s not one person that does this, but it surely must make a lot of people laugh a bit each year, and also induce a lot of eye-rolling.
To be clear - Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc have no bearing on the efficacy of the SF-26 or the SF-27 chassis, or the Ferrari PU in either year. They are drivers, not engineers, and they do not know what is “fast” as they’re high school educated athletes. Else they’d just build the cars by themselves.
This is in essence saying “I told the team we need more horsepower”, and acting like it was the missing revelation. It’s like painting a picture that there’s a hapless group of wayward dullards scurrying around the factory just hoping and waiting for a driver to instruct them on CFD analysis and advanced kinematic design and materials composition.
Engineering. Engineering. Engineering. Drivers have an utterly negligible impact on the car. It must be said repeatedly until it sticks, because it is true.
If Ferrari wins the the engineering battle next season, they’ll have a shot at a championship. They lost it on BOTH the chassis side with several deficiencies, and the PU side with several deficiencies this year.
If the engineering team wins that battle against the other teams in 2027, there’s a shot at championships. If they don’t, there’s not. We’ve fallen short of the bar of F1-75 and SF-24, but improved on SF-23 and SF-25. Engineering must take another step forward.
The prevailing constant is that the drivers will have next to nothing to do with that, either way. Fred has been methodically rebuilding the Ferrari inner working on the engineering side since 2023. To win, that effort must come good.
Give these genius engineers the credit (and blame) they’re due, as macro results are entirely their doing.
2026 F1 qualifying simulation visualized #MexicoGP 🇲🇽
pole prediction time - 1:17.052
AC is the renderer for an offline lap, no driver, or in-game AI. Own physics, regulations, and vehicle model used.
Lots of changes went in before this weekend, so I'd hazard some inaccuracies. Recalibrated before qualifying if necessary.
Still on the free-signed MGU-K, so the behavior is not 1:1 with real cars, but this is accepted for now as a limitation until a solution is found.
Qualifying Simulation #MexicoGP 🇲🇽
Lap Stats:
laptime - 1:17.052
S1 - 26.676
S2 - 30.753
S3 - 19.623
top speed - 349 km/h
distance driven - 4257 m
power limited distance - 2064 m
grip limited distance - 2193 m
Energy Strategy:
start SOC - 2.996 MJ (start using 276 m before the line)
finish SOC - 0.055 MJ
energy recovered - 7.197 MJ / 8.5 MJ allowed
fuel spent - 1.043 kg (42.749 MJ)
Recovery Split:
overrun - 5.204 MJ
part Throttle - 1.992 MJ
superclipping - 0.000 MJ
Lap Time Sensitivity:
power +10 kW - 0.066 s
downforce +1% - 0.100 s
drag -1% - 0.024 s
vehicle body used is from dave love sketchfab
sketchfab.com/Tyler_Dave
I have to say I really enjoyed watching the GTWC race in Portimao, but something about BoP'ed production car-based racing series just doesn't scratch that itch for me. I just yearn for a class 1 touring car series to return to Europe.
I find the public reaction to this sort of thing incredibly amusing, as if it's some sort of divine revelation. The teams have been using AI to design components and run simulations for years now. You'll struggle to find any major CAD/CFD/FEA/MBD software vendors that don't have AI capabilities.
🚨AI WILL HELP DESIGN FUTURE FORMULA 1 CARS
Using AWS as the foundation for CFD work will allow it to be integrated into the FIA’s own virtual wind tunnel and will contribute to the creation of car prototypes that can be used to test, for example, how much downforce is lost when following another car and whether the regulations result in the kind of races the FIA wants
Private secure versions of ChatGPT or Claude will also be used to review such a vast, complicated rulebook and its interrelated clauses
📰 @wearetherace
The Mexico City GP is upon us, and as usual there are tons of questions about what effect altitude has on a race car. In this video I summarize for you all of the ways that race cars can be effected by the higher altitude of the Mexico City GP.
So who will benefit the most from this?! Comment below 👇
I'm a bit miffed we didn't get to see a one-stop. Maybe I'm a bit delusional, but I genuinely think Leclerc could have put up a fight with Kimi. The car looked a lot better on the harder compounds.
Leclerc is in the pit window to come out ahead of Lawson. If they plan on doing a two-stop an undercut on Max would be nice.













