Pinned Tweet
Do legacy automakers really want to sell EVs?
Analyzing how these OEMs view EVs and why:
autoinsights.substack.com/p/…
$TSLA revenue is lower than it was 3 years ago
Despite significant improvements to FSD, upgrades to Model 3/Y, ramping Energy, launching CT, etc. over this period
Does not bode well for future FSD/robotaxi monetization, imo
May 2024: xAI raises Series B at a $24B valuation. Tesla does not invest
Nov 2025: Tesla holds shareholder vote on xAI investment. Shareholders reject
Jan 2026: Tesla ignores shareholder vote, invests in xAI anyways, at a $230B valuation
The average person is pretty stupid. This is a good reminder that half of them are even stupider than that
“We expect to have Dojo II operating at scale sometime next year” - Elon Musk, two weeks ago
Today, Tesla abandoned the Dojo project
Goes to show how believable his commentary is on FSD/Optimus, which is driving Tesla’s entire valuation now
As somebody who’s been invested in TSLA for over 10 years now, I’m no stranger to his missed ambitious deadlines
But I think his commentary on FSD, Optimus, and Dojo over the past couple of years goes beyond that
It’s misleading but he knows it needs to continue given the collapse of Tesla’s car business
Not long ago, Elon predicted >20% delivery growth in 2025
YTD deliveries are down -13% compared to H1 2024 (-19% compared to H1 2023!) despite steep price cuts
Elon’s guidance on $TSLA Q3 earnings call on 10/23:
- Q4 deliveries of >515k
- FY25 deliveries of 2.17-2.35M
- FSD exceeds human drivers in miles per critical intervention by Q2’25
Q4 deliveries fell flat at ~496k
I’m skeptical of the other two items as well
Wants to go all-in autonomous vehicles by investing in Google (Waymo is ~0% of Google’s revenue and ~2% of its total enterprise value. the stock is tied to advertising)
Assumes Waymo has $0 capex (it’s very capex heavy)
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
When will fintwit realize most of an insurer’s cash is just a reserve to pay out future claims and can’t be returned to shareholders
If you listened to last week’s @FuturumEquities podcast -- you know we spent time walking through why $OSCR feels like a rare setup.
At $13, you’re not actually paying $13 for the business. You’re paying $4 -- the rest is sitting on the balance sheet in cash 😳
Reminder that Uber will not benefit from AVs
No ownership of autonomous tech nor vehicle manufacturing. Uber’s economics will be worse than current-state
The average American is born into the top 1% of wealth globally along with more freedom, opportunity, and access to high-quality healthcare than people from virtually every other country
Most Americans don’t understand their privilege
And there are people fighting to allocate more money away from billionaires (mostly great capital allocators) towards the federal government (capital incinerators)
-14% YoY decline
Big step forward 🔥
😂 this was never going to end well
Piss off both political parties - great strategy for the face of a consumer brand
Replying to @AutismCapital
Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.
Still amazes me that $LMND's market cap is anywhere near $ROOT. Don't think it stays that way for long
Ceding a lower portion of earned premiums (now <7% for Root) is a good thing. This lowers Root's reinsurance costs, allows them to retain / convert more premium to net income, and shows confidence in their underwriting. For context, LMND is still ceding over 50% of GEP to reinsurers, which means they're capital constrained and not confident in their underwriting
On growth, Root is growing faster than peers, including LMND's car business. For context, in Q1 Root grew policies 9.4% QoQ, while LMND as a whole grew 4.7% QoQ and LMND's car policies grew 6.7% QoQ. This is despite Root having >6x more car customers than LMND, and despite Root spending a lower % of revenue on marketing (15% for Root vs 29% for LMND)
Not only is Root growing faster, but their underwriting is more profitable. In Q1 Gross Loss Ratio was 56% for Root (-70bps QoQ) compared to 88% for LMND car (+500bps QoQ)
Not only is Root's underwriting more profitable, but they are processing claims more efficiently. Root's Gross LAE ratio was just 6.7% in Q1, compared to 8% for LMND
Tesla benefitting from excuses that:
- sales are down mostly because of Model Y changeover
- auto sales don't matter anyways because robotaxi is launching in two months
I'm skeptical of demand once Y is ramped, and I'm skeptical of the robotaxi rollout relative to expectations
Let's not forget what was promised on the Q3'24 call. None of these things look like they will come to fruition
nitter.cf/forwardcap/status/1874…
Elon’s guidance on $TSLA Q3 earnings call on 10/23:
- Q4 deliveries of >515k
- FY25 deliveries of 2.17-2.35M
- FSD exceeds human drivers in miles per critical intervention by Q2’25
Q4 deliveries fell flat at ~496k
I’m skeptical of the other two items as well














