@goodbadimtheguy
Account based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Joined April 2016
- Tweets26.6K
- Following176
- Followers170
- Likes124K
Nathan retweeted
Very confusing for the people who claim Jews are not indigenous to that land…
Nathan retweeted
.@benshapiro was asked on @CBNNews where the post 10/7 Jew hatred originated.
His response was simple:
There’s a growing Politics of Envy in the U.S.
This ideology of discontent posits that “the successful must have created the system in order to exploit the unsuccessful.”
In foreign policy, this manifests as “Israel is the great exploiter” since it’s more successful than its foes.
In domestic policy, the claim is that Jews are disproportionately wealthy and well educated, so “they must have designed the system for their own benefit in order to harm others.”
You’ll notice that this is EXACTLY what Tucker has been claiming- down to his allegation that Ben didn’t really deserve to get into Harvard but was forced in by the powers that be.
Nathan retweeted
Gillian Anderson dared to speak up for Sudan and just see what her comments section looks like.
It’s an unspoken rule that any time someone mentions suffering that isn't in Gaza, the response is to attack them for not talking about Gaza.
Sudan has the largest displacement crisis in the world and millions of children going hungry, over 150,000 killed or starved to death, and the reaction to a video about them is "is she a zio?"
Do you understand how demented these people are?
Nathan retweeted
In the October 7 war in Gaza, the IDF achieved by far the lowest proportion of civilians to combatants killed in any war anywhere in the world by any other country's military at any time in history -- and in a densely populated area where Hamas was using civilians as cannon fodder.
Suck it up.
Nathan retweeted
Bullsh*t to your bullsh*t.
1) Israel and IDF have throughout the war given estimates of combatants killed such as of over 24,000 combatants killed in Gaza (timesofisrael.com/idf-says-t…), Prime Minister of Israel over 16,000 in May 2024, even the U.S. President “greater than 25,000” (October 2025) 2) Hamas won’t even say many civilians they’ve killed (their rockets, their killing of opposition or innocent civilian in Gaza trying to get to food) which is a part of the 73,000 you repeat and then say Israel has killed “enormous”/too many civilians. 3) Hamas won’t even say how many of their fighters have died which is a part of the 73,000 you repeat and then say Israel has killed “enormous”/too many civilians. Killing the enemy’s fighters in a war is not unlawful or immoral, it is one of the goals. 4) There is no legal requirement for Israel to say how many civilians or combatants have died in Gaza. It is a legal requirement for Israel to not target civilians (there is no evidence of Israel targeting civilians), not conduct indiscriminate attacks (no evidence of Israel conducting indiscriminate attacks), conduct proportionality assessments when targeting combatants (assess military value against incidental harm to civilians and take measure to minimize civilian harm – lots of evidence of Israel doing these assessments and taking historical civilian harm mitigation measures).
As I have told you before, 1) based on the history of urban warfare and comparative analysis 2) based on the HAMAS list of killed in Gaza (even with errors, natural deaths, etc) compared to the IDF/Israel statements on combatants killed throughout the war. - Israel still has a historically low civilian to combatant death ratio in urban warfare compared to any like battle or war. See the detailed analysis you refuse to acknowledge - nitter.cf/SpencerGuard/status/20…
3) It is basic math that you can do. One number minus the other.
4) You use numbers without verification or context to vilify Israel’s government and military while saying the same numbers can’t be used to state the obvious, which is the opposite of the demonizing of the IDF that you want it to be.
Your continued use of 70% rubble is also bulls*it. You are quoting Haaretz. Congrats. But like Hamas supporters you take a report and then increase it beyond even the source because you don’t know what you are talking about. Haaretz in July 2025 reported 160,000 buildings, roughly 70% of structures in Gaza had severe damage – not rubble. UNOSAT has other figures of destroyed, severe, moderate, possible. But don’t let those details get in your way of amplifying generalizations, demonization efforts as usual. Of course, there is a lot of rubble in Gaza because of the urban battles and war that has occurred after October 7th. I’ve seen it with my own eyes on 7 trips into Gaza. You have probably been invited by @jconricus at least 7 times to see it yourself but won't go. You just want to keep up with your bulls*it
Nathan retweeted
Piers Morgan keeps returning to the same Gaza numbers and claims. John Spencer answers them here point by point, with context, distinctions and the laws of war that so often disappear from this debate.
Read the full thread 👇
Bullsh*t to your bullsh*t.
1) Israel and IDF have throughout the war given estimates of combatants killed such as of over 24,000 combatants killed in Gaza (timesofisrael.com/idf-says-t…), Prime Minister of Israel over 16,000 in May 2024, even the U.S. President “greater than 25,000” (October 2025) 2) Hamas won’t even say many civilians they’ve killed (their rockets, their killing of opposition or innocent civilian in Gaza trying to get to food) which is a part of the 73,000 you repeat and then say Israel has killed “enormous”/too many civilians. 3) Hamas won’t even say how many of their fighters have died which is a part of the 73,000 you repeat and then say Israel has killed “enormous”/too many civilians. Killing the enemy’s fighters in a war is not unlawful or immoral, it is one of the goals. 4) There is no legal requirement for Israel to say how many civilians or combatants have died in Gaza. It is a legal requirement for Israel to not target civilians (there is no evidence of Israel targeting civilians), not conduct indiscriminate attacks (no evidence of Israel conducting indiscriminate attacks), conduct proportionality assessments when targeting combatants (assess military value against incidental harm to civilians and take measure to minimize civilian harm – lots of evidence of Israel doing these assessments and taking historical civilian harm mitigation measures).
As I have told you before, 1) based on the history of urban warfare and comparative analysis 2) based on the HAMAS list of killed in Gaza (even with errors, natural deaths, etc) compared to the IDF/Israel statements on combatants killed throughout the war. - Israel still has a historically low civilian to combatant death ratio in urban warfare compared to any like battle or war. See the detailed analysis you refuse to acknowledge - nitter.cf/SpencerGuard/status/20…
3) It is basic math that you can do. One number minus the other.
4) You use numbers without verification or context to vilify Israel’s government and military while saying the same numbers can’t be used to state the obvious, which is the opposite of the demonizing of the IDF that you want it to be.
Your continued use of 70% rubble is also bulls*it. You are quoting Haaretz. Congrats. But like Hamas supporters you take a report and then increase it beyond even the source because you don’t know what you are talking about. Haaretz in July 2025 reported 160,000 buildings, roughly 70% of structures in Gaza had severe damage – not rubble. UNOSAT has other figures of destroyed, severe, moderate, possible. But don’t let those details get in your way of amplifying generalizations, demonization efforts as usual. Of course, there is a lot of rubble in Gaza because of the urban battles and war that has occurred after October 7th. I’ve seen it with my own eyes on 7 trips into Gaza. You have probably been invited by @jconricus at least 7 times to see it yourself but won't go. You just want to keep up with your bulls*it
Nathan retweeted
WATCH: Gov. Ron DeSantis says you don’t need a 4-year degree to make serious money.
@GovRonDeSantis: "I'm a big believer in learning by doing."
In Florida, apprentices are finishing workforce programs and walking into $30/hour jobs — nearly $60,000 a year with no debt.
Nathan retweeted
Your Postliberal friends including Haywood & Deneen have been stating openly for years that they want to purge the "classical liberal wing" from the American conservative movement.
JD Vance has repeated and amplified those same attacks on classical liberals, including scapegoating Milton Friedman and spreading conspiracy theories about "libertarian donors" and "free market fundamentalism" coopting the right.
Sorry Nate, but you don't get to police our "behavior" when you're part of the faction that declared an unprovoked war on us.
It’s unfortunate that the more people in the classical liberal wing engage in behavior like Erickson’s, the more they’ll push the natural Vance coalition away from free markets.
It will be sub-optimal for the party and for the country, but could be the necessary move politically. People like @DavidBahnsen will decry this even more than they decry Trump’s milder moves in this direction, but they’ll have played a role.
Nathan retweeted
We always talk about the 2,753 people who died in the Twin Towers.
You know what we don't talk about?
The 15,000 who were successfully evacuated.
Yes, the survival rate for people in the World Trade Center when the planes hit was over 80%.
If you were below the impact zone, the survival rate was nearly 99%.
This is because of two things:
1. The incredible work of the first responders
2. The incredible engineering of the Twin Towers.
While 9/11 was an American Tragedy, the evacuation was an American Triumph.
We should be more proud of that.
Nathan retweeted
Dave Greene—one of the high pagan priests of the post-liberal Right
Just incredible content here
Nathan retweeted
It’s all going to Hamas:
nitter.cf/dloesch/status/2100630…
JUST IN: Children’s YouTuber Ms. Rachel announces she will match Macklemore’s $1 million Palestine donation, saying wealthy celebrities have a “moral obligation” to do the same.
Nathan retweeted
What?
He has this inverted. The entire reason the 10/7 happened (aside from Hamas being animals) is because Israel believed in the containment trap.
It was easier and better for public opinion of Europe and the West to believe that Hamas was contained and wouldn’t execute such an op.
The situation manifested and the response was prolonged because Israel is constrained by the public opinion of the world. No one would question the US response to terrorists if we lost the equivalent 40k in one day, but Israel is attacked at every turn. It’s the only nation expected to telegraph its every move, provide health care to the terrorist masterminds plotting to murder them, give aid that the Gazan govt sells on the black market, risk higher casualty rates for its troops by choosing risky urban combat to minimize civilian deaths while they’re picked off by snipers — because if they defend themselves and more aggressively they’re lambasted worse than the terrorists who started it and continue it all to this day. All the while the idiots of the world parrot fabricated and routinely debunked Hamas kayfabe of astronomical civilian casualties caused mostly by its own, inept and recklessly murderous hand.
It’s a country forced to ask permission of the United States before they can share their innovations with countries, like David’s Sling with Finland, a country that is only allowed to purchase US weaponry, and a country that must give us ownership of its IP when it brings tech to scale up with us.
So no, the idea that Israel runs US policy is absurd.
JD Vance just said “we cannot let our Middle Eastern foreign policy be subservient to the state of Israel.”
Our U.S. foreign policy has never been subservient to Israel’s foreign policy. He knows that. Why would he need to say that unless he’s trying to politically gain some points with Israel haters?
We are the superpower of the world. A presidential candidate of the USA should have the experience and the confidence to stand with one of our greatest allies in the world without hesitation. Unafraid.
We have never been, nor will we ever be, subservient to Israel. 🙌🏽🇺🇸🇮🇱
Nathan retweeted
This is what @Macklemore never protested, btw. FUCK MACKLEMORE
Nathan retweeted
.@benshapiro on the "heritage American" take following the UT reaction:
"Could I take a picture of J.D. Vance's house...and say
why is America being transformed like this?"
Nathan retweeted
Notice the complete absence of anything in this thread besides ad hominem. It's still hilarious, looking back on how RedState rose as a totally seat-of-the-pants, outside-the-Beltway grassroots site without funding or an office, that its alums are now treated as if we were some sort of Beltway insiders.
Erick Erickson is a washed-up, degenerate old man.
Bitter at his marginalization in the Trump era, and especially Vance's status as a successor, Erick lashes out at a wide array of people he sees as representing this movement.
Ironically, though he focuses his attacks on Carl Schmitt's ideas, his smear attempts make clear he is as committed to a friend-enemy lens as any of his opponents. But instead of acknowledging this honestly, he moralistically denounces the same behavior he practices in an attempt to divide Christians and undermine the contemporary right.
Nathan retweeted
.@benshapiro on the idea that Israel dictates American foreign policy:
"America is the one holding the end of the chain...
"it's like saying Ukraine controls American foreign policy"
Nathan retweeted
Stopping Nazi sympathizers and white nationalists is important work.
Erickson embodies the sort of legacy conservative who continually whines about abstract principle even as he does nothing to stop concrete evils directly targeting our country and our church.
nitter.cf/NateAFischer/status/21…
Nathan retweeted
Important article.
Longest thing I've written in a while. You want to know why so many white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and antisemites are rising on the Right? Shampoo.
ewerickson.substack.com/p/th…