
Bongbong Marcos kriminal, ikulong. Pagbayarin. Impeach Sara Duterte! Sahod Itaas, Presyo Ibaba No to Jeepney Phaseout! mail: [email protected]
Moon
Joined February 2019
- Tweets40.8K
- Following882
- Followers2.3K
- Likes67.5K
I don't think going PARTICULARLY about the content (aesthetic, narrative, etc) decidedly forms taste, it does help, but lots of extra-cinematic factors are involved in the shaping of taste. so I don't think it is not a concern that can be resolved right away (hence, secondary)
"is the secret to developing taste just watching more movies?"
Yes. Or there are times it's just watching a film you love more than twice. Everything else is secondary.
Replying to @AdaDimasalang
they're definitely different drinks.
u are the one who red washes your reactionary suspicion against comrades. maybe you are the CIA asset that you are scared of.
Replying to @Souvie
where in the statement "we must build solidarity with the American and Chinese working classes" is sinophobic??
you're the one pushing the US narrative here by polluting the conversation with uncomradely suspicion. maybe U ARE THE ASSET
haha ngayon ko lang nabuksan sorry na @CarloCielo. ang saya.
Replying to @kittych0cklit
napa-urong talaga ako sa paratang na "Stembrained" ang education system eh haha sana lang di ba.
Replying to @kittych0cklit
HAHAHAHAH KAWAWANG SOCIOLOGY
Replying to @eatsamii
nature vs nurture frame in behavioral psychology needs to be revisited because it gives birth to many reductionist theorists that none of us positively benefit from.
Replying to @missingcodec @o_li_si
kaya nga rin sinabi ko na hindi malinaw yung grounding ng argument for nature when cinema itself is synthetically produced in the modern era that every argument that you go for will always be incidental if not, totally reductive treating technics as nature.
Replying to @missingcodec @o_li_si
well, yun din naman yung limitasyon nung tanong ni pelikulit which is to say, pareho ninyo nacommit yung reduction ng nature into mere genetics.
Replying to @o_li_si
yung problem kasi rin nung point mo e yung reduction ng "nature" into "genetics" :)
Replying to @XxBaby_Girl_666
if you think about how a portion of Manson fans also unironically Vince McMahon fans.... it does make sense.
cc @o_li_si because evolutionary psychology should account for technics.
Cinephilia is an activity and can only be ontic "in nature" i.e., cinephilia's "nature" only comes off from experience and is never given by nature as such -- especially since the phenomenon of cinema is technological, to argue otherwise is to denounce cinema's real existence.
Replying to @o_li_si
walang malinaw na grounding yung argument for nature
Ginawa talaga para sa akin yung Junji Ito's Tales for Sleepless Nights.
youtube.com/watch?v=L6CfQwa2…
Epoy Deyto #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba retweeted
It took 2–3 years to edit Apocalypse Now because Coppola shot 1 million feet of film, 90x what’s typical, and the footage was a mess.
The movie wrapped without a clear plot structure, so editor Walter Murch spent months shaping it into a cohesive arc.
But sure, praise Coppola.








