Pinned Tweet
Finally… I’ve declared war on spammers & repeat callers.
BajajFin/Policybazaar/IDFCbank.. You’ve been warned. 😈
I built a small app to fight back.
Give it a try e'one and tell me what you think:
play.google.com/store/apps/d…
Your Call. Your Rules. Your Peace.
🤖 Made with AI
Nitin retweeted
Surprise 1: Anthropic acquired a one-person biotech
.
.
.
Surprise 2: that person is me
Surprise 3: I’m here to tell you all about it
Yes, this is what you think it is; after 6 yrs of increasingly loose anonymity: the Professor Oak reveal post
…and yes, it has gotten so boring around here that I’m literally doxxing myself to spice up the timeline
-------
Ok, allow me to introduce myself. My name is Cody Tranbarger. I mostly tweet, but occasionally find time to dabble in drug dev & starting/building biotechs. My past lives span the VC, crossover, startup continuum; Prof Oak has been my way of keeping a digital foot in those worlds, despite having my physical feet planted elsewhere.
The past 18 mo, ‘elsewhere’ was Mithril Medicine, a co. I founded to develop bsAbs for LAMA2-CMD & other ECM-related genetic diseases.
Mithril was born out of hands-on building with @MikeNGladstone, @JasonPaulRhodes, @LifeSciVC, & team @atlasventure. Somehow, I made enough half-decent calls along the way (even a broken clock is right twice a day, eh?) to convince them Mithril/I warranted a small seed. While I can hardly rationalize such an outrageously cavalier bet, I’m grateful for it, & I'd partner with Atlas again in a heartbeat.
In typical AV fashion, Mithril’s primordial form was virtual, decentralized, & ultra-lean. This stage tends to be short-lived, but for Mithril, it worked surprisingly well, for surprisingly long, thanks in part to the rapid maturation of the AI tools I used liberally.
Eventually, Mithril became a bit of an experiment itself - to find the upper bound of how far it could scale as a single operator + a bunch of Claude (+ a stellar bench of part-time consultants).
In parallel, I started spending time with @nc_frey, @an1lam, & @CoefficientBio team; and promptly experienced, for the 1st time, AI at the frontier. Soon thereafter, Mithril stopped looking like an experiment, & started looking like a preview of an entirely new operating model.
From that spark came “Pipeline-in-a-Person.” The idea immediately resonated when we shared it here back in April; and it was central to the shared vision that led to Anthropic’s acquisition of Mithril, & my joining the team.
Why join Anthropic? Three reasons.
(1) For Mithril, the programs continue, with more resources & infrastructure behind them, and as much Claude as I can put to work.
(2) For me, the chance to start several more programs, & find out how many one person can actually run in parallel - an almost unprecedented luxury for a curious drug hunter.
(3) For our mission, a path to institutionalize & scale this new way of working, then put it in the hands of all of biopharma, all over the world - which, candidly, I find the most energizing.
Will AI x Bio cure diseases? Unequivocally yes, imo… but not by the route that gets the most airtime. Rather than timeline acceleration & compression, I see orchestration & parallelization as today's low-hanging fruit.
Most drug hunters see a handful of go/no-go calls in a career, & spend entirely too much of the rest trading emails (my inbox can attest).
Give them the bandwidth to run several programs at once, and the time to focus on scientific judgment, and I’m willing to bet they’ll make better calls. And at scale, better calls translate to more drugs, higher hit rates, broader patient impact, & likely, a disease or 10 or 100 cured. I couldn't be more excited to build toward that future @AnthropicAI.
Finally, a heartfelt thank you to BioTwitter/X. The end of anonymity is bittersweet, but if anyone’s earned a proper introduction, you all have.
It’s difficult to overstate how much this app has done for me: a decade of education, plenty of friends, many job opportunities, several mentors, a few investors, even a co-founder (fmr). It was the generosity of this community that inspired me to start posting 6 years ago, after just as many years lurking. I hope I’ve been able to pay it forward, in my own small way.
But, to be clear, Prof Oak isn’t going anywhere. Same beat, same themes, and now, a front-row seat to drug development at the frontier. Stay tuned for dispatches from the trenches; and remember...
Gotta Cure 'Em All
Nitin retweeted
Many of you don't understand how serious this is, so let me break it down.
In computer science there is a famous kind of puzzle called 3-SAT. You are given a long list of yes-or-no switches and a set of rules about how they must be arranged, and you have to find a combination that satisfies every rule. The obvious way to solve it is to try every combination, but each new switch doubles the number of possibilities, so a puzzle with a few hundred switches would take longer than the age of the universe to brute force.
For decades, the smartest people in the field found clever tricks that made this a little faster, but every trick still hit the same wall: the time required kept exploding as the puzzle grew.
About 25 years ago, two computer scientists, Russell Impagliazzo and Ramamohan Paturi, working with Francis Zane, turned that wall into a formal idea.
They proposed the Exponential Time Hypothesis, which says this explosion is not a failure of human cleverness but a law of nature. No algorithm, however brilliant, will ever solve 3-SAT without the time blowing up exponentially. Nobody could prove it, but almost everyone believed it, and it became one of the foundations of modern computer science.
Researchers used it as a measuring stick. If you could show that solving some other problem quickly would also crack 3-SAT quickly, you had shown that problem was hopelessly hard too. Hundreds of papers, across scheduling, graphs, logic and much more, rest on this one assumption.
Now an internal AI model at OpenAI claims to have broken it. It says it found an algorithm that solves these puzzles meaningfully faster than the hypothesis allows, and it has checked the proof in a computer verification system called Lean.
And here is the remarkable part: the very people who proposed the hypothesis, Impagliazzo and Paturi, along with MIT's Ryan Williams, are now leading the public review of whether a machine has disproved their own idea.
So what happens next? If the disproof holds, a large part of theoretical computer science has to be revisited.
Every result that said "this problem cannot be solved faster, assuming ETH" loses its foundation, and researchers will have to work out which of those walls were real and which were simply where we stopped looking. It does not mean everything becomes easy. The new algorithm is still slow in absolute terms and this is not the famous P versus NP problem being solved.
But it means our map of what is possible was wrong in a place we were very confident about, and it was an AI that redrew it. If the disproof fails, the hypothesis survives and the field breathes out, but we will still have watched an AI produce serious, checkable work on one of the deepest questions in the discipline, closely enough that the founders of the idea had to take it seriously. Either way, something has shifted.
Let’s break down this paper in simple terms.
nitter.cf/nitin_twit/status/2114…
The main idea behind this paper is that AI don't need to generate text 1 token at a time and while doing so, it shows the significant improvement in training efficiency and inference speed..
At each level, it predicts many pieces of text at the same time, instead of one by one.
Then it moves to the next level and adds more detail.
Think of it as building text layer by layer, in parallel.
Nitin retweeted
People who cured / are curing their own cancer on X:
1/ @sytses - bone cancer, billionaire founder of Gitlab, developed 10+ personalized therapies for himself.
2/ @paul_conyngham - shrank his dog Rosie's mast cell cancer tumors after chemo and surgery weren't enough. Now backed by YC and Founders Fund
3/ @miriamgonp - stage 4 breast cancer, tumor sequenced, searching for vaccine manufacturer now
4/ @kevinace - stage 4 lung cancer, angel investor in 300+ companies, first drug stopped working after 18 months. Vaccine designed, now paying $300k out of pocket for the vaccine
5/ @masonbgrant: going founder mode on his his 32-year-old wife's rare liver cancer, sequencing her tumor with AI agents
6/ @ArunRLverma: former product leader at Atoms and Shopify, brain tumor, built a vaccine from his tumor. Now building an AI health agent startup based on what he went through
We're going to make it
Nitin retweeted
Everyone should protest.
Before you call me anti-national, hear me out.
Remember one thing very clearly. Whatever rights and privileges you enjoy today, someone protested and fought for them.
Let's start with our freedom - People protested and fought for years so that you could live in a free country, vote and hold those in power accountable.
Gandhi broke the law. Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekhar Azad and Subhas Chandra Bose were treated as enemies of British rule. Today, we call them freedom fighters.
If protesting made you anti-national, Gandhi would be the biggest anti-national this country ever produced.
Aapka koi bhi haq aapko thaali mein paros ke nahi diya gaya hai. (Someone fought for every right you have)
Raja Ram Mohan Roy protested for years to abolish Sati Pratha so that women could have the right to live and not be burned alive on their husbands’ funeral pyres.
Today, women have this right because someone protested for it.
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar protested and fought against untouchability when millions of Indians were treated as inferior simply because of their birth. That’s why untouchability is illegal in India today.
Not because society suddenly became kind. Because people fought.
Recent example. The RTI Act - Ordinary people fought for years to demand one simple thing. Tell us what you're doing with our money. Today, you can question the government because someone fought for that right.
I can go on and on for the entire day.
Here's something I find fascinating - Every generation enjoys the rights the previous generation fought for, yet many oppose those fighting for the next set of rights.
People love the benefits of protests. They just don't like protesters. If you hate every protester today, be honest - You would have hated Bhagat Singh too.
Jo bhi power mein hota hai, usko aur uske support karne walon ko hamesha yahi lagta hai ki yeh right aapko nahi milna chahiye. (Whoever is in power, they and their supporters always believe you don't deserve this right)
Protesting against the government is not protesting against the country. The government is not the country.
Loving your country is patriotism. Loving your government is just fandom.
Governments come and go. Your rights should not depend on who's in power.
But you keep fighting. 🇮🇳
Nitin retweeted
BREAKING 🚨: How corrupt is the United States? The day after the Justice Department launched an investigation into Wall Street short sellers the largest document storage facility, TD Ameritrade Bartlett Warehouse, went up in flames. They hauled the evidence away ON FIRE in direct violation of OSHA safety requirements. 60 hedge funds were to undergo investigations for manipulative short selling. Authorities concluded that a “falling shelf” took out the entire building’s sprinkler system that was located on the roof.
⠀
The facility was a newer facility outfitted with state of the art fire prevention technology.
⠀
Hedge funds have been under heavy scrutiny from retail investors.
⠀
More specifically from the AMC and GME community after the ‘meme stock’ frenzy early last year, 2021
⠀
Hedge funds have been able to suppress the share price of both these stocks through predatorial short-selling strategies.
⠀
In a Bloomberg exclusive, Gary Gensler states 90%-95% or retail market trades do not go through the lit exchange, but rather through dark pools.
⠀
This happened on February 4th 2022. Just like everything with out government absolutely NOTHING has come from the investigation. No charges. No stop to the blatant naked short selling taking place on a daily basis robbing investors.
⠀
The primary offender of naked shorting of course is Citadel, owned by Ken Griffin. Griffin is Ron DeSantis’s MEGADONOR and #WEF member.
Nitin retweeted
The deadline to submit feedback on CAS is 3rd Oct and approaching fast. I have recorded the step-by-step process and the importance of providing this feedback 👇
CAS impacts the entire ecosystem and not just 0DTE so please give the feedback and spread the word.
Nitin retweeted
Sebi's F&O ban rules: Why should us traders pay the price?
There is great need for SEBI to revisit the delta change rules as I have tried to highlight in this article with the help of a trade I was in this month - Kaynes Tech.
Read More:
moneycontrol.com/news/busine…
Nitin retweeted
ज्ञानेश कुमार मोदी का चपरासी बन जाए या फिर मोदी के दफ्तर में पोंछा लगाएं. लेकिन अपने पद से इस्तीफ़ा दे दें.
प्रेस कॉन्फ़्रेंस में खुलकर बोले अभिजीत दीपके
Here comes the CM of Bihar!
'रील नहीं बनाता तो पकड़ाता क्या?'
Jamui कांड पर CM Samrat Choudhary का वीडियो वायरल, रील बनाने की बात कर आरोपियों पर बोले - 'रील नहीं बनाता तो पकड़ाता क्या?' पूरा सुनिए क्या कहा...
Jamui Case | Bihar Jamui | Samrat Choudhary | #Bihar

















