How to get into @ycombinator or @speedrun? just ask founders of @Amboras_inc @pavoot_com @nunudotai or Aquashield at @thejfloor in Zurich. Great job @kalio_late 🇨🇭
Mat K retweeted
I spent 48 hours in SF hanging out with billionaires, data labs and AI founders and execs running $1B to $100B companies.
My observations:
1. Sooo MANY stories of data brokers making like $2M a WEEK selling company data to labs. I can't tell if it's the beginning or a bubble, and I kept wondering which niches are left. Digging into it actively.
2. At dinner, someone asked the table, "If a new model drops next month, does your company get better or worse?" HALF the table went quiet! I think that's the best question to ask about any AI startup right now.
3. The bar people talk about now is hitting $1B in revenue in 12 months (I guess that's the new unicorn?). What I didn't hear much about is retention. AI revenue can come in fast and leave fast, and I think we're going to see a lot of stories of AI companies with huge revenue and terrible retention.
4. It's pretty clear we're living through the reinvention of the computer. The model is the CPU, the harness is the operating system, and skills and plugins are the apps. Thinking about it that way makes it easier to see where the whitespace is.
5. We're maybe 12 months from an agent that can watch you work for a week and then do your job without any instructions. The screen recording plus agent memory plus local model combination makes this possible right now.
6. Agent harnesses feel like the new GPT wrappers, in a good way, especially vertical ones. The best teams I talked to treat the model as swappable. One founder walked me through routing different models to different jobs: one for taste and visuals, a cheaper one for the everyday stuff, another for text.
They use prompts they can move across models over fine-tuning, and A/B test the output on what users actually do with it: do they edit it, export it, share it? A vertical harness is basically four things: the connectors for that industry's data, evals written by people who know the work, rules for what the agent can and can't touch, and a clean screen for a human to review. The model is maybe 20% of it.
7. There's a lot of reverse engineering going on/cloning going on more than I've ever seen. People are decompiling software and rebuilding it with agents, and someone showed a suite of like 10 apps that are worth $5B+ each all that he cloned open source. Me and everyone are still thinking through what it means when software gets this easy to copy.
8. My guess is the value moves to data. If the software can be rebuilt quickly, what's worth paying for in a legacy SaaS company is the years of customer data and workflows inside it. Some SaaS companies are secretly data companies.
Gets me thinking about how do you truly value data for this saas companies? Like if we were buying these dying saas companies at 2x ARR before (as example), maybe there is a better metric. Idk, just thinking out loud here.
9. It feels like a good chunk of legacy software won't make it to the agentic era, especially anything built around people clicking through a lot of screens.
10. Every company I talked to wants to pipe its internal data into one place and expose it to agents through MCP. Then they look at the data and realize it's a mess: five versions of the same customer, old Slack channels, PDFs nobody can search. Cleaning that up feels like a big consulting opportunity!
11. A lot of founders are building the basic building blocks for agents: APIs, data layers and tools. Some of the companies I saw barely have a UI because the main user is an agent. I really believe the startups that build primitives to this agentic era will do extremely well. Building blocks is the best way to think about it.
12. Labs can get plenty of training data, but it's harder to get real examples of agents failing inside companies. Whoever has those logs has something valuable.
13. Someone running a big consumer company told me the next fight is over memory. The model that remembers the most about you wins, and the smartest model matters less than people think.
14. Physical AI came up a lot. Astra I think was the first model that got people into AI can actually do CAD, and I think a lot of people are thinking what does vibe manufacturing really look like. The line I keep thinking about came from a robotics founder: the hardest problems in AI are deployment problems now, not research problems. Their robots work on their own, call a human when they get stuck, and every one of those calls becomes training data.
15. Cybersecurity companies are having a moment and are actually cool companies to build now, especially the ones that clean up after a breach. Every agent with access to your systems is a new door into your company, and a lot of those doors were left open.
16. Some startups are worth more dead than alive now. A shutdown company with 5 years of Slack, email and code can get paid for licensing all of it. I wouldn't be surprised if founders start factoring that into when they shut down.
17. People are starting to talk about monetizing the agent web. It feels really early, but when the most popular user of the internet is an agent, what startups should you be building?
18. I think agent insurance is coming. Once an agent makes an expensive mistake, insurers will want audits before they cover anyone.
19. Several people said the hire they want most is someone with taste who can write evals. The models are getting good at generating ideas, so the hard part is judging which ones are good.
20. New trend I observed: startup raises VC, uses venture dollars to become a creator, startup fails, founder falls back on being a full-time creator and incubates other products bootstrapped.
21. Getting SIGNIFICANT distribution is HARD right now. Founders are sponsoring buses, buying billboards like crazy and throwing parties with famous DJs to get noticed. Kinda feels dotcom era in that sense.
Attention is what's scarce! The growth guy going viral sharing his UGC strategy from Wispr Flow is a good example. It's the sauce everyone wants, and I truly believe there are probably only 50 people on the planet who know how to scale these types of businesses efficiently in this era.
Always good to get that dose of SF. I felt sooo lucky to have such an incredible trip during such an incredible time in building businesses. Surreal in so many ways.
Happy to be home and locked in.
Until next time!
Mat K retweeted
Today we’re launching @runpraxis (YC F26), AI agents that run law firm operations, from first inquiry to paid invoice.
Law firms spend 62% of their time on admin tasks they don’t bill.
With Praxis, agents do the admin end to end, and the lawyer supervises and approves every step.
Law firms, get your spot today on the waitlist at runpraxis.ai/waitlist.
Great folks can’t stop joining @aionic_labs
Mat K retweeted
Replying to @Yuchenj_UW
Curious if you’ve tried Claude Code Desktop recently. It’s quite good now, would love to hear what’s missing or could be improved
Mat K retweeted
Goodbye Meta! Hello @aionic_labs!
Stoked to announce that I've joined the crew over at AionicLabs, where we are putting up the first serious AI Frontier Lab based in Zurich.
The past month I've been building our training infra and co-authored on FIVE papers! This team is fire!
🤖 Made with AI
Jeez 😳
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI?
I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev
• 20-200x faster
• 40-400x cheaper (w/ output tokens free)
• Frontier composable intelligence optimized for decisions
AFAICT the shortest path to AI-based economic revolution
Mat K retweeted
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so.
Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training.
You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
Mat K retweeted
Lots of robot demos at WRC this year. This one stands out for what it's attempting.
A Symbiosis Robotics humanoid autonomously drives a go-kart. One take, no stitched clips.
The hard part isn't the driving. It's climbing into a confined cockpit, sitting, then coordinating vision, both hands, both feet, and balance through a continuous multi-contact task.
They moved from a hierarchical brain-plus-cerebellum architecture to end-to-end control, feeding perception straight into a single model that outputs motion. Fewer cascading errors between layers.
Mat K retweeted
2012: acquire company for users
2021: acquire company for engineers
2026: acquire company for training data
Mat K retweeted
Original Video - youtube.com/watch?v=Z-c11pV_…
Twitter professor - nitter.cf/coyle_frankp
Mat K retweeted
BERKELEY PROFESSOR DROPPED A 20-MINUTE GUIDE ABOUT CLAUDE.
the fastest way to understand how real Claude agents get built, taught through what not to do.
Bookmark this for the weekend.
19 minutes. real anti-patterns. production code. what actually breaks.
Claude → Stop Reasons → Subagents → Context → Systems
then read how I applied it in my Kimi K3 guide, From Loops to Graphs, below ↓
Mat K retweeted
Legendary tech rebrands:
Sales → GTM
Marketing → Growth
Freelancer → Fractional executive
Executive assistant → Chief of staff
Business development → Partnerships
Customer support → Customer success
Software engineer → Member of technical staff
Mat K retweeted
Wondering, how many people"half-baked" projects. Half-baked in the sense, it was a deeply technical project, that needed some resources for some experimentation, and so it was put in the closet.
Could be something on the side of studies, or tinkering over the weekends. What if finishing those could bring significant change in the world
Mat K retweeted
The AI boom is turning into one big circular money machine.
Nvidia is helping round up to $500 billion from the likes of Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman and KKR to fund the AI buildout.
Meanwhile the same tight circle (Nvidia, OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Broadcom) keeps buying from, investing in, and selling to each other.
AI-linked bonds have already jumped from $2.4 billion in 2020 to $15.5 billion last year.
If the demand is really that strong… why does the whole ecosystem keep having to fund itself just to keep expanding?
Source: @GlobalMktObserv / Writer: Lynn
Mat K retweeted
I calculated the real cost of a 16+ DOF robotic hand in 2026 by checking component prices in China, the USA, and Japan.
Result: about $1,500 if you 3D-print and assemble it yourself.
Here is the China prototype breakdown behind that number:
• 6x micro actuators: $372
• 6x gear reducers: $264
• 6x position sensors: $72
• transmission tendon / cable set: $69
• lead screw / termination kit: $46
• palm + finger structure set: $148
• bearings + fasteners kit: $61
• tactile sensor set: $132
• control PCB: $89
• driver + power + wiring kit: $191
Quality: With these budgets you’re looking at a functional prototype not the robustness or service life of an industrial grade hand (Harmonic Drive high end Maxon/Faulhaber multi-axis sensors etc.).
China prototype BOM total: $1,444.
To put that in perspective, here’s what complete dexterous hands currently sell for:
• Hitbot 5-Finger Hand: $690–$990 / piece
• Avatar 6DOF Hand: $2,500 / piece
• Inspire Robots RH56DFX: $2,950 / piece
• Unitree Dex3-1: $5,000–$6,000 / piece
What if you build this in the US ?? 👇👇
The World Humanoid Robot Games 2026 will put 2056 robots into competition in Beijing.
• 666 teams
• 16 countries across 6 continents
• 1301 competitions in 5 days
• August 22 to 26
Robot participation is roughly four times higher than the first edition.
The number of teams has increased 138 percent.
The program includes 50 events including:
• Football
• Athletics
• Weightlifting
• Kung fu
• Combat
• Table tennis
• Tug of war
There are also task based scenarios covering:
• Industrial manufacturing
• Retail
• Restaurants
• Home cleaning
• Rescue
• Dexterous manipulation
China accounts for 641 of the 666 teams.
These represent:
• 157 companies
• 200 universities or research institutes
I want to see robots:
• Miss a grasp
• Lose balance
• Recover after a fall
• Fail to coordinate both hands
• Require teleoperation when autonomy breaks down
With 1301 competitive runs packed into five days the Games should expose performance differences that are much harder to hide than in a controlled company demo.
































