This is for my fellow students of history and pattern recognizers. Buckle up, this will be a read. @RealCandaceO @DiligentDenizen and @baroncoleman are the collective embodiment of our generation's Jim Garrison. After the JFK assassination, Jim Garrison took a long hard look at the official investigation of who killed JFK and how. What he found is that the official narrative around the assassination demanded that the American people accept that a washed out Marine, who was recorded as being a horrible marksman, pulled off several shots with a scrappy Italian-made sniper rifle with a bullet that was able to perform absolute magic. Not only that, that same magic bullet that supposedly killed JFK was found on a gurney in perfect condition. His investigation went deeper. He found odd ties between Oswald and government agencies. He was able to defect to the Soviet Union, marry a soviet woman, and then return to the US unmolested. He finds himself in the company of CIA-connected people in the New Orleans area that were involved in the Bay of Pigs operation. Jim Garrison asked basic questions first. How? How was Oswald not on the government's radar? How did a poor shot pull off the shot? How does a bullet hit a man in the back of the head but the target's head move back towards the direction of the bullet, defying physics? How did the bullet perform the impossible (magic bullet)? How did the police know exactly where to find Oswald (the movie theater)? How was the security presence around Oswald so bad that Jack Ruby could walk up to him and shot him before he could go to trial? Why did Oswald claim he was a patsy if he was supposedly a self-proclaimed, JFK-hating Marxist? How was the bullet in perfect condition after hitting multiple bones in the human body? The system, in an effort to protect the official narrative, reacted. Call anyone questioning the official story a "conspiracy theorist". Work with the media to disparage anyone asking questions. Smear them, attack their character, attack their family, accuse them of illegality, engage in lawfare, pressure those close to them to denounce them, but never address the questions they raise. Sound familiar? Let's jump to today. Tyler Robinson, a young man we are told is Trans leftists who hated Charile, with no real record of experience with firearms (precision shooting), has no normal digital footprint, decided to track Charlie, leave evidence of his crime for his boyfriend that was later destroyed but photographed, infil the operating area, establish a sniper position, fire high powered weapon, exfil the area, suggested he was the assassin in electronic communications, left the weapon on location, later surrenders to police, and refuses to confess to the crime he supposedly took credit for earlier in the day. Enter the modern Garrison gang. They ask the question. How? How did he seemingly avoid all high definition CCTV and Flock camera on that day. How did the high powered bullet do so little damage to one of the weakest parts of the body when it blows through big animals? How did he communicate on discord after be turned himself in and his cellphone was taken? How did the sole officer that accessed the reported sniper position have his bodycam fail? Then the why questions. Why did the FBI seize the local CCTV footage? Why did members of TPUSA, after the shooting, tamper with the crime scene and remove SD cards from the high definition cameras in close proximity to Charlie? Why are their conflicting stories from the people that we all part of the same event? Why was the rooftop that was reportedly used as the snipers position not secured or monitored? The questions go on and on. The system reacts to protect the official narrative. Those asking questions are attacked, called conspiracy theorists, those close to them are pressured to denounce them, accused of illegality and threatened with lawfare, but never address the questions.