Either the dumbest genius or the smartest idiot you will ever meet. A day you dont improve is a day you got worse. Building generational wealth brick by brick!

Washington, DC
Joined May 2017
My grandparents risked everything to immigrate here... My parents were the first in their families to become educated professionals, brought us up to the middle class... I have large shoes to fill... Its my job to take this bloodline to the next level... Financial freedom!
2
21
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
Ok, we now have the actual text of the Greenland deal (whitehouse.gov/briefings-sta…), so we can say how it compares to the existing 1951 arrangement and who, between Trump and Denmark, lied the most in their framing of it. Long story short - which may surprise some - the Danes lied the most: Trump is pretty much correct in saying that this new deal grants the US control of Greenland. Let's look into what changed compared to the 1951 deal. 1) This is now a permanent arrangement: whereas the existing 1951 deal only lasted as long as NATO existed, this one "does not have an end date and may only be amended by mutual consent." It even survives a hypothetical future independence of Greenland: in that event, Denmark and Greenland must ensure that the independent Greenlandic state "affirmatively assume[s] all of the rights and obligations of the Kingdom of Denmark specified in this Agreement." 2) In the 1951 agreement, the US could set up bases only where both governments agreed, and only on the basis of NATO planning. The new deal locks in three bases: the US can "modernize and expand its activities" at Pituffik, its only base in Greenland until now, and "shall be allowed to establish an additional Defense Area at Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig." Further bases beyond these 3 can be justified by the defense of "the American continent," a US interest rather than a NATO one. Also, quite subtle but this is interesting: Article IV(iii) says that "the United States may establish additional defense areas in Greenland" and that consultations are then held "to decide implementation details based on mutual agreement." What this means is that the principle of a new base is automatically granted and only the implementation details require agreement. Article VII also gives the US "the right to raise concerns regarding construction, or change of use" of any building near a US base, after which the parties decide together what to do. Which means that the US has a say over civilian planning around its bases. 3) On US military movement across Greenland, the wording change between the 1951 agreement and this new one is quite funny. The 1951 text said (Art. V(3)): the US "may enjoy... the right of free access to and movement between the defense areas through Greenland, including territorial waters, by land, air and sea," but only "in accordance with general rules mutually agreed upon and issued by the appropriate Danish authority in Greenland." The new one says: "the United States of America shall enjoy... the right of free access to and movement between the Defense Areas through Greenland, including the Territorial Waters, by land, air and sea." That's it: "May" becomes "shall," and the US military movement no longer has to follow rules "issued by the appropriate Danish authority in Greenland." The US also gets something new on top: "undersea access to and movement within the Territorial Waters," i.e. submarines. 4) Non-NATO exclusion: non-NATO states are barred from military installations or a persistent presence in Greenland unless all three parties approve, giving the US an effective permanent veto. The 1951 deal had no equivalent clause. 5) Investment screening: this is entirely new. "States or investors from a state that is not a member of NATO, a NATO partner, or an EU member state" (i.e. Russia, China, India, the Gulf States, etc.), "shall not be allowed to have (i) control, (ii) significant influence, or (iii) access to non-public information...within Particularly Sensitive Sectors or Activities in the territory of Greenland (including the Territorial Waters), unless agreed between the Parties." Again, it basically means that the US has a permanent veto over who can invest in strategic sectors in Greenland, as far as non-NATO or EU states are concerned. 6) Lastly, in stark contrast with the 1951 deal, the framing of the deal changes significantly: this new deal is largely framed around the US. The 1951 agreement existed only "for the benefit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization." The new one lists the defense of "the American continent" as an objective, celebrates "the irreplaceable role" of the United States military as well as "the United States' indispensable historical and ongoing contributions to the security and defense of Greenland," and names the establishment of Trump's "Golden Dome" missile defense system as a key goal. So, to sum up: - The US secured a permanent military foothold that even an independent Greenland would inherit whether it likes it or not - The US now has veto power over any non-NATO military presence in Greenland, and over who can invest in its strategic infrastructure and resources (beyond NATO and the EU) - Denmark signed away its say over the principle of new US bases, with only the right to discuss the "implementation details" - Danish authorities no longer set the rules for US military movement across the island - And all of it is now justified by the defense of "the American continent" I don't know in which universe this even remotely "recognizes the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Kingdom and the Greenlandic people's right to self-determination," as Danish PM Mette Frederiksen put it (stm.dk/en/press/press-releas…). Yes, the preamble of the text cynically "reaffirms" Danish sovereignty but, in my book, when you let a foreign country put bases on your soil, move its troops without following your rules and veto who else can come in, in perpetuity, after it spent two years threatening to take you by force, the word for that is anything but "recognized sovereignty" 🤷
Looks like what happened was: Trump: "We're going to buy Greenland!" Denmark: "Absolutely not, Greenland is not for sale! But you can have it for free" (I'm aware that Denmark is saying they kept "sovereignty" over it, but not sure what that word means when another country has permanent veto power over who can invest on your territory and occupies the place militarily)
723
3,911
809
14,244
1,989,075
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
"I'm calling it the threatro-dollar. The US is basically threatening the rest of the world, particularly the nations that have a lot of bonds, and what it's going to do is say, OK, we want you to take this 100-year bond, and if you don't, your nations are going to be destabilized. The way that it could work with the techno-dollar, which goes back to what we were discussing before, is if you have people take Tether, these digital dollars, because of the Genius Act, they have to buy U.S. Treasuries, so they're a forced buyer, so the more people you get using the digital dollar, the more treasuries get bought. So what they could do is just collapse all the other currencies, have a major financial crisis, melt it all down, and then force nations to take Tether and that will give a guaranteed buyer of treasuries too. There's going to be some major events in the coming years, probably the next 6 to 12 months regarding US debt. I think that's what all of this with Trump has been building up to. It also explains why they put Bessent in, who's a guy who's crashed not just the British pound, but the Japanese in too, by the way. When you zoom out, you can see there's actually quite a coherent narrative here as to where it's going. Go read that paper by Stephen Moran (A User's Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System). It lays it all out..." Cognitive Dissidents (@HrvojePM, @parallel_mike, @MonicaPerezShow) 💰🔥 🔗 geopoliticsandempire.com/202… 📰 SUBSCRIBE geopoliticsandempire.substac… ✈️ EXPAT MONEY ONLINE SUMMIT 2026 expatmoney.com/geopolitics
19
169
14
497
14,269
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
Sweden's Right-wing coalition got the order of operations wrong. They did the typical conservative thing of passing policies that would objectively make people's lives better. They succeeded, and then people stopped caring about the issues that got the Right elected in the first place because they no longer saw them as problems to solve. The siren song of progressivism and social democracy then lured these people back into complacency, as it always does in any universal mass democracy. The order of operations shouldn't be: Get elected -> Solve problems -> Lose to the Left because you've already solved the immediate problem that got you elected in the first place -> Wait for the Left to break something -> Try to win off of the ensuing backlash. It should be: Get elected -> Defund the Left -> Solve the first set of problems the Left created -> Win in an even greater landslide -> Crush the Left further -> Solve even larger problems you couldn't solve before because you didn't have a large enough majority. Each action you take should make the next action easier. This is why the Trump administration got off on such a strong foot with the shuttering of USAID and the defunding of large swaths of the Left's patronage network. The lesson here is to stop playing fair. Power is a tool to be wielded in order to destroy your enemies, not merely to do a good job of administering the daily functions of state.
Sweden, 6,200 of 6,626 districts counted: Seat projection per bloc, national parliament S+V+MP+C-S&D|LEFT|G/EFA|RE: 176 (+3) SD+M+KD+L-ECR|EPP|RE: 173 (-3) +/- vs. Last election result ➤ europeelects.eu/sweden
91
764
65
6,133
163,947
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
🔥 Chamath Shuts Down Axios’ Dan Primack on Immigration and H-1B’s “A handful of companies in certain countries have abused this system. You need to stop and tourniquet the bleeding so that you can reestablish trust with the American population.”
81
350
18
3,201
154,786
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
Every week, these strange white crates leave a high-security Tesla compound in Lathrop, California. They’re showing up near the Hoover Dam. At an Air Force base in Georgia. In the heart of New York City… An estimated 4,000 of them are now spread across 48 locations in 14 states. And more roll out every week. But you won’t see this on CNBC, and you won’t read about it in the Wall Street Journal. Because these mystery Elon crates have nothing to do with electric vehicles, space, social media, crypto, biotech, robots, or AI… The “mystery Elon crates” are Tesla Megapacks — grid-scale battery storage units being deployed across the country for utility, military, and commercial energy projects. Tesla is quietly building the backbone of America’s grid-storage infrastructure while everyone’s distracted by culture-war bullshit — but it is the actual story worth paying attention to. No secret technology. No hidden invention. Just the most boring, most profitable, and arguably most important thing Tesla does — hidden in plain sight.
559
5,149
252
25,047
1,094,047
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
Actually, live your life normally, use your AC in whatever manner keeps you comfortable, and if the grid collapses make them explain why we don’t have power generation capacity sufficient to our needs as a city, and make them fix it by building more capacity. Do not acquiesce or normalize any of this. Nothing socialists say can be taken in good faith. They want to take away AC permanently (as they have in Europe) and they will do it first by getting you used to the idea that your AC must be turned down for ‘the greater good’, then by making it more expensive to purchase and operate through higher energy costs (also already happening), and finally by regulating it out of existence. Just say no.
New York: it's hot out there, and the power grid is working overtime to keep us cool. Set your AC to 78 degrees, turn off lights/electronics you're not using, and unplug what you can. Our City is doing its part too: maintaining the 78 degrees rule in our buildings, dimming/turning off our lights during peak electricity demand, asking private partners to do the same, and powering down non-essential equipment. A stable grid means the AC stays on, and lives are saved. Let's ease demand — and get through the heat — together.
1,498
3,459
247
23,452
809,908
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
They're not freezing your rent, they're freezing your housing providers' income, while their expenses keep increasing. The point isn't to make your housing affordable, it's to make providing housing financially inviable, so government(s) can seize the unmanageable properties. Our lack of financial literacy is going to destroy us. spencerpratt.substack.com/p/…
3,949
26,276
1,466
109,641
4,831,089
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
New York primaries EXPLAINED + quick history lesson that will terrify you
585
2,664
220
10,901
447,443
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
A majority Muslim city council in Michigan voted to permanently ban the LGBTQ Pride Flag on public property. White liberal women who welcomed refugees from Islamic countries are now wondering what happened. Consequences of suicidal empathy coming to a leftist town near you.
1,531
9,008
937
35,399
1,004,114
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
FIGHT UNFAIR 🇺🇸
43
86
16
1,657
331,366
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
We're nearing the end of era, Grace is still young & she won't like what comes next. For more than a century, wealthy "progressives" (really Marxists if they are at all intellectually aware), have been able to live the best of both worlds - but no more, an inflection point 1/
Replying to @JeremiahDJohns
I spend my summers wearing American flag sweaters and long skirts and I’m literally a progressive political operative
61
215
16
4,982
633,181
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
Socialism is the flat earth theory of economics.
552
4,297
300
29,352
1,713,614
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
BREAKING: The U.S. appears to have ended its military presence in Syria with the last convoy leaving the Qasrak base in the northeast. Control of the area is now shifting to Syrian forces. This effectively ends the U.S. ground presence that began in 2014.
89
842
98
5,375
513,811
Thought some of you might appreciate this long form answer I sent to a friend in another chat last week about Iran This is what she asked: "Where exactly we are winning? Removing all emotional semantics from Easter and things like that, practically how is this going to help America?" My response: 1) Iran has created a risk premium on global oil markets that has raised the cost of literally everything in the entire world. Oil should be a flat, boring market and <$50. If they were to get a nuclear weapon, which they were incontrovertibly close to getting, they would be able to further amplify that risk premium. With their ballistic missiles they would be able to threaten also the straights of malacca, suez, and Gibraltar along with hormuz. That would be a hijacking of most of the most important chokepoints in the world, in one of the most important sectors for energy in the world. 2) China's blue water navy requires a very dense type of oil that only comes out of a handful of places in the world, Venezuela and Iran being two of them. China has been getting this oil at a major discount due to US sanctions from these countries and it has given China a strategic advantage over the United States. Trump took control of Venezuelen oil when he overthrew Maduro, and with Iran next now China's navy is now basically constrained in operations by the US' control over their fuel sources. We are not depriving them of oil but they are paying more now and we can control the amount they receive, so they are unable to have an autonomous navy. 3) The constant threat of Iran and Israel nuking each other creates instability in the oil market, which creates opportunities for financial arbitrage in comex and insurance premiums through Lloyds of London - both of which are dominated by the City of London. This has been one of the major ways the "hidden empire" has continued to profit and control world affairs. The IRGC is not a sovereign entity in reality but a puppet of this Empire; Iran is heavily tied behind the scenes to both the UK and France. This is why you saw so much issue with these countries getting involved in Iran, to the extent that they deprived the US of airspace and key bases like Diego Garcia, compared to their bloodlust in Ukraine. Removing the IRGC and having oil flow to a new civilian government, with the US taking a small tax in compensation (like in Venezuela) will ultimately bring stability to the region and benefit the US financially. For years the US navy has paid to keep the straights secure and the UK has been profiting from it - no more. 4) The United States doesn't actually need the straight open because we are the biggest oil producer in the world now, bigger than the next 3 countries combined. The oil from the straight mostly goes to Europe and Asia. WTI (American oil index) actually fell beneath Brent recently, which is the is the British financialized index, and Brent will eventually stop being relevant. It is obvious the US has been in no hurry to reopen the straight because it hurts our adversaries, China and the EU/UK, much more than us. This has given us leverage especially on Europe on natural gas as since the destruction of Nordstream by Ukraine, they are dependent on LNG. The destruction of qatars terminals has put them in a bind - where can they get it from? Only the US, which has tons of natural gas and will have substantially more export terminals online by the end of the decade. We are essentially using the closure of the straight to exert more leverage on Europe via being the only seller for their energy. The same goes for EU and China when it comes to Helium exports which are required for semi-conductors. Notice that Russia has not gotten involved and has been tepid in its support for Iran. That is because this war is predominantly harming Europe, by design. It is bankrupting them, making it hard for them to control their bond spreads and maintain domestic control while pursuing their agendas (note the abrupt backtracking on migration across many euro countries just in the past couple weeks). Also notice how it put Europe in a situation where by not helping the US they have given Trump the pretext to leave NATO, something I think is extremely likely at this point. Russia is meanwhile making TONS of money from the war through the raised oil prices. It has also served a secondary objective of keeping China in check and more dependent on Russia, something that had shifted the opposite direction after the Ukraine War. 5) Israel's role in this is fairly simple: they view Iran as an existential threat to them, which is somewhat plausible as Iran has not proven itself rhetorically (it has a fatalistic version of islam) or otherwise to be a rational actor. Netanyahu also hates the IRGC with his own deranged passion, and it's plausible that if the US did not get involved Israel would have nuked Iran preemptively. We absolutely do not want this. I think it is fair to suggest that Israel's objectives have accordingly impacted the operational tempo to an extent. Israel also does not care about expanding the war which creates a frustration behind the scenes between the two governments, something obvious if you are paying attention. We have had to tell Israel many times to stand down on making certain escalatory attacks on refineries etc. The neocons in Congress are very upset already Trump is allowing the current negotiations to move forward. Personally, I do not think Trump is negotiating with the IRGC so much as the civilian government and military, but time will shake all this out. At any rate, the point is that Israel and the US can be allies while not having the exact same reasons for going to war. There are major, major reasons Trump is making the moves he is making, and indeed in the order he is making them in. Note that Venezuela is currently operating at the highest production in years since we took that piece off the board in January, just in time for this fight. The end of Iran's regime will lead to the end of Zelensky next and I believe this will ultimately collapse the democratic party at home. Venezuela, Iran, and Ukraine are the cabal's primary proxy states where trafficking and money laundering were taking place. As these cash inflows collapse the cabal's money to fund operations will dry up. It's worth noting that Obama gave Iran 160 billion dollars before he left office, much of it in cash. What was this for really? And where did Iran's Uranium come from - was it the same Uranium from Clinton's "Uranium One" fiasco that disappeared? Much to think about, because there is much more to this than meets the eye. More I could say but I think this gives the big picture view of things.
10
11
1
84
5,513
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
His wife fled Canada to save her life from stage 4 ovarian cancer 2.5 years ago. Canada said assisted su1c1de (MAID) was her only "option" Wanna guess how she is doing now that she has proper healthcare in the USA?
923
6,897
494
28,633
903,109
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
BREATHTAKING🚨: WOW! NASA just dropped this view of the moon’s far side!
688
10,825
790
75,729
6,813,025
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
3 weeks ago I argued the US goal in Iran is to seize the global oil spigot. Venezuela in January -> Iran in February. Neutralize every supply channel outside the dollar system within 90 days. Achieve a compliant successor government and complete energy dominance. The oil thesis was the obvious layer. However, when you zoom out & view the last four years as a single sequence rather than isolated geopolitical events, the architecture of the grander US plan becomes visible. 1st was Europe, which laid the groundwork. The Ukraine conflict provided the justification for sanctions that collapsed Russian pipeline gas from 150 billion cubic meters to 40. Then Nordstream was destroyed, which rewired the entire European energy system permanently. The US went from supplying 28% of Europe's LNG in 2021 to 58% by 2025, exporting a record 111 million MTs, the 1st country in history to break 100 MT. Europe was transformed from a customer with options into a captive market now purchasing its survival in USD. 2nd was Syria. The fall of Assad severed the critical node connecting China's Belt & Road Initiative to the Mediterranean. The trilateral railway linking Iran, Iraq & Syria, designed to bypass Western maritime chokepoints, was completely destroyed. This isolated Iran geographically & cleared the path for what came next. 3rd was Venezuela. In January the US effectively took control of the world's largest heavy crude reserves. The US Gulf Coast has the most advanced refining complex on earth, specifically built for heavy sour crude. Phillips 66, Valero & the rest are now positioned to process hundreds of thousands of barrels of Venezuelan crude daily. The US captured a massive strategic reserve & solidified its position as the dominant exporter of refined petroleum products, an industry worth $110 billion in 2025 alone. Venezuela & Iran were the two major oil supply channels that existed outside the dollar system. Both produce heavy crude sold primarily to China & evaded US financial supervision. Both now being neutralized within 90 days, which leads us to.. 4th is Iran & the Middle East energy shock. Israel struck Iran's South Pars gas field, the world's largest natural gas reservoir. Iran retaliated against Qatar's Ras Laffan, the single largest LNG facility on earth, responsible for a fifth of global supply. QatarEnergy's own assessment is that 17% of export capacity is gone and recovery will take up to 5 years. The Strait of Hormuz is closed. European gas prices spiked 70%. Asian spot prices doubled. The only remaining scaled supplier? The United States. If Iran falls & a successor government is installed that the US controls or influences (the Delcy model described weeks ago) then roughly 40 to 45 million barrels per day of global production out of 103 million is effectively under US control. OPEC becomes irrelevant because the US coalition is now the marginal producer. Now add the gas dimension & it goes beyond oil. This war is solidifying the petrodollar system as it evolves into a hybrid petro/LNG-dollar. The old system was built on Saudi crude priced in USD. The new system is built on American crude plus American gas from the Gulf Coast, with no alternative supplier of comparable scale. The dependency is deeper because LNG infrastructure requires long term contracts & regasification terminals that lock buyers into supply relationships for decades. Europe & the Pacific allies (Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, etc.) cannot pivot away as there is nowhere left to pivot to. They're now locked into the US energy system. The market confirms this. DXY went from 96 to 101. Gold down ~20% from its January all time high. Bitcoin down 20% on the year. Brent above $100. European & Asian institutions are liquidating precious metals and crypto to buy dollars because they need dollars to buy the only remaining scaled energy supply. The world is selling its gold to buy American energy in American currency. The dollar is now being weaponized through energy dependency. The structural repricing is happening regardless of how the conflict resolves. But the US grand strategy goes deeper.. Artificial intelligence is a physical industry. It runs on power and chips. Data centers require massive uninterrupted baseload electricity, primarily provided by natural gas. Semiconductor fabrication requires helium & rare earths. By choking the Strait of Hormuz & crippling Middle Eastern LNG & helium production, the US is systematically degrading China's ability to power its data centers & fabricate semiconductors at scale. The US is energy self sufficient, especially with newly captured Venezuelan reserves & expanding Gulf Coast capacity running on domestic gas. On the other hand, China is import dependent & every joule it imports effectively now transits chokepoints the US Navy controls.. Iran was the Belt & Road's overland energy bypass, the corridor that allowed China to mitigate the Malacca Trap. With Iran neutralized that corridor is severed. China faces a world where its compute infrastructure competes for scraps on a depleted global LNG market, while American data centers run at full capacity on domestic energy. Russia is next in the sequence. A post-war Iran reopening under US influence competes directly with Russia for the same refineries in China & India at lower cost. Iran's production costs are lower. Russia loses its last structural advantage in heavy crude & its economic lifeline. Additionally, under the Iran war cover, Ukraine has been opportunistically destroying Russian energy infrastructure & all signs point towards Russia being at the end of the line. The message from Washington becomes very simple: we dismantled two regimes in three months, your economy is about to get crushed, sign the Ukraine deal. Then Trump sits down with Xi holding every card. Complete energy dominance. The hybrid petro/LNG-dollar fortified, Iran cleared, Russia cornered, & China facing the Malacca Trap fully closed with no remaining energy bypass. Israel & the GCC are absorbing the kinetic cost of a conflict whose primary beneficiary, counter to the mainstream narrative, is actually America (First). Qatar offline for 5 years reprices the entire global gas market in favor of US exporters for the remainder of the decade. The Gulf states face years of rebuilding. Europe faces its 2nd energy crisis in four years. Sure, the average American might face temporary moderate inflation & higher gas prices. But if you are the architect of the US empire & you view the rise of China & Chinese ASI as an existential winner takes all scenario, the collateral damage is acceptable cost. Whoever controls the energy corridors controls the monetary system. Whoever controls the monetary system & the energy supply simultaneously controls the compute infrastructure that determines which civilization builds ASI first. The US is seizing all 3.
1,073
4,223
1,098
18,761
3,336,344
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
Spanish girl gets brutally gang-raped by migrants, ends up paralyzed and developing severe PTSD. The Spanish government offers her assisted suicide as a solution to all of those problems. IDK if that counts as a metaphor because they're doing it literally.
Noelia Castillo Ramos será la primera persona en recibir la eutanasia por depresión en España. ¿La causa? Nadie te la dirá. En 2022, Noelia sufrió una violación múltiple en un centro tutelado. Esto destrozó su vida por completo, lo que le llevó a un intento de suicidio fallido que la dejó parapléjica. El sistema le ha fallado y ahora le ofrece la eutanasia como remedio.
630
7,007
500
23,616
628,804
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
"je comprends pas pourquoi Elon Musk fait des fusées." Je me rappelle une conversation avec un ami qui m'avait dit ça. C'est assez typique. La majorité des gens voient ça sous le prisme du délire de milliardaire. Le mec a trop d'argent, il sait plus quoi en faire, alors il joue à la conquête spatiale. C'est le récit confortable. Celui qui permet de pas se poser de questions. Sauf que c'est à complètement à côté de la plaque. Musk a raconté dans une interview qu'après avoir lu les philosophes allemands, en pleine quête de sens, il était tombé dans un nihilisme total. Et que ce qui l'en avait sorti, c'était pas une réponse philosophique. C'était une mission. Rendre l'humanité multiplanétaire. Accélérer la transition énergétique. Pas parce que c'est rationnel au sens comptable. Parce que c'est la seule chose qui donne un sens suffisamment grand pour se lever chaque matin. Les fusées c'est pas un caprice. C'est une réponse existentielle. Et quand tu regardes l'histoire, c'est toujours comme ça que ça a fonctionné. Colomb avait zéro garantie de trouver quoi que ce soit. Les frères Wright construisaient un truc que 99% des scientifiques trouvaient impossible. Apollo 11 c'était envoyer des mecs dans une boîte en métal vers un caillou à 384 000 km. À chaque fois la majorité trouvait ça absurde. À chaque fois c'est exactement ces projets qui ont redéfini les limites du possible. Terafab c'est dans cette lignée. Et quelqu'un de sain d'esprit ne peut que s'enthousiasmer devant autant d'ambition. Le vrai problème c'est qu'on vit dans une époque qui éduque ses gamins dans l'autoflagellation. Le monde va mal, tout s'effondre, voyez petit. Alors qu'objectivement, sur quasi tous les indicateurs, le monde n'a jamais été aussi bien. Notre crise c'est pas une crise de ressources. C'est une crise de sens. Et on devrait éduquer les gamins à inventer le futur, pas à avoir honte d'exister.
Elon Musk est en train de construire la première corporation intergalactique de l'histoire de l'humanité. Hier soir, depuis Giga Texas à Austin, il a annoncé Terafab. Une joint venture Tesla x SpaceX x xAI. L'objectif : produire 1 terawatt de compute par an. Pour mettre ça en perspective, toutes les fabs de la planète combinées ne produisent que 2% de ce dont il a besoin. Ce qu'il construit : → Une fab de semiconducteurs en 2nm, la technologie la plus avancée au monde → Intégration verticale totale : design, logique, mémoire, packaging, test, sous un seul toit → 100 000 wafer starts par mois pour commencer, objectif 1 million → Premier produit : la puce AI5, 40 à 50x plus performante que l'AI4 → Investissement de 20 à 25 milliards de dollars Pourquoi il fait ça : Parce que le Full Self-Driving, les robotaxis Cybercab, les robots Optimus, le supercalculateur Dojo, et l'infra d'entraînement de Grok chez xAI demandent un volume de puces qu'aucun fournisseur sur Terre ne peut livrer dans ses délais. Ni TSMC, ni Samsung. Personne. Mais le plus dingue c'est la suite. 80% de la production de Terafab est destinée à l'espace. Pas à la Terre. À l'espace. Le plan : envoyer les puces AI via Starship vers une base lunaire. Fabriquer les composants lourds (panneaux solaires, structures, radiateurs) directement sur la Lune avec les ressources locales. Et les lancer en orbite via des mass drivers électromagnétiques, des sortes de railguns solaires qui exploitent la gravité 6x plus faible de la Lune pour catapulter des charges à la vitesse de libération. Sa citation exacte : "Je veux qu'on vive assez longtemps pour voir le mass driver sur la Lune, parce que ça va être incroyablement épique." On parle d'un mec qui est en train de fusionner la fabrication de semiconducteurs, l'IA, la robotique, l'énergie solaire et l'exploration spatiale en une seule machine industrielle. Il ne construit pas une entreprise. Il construit l'infrastructure d'une civilisation post-planétaire. Et la construction commence maintenant, à Austin, Texas.
256
690
39
3,980
1,185,619
Norbie the wise fool retweeted
I should be clearer re how I view what’s happening: A. I do not think this all ends cleanly in a week. That’s delusional. I do think the U.S. is ahead of their own expected timeline but is still very much at risk of terror attacks or blown up tankers. B. I however also completely disagree that regime change is impossible without boots on the ground in a world where the U.S. has precise targeting and Israel is willing to do its dirty work while the U.S. provides overwatch C. I disagree that elevated oil prices are a certainty and instead view oil prices as a lever that the admin can now control more precisely with the ability to make things very painful for whichever major energy importers at will. D. I disagree with the framing that the American voter is the ultimate loser if energy prices spike as there are levers to pull to mitigate the impact as I and others have outlined before. E. This is all about decoupling which is the only reason the admin is taking this kind of risk. Regardless of whatever bullshit about Epstein and AIPAC your favorite podcaster is spewing i still believe that people like Bessent, Rubio and Vance only care about the American interest. Isreal is a useful ally in this endeavor but the endeavor was undertaken due to a broader playbook. F. I think this is all about decoupling and we are systemically grabbing the levers of global trade into a divorce with China. G. On the way to decoupling the west from China we still need to beat Europe, India and South Korea into submission. They agreed to trade deals with transshipment clause but they haven’t yet been asked to enforce it. When it’s time we need a really dam heavy stick. I’ve outlined what that looks like. Think of access to ME energy as another arrow in the quiver. H. I also believe this endeavor was not embarked on without first getting the Gulf States on-sides. We had to offer them something China couldn’t - long term security with the permanent removal of the destabilizing actor in the region. In return when divorce comes they will be on sides. They will throttle energy when needed. They will price energy in dollars. They will give Trump pools of capital to offset weaponization of financialization as countries try to dump stocks and bonds to fight the transhipment enforcement. I. And finally we have preemptively defanged a Taiwan invasion. In addition to the obvious loss of fabs and breakout of the first island chain the biggest issue with a successful invasion of Taiwan is it would demonstrate that American overwatch is a paper tiger. Trump has successfully demonstrated to the world that Americas military is lethal and valuable to have as an ally. Yes we need to ramp production rates of drones and interceptors - which we are doing - and yes China is downstream of some of our supply lines which we are addressing - but if we let Xi take Taiwan it won’t be as disastrous as it would have been in an alternate world where the last thing the American military did was botch a withdrawal from Afghanistan. I still think we can amicably split the world into spheres. I still think decoupling is the goal. But first we need to crush Europe and Canada before we ultimately pull the west away from China. 🫡
63
88
19
610
51,758